Re: Postfix Content Filter

2013-06-19 Thread Wietse Venema
Venkat R: > Thank you Wieste. Sorry for the repetition but the python or the Java vers >-ion of the jitler a good option? My use case is very basic so Java is much p >-referred for milter development if jitler framework work with the postfix. I wrote Postfix, and don't use every milter in the uni

RE: Postfix Content Filter

2013-06-19 Thread Venkat R
Thank you Wieste. Sorry for the repetition but the python or the Java version of the jitler a good option? My use case is very basic so Java is much preferred for milter development if jitler framework work with the postfix. Anyone tried Java version of the milter to get full email content with

Re: Postfix Content Filter

2013-06-19 Thread Wietse Venema
Prasad R: > Thank you Wietse. This is the link I was reading: > http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html and forth bullet from the bottom > of the page. > How can I configure the milter to get access to full content and use it > after smtpd_proxy_filter? Any pointers on the documentation? Documen

Re: Postfix Content Filter

2013-06-19 Thread Prasad R
Thank you Wietse. This is the link I was reading: http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html and forth bullet from the bottom of the page. How can I configure the milter to get access to full content and use it after smtpd_proxy_filter? Any pointers on the documentation? On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 5:

Re: Postfix Content Filter

2013-06-19 Thread Wietse Venema
Prasad R: > I checked in to the SendMail Milter APIs but postfix documentation said, > its only used in Before Queue Content Filter and doesn't have access to the > full content of the email. And I didn't find the SendMail Milter API Your reading is incorrect. The Milter has access to the full con

Postfix Content Filter

2013-06-19 Thread Prasad R
Hi, I am new to postfix and want to develop a content filter/milter that will need to perform the following activities. - get the full email content including headers, body - be able to adjust the email content before it goes to user, this could mean reject the message going to user. I checked in

Re: Local UNIX accounts, aliasing & rejecting mail to non-public UNIX accounts

2013-06-19 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 07:43:16PM +0100, Craig R. Skinner wrote: > Looks simple enough, but no joy with: > > virtual_alias_maps.map: > user.n...@example.com user1@localhost > > status=bounced (mail for localhost.example.com loops back to myself) You MUST include localhost.$mydomain in mydestin

Re: Is this an attack?

2013-06-19 Thread Noel Jones
On 6/19/2013 12:56 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 06/19/2013 07:32 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> Ansgar Wiechers: >>> On 2013-06-19 Jeroen Geilman wrote: >> Zitat von Andreas Kasenides : >>> Out: 250-VRFY You really don't want to enable VRFY on a public mailserver; it only enab

Re: Local UNIX accounts, aliasing & rejecting mail to non-public UNIX accounts

2013-06-19 Thread Craig R. Skinner
On 2013-06-19 Wed 18:12 PM |, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > >hosts a single mail domain IIUC. He's simply wanting to create alias > >addresses presented to the public for each local UNIX mailbox address. > >Additionally he wants to reject any inbound mail destined for the actual > >local UNIX addresses,

Re: Local UNIX accounts, aliasing & rejecting mail to non-public UNIX accounts

2013-06-19 Thread Craig R. Skinner
On 2013-06-19 Wed 10:55 AM |, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > > I'm anything but an expert in this particular area of Postfix, but I > think the problem is that Craig is trying to use virtual_alias_maps when > he should probably just be using the local aliases file. His Postfix > hosts a single mail domai

Re: Is this an attack?

2013-06-19 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 06/19/2013 07:32 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Ansgar Wiechers: On 2013-06-19 Jeroen Geilman wrote: Zitat von Andreas Kasenides : Out: 250-VRFY You really don't want to enable VRFY on a public mailserver; it only enables more spammers to abuse you. Set 'disable_vrfy_command = yes' in main.cf t

Re: Is this an attack?

2013-06-19 Thread Wietse Venema
Ansgar Wiechers: > On 2013-06-19 Jeroen Geilman wrote: > >>> Zitat von Andreas Kasenides : > Out: 250-VRFY > > > > You really don't want to enable VRFY on a public mailserver; it only > > enables more spammers to abuse you. > > Set 'disable_vrfy_command = yes' in main.cf to globally disable

Re: Is this an attack?

2013-06-19 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2013-06-19 Jeroen Geilman wrote: >>> Zitat von Andreas Kasenides : Out: 250-VRFY > > You really don't want to enable VRFY on a public mailserver; it only > enables more spammers to abuse you. > Set 'disable_vrfy_command = yes' in main.cf to globally disable it. Not really. Aside the fact

Re: Local UNIX accounts, aliasing & rejecting mail to non-public UNIX accounts

2013-06-19 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 06/19/2013 05:55 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 6/19/2013 10:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Craig R. Skinner: On 2013-06-19 Wed 06:51 AM |, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 6/19/2013 6:11 AM, Craig R. Skinner wrote: What happens when you try mydestination = That's something I didn't think of trying.

Re: Is this an attack?

