Yea, I hear ya on the historian, but you know clients "if it's not broken
dont fix it"
I'm wondering how much of a nightmare it would be to upgrade from this
version to the latest and if there are any gotcha I need to be aware of?
Jon
--
From:
On 9/25/2012 8:29 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Mikael Bak :
>> Hi Stan,
>>
>> On 09/25/2012 08:22 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>>
>>> Apparently Linux and Windows TCP window scaling doesn't always work
>>> reliably together. Try disabling TCP window scaling on the Linux box(en):
>>>
>> [snip]
>>
>
Wietse wrote:
> If you have ""hosts: files dns", and you have only one address in
> /etc/hosts, you'll get only one address from getaddrinfo().
As I wrote before, /etc/hosts contains both addresses:
176.9.43.216 monthu.horus-it.com monthu
2a01:4f8:150:54c1::b009:2bd8 monthu.horus-it.com monthu
Noel Jones wrote:
To add a bcc: address for a specific sender+recipient combination,
you could use a restriction class that checks for that condition and
documentation:
http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html
A more flexible and scalable appro
Ralph Seichter:
> Gentoo Linux's default /etc/nsswitch.conf contains "hosts: files dns",
> and the corresponding test program output looks like this:
>
> $ ./getaddrinfo monthu.horus-it.com
> Hostname: monthu.horus-it.com
> Addresses: 176.9.43.216
>
> When I change the setting to "host
Gentoo Linux's default /etc/nsswitch.conf contains "hosts: files dns",
and the corresponding test program output looks like this:
$ ./getaddrinfo monthu.horus-it.com
Hostname: monthu.horus-it.com
Addresses: 176.9.43.216
When I change the setting to "hosts: dns files", the output change
Michal Kurka:
> Dne 21.9.2012 v 06:55 Wietse Venema napsal(a):
>
> > > I'm viewing "http://www.postfix.org/OVERVIEW.html#delivering";. The
> > > local(8) and virtual(8) are at the same level. Why local(8) return
> > > SMTP-error and virtual(8) generate bounce mail?
> >
> > ALL Postfix delivery
Ralph Seichter:
> Wietse wrote:
>
> > Please run the attached test programs and verify that your system
> > library is not borked.
>
> $ ./getaddrinfo monthu.horus-it.com
> Hostname: monthu.horus-it.com
> Addresses: 176.9.43.216
My FreeBSD system says:
% ./getaddrinfo monthu.horu
Wietse wrote:
> Please run the attached test programs and verify that your system
> library is not borked.
$ ./getaddrinfo monthu.horus-it.com
Hostname: monthu.horus-it.com
Addresses: 176.9.43.216
$ ./getnameinfo 176.9.43.216
Hostname: monthu.horus-it.com
Address:176.9.4
Dne 21.9.2012 v 06:55 Wietse Venema napsal(a):
> > I'm viewing "http://www.postfix.org/OVERVIEW.html#delivering";. The
> > local(8) and virtual(8) are at the same level. Why local(8) return
> > SMTP-error and virtual(8) generate bounce mail?
>
> ALL Postfix delivery agents generate a bounce mes
Ralph Seichter:
> Wietse wrote:
>
> > What's in /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf?
>
> The directory /var/spool/postfix/etc does not exist on the server.
> Should I create it?
Postfix uses the getaddrinfo() and getnameinfo() system library
routines.
You used dig.
The two are not comparable.
Luigi Rosa:
> The documentation says
>
> "The address type ("ipv6", "ipv4" or "any") that the Postfix SMTP client will
> try first, when a destination has IPv6 and IPv4 addresses with equal MX
> preference."
>
> What exacly happens if example.com has
>
> example.com. IN MX 10 mail.example.com.
>
Wietse wrote:
> What's in /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf?
The directory /var/spool/postfix/etc does not exist on the server.
Should I create it?
> Any recent upgrades that failed to update (system library or config)
> files under /var/spool/postfix?
I am not aware of any failures. I've upda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The documentation says
"The address type ("ipv6", "ipv4" or "any") that the Postfix SMTP client will
try first, when a destination has IPv6 and IPv4 addresses with equal MX
preference."
