Le 19 avr. 2014 à 20:01, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit :
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 07:01:45PM +0200, Axel Luttgens wrote:
>
>> action=REJECT Mailbox is unavailable
>>
>> This is then what I get in the SMTP conversation:
>>
>> 554 5.7.1 <END-OF-MESSAGE>: End-of-data rejected: Mailbox is unavailable
>>
>> Where does this substring "<END-OF-MESSAGE>: End-of-data rejected: " come
>> from?
>
> This is how "REJECT" is implemented.
>
> /*
> * REJECT means NO. Use optional text or generate a generic error
> * response.
> */
> if (STREQUAL(value, "REJECT", cmd_len)) {
> dsn_split(&dp, "5.7.1", cmd_text);
> return (smtpd_check_reject(state, MAIL_ERROR_POLICY,
> var_map_reject_code,
> smtpd_dsn_fix(DSN_STATUS(dp.dsn),
> reply_class),
> "<%s>: %s rejected: %s",
> reply_name, reply_class,
> *dp.text ? dp.text : "Access denied"));
> }
Hello Viktor,
Once again, thank you very much for your patience with such a lazy guy (aka
"me").
Indeed, I have to confess I didn't think to check the source code: I'm
currently a bit in a hurry, since I have to set up a workaround for a quota
policy server that should work and that doesn't for some obscure reasons I'm
trying to discover since several months...
>> Can it be avoided?
>
> No.
Well... This is perhaps the opportunity for a feature request?
Such messages are liable to be shown in a MUA user interface.
But end-users often tend not to read such messages, especially when they are a
bit complicated, too technical.
Would there be an easy way, I mean without rewriting a bunch of code, to avoid
such frightening tech pieces ("<END-OF-MESSAGE>", "End-of-data"...)?
Wishing you a nice evening,
Axel
