On Jun 4, 2013, at 10:28 PM, Grant wrote:
> I tried switching to the following in main.cf:
>
> smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_auth
>
> but I started getting messages like this in the log:
>
> warning: unknown smtpd restriction: "permit_sasl_auth"
> 451 4.3.5 Server c
I keep catching myself typing "postfix.org" and expecting to end up on the
Postfix website, and then realizing that I need to put the "www" subdomain
on there.
Wietse: I'm sure you're aware of how to use mod_rewrite to redirect web
traffic from postfix.org to www.postfix.org, but I'm curious as to
>> am i allowed to ask why disabling smtpd_relay_restrictions only on
>> submission?
>> &
>> is this really the way to use it? ( in master.cf ?)
>
> This is not good general advice. A properly-configured
> smtpd_relay_restrictions should not interfere with submission, and
> is not used by pickup
> Grant:
>> I recently upgraded from 2.9.5 to 2.10 and ever since I've been having
>> an intermittent problem with email sent from within my web framework
>> (Interchange - icdevgroup.org) not reaching its recipient. I usually
>> get an error message in Interchange's log when there's a postfix
>>
Please file a bug report with your distribution.
Postfix 2.10 as distributed by me will add a backwards-compatibility
setting to main.cf, thusly:
# postfix upgrade-configuration
COMPATIBILITY: editing /etc/postfix/main.cf, overriding
smtpd_relay_restrictions to prevent inbound
Hi again,
Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2013, 01:34:13 schrieb Jan Kohnert:
> Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2013, 18:24:23 schrieb /dev/rob0:
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 01:08:09AM +0200, Jan Kohnert wrote:
> > > I have recently upgraded to 2.10.0 (gentoo) and now having some
> > > issues with relaying authenticate
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2013, 18:24:23 schrieb /dev/rob0:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 01:08:09AM +0200, Jan Kohnert wrote:
> > I have recently upgraded to 2.10.0 (gentoo) and now having some
> > issues with relaying authenticated users. I'm using dovecot sasl
> > and according to the logs auth work
Hi there again,
Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2013, 01:08:09 schrieb Jan Kohnert:
> I have recently upgraded to 2.10.0 (gentoo) and now having some issues
> with relaying authenticated users. I'm using dovecot sasl and according
> to the logs auth works fine, but however postfix thinks I do not want to
> r
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 01:08:09AM +0200, Jan Kohnert wrote:
> I have recently upgraded to 2.10.0 (gentoo) and now having some
> issues with relaying authenticated users. I'm using dovecot sasl
> and according to the logs auth works fine, but however postfix
> thinks I do not want to relay stuff
Hi folks,
I have recently upgraded to 2.10.0 (gentoo) and now having some issues
with relaying authenticated users. I'm using dovecot sasl and according
to the logs auth works fine, but however postfix thinks I do not want to
relay stuff from authenticated users anymore...
Here's the log ent
David Benfell:
> Hi,
>
> All of a sudden, I'm getting a blizzard of these messages in my logs:
>
> postfix/postdrop[23453]: warning: mail_queue_enter: create file
> maildrop/558196.23453: Permission denied
Someone removed the set-gid bits from /usr/sbin/postdrop and
/usr/sbin/postqueue?
Execute
On 04 Jun 2013, at 10:27 , Robert L Mathews wrote:
> "In general, the thing I've learned about monitoring is that when possible,
> check the system by using it, rather [than] looking for changes in side
> effects (such as logs, or number of processes running, etc.). That's not to
> say that t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
All of a sudden, I'm getting a blizzard of these messages in my logs:
postfix/postdrop[23453]: warning: mail_queue_enter: create file
maildrop/558196.23453: Permission denied
Some mail seems to not be making it through. I haven't touched the
con
b...@indietorrent.org:
> For the sake of thoroughness, and because I'm expected to perform a
> root-cause-analysis, I'm following-up on this after noticing that there was
> a missing comma in the smtpd_recipient_restrictions directive (after
> check_recipient_access on the third line):
>
> smtpd_r
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 12:25:16PM -0700, b...@indietorrent.org wrote:
> For the sake of thoroughness, and because I'm expected to perform a
> root-cause-analysis, I'm following-up on this after noticing that there was
> a missing comma in the smtpd_recipient_restrictions directive (after
> check_
On Wed, 29 May 2013 10:34:37 -0400, Ben Johnson
wrote:
> On 5/28/2013 1:38 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Viktor Dukhovni:
>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:18:25PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>>
I strongly suggest that you swap the order of the following
two rules in main.cf:
c
On 6/4/2013 10:34 AM, Marko Weber | ZBF wrote:
>
>
> Am 2013-06-04 15:00, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
>> Grant skrev den 2013-06-04 01:45:
>>
>>> The big config change I see referenced with regard to 2.10 is
>>> smtpd_relay_restrictions but I don't see how that could be related.