What exacly happens if example.com has
example.com. IN MX 10 ma
Ralph Seichter:
> Hello list members,
>
> Postfix keeps logging warnings like the following:
>
> Sep 25 21:00:17 monthu postfix/smtpd[31253]: warning: hostname
> monthu.horus-it.com does not resolve to address
> 2a01:4f8:150:54c1::b009:2bd8: No address associated with hostname
What's in /v
Hello list members,
Postfix keeps logging warnings like the following:
Sep 25 21:00:17 monthu postfix/smtpd[31253]: warning: hostname
monthu.horus-it.com does not resolve to address
2a01:4f8:150:54c1::b009:2bd8: No address associated with hostname
Name server queries appear to be successf
On 9/25/2012 12:33 PM, Aaron Bennett wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Ralf Hildebrandt
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 9:30 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: sporadic bouts of los
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Ralf Hildebrandt
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 9:30 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: sporadic bouts of lost connections to exchange 2010 hub transport
* Mikael B
Hi,My friend
Thank you for Benny Pedersen and Noel Jones answer
I will try to install fail2ban to stop them next time
By the way The IP 5.39.219.175 is too bad
I just put it into hosts.deny
Thanks a lot
TOM
2012/9/25 Noel Jones
> On 9/25/2012 8:56 AM, Feel Zhou wrote:
> >
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Mikkel Bang wrote:
> 2012/9/20 Anonymous :
>>>Thanks a lot everyone! After thinking long and hard about all your advice I
>>>finally ended up with:
>>>
>>>..+ postfix-anti-UCE.txt +..
>>
>> "Ultimate" server, or "cheap" server?
>>
>> Postfix-anti-UCE.txt is a poor
On 9/25/2012 8:56 AM, Feel Zhou wrote:
> /var/log/maillog
> Sep 24 08:37:50 shcx postfix/smtpd[14960]: warning:
> unknown[5.39.219.175]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed:
> authentication failure
...
>
> Hello My friend
> Someone who want to guess username and passwd in my mail server
> W
Feel Zhou skrev den 25-09-2012 15:56:
Sep 24 08:44:52 shcx postfix/anvil[14914]: statistics: max connection
rate 805/60s for (smtp:5.39.219.175) at Sep 24 08:38:22
Sep 24 08:44:52 shcx postfix/anvil[14914]: statistics: max connection
count 52 for (smtp:5.39.219.175) at Sep 24 08:37:33
Sep 24 08
* Mikael Bak :
> Hi Stan,
>
> On 09/25/2012 08:22 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >
> > Apparently Linux and Windows TCP window scaling doesn't always work
> > reliably together. Try disabling TCP window scaling on the Linux box(en):
> >
> [snip]
>
> Perhaps off topic, but do you have any links to
Hi Stan,
On 09/25/2012 08:22 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> Apparently Linux and Windows TCP window scaling doesn't always work
> reliably together. Try disabling TCP window scaling on the Linux box(en):
>
[snip]
Perhaps off topic, but do you have any links to documents or similar
that proves th
Jon Miller:
> I need to configure a existing mail server to accept mail for
> another domain until their server is replaced. I'm currently using
> postfix-2.2.9-10.18, which I know is old.
>
> Is it necessary to update the postfix first?
No, but you might need a historian to answer your questions
V?clav Pernica:
>
> Wietse Venema:
>
> > Alas, as documented tcp_table(5) is an insecure table (no secure
> > communication) so Postfix probably will not allow you to look up
> > mailbox pathnames with this.
>
> You are right it doesn't work:
> fatal: tcp:127.0.0.1:2527 map is not allowed for se
Wietse Venema:
> Alas, as documented tcp_table(5) is an insecure table (no secure
> communication) so Postfix probably will not allow you to look up
> mailbox pathnames with this.
You are right it doesn't work:
fatal: tcp:127.0.0.1:2527 map is not allowed for security sensitive data
Is there an
A related question, is it possible to enforce an authenticated user to
one specific ip? I'll have to figure out how to enforce outgoing mail
to a certain ip, on a plesk machine, otherwise I'll have to get
another VPS specificly for the purpose of outgoing mail.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Marc van D
28 matches
Mail list logo
