On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 03:45:11PM +0200, Mikkel Bang wrote:
> 2012/9/20 Anonymous :
> >>Thanks a lot everyone! After thinking long and hard about all
> >>your advice I finally ended up with:
> >>
> >>..+ postfix-anti-UCE.txt +..
> >
> > "Ultimate" server, or "cheap" server?
> >
> > Postfix-anti-U
2012/9/20 Anonymous :
>>Thanks a lot everyone! After thinking long and hard about all your advice I
>>finally ended up with:
>>
>>..+ postfix-anti-UCE.txt +..
>
> "Ultimate" server, or "cheap" server?
>
> Postfix-anti-UCE.txt is a poor choice because of the damage it does to
> legitimate mail. Alt
>In a Postfix pcre_table(5) you must have a space between the
>expression closing delimiter, "/" above, and the SMTP code (or
>access(5) keyword). Your "551" would thus be misinterpreted as
>unknown PCRE flags.
Gotcha. Thanks. I read that slightyl backwards at first
>You obviously must fix that p
Michal Kurka:
> > > I need to return SMTP-error to sender server without put in local
> > > queue as well as local(8). Is it possible?
> >
> > No. Postfix delivery is asynchronous.
> > http://www.postfix.org/OVERVIEW.html
>
> I'm viewing "http://www.postfix.org/OVERVIEW.html#delivering";
Dne 19.9.2012 v 19:37 Viktor Dukhovni napsal(a):
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 07:46:06PM +0200, Michal Kurka wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > I use virtual_transport and my own script for local delivery:
> >
> > main.cf:
> > virtual_mailbox_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/vmailbox
> > virtual_transport =
