Hi,
I have running a server with postfix-mysql+dovecot+postfixadmin,in
main.cf:
smtpd_sender_login_maps =
mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_mailbox_maps.cf，
mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_alias_maps.cf
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_sender_login_
On 9/19/2012 10:05 PM, Brock Henry wrote:
> I can't work out the combination of rules that will give me what I want.
>
> What I want.
> 1) non sasl, incoming mail permitted, and seen by checkfull.
> 2) non sasl, outgoing mail (from inside) permitted, not seen by
> checkfull.
> 3) non sasl, outgoin
I still can't quite get my head around it. I am fairly new to Postfix.
If a user connects via SASL, they get permitted too early, and miss out on
the check_policy_service.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_unauth_destination,
check_policy
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:17:59PM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> "A list", just list them.
Then I'll assume whether I have commas or spaces then it'll be
fine.
> If this did not answer your question, start again with what you are
> trying to accomplish. Show postconf -n and the logs showing the
> p
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:34:42PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
> I'm trying to use the postscreen_whitelist_interfaces feature of
> Postfix but it does not appear to work properly with IPv6. I have
> put in an address with and without the square brackets around the
> address and either way postscre
Hi,
I'm trying to use the postscreen_whitelist_interfaces feature of Postfix
but it does not appear to work properly with IPv6. I have put in an address
with and without the square brackets around the address and either way
postscreen does not behave in the same manner as it does with an IPv4
addr
Michael Storz:
> The consistency check requires that a user object is first (correctly)
> defined in OpenLDAP. Only then the second check looks for the correct
> definition in Active Directory. If it is not then we defer the email (we
...
> If a new user is created the user object appears instan
Hi,
May be it is a DirectAdmin host. Have a look at www.directadmin.com...
aemsg and smtpb4pop should be customer implementations to the directadmin
mail server, they are using exim, which I believe is highly configurable...
BUT... I do not know for sure...
Best regards,
---
Fernando Maciel Sou
Thanks!
On 9/19/2012 12:24 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:25:18AM -0400, Rod K wrote:
I have a client request that any outbound emails sent by a specific
user be BCCd to another email address in the organization. Any
ideas on how best to accomplish this?
Sounds like you want
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 07:13:49PM +0200, Michael Storz wrote:
> Am 2012-09-19 18:50, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> >Coming back to the original problem, if you don't want to reject
> >mail with "user unknown" when a user might still be in the process
> >of being created, how are you going to deal with
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 07:46:06PM +0200, Michal Kurka wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I use virtual_transport and my own script for local delivery:
>
> main.cf:
> virtual_mailbox_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/vmailbox
> virtual_transport = locdel
>
> master.cf:
> locdel unix - n n - - pipe
> flags=
Hello.
I use virtual_transport and my own script for local delivery:
main.cf:
virtual_mailbox_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/vmailbox
virtual_transport = locdel
master.cf:
locdel unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRXhu user=vmail:vmail
argv=/usr/local/bin/MailDelivery.sh ${sender} ${recipient
Am 2012-09-19 18:50, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Coming back to the original problem, if you don't want to reject
mail with "user unknown" when a user might still be in the process
of being created, how are you going to deal with really unknown
addresses, like a sender who mistyped something?
Coming back to the original problem, if you don't want to reject
mail with "user unknown" when a user might still be in the process
of being created, how are you going to deal with really unknown
addresses, like a sender who mistyped something?
Wietse
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:41:02AM -0700, Naval saini wrote:
> I have postfix running with multiple postfix-out instances i
> upgrade postfix version from 2.3 to 2.10 before upgrade sasl
> authentication was fine after upgradation sasl authentication
> rejecting. logs of /var/log/maillog showing
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:25:18AM -0400, Rod K wrote:
> I have a client request that any outbound emails sent by a specific
> user be BCCd to another email address in the organization. Any
> ideas on how best to accomplish this?
Sounds like you want sender_bcc_maps:
http://www.postfix.org/
Am 2012-09-14 17:24, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Michael Storz:
If a new parameter no_result_format would exist, we could define the
ldap procedure with
result_format = DUNNO
no_result_format = 450 User not yet available in Exchange
which is very straightforward and understandable.
Except that th
I have postfix running with multiple postfix-out instances i upgrade postfix
version from 2.3 to 2.10 before upgrade sasl authentication was fine after
upgradation sasl authentication rejecting.
logs of /var/log/maillog showing
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable is true, but SASL support is not compiled in.
h
I have a client request that any outbound emails sent by a specific user
be BCCd to another email address in the organization. Any ideas on how
best to accomplish this?
