On 6/28/2013 5:39 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Does anyone know of a tool that will let me modify the subject line
> of all emails that pass through it? I would call it via a transport
> map.
>
> My application - we just switched to a new email-to-fax service. As
> part of their security implem
T?ssio Fechine:
> var/log/mail.log:Jun 28 18:25:43 rt-dq postfix/smtpd[4931]: NOQUEUE:
> reject: RCPT from unknown[209.85.219.66]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected:
> cannot find your hostname, [209.85.219.66]; from=
> to= proto=ESMTP helo=
Wietse:
> > If you don't like that don't use reject_unknown
Does anyone know of a tool that will let me modify the subject line of
all emails that pass through it? I would call it via a transport map.
My application - we just switched to a new email-to-fax service. As
part of their security implementation (THEIRS, not mine!) they require
all emails s
On 28/06/13 23:33, John Fawcett wrote:
> On 28/06/13 22:30, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Wietse Venema:
>>> John Fawcett:
I use fail2ban in order to block some types of apparently malicious
connections to postfix when the clients keep retrying. For example the
>>> As you agree logging every fa
I use reject_unknown_client_hostname at many email servers. Only this one
is having a problem.
Why DNS is bad if nslookup works fine?
2013/6/28 Wietse Venema
> T?ssio Fechine:
> > var/log/mail.log:Jun 28 18:25:43 rt-dq postfix/smtpd[4931]: NOQUEUE:
> > reject: RCPT from unknown[209.85.219.66]:
T?ssio Fechine:
> var/log/mail.log:Jun 28 18:25:43 rt-dq postfix/smtpd[4931]: NOQUEUE:
> reject: RCPT from unknown[209.85.219.66]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected:
> cannot find your hostname, [209.85.219.66]; from= to=<
> nti-ad...@quimica.ufpb.br> proto=ESMTP helo=
If you don't like that don't us
var/log/mail.log:Jun 28 18:25:43 rt-dq postfix/smtpd[4931]: NOQUEUE:
reject: RCPT from unknown[209.85.219.66]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected:
cannot find your hostname, [209.85.219.66]; from= to=<
nti-ad...@quimica.ufpb.br> proto=ESMTP helo=
Then, at this exactly mail server machine:
# nslooku
On 28/06/13 22:30, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse Venema:
>> John Fawcett:
>>> I use fail2ban in order to block some types of apparently malicious
>>> connections to postfix when the clients keep retrying. For example the
>> As you agree logging every failed command would not be safe by
>> default.
Wietse Venema:
> John Fawcett:
> > I use fail2ban in order to block some types of apparently malicious
> > connections to postfix when the clients keep retrying. For example the
>
> As you agree logging every failed command would not be safe by
> default.
>
> On the other hand, logging the comman
John Fawcett:
> I use fail2ban in order to block some types of apparently malicious
> connections to postfix when the clients keep retrying. For example the
As you agree logging every failed command would not be safe by
default.
On the other hand, logging the command name (even without) parameter
Julio Talaverano:
> Many thanks Wietse,
>
>does that also mean, it's not possible to distinguish?
header_checks matches header lines. No more, no less.
It is not a spam filter, therefore it does not need to be aware of
direction, sender, recipient and so on.
Wietse
I use fail2ban in order to block some types of apparently malicious
connections to postfix when the clients keep retrying. For example the
following fail2ban regexes match cases I currently block by parsing the
maillog.
reject: RCPT from (.*)\[\]: 554
lost connection after AUTH from (.*)\[
On 28 Jun 2013, at 11:03 , Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> Nor is it a good idea to use a random website for instructions. Many of them
> are wrong
You know, that should be front and center in the readme files and the "welcome
to the list" message.
--
'But you ain't part of it, are you?' said Granny
On 06/28/2013 01:33 PM, Roel Wagenaar wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
is it possible to setup one instance of postfix to
1 - use submission to let users send ( with STARTTLS )
2 - receive emails with normal SMTP
thank you
A quick
Many thanks Wietse,
does that also mean, it's not possible to distinguish?
Julio
--- On Fri, 6/28/13, Wietse Venema wrote:
> From: Wietse Venema
> Subject: Re: header_checks: distinguishing between incoming and outgoing mail?
> To: "Postfix users"
> Date: Friday, June 28, 2013, 11:50 AM
> Ju
/dev/rob0 thank you you are right! I did not type space before -o
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Dejan Doder wrote:
> "_timeout"? it my fault in typing
> I edited this in vi editor..
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 03:22:58PM +0200, Mic
"_timeout"? it my fault in typing
I edited this in vi editor..
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 03:22:58PM +0200, Michael P. Demelbauer wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 03:04:29PM +0200, Dejan Doder wrote:
> > > i have this message in tail -f /var/l
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 03:22:58PM +0200, Michael P. Demelbauer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 03:04:29PM +0200, Dejan Doder wrote:
> > i have this message in tail -f /var/log/maillog
> >
> > bad transport type : lmtp_data_done_tiemeout=1200
Correct spelling DOES count here, "_timeout"?
> > I
No it is not that i tryed , something with lmtp is
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Michael P. Demelbauer <
michael.demelba...@wsr.ac.at> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 03:04:29PM +0200, Dejan Doder wrote:
> > Hi group
> > i have this message in tail -f /var/log/maillog
> >
> > bad transpo
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 03:04:29PM +0200, Dejan Doder wrote:
> Hi group
> i have this message in tail -f /var/log/maillog
>
> bad transport type : lmtp_data_done_tiemeout=1200
>
> I dont know where is problem
>
> /etc/postfix.master.cf
>
> # =
Hi group
i have this message in tail -f /var/log/maillog
bad transport type : lmtp_data_done_tiemeout=1200
I dont know where is problem
/etc/postfix.master.cf
# ==
# service type private unpriv chroot wakeup maxproc com
Julio Talaverano:
> So I attached a new regexp line in the existing header_cheks file in warning
> mode.
> But the result is that everything (in- and outbound mails)containing my
> domain in the From:-Header would be rejected.
> How can I apply this check to only incoming mails?
First, you would
On 06/28/2013 01:33 PM, Roel Wagenaar wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
is it possible to setup one instance of postfix to
1 - use submission to let users send ( with STARTTLS )
2 - receive emails with normal SMTP
thank you
A quick
Frank Bonnet wrote:
> Hello
>
> is it possible to setup one instance of postfix to
>
> 1 - use submission to let users send ( with STARTTLS )
> 2 - receive emails with normal SMTP
>
> thank you
>
>
>
A quick searche for "Postfix multiple instabce
Hi,
I'm already using header_checks (regexp) to reject outgoing mails containing a
specific string in the subject.
(OK, usually incoming mails don't include this string in the subject).
Now I wanted to reject incoming emails with forged From:-Header containing my
own domain.
So I attached a new
You have to setup two different services, on the port 25 without AUTH nor TLS
and on submission port (587) with both AUTH and TLS.
On Friday 28 June 2013 14:43:16 li...@kurawa.fidonet.or.id wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:40:05 +0200
>
> Frank Bonnet wrote:
> > is it possible to setup one inst
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:40:05 +0200
Frank Bonnet wrote:
> is it possible to setup one instance of postfix to
>
> 1 - use submission to let users send ( with STARTTLS )
> 2 - receive emails with normal SMTP
>
Yes, that possible. I'm using it on production server.
Hello
is it possible to setup one instance of postfix to
1 - use submission to let users send ( with STARTTLS )
2 - receive emails with normal SMTP
thank you
28 matches
Mail list logo