2013-06-19 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 06/19/2013 02:33 PM, Birta Levente wrote: On 19/06/2013 14:37, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: Zitat von Andreas Kasenides : One of my mail servers (postfix 2.6) has been target of what seems to me to be an attack. The attacker tried to deliver messages to a non-existent user names formed as a

Re: Local UNIX accounts, aliasing & rejecting mail to non-public UNIX accounts

2013-06-19 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 6/19/2013 10:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Craig R. Skinner: >> On 2013-06-19 Wed 06:51 AM |, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >>> On 6/19/2013 6:11 AM, Craig R. Skinner wrote: >>> >>> What happens when you try >>> >>> mydestination = >>> >> >> That's something I didn't think of trying. >> >> Either blank,

Re: Local UNIX accounts, aliasing & rejecting mail to non-public UNIX accounts

2013-06-19 Thread Wietse Venema
Craig R. Skinner: > On 2013-06-19 Wed 06:51 AM |, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > > On 6/19/2013 6:11 AM, Craig R. Skinner wrote: > > > > What happens when you try > > > > mydestination = > > > > That's something I didn't think of trying. > > Either blank, or with localhost: > > status=bounced (User

Re: postfix munin graphs

2013-06-19 Thread Marko Weber | ZBF
Am 2013-06-19 09:56, schrieb Grant: I think I need to tell munin where my postfix logs are (/var/log/mail/current) since I use metalog. How can I do that? Instead of searching online, use the built-in pod based format, e.g.: $ munindoc postfix_mailstats You just improved my life. You mig

Re: Local UNIX accounts, aliasing & rejecting mail to non-public UNIX accounts

2013-06-19 Thread Craig R. Skinner
On 2013-06-19 Wed 06:51 AM |, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 6/19/2013 6:11 AM, Craig R. Skinner wrote: > > What happens when you try > > mydestination = > That's something I didn't think of trying. Either blank, or with localhost: status=bounced (User unknown in virtual alias table) Which is wi

Re: Is this an attack?

2013-06-19 Thread Birta Levente
On 19/06/2013 14:37, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: Zitat von Andreas Kasenides : One of my mail servers (postfix 2.6) has been target of what seems to me to be an attack. The attacker tried to deliver messages to a non-existent user names formed as a long hex string. It only happened once from on

Re: Local UNIX accounts, aliasing & rejecting mail to non-public UNIX accounts

2013-06-19 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 6/19/2013 6:11 AM, Craig R. Skinner wrote: > > I'm setting up Postfix for a domain that hosts Dovecot IMAP mail dirs > for real Unix accounts. Postfix needs to accept mail for users' public > aliases, but not their Unix login, and reject mail for daemon accounts. > e.g: > > > joe.blo...@examp

Re: Is this an attack?

2013-06-19 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Andreas Kasenides : One of my mail servers (postfix 2.6) has been target of what seems to me to be an attack. The attacker tried to deliver messages to a non-existent user names formed as a long hex string. It only happened once from one particular client and kept going for some

Local UNIX accounts, aliasing & rejecting mail to non-public UNIX accounts

2013-06-19 Thread Craig R. Skinner
I'm setting up Postfix for a domain that hosts Dovecot IMAP mail dirs for real Unix accounts. Postfix needs to accept mail for users' public aliases, but not their Unix login, and reject mail for daemon accounts. e.g: joe.blo...@example.com --> jb4356 jane.blos...@example.com-->

Is this an attack?

2013-06-19 Thread Andreas Kasenides
One of my mail servers (postfix 2.6) has been target of what seems to me to be an attack. The attacker tried to deliver messages to a non-existent user names formed as a long hex string. It only happened once from one particular client and kept going for some time. SMTP sessions were coming in o

Re: postfix munin graphs

2013-06-19 Thread Grant
>>> I think I need to tell munin where my postfix logs are >>> (/var/log/mail/current) since I use metalog. How can I do that? Instead of searching online, use the built-in pod based format, e.g.: $ munindoc postfix_mailstats >>> >>> You just improved my life. >>>

Re: postfix munin graphs

2013-06-19 Thread Tom Hendrikx
On 06/19/2013 10:03 AM, Grant wrote: >> I think I need to tell munin where my postfix logs are >> (/var/log/mail/current) since I use metalog. How can I do that? >>> >>> Instead of searching online, use the built-in pod based format, e.g.: >>> >>> $ munindoc postfix_mailstats >> >> You jus

Re: postfix munin graphs

2013-06-19 Thread Grant
> I think I need to tell munin where my postfix logs are > (/var/log/mail/current) since I use metalog. How can I do that? >> >> Instead of searching online, use the built-in pod based format, e.g.: >> >> $ munindoc postfix_mailstats > > You just improved my life. > >> You might also need

Re: postfix munin graphs

2013-06-19 Thread Grant
I think I need to tell munin where my postfix logs are (/var/log/mail/current) since I use metalog. How can I do that? > > Instead of searching online, use the built-in pod based format, e.g.: > > $ munindoc postfix_mailstats You just improved my life. > You might also need to set grou

Re: Getting around Comcast Port 25 Block with a Local + Remote Postfix Server?

2013-06-19 Thread LuKreme
On 18 Jun 2013, at 10:45 , Al Zick wrote: > Does anyone know if Comcast will let you relay emails through there mail > server that do not have a comcast email address? Yes, they will. So will Google. Mac.com, otoh, will not (last I checked). -- I find Windows of absolutely no technical interes