Den 2012-09-19 14:35, Ralf Hildebrandt skrev:
; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> @ns1.bdm.microsoftonline.com www.pimda.eu
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available
good, atleast not public recursive :)
Wietse Venema:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:13PM +1000, Brock Henry wrote:
> > I have created a policy service, which checks quota, returning
> > 'reject' if the mailbox is full, and 'dunno' otherwise.
> >
> > smtpd_(data|recipient)_restrictions =
> >check_policy_service unix:private/check
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:46:58AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:13PM +1000, Brock Henry wrote:
> > I have created a policy service, which checks quota, returning
> > 'reject' if the mailbox is full, and 'dunno' otherwise.
> >
> > smtpd_(data|recipient)_restrictions
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:13PM +1000, Brock Henry wrote:
> I have created a policy service, which checks quota, returning
> 'reject' if the mailbox is full, and 'dunno' otherwise.
>
> smtpd_(data|recipient)_restrictions =
>check_policy_service unix:private/checkfull
>
> And it's all work
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:13PM +1000, Brock Henry wrote:
> I have created a policy service, which checks quota, returning
> 'reject' if the mailbox is full, and 'dunno' otherwise.
>
> smtpd_(data|recipient)_restrictions =
>check_policy_service unix:private/checkfull
>
> And it's all work
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:11:52AM -0500, I wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:58:27AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Milo :
> >
> > > % WHOIS pidma
> > > Domain: pidma
> > > Status: AVAILABLE
> >
> > Oh, good one!
> > My respect to you for spotting this!
>
> And to me for spotting th
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:58:27AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Milo :
>
> > % WHOIS pidma
> > Domain: pidma
> > Status: AVAILABLE
>
> Oh, good one!
> My respect to you for spotting this!
And to me for spotting the typo, "pidma" != "pimda" :)
> > To conclude: this domain was isn't
Dear Jim.
On 09/19/2012 02:47 PM, Jim Reid wrote:
> There's clearly no point continuing this thread. You clearly don't
> understand or choose not to understand what's being discussed.
Really sorry to read this.
So let's
> just shut up and agree to disagree.
Agree.
> I wish you the very best o
There's clearly no point continuing this thread. You clearly don't
understand or choose not to understand what's being discussed. So
let's just shut up and agree to disagree.
I wish you the very best of luck in using whois to troubleshoot DNS
problems.
On 09/19/2012 02:16 PM, Jim Reid wrote:
> On 19 Sep 2012, at 12:49, Milo wrote:
>
>> On 09/19/2012 01:41 PM, Jim Reid wrote:
>>> If you want to know what domains are actually in the DNS or
>>> what data are there, consult the DNS - not whois.
>>
>> This is incorrect.
>
> Well one of us is wrong.
* Jim Reid :
> The above is a NOHOST (or NODATA) response. There was no error
> (NOERROR) and the Answer Section of the reply was empty. The name
> being looked up exists but not as the QTYPE (or QCLASS) that was
> asked for. ns1.bdm.microsoftonline.com is saying there are RRs for
> www.pimda.eu,
On 19 Sep 2012, at 12:49, Milo wrote:
On 09/19/2012 01:41 PM, Jim Reid wrote:
If you want to know what domains are actually in the DNS or
what data are there, consult the DNS - not whois.
This is incorrect.
Well one of us is wrong. And it's not me. :-)
I will repeat what I said above. If y
On 09/19/2012 01:41 PM, Jim Reid wrote:
> On 19 Sep 2012, at 11:37, Milo wrote:
>
>>> Why do you think whois can tell you what the DNS is doing?
>
>> whois can tell if domain exists.
>
> No it can't. If you want to know what domains are actually in the DNS or
> what data are there, consult the D
On 19 Sep 2012, at 11:37, Milo wrote:
Why do you think whois can tell you what the DNS is doing?
whois can tell if domain exists.
No it can't. If you want to know what domains are actually in the DNS
or what data are there, consult the DNS - not whois.
There will be no whois entry anywh
Den 2012-09-18 20:54, Leon skrev:
Hi,
I have running a postfix+mysql+dovecot+postfixadmin+roundcube
server and it working well.Now in postfixadmin i set a domain1.com
alias to domain2.com and create u...@domain2.com.I think that if
someone send a mail to u...@domain1.com,i can receive the mail
On 19 Sep 2012, at 11:40, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
The broken name server at ns1.bdm.microsoftonline.com. The other one
is rightly returning NOHOST responses when asked for or MX
records for www.pimda.eu.
