On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:38 AM, LuKreme wrote:
>
> On 05 Nov 2013, at 17:42 , Ian Evans wrote:
>
> [snip]
> It’s really straight forward, just set SM up to use auth. Updating
> Squirrelmail is pretty painless.
>
>
Thanks for the info. Got it set up.
You probably do not want http running on the
On 05 Nov 2013, at 17:42 , Ian Evans wrote:
> As I'm migrating my site to a new server, my postfix/dovecot setup is
> currently on the new server, while nginx (and squirrelmail) is on the old.
>
> Since I can't use localhost:25 for smtp in Squirrel (since it's on another
> server) I need to m
As I'm migrating my site to a new server, my postfix/dovecot setup is
currently on the new server, while nginx (and squirrelmail) is on the old.
Since I can't use localhost:25 for smtp in Squirrel (since it's on another
server) I need to make sure I have postfix and SM correctly configured for
sec
* Benny Pedersen :
> Patrick Ben Koetter skrev den 2013-11-05 21:57:
>
> >>http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#auxprop_ldapdb
>
> cyrus sasl does not need to have running saslauthd for mysql auth,
> is this diff for ldap ?
In order to use an SQL backend with Cyrus SASL you have to use either
Patrick Ben Koetter skrev den 2013-11-05 21:57:
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#auxprop_ldapdb
cyrus sasl does not need to have running saslauthd for mysql auth, is
this diff for ldap ?
and if dovecot is working one does not need to setup cyrussasl api lib
at all
i lost the link
Patrick Ben Koetter:
> * Merve Temizer :
> > Hello
> >
> > At the link
> >
> > http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#auxprop_ldapdb
> >
> > there is a statement that if i need to use encrypted password, there is no
> > documentation for explaining Postfix's LDAP authentication with encrypted
>
* Merve Temizer :
> Hello
>
> At the link
>
> http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#auxprop_ldapdb
>
> there is a statement that if i need to use encrypted password, there is no
> documentation for explaining Postfix's LDAP authentication with encrypted
> password.
You need to use the passwor
On 11/06/2013 07:01 AM, Vijay Rajah wrote:
>
> How do I configure postfix to drop the mail rather than reject? Is it
> configurable?
Why on earth would you want to drop mail that you can reject?
> I have already configured my servers to REJECT all mails
> not-intended to my domains and non-exsis
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 07:24:03PM +0200, Merve Temizer wrote:
> http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#auxprop_ldapdb
>
> there is a statement that if i need to use encrypted password, there is no
> documentation for explaining Postfix's LDAP authentication with encrypted
> password.
>
> Is th
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Vijay Rajah wrote:
> How do I configure postfix to drop the mail rather than reject? Is it
> configurable? I have already configured my servers to REJECT all mails
> not-intended to my domains and non-exsistant users and I do not accept mails
> from non-exsistant do
Merve Temizer:
> Hello
>
> At the link
>
> http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#auxprop_ldapdb
>
> there is a statement that if i need to use encrypted password, there is no
> documentation for explaining Postfix's LDAP authentication with encrypted
> password.
>
> Is there a new document th
On 05/11/13 4:56 PM, Mark Goodge wrote:
On 05/11/2013 11:03, Jose Borges Ferreira wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:43 AM, LuKreme wrote:
Normally, bouncing undeliverable messages is the proper behavior
for a good netizen.
*NEVER* Bounce. Ever.
Reject, yes. Bounce? Absolutely never. If you b
Hello
At the link
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#auxprop_ldapdb
there is a statement that if i need to use encrypted password, there is no
documentation for explaining Postfix's LDAP authentication with encrypted
password.
Is there a new document that tells how can i authenticate postf
On 11/4/2013 9:47 PM, inteq wrote:
> Decided to tar my log and send it.
> Tested with the yesterday log containing malware links and it works.(so far)
>
> Thank you for your input
>
> My approach:
>
> #!/bin/bash
> # Use apt-get install sendemail (this is NOT sendmail) if you do not have it
> /u
On 11/5/2013 5:41 AM, mark hardwick wrote:
> Hi All
> I'm setting up a new email server and I'm fairly green so I just wanted
> someone to confirm I'm not doing anything stupid.
>
> First I've followed the instructions from Falco here:
> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-po
are delivered to a filter.
> >
> > Maybe the patch could included in future versions of postfix.
>
> The patch looks good. It is consistent with other pipe(8) features
> so it introduces no surprises.
>
> Thanks for your contribution.
Released in postfix-2.11-20131105.
BTW I also cleaned up the \fB${\fBmacro-name\fR}\fR text in the
pipe(8) manpage. Those extraneous \fB and \fR were introduced early
1999.
Wietse
On 04 Nov 2013, at 23:15 , George Adams wrote:
> We're using Postfix 2.1.5 on an old Debian 5 Linux system as an
Wow, that is really really ancient.
> Time Warner has been useless in diagnosing the problem.
Time Warner has always been useless, doubly so since they absorbed the
gibbering morons
> On Nov 4, 2013, at 10:43 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>
>
>> On 04 Nov 2013, at 16:50 , Jim Wright wrote:
>>
>>
>> Normally, bouncing undeliverable messages is the proper behavior for a good
>> netizen.
>
> *NEVER* Bounce. Ever.
>
> Reject, yes. Bounce? Absolutely never.
Apologies to the OP and
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Mark Goodge wrote:
>> if a server is sending bounces instead reject messages it is wrong
>> configured
>
>
> Indeed. But there are circumstances where a reject isn't possible. In
> those cases, the choice is between drop or bounce. And bounce is the
> right choice
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Nathan Schultheiss
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> By spawn I've a script that checks several parameters before accepting an
> SMTP email.
> I found the list of variables here
> http://www.cs.ait.ac.th/~on/postfix/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
>
> But I would retrieve the subj
Nathan Schultheiss:
> Hello All,
>
> By spawn I've a script that checks several parameters before accepting an
> SMTP email.
> I found the list of variables here
> http://www.cs.ait.ac.th/~on/postfix/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
These checks normally run BEFORE Postfix receives the email message,
i.
Hi All
I'm setting up a new email server and I'm fairly green so I just wanted someone
to confirm I'm not doing anything stupid.
First I've followed the instructions from Falco here:
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-debian-wheezy
thi
On 05/11/2013 11:10, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 05.11.2013 12:03, schrieb Jose Borges Ferreira:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:43 AM, LuKreme wrote:
Normally, bouncing undeliverable messages is the proper
behavior for a good netizen.
*NEVER* Bounce. Ever.
Reject, yes. Bounce? Absolutely never.
On 05/11/2013 11:03, Jose Borges Ferreira wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:43 AM, LuKreme wrote:
Normally, bouncing undeliverable messages is the proper behavior
for a good netizen.
*NEVER* Bounce. Ever.
Reject, yes. Bounce? Absolutely never. If you bounce a message to
me, you get put on the
Am 05.11.2013 12:03, schrieb Jose Borges Ferreira:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:43 AM, LuKreme wrote:
>>> Normally, bouncing undeliverable messages is the proper behavior for a good
>>> netizen.
>>
>> *NEVER* Bounce. Ever.
>>
>> Reject, yes. Bounce? Absolutely never. If you bounce a message to me
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:43 AM, LuKreme wrote:
>> Normally, bouncing undeliverable messages is the proper behavior for a good
>> netizen.
>
> *NEVER* Bounce. Ever.
>
> Reject, yes. Bounce? Absolutely never. If you bounce a message to me, you get
> put on the deepest darkest shitlist imaginable w
26 matches
Mail list logo
