Re: Logs location

2013-02-24 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 24.02.2013 22:14, schrieb Fabian von Romberg: > by default postfix logs debugging info at /var/log. Is it possible to make > it log information at at different location like /usr/local/postfix/logs ? not the job of postfix read the manpage for rsyslog or whatever syslog-daemon runs on your

Logs location

2013-02-24 Thread Fabian von Romberg
Hi, by default postfix logs debugging info at /var/log. Is it possible to make it log information at at different location like /usr/local/postfix/logs ? Regards, Fabian

Re: Mail sent from localhost doesn't check relay_recipient_maps

2013-02-24 Thread mouss
Le 22/02/2013 16:09, Geoff Shang a écrit : > Hi, > > I guess the following makes sence. I was just wondering if this is > intended behaviour, and if so, why. > > As I posted in my previous messages, I'm setting up mail for a mail > hosting solution that will host any number of domains. The mail >

Re: header_checks issue

2013-02-24 Thread Wietse Venema
Deeztek.com Support: > On 2/24/2013 10:19 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Deeztek.com Support: > Most of the e-mail for that domain is of course relaying to the 1.1.1.1 > server. However, there are some e-mail addresses on that domain that I > want to make an exception for and I need t

Re: header_checks issue

2013-02-24 Thread Deeztek.com Support
On 2/24/2013 10:19 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Deeztek.com Support: Most of the e-mail for that domain is of course relaying to the 1.1.1.1 server. However, there are some e-mail addresses on that domain that I want to make an exception for and I need to relay the e-mail to 2.2.2.2 instead of 1.1.

Re: header_checks issue

2013-02-24 Thread Wietse Venema
Deeztek.com Support: > >> Most of the e-mail for that domain is of course relaying to the 1.1.1.1 > >> server. However, there are some e-mail addresses on that domain that I > >> want to make an exception for and I need to relay the e-mail to 2.2.2.2 > >> instead of 1.1.1.1. So, if we had a user c

Re: header_checks issue

2013-02-24 Thread Deeztek.com Support
On 2/24/2013 9:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Deeztek.com Support: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] On 2/24/2013 8:19 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Someone: You can, but the bob entry is redundant. I don't recommend per-mailbox transport entries at all, it is best to stick to per-doma

Re: header_checks issue

2013-02-24 Thread Wietse Venema
Deeztek.com Support: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > On 2/24/2013 8:19 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Someone: > >> You can, but the bob entry is redundant. I don't recommend per-mailbox > >> transport entries at all, it is best to stick to per-domain transport > >> entries only,

Re: header_checks issue

2013-02-24 Thread Deeztek.com Support
On 2/24/2013 8:19 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Someone: You can, but the bob entry is redundant. I don't recommend per-mailbox transport entries at all, it is best to stick to per-domain transport entries only, and handle per-user routing via virtual(5) alias rewriting. Wietse: Typically this woul

Re: header_checks issue

2013-02-24 Thread Wietse Venema
Someone: > You can, but the bob entry is redundant. I don't recommend per-mailbox > transport entries at all, it is best to stick to per-domain transport > entries only, and handle per-user routing via virtual(5) alias rewriting. Wietse: > Typically this would be done with virtual aliases that sen

Re: header_checks issue

2013-02-24 Thread Deeztek.com Support
On 2/24/2013 6:39 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote: Am 24.02.2013 12:28, schrieb Deeztek.com Support: On 2/22/2013 4:13 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Deeztek.com Support: On February 22, 2013 3:40:22 PM Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:13:27PM -0500, Deeztek.com Support wrote: b...

Re: header_checks issue

2013-02-24 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 24.02.2013 12:28, schrieb Deeztek.com Support: > On 2/22/2013 4:13 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> Deeztek.com Support: >>> On February 22, 2013 3:40:22 PM Viktor Dukhovni >>> wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:13:27PM -0500, Deeztek.com Support wrote: >> b...@example.com smtp:[1.1.1

Re: header_checks issue

2013-02-24 Thread Deeztek.com Support
On 2/22/2013 4:13 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Deeztek.com Support: On February 22, 2013 3:40:22 PM Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:13:27PM -0500, Deeztek.com Support wrote: b...@example.com smtp:[1.1.1.1] m...@example.com smtp:[2.2.2.2] example.com smtp:somewhere.else