"_timeout"? it my fault in typing I edited this in vi editor..
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, /dev/rob0 <r...@gmx.co.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 03:22:58PM +0200, Michael P. Demelbauer wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 03:04:29PM +0200, Dejan Doder wrote: > > > i have this message in tail -f /var/log/maillog > > > > > > bad transport type : lmtp_data_done_tiemeout=1200 > > Correct spelling DOES count here, "_timeout"? > > > > I dont know where is problem > > > > > > /etc/postfix.master.cf > > > > > > # > ========================================================================== > > > # service type private unpriv chroot wakeup maxproc command + args > > The transport type is the second field. > > > > # (yes) (yes) (yes) (never) (100) > > > # > ========================================================================== > > > > > > ... > > > > > > amavisfeed unix - - n - 2 lmtp > > > -o lmtp_data_done_timeout=1200 > > This suggests that Postfix, when parsing master.cf, did not see the > whitespace at the beginning of this line. Did you edit this in a Unix > editor? I'd also suspect non-breaking spaces, which AFAIK are not > going to be recognized as legitimate whitespace characters. > > > > -o lmtp_send_xforward_command=yes > > > -o disable_dns_lookups=yes > > > -o max_use=20 > > > > is it possible that this has to be > > > > lmtp_data_done_timeout=1200s > > > > ? > > > > At least when reading > > > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html > > > > it appears like that to me. Nonsense? > > The default time unit is s (seconds), so "1200" and "1200s" are the > same thing. > -- > http://rob0.nodns4.us/ -- system administration and consulting > Offlist GMX mail is seen only if "/dev/rob0" is in the Subject: >
