On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 12:25:16PM -0700, b...@indietorrent.org wrote:
> For the sake of thoroughness, and because I'm expected to perform a
> root-cause-analysis, I'm following-up on this after noticing that there was
> a missing comma in the smtpd_recipient_restrictions directive (after
> check_recipient_access on the third line):
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> permit_mynetworks,
> permit_sasl_authenticated,
> check_recipient_access
> mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_recipient.cf,
> reject_unauth_destination,
> reject_invalid_hostname,
> reject_non_fqdn_hostname,
> reject_non_fqdn_sender,
> reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
> reject_unknown_sender_domain,
> reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
> reject_unauth_destination,
> reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
> reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
Postfix does not distinguish between commas and whitespace in this
context. You can remove them all if you please. They make the rules
more *human-readable*, by placing commas between complete rule elements,
rather than individual tokens.
So I would write your rules as:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
check_recipient_access mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_recipient.cf,
reject_unauth_destination,
reject_invalid_hostname,
reject_non_fqdn_hostname,
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
reject_unauth_destination,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
for clarity, but it makes no difference.
--
Viktor.