How can I see that? I performed a query using dig and gut:
# dig @ns1.bdm.microsofto
* Jim Reid :
> The DNS admin for pimda.eu has screwed up. He/she has created a
> delegation for www.pimda.eu and failed to configure the name servers
> that allegedly serve this new zone.
>
> gromit% dig www.pimda.eu any
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.9.1-vjs197.15-P2 <<>> www.pimda.eu any
> ;; global options
On 09/19/2012 12:33 PM, Jim Reid wrote:
> On 19 Sep 2012, at 10:53, Milo wrote:
>
>> % WHOIS pidma
>> Domain:pidma
>> Status:AVAILABLE
>
> Why do you think whois can tell you what the DNS is doing? It might also
whois can tell if domain exists. If domain don't exist, lack of proper
recor
At 04:36 AM 9/19/2012, you wrote:
>I'm trying to debug a DNS issue:
>
># host www.pimda.eu
>www.pimda.eu has address 88.208.252.197
>Host www.pimda.eu not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
>Host www.pimda.eu not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
>
>Where does the NXDOMAIN come from?
>
># host -t a www.pimda.eu
>www.pimda.eu ha
On 19 Sep 2012, at 10:53, Milo wrote:
% WHOIS pidma
Domain: pidma
Status: AVAILABLE
Why do you think whois can tell you what the DNS is doing? It might
also help if you queried the DNS for pimda.eu, not pidma.
On 19 Sep 2012, at 10:36, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I'm trying to debug a DNS issue:
# host www.pimda.eu
You'll get better results if you use The One True DNS tool: dig.
The DNS admin for pimda.eu has screwed up. He/she has created a
delegation for www.pimda.eu and failed to configure the na
19.09.2012 11:53, Milo:
> On 09/19/2012 11:36 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> I'm trying to debug a DNS issue:
>>
>> # host www.pimda.eu
> % WHOIS pidma
pidma != pimda
$ whois pimda.eu
[...]
% WHOIS pimda
Domain: pimda
Registrant:
NOT DISCLOSED!
Visit www.eurid.eu for webbased w
On 09/19/2012 11:58 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Milo :
>
>> % WHOIS pidma
>> Domain: pidma
>> Status: AVAILABLE
>
> Oh, good one!
> My respect to you for spotting this!
>
>> To conclude: this domain was isn't registered yet but was probably
>> preconfigured on some authoritative DN
On 19/09/2012 11:58, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
To conclude: this domain was isn't registered yet but was probably
preconfigured on some authoritative DNS server(s).
I wonder why dnstrace and dig + trace found me the entries.
I would think more that the domain was registered and has now been
de
* Milo :
> % WHOIS pidma
> Domain: pidma
> Status: AVAILABLE
Oh, good one!
My respect to you for spotting this!
> To conclude: this domain was isn't registered yet but was probably
> preconfigured on some authoritative DNS server(s).
I wonder why dnstrace and dig + trace found me th
On 09/19/2012 11:36 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> I'm trying to debug a DNS issue:
>
> # host www.pimda.eu
> www.pimda.eu has address 88.208.252.197
> Host www.pimda.eu not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
> Host www.pimda.eu not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
>
> Where does the NXDOMAIN come from?
>
> # host -t a www.pi
* Bernhard Schmidt :
> Not exactly sure why you are getting NXDOMAIN, I'm getting SERVFAIL
> because they are sending a broken horizontal referral on anything !=
> A.
Yes, seeing the same here
> Problem is, when you are asking for A you get a legitimate answer
Exactly. So I wonder what host is
On 19.09.2012 11:36, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to debug a DNS issue:
# host www.pimda.eu
www.pimda.eu has address 88.208.252.197
Host www.pimda.eu not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host www.pimda.eu not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Where does the NXDOMAIN come from?
# host -t a www.pimda.eu
www.pimd
I'm trying to debug a DNS issue:
# host www.pimda.eu
www.pimda.eu has address 88.208.252.197
Host www.pimda.eu not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host www.pimda.eu not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Where does the NXDOMAIN come from?
# host -t a www.pimda.eu
www.pimda.eu has address 88.208.252.197
# host -t www.p
When asked after a EHLO, I'm getting this list of verbs:
H E L P
250 +OK entry follows, ends in .
ehlo
tls
smtpb4pop
h e l p
sendfrom
starttls
cqsmsg
data
aemsg
somlfrom
auth
exip
quit
samlfrom
rcptto
rset
mailfrom
noop
helo
type
wlist.
smtpb4pop? aemsg? Never heard of those, Google doesn't know
49 matches
Mail list logo
