Il 28/01/2014 19:55, Terry Barnum ha scritto:
Okay, my problem: I have a new employee that works remotely using Windows 7 Outlook
2010. This is our first Windows and Outlook user but I have eight other employees
successfully sending and receiving mail from outside for several years using Macs,
Il 28/01/2014 18:01, Marc B ha scritto:
Hi,
I've got a small issue with our Postfix Relay which doesn't use the
Policyd-Weight daemon or Tumgreyspf which it should. The Policy-Weight
daemon is running and listen if I test it and the config has no errors
but still Postfix just ignores the policy
Hi Victor,
I managed to resolve the issue. The mailbox was corrupt but Cyrus
reconstruct did not really reconstruct anything until I deleted the
cyrus.cache/index and header files from the mailbox.
Everything came up fine after that.
There was no doubt that Cyrus had an internal error. After mos
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 07:51:19PM -0800, mcruse wrote:
> I understood that it was a response from Cyrus causing the error message. I
> was not sure if it was due to something bad being sent by postfix.
When cyrus claims an "unexpected internal error", regardless of
what Postfix sends, there is a
Hi Victor,
I understood that it was a response from Cyrus causing the error message. I
was not sure if it was due to something bad being sent by postfix.
There is no other indication from Cyrus that anything is wrong with any
mailboxes. I ran 'reconstruct' on the mailbox in question, no luck thou
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:00:29PM +1100, cruse.m...@gmail.com wrote:
> The error I see in the logs is this:
>
> Jan 29 13:26:10 bigyetti postfix/lmtp[7581]: C7C222806EA: to=<
> mcr...@definium.net>, relay=[/var/lib/imap/socket/lmtp],
> conn_use=5, delay=1079, delays=1079/0.14/0/0.01, dsn=4.3.0,
Hi there,
I run a postfix and cyrus-imap setup and have done so for years. Yesterday
I experienced a power loss and after the mail server rebooted postfix
cannot deliver mail to cyrus-imap via lmtp (unix socket) anymore.
The error I see in the logs is this:
Jan 29 13:26:10 bigyetti postfix/lmtp
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 09:15:02PM -0500, Dennis Putnam wrote:
> The following is in my main.cf.
>
> smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
> smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
> smtp_sasl_security_options =
You might think so, but that does not make it so.
> However, when I run postc
My authentication has recently stopped working (at least it appears to
me there is no attempt to authenticate). The problem appears to be that
the sasl parameters are being ignored. The following is in my main.cf.
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 03:58:45PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Otherwise, you can set the Postfix tcp_windowsize to a non-zero
> > value to slow down email. I have used a value as low as 512 to keep
> > a low-speed backup connection usable. For this a simple "postfix
> >
Wietse Venema wrote:
> [thundering herd problem]
> > When the sender exceeds the smtpd_client_connection_count_limit,
> > they will get a 4xx deferral. When they retry delivery is out of
> > your control -- some may retry in a few minutes, other hours, a few
> > never (although not retrying is non-
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Periodically a large wave of email from the mailing lists will be
> > unleashed. Such as when upstream connectivity is down for a while
> > causing a backlog and then it is restored causing a transfer of the
Probably due to high load on the server th
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 03:58:45PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Otherwise, you can set the Postfix tcp_windowsize to a non-zero
> value to slow down email. I have used a value as low as 512 to keep
> a low-speed backup connection usable. For this a simple "postfix
> reload" is not sufficient. Fo
[thundering herd problem]
> The bigger problem is that one or two connections from a
> well-connected client will still overwhelm your bandwidth. The real
> solution is traffic shaping or QoS to limit the bandwidth used by
> SMTP. Your firewall software or your router may already have this
> featu
On Jan 28, 2014, at 12:01 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 1/28/2014 12:55 PM, Terry Barnum wrote:
>> First off, thank you Wietse for postfix. It's really amazing software and I
>> appreciate the hard work and dedication by you and others here that make it
>> so great.
>>
>> Okay, my problem: I hav
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:53:41PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Periodically a large wave of email from the mailing lists will be
> unleashed. Such as when upstream connectivity is down for a while
> causing a backlog and then it is restored causing a transfer of the
> backlog. Then the upstream E
On 1/28/2014 1:53 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Looking for advice...
>
> I have a Postfix mail server on a relatively slow 1.5Mbit/s dedicated
> link. (It used to be relatively fast. Now it is relatively slow.)
> It receives a lot of mailing list email from a well connected mailing
> list server runn
On 1/28/2014 12:55 PM, Terry Barnum wrote:
> First off, thank you Wietse for postfix. It's really amazing software and I
> appreciate the hard work and dedication by you and others here that make it
> so great.
>
> Okay, my problem: I have a new employee that works remotely using Windows 7
> Ou
Looking for advice...
I have a Postfix mail server on a relatively slow 1.5Mbit/s dedicated
link. (It used to be relatively fast. Now it is relatively slow.)
It receives a lot of mailing list email from a well connected mailing
list server running Exim.
Periodically a large wave of email from t
Am 28.01.2014 19:55, schrieb Terry Barnum:
> His Outlook is configured to use port 587 with TLS
>
> Jan 27 15:17:20 mailbox postfix/smtpd[84445]: connect from
> xx-xx-xx-xx.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net[12.34.56.78]
> Jan 27 15:17:20 mailbox postfix/smtpd[84445]: Anonymous TLS connection
> est
First off, thank you Wietse for postfix. It's really amazing software and I
appreciate the hard work and dedication by you and others here that make it so
great.
Okay, my problem: I have a new employee that works remotely using Windows 7
Outlook 2010. This is our first Windows and Outlook user
Marc B:
> I've got a small issue with our Postfix Relay which doesn't use the
> Policyd-Weight daemon or Tumgreyspf which it should. The Policy-Weight
> daemon is running and listen if I test it and the config has no errors
> but still Postfix just ignores the policy service and proceeds the
Hi,
I've got a small issue with our Postfix Relay which doesn't use the
Policyd-Weight daemon or Tumgreyspf which it should. The Policy-Weight
daemon is running and listen if I test it and the config has no errors
but still Postfix just ignores the policy service and proceeds the
mail to
On 01/28/2014 03:10 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 08:21:01AM +0100, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
>
Do you plan to support SRV DNS records in a few years perspective?
>>>
>>> What real problem does this solve? Developer cycles are finite
>>> and must be spent wisely.
>>
>> IM
bensjomic1:
> Thank you for your answer.
>
> That is what i exactly was doing, after 1,5 days of trying I still not
> can find a solution. The problem is, that when I use the filter,
> following the example of the documentation. I get a loop.
There are many ways that Postfix can report a loop.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 08:21:01AM +0100, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
> >> Do you plan to support SRV DNS records in a few years perspective?
> >
> > What real problem does this solve? Developer cycles are finite
> > and must be spent wisely.
>
> IMHO it would allow better configuration of (internet
Thank you for your answer.
That is what i exactly was doing, after 1,5 days of trying I still not
can find a solution. The problem is, that when I use the filter,
following the example of the documentation. I get a loop.
After trying many different ways i can not find the reason why the
server
bensjomic1:
> Since I use this confuration mail will be not deliverd and also not stored.
> Sometimes it ignores the filter and go directly in the mailbox.
My advice: go back to the working configuration.
Make a first change, and verify that it works.
Then make the second change, and verify that
I have a question related to postfix and pipe email.
Before I not used multi ip-addresses. But recently I changed our
configuration to make it possible.
At this moment I can not use a filter to pipe the mail to external process.
The configuration before was like this:
smtp inet n -
29 matches
Mail list logo