>>> My smtpd_relay_re
On 6/2/13 9:12 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> For example, periodically send email to mailboxname+timest...@example.com,
> and parse the "to=" and
> "status=delivered" out of the logfile record stream.
Or, even better, try to retrieve those messages from the actual mailbox
using POP3. That way you've
Marko Weber | ZBF skrev den 2013-06-04 17:34:
am i allowed to ask why disabling smtpd_relay_restrictions only on
submission?
submission users is here sasl auth users, if sasl is not enforced then
it will be in error to remove relay restrictions, if you ensure smtp
auth its perfectly ok
i
Am 2013-06-04 15:00, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Grant skrev den 2013-06-04 01:45:
The big config change I see referenced with regard to 2.10 is
smtpd_relay_restrictions but I don't see how that could be related.
My smtpd_relay_restrictions is blank.
suggest to make it not in main.cf, but use t
Jerry skrev den 2013-06-04 12:09:
Someone has way too much time on their hands!
and others still not understanding configure postfix 2.10 yet :)
--
senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own
trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
Grant skrev den 2013-06-04 01:45:
The big config change I see referenced with regard to 2.10 is
smtpd_relay_restrictions but I don't see how that could be related.
My smtpd_relay_restrictions is blank.
suggest to make it not in main.cf, but use this restriction only on
master.cf to disable it
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:44:46PM CEST, Tom Hendrikx said:
> On 06/04/2013 01:22 PM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
> > Hi Wietse,
> >
> > Yes, its a solution, but these emails should be delivered in
> > bussines-time :-(
> > (it doesnt matter if it takes 2 hours... but in bussiness time...)
>
not much required, 'man 6 figlet'
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 00:08:17 +
> Viktor Dukhovni articulated:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 04:45:41PM -0700, Grant wrote:
> >
> > > I know this is incredibly vague, but can anyone hazard a guess as to
> > > wha
On 06/04/2013 01:22 PM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
> Hi Wietse,
>
> Yes, its a solution, but these emails should be delivered in
> bussines-time :-(
> (it doesnt matter if it takes 2 hours... but in bussiness time...)
>
> thank you so much!
>
You could run a script as a cronjob that queue
Hi Wietse,
Yes, its a solution, but these emails should be delivered in bussines-time
:-(
(it doesnt matter if it takes 2 hours... but in bussiness time...)
thank you so much!
2013/6/4 Wietse Venema
> Maybe you can automatically HOLD all his mail and then automatically
> release all his mail
* Wietse Venema :
> Maybe you can automatically HOLD all his mail and then automatically
> release all his mail in the evening.
I even have a script for that...
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht
Maybe you can automatically HOLD all his mail and then automatically
release all his mail in the evening.
Wietse
Hi all!
My name is Antonio I am currently managing a system with postfix+
spamassassin and Maia.
First of all, sorry for my bad english.
I would like to ask a question. Once in a month, more or less, I have a
user who sends
a LOT of mails (mailing) to a group of recipients. This list could have
a
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 00:08:17 +
Viktor Dukhovni articulated:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 04:45:41PM -0700, Grant wrote:
>
> > I know this is incredibly vague, but can anyone hazard a guess as to
> > what the problem might be?
>
> L O G S
> L 0
30 matches
Mail list logo
