On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 13:13:54 +0100, Miha Valencic wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> > HOLD acts at the message level, not the recipient level.
> > If one recipient of a multi-recipient message is put on HOLD, all
> > recipients of that message will be affected.
>
>
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:40:58 +0100
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> richard lucassen skrev den 2013-02-19 13:58:
>
> > Ok, that seems to be very nice. AFAIUI it can be implemented on the
> > backend server. I'd prefer not to touch the front-end servers.
>
> then use the ha-proxy on front end, and postfw
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:07:43 +0100
Mikael Bak wrote:
> > Ok, that seems to be very nice. AFAIUI it can be implemented on the
> > backend server. I'd prefer not to touch the front-end servers.
>
> That does NOT sound like a good idea.
> If you accept the message on the fronend and then reject is
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:21:35PM +0100, Titanus Eramius wrote:
> I've tried with relay_domains, but it matches on domain-level which is
> too much. I then applied relay_recipient_maps, but it don't seem to
> have any effect, which means that addresses is still matched on domain
> basis.
>
> Eve
On 02/19/2013 01:58 PM, richard lucassen wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:49:54 +0100
> Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
>>> Any hint?
>>
>> google postfwd
>>
>> postfix can do it with classes, but its more complicated then with
>> postfwd
>
> Ok, that seems to be very nice. AFAIUI it can be implemented
richard lucassen skrev den 2013-02-19 13:58:
Ok, that seems to be very nice. AFAIUI it can be implemented on the
backend server. I'd prefer not to touch the front-end servers.
then use the ha-proxy on front end, and postfwd on backend
could you remove email addr in reply template ? (@ does no
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:49:54 +0100
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > Any hint?
>
> google postfwd
>
> postfix can do it with classes, but its more complicated then with
> postfwd
Ok, that seems to be very nice. AFAIUI it can be implemented on the
backend server. I'd prefer not to touch the front-end
richard lucassen skrev den 2013-02-19 12:34:
Any hint?
google postfwd
postfix can do it with classes, but its more complicated then with
postfwd
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:54:42 +0100
Mikael Bak wrote:
> > I want to blacklist 1.2.3.4/24 only for destination domain3.tld (and
> > reply with a 5xx if possible).
> >
> > What's the best way to handle this? On the backend server somewhere?
> > But the backend server receives the mail from the fron
Richard,
On 02/19/2013 12:34 PM, richard lucassen wrote:
> I have transport front-end servers for domains:
>
> domain1.tld
> domain2.tld
> domain3.tld
> domain4.tld
> [..]
> domainX.tld
>
> I want to blacklist 1.2.3.4/24 only for destination domain3.tld (and
> reply with a 5xx if possible).
>
>
I have transport front-end servers for domains:
domain1.tld
domain2.tld
domain3.tld
domain4.tld
[..]
domainX.tld
I want to blacklist 1.2.3.4/24 only for destination domain3.tld (and
reply with a 5xx if possible).
What's the best way to handle this? On the backend server somewhere?
But the backen
Thinking about this, I might have been to specific in my question.
At the fundamental level I would like to have 2 or more Postfix servers
capable of receiving virtual mail for multiple domains, where one of
the servers also handles relaying and local delivery. The rest should
function as backup M
Am 19.02.2013 12:00, schrieb Birta Levente:
> OK, after a look up in $daemon_directory/postfix-files I see the
> $config_directory need 0755 permission ... but
> main was 0644 ...
well, directories always need 755/750/700 instead 644/640/600
> why worked until now ... i don't now ...
because
On 19/02/2013 11:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
and why do you reply off-list?
Am 19.02.2013 10:36, schrieb Birta Levente:
On 19/02/2013 11:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.02.2013 10:04, schrieb Birta Levente:
Today I restarted the postfix server because one misconfiguration in the
master.cf: unk
On 19/02/2013 11:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
and why do you reply off-list?
Am 19.02.2013 10:36, schrieb Birta Levente:
On 19/02/2013 11:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.02.2013 10:04, schrieb Birta Levente:
Today I restarted the postfix server because one misconfiguration in the
master.cf: unk
and why do you reply off-list?
Am 19.02.2013 10:36, schrieb Birta Levente:
> On 19/02/2013 11:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 19.02.2013 10:04, schrieb Birta Levente:
>>> Today I restarted the postfix server because one misconfiguration in the
>>> master.cf: unknown smtpd restriction:
>>> "r
Am 19.02.2013 10:04, schrieb Birta Levente:
> Today I restarted the postfix server because one misconfiguration in the
> master.cf: unknown smtpd restriction:
> "reject_unauth_destionation"
ouch - this was a dangerous typo
> Then in the maillog appears other errors, I think not related to abov
Hi all
Today I restarted the postfix server because one misconfiguration in the
master.cf: unknown smtpd restriction: "reject_unauth_destionation"
Then in the maillog appears other errors, I think not related to above:
/proxymap[9105]: error: open /etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_forwardings.cf:
Pe
18 matches
Mail list logo
