Thank you Wietse this was what i didnt` knew.
B?ny?sz Botond:
> I would like to ask? if it`s possible to configure postfix to not
> send mails to mime to and cc recipients
Postfix does not send to the To:/Cc: recipients by default. It
will do so only when you execute "sendmail -t".
Wietse
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 3 May 2012 19:04:13 -0500
> Von: Chad M Stewart
> An: Steve
> CC: "postfix-users@postfix.org"
> Betreff: Re: a header check rule to do <= or >=
>
>
> On May 3, 2012, at 5:26 PM, "Steve" wrote:
>
> > Original-Nachricht
> >
On May 3, 2012, at 5:26 PM, "Steve" wrote:
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Thu, 3 May 2012 17:03:15 -0500
>> Von: Chad M Stewart
>> An: Postfix users
>> Betreff: a header check rule to do <= or >=
>
> Hello Chad,
>
>
>>
>> Is it possible to write a header check (I'm think
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 3 May 2012 17:03:15 -0500
> Von: Chad M Stewart
> An: Postfix users
> Betreff: a header check rule to do <= or >=
Hello Chad,
>
> Is it possible to write a header check (I'm thinking pcre is probably the
> way to go) that would find a header,
Is it possible to write a header check (I'm thinking pcre is probably the way
to go) that would find a header, and then take action based on the value of
said header.
Sample header
X-spam-Confidence: 0.8505
In pseudo code I'd like something like
if header (/X-spam-Confidence/) && ($val
I do not see where Stan was abusive.
Abrasive maybe, but then sometimes bumps on logs need sanding down this
would appear to be one of those occasions.
On 03/05/2012 11:29 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 5/3/2012 8:48 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 03.05.2012 17:16, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
[]
To who
B?ny?sz Botond:
> I would like to ask? if it`s possible to configure postfix to not
> send mails to mime to and cc recipients
Postfix does not send to the To:/Cc: recipients by default. It
will do so only when you execute "sendmail -t".
Wietse
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 03:51:16PM -, Pau Amma wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 3:32 pm, Bányász Botond wrote:
> > I would like to ask if it`s possible to configure postfix to
> > not send mails to mime to and cc recipients
>
> What exactly do you mean by "MIME to and cc recipients"? The To:
> an
On Thu, May 3, 2012 3:32 pm, Bányász Botond wrote:
> I would like to ask if it`s possible to configure postfix to not send
> mails to mime to and cc recipients
What exactly do you mean by "MIME to and cc recipients"? The To: and Cc:
header fields are the same whether the message is MIME or plain
I would like to ask if it`s possible to configure postfix to not send mails to
mime to and cc recipients
Thank You
On 5/3/2012 8:48 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 03.05.2012 17:16, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> []
>> To who at Debian? Lamont Jones? Has he replied to your idiotic idea yet?
>
> Please refrain from using such words in public forum.
> Such usage makes you to be of that kind.
My apologies for allowing
I already thanked Michael for his contributions in private email.
Michael, does editing master.cf and s/fifo/unix/ solve the mtime
file system updates problem? This is already supported by existing
code, works on Linux and *BSD, and I can make a config parameter
that makes this configurable with
On 03.05.2012 17:16, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
[]
> To who at Debian? Lamont Jones? Has he replied to your idiotic idea yet?
Please refrain from using such words in public forum.
Such usage makes you to be of that kind.
>> Thank you for making my worst nightmares come true. I will do
>> my best to p
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 08:16:33AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Has he replied to your idiotic idea yet?
Stan, please have the decency to not reflexively abuse others on
this list, or otherwise leave.
Michael, thanks for all your contributions over the years.
The issue you raised here is a val
On 5/2/2012 6:02 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Michael Tokarev:
>>> The preferred pickup/qmgr IPC type (fifo or unix) can be a main.cf
>>> parameter setting (with an OS-dependent default value, e.g., fifo
>>> for Solaris and unix for everything else), and post-install can be
>>> updated to edit master
Eliezer Croitoru:
> it seems that this problem is not postfix specific but a more runtim\io
> or other low level problem.
Hypervisors are known to have problems delivering timer events.
Without proper timer support, Postfix processes cannot detect
timeout conditions and will hang indefinitely.
it seems that this problem is not postfix specific but a more runtim\io
or other low level problem.
Eliezer
On 03/05/2012 11:56, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 3/5/2012 11:43 πμ, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
the thing is it seems like a FS issue or VM cpu\clock issues from the
log.
It might. In the m
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of DTNX Postmaster
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 10:43 AM
> To: postfix users
> Subject: Re: Stress docs update
>
> Please let me know if this isn't the right format, style a
On 3/5/2012 11:43 πμ, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
the thing is it seems like a FS issue or VM cpu\clock issues from the
log.
It might. In the meantime, I found the following in /var/log/messages
(which occurred when Postfix problems started).
Such errors have never occurred in the past (nor oc
On 03/05/2012 11:04, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 3/5/2012 10:29 πμ, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
just out of curiosity, does this KVM host uses some nas\san for VMs HD?
Yes. It is a cluster of physical servers using a SAN/NAS for data
storage. However, I don't know much more, because it is operated b
On May 1, 2012, at 18:32, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Michael Orlitzky:
>> At the bottom of the stress readme,
>>
>> http://www.postfix.org/STRESS_README.html#other
>>
>> there is an allusion to what would eventually become postscreen. Might
>> as well update it with a sentence and a link to POSTSCR
On 3/5/2012 10:29 πμ, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
just out of curiosity, does this KVM host uses some nas\san for VMs HD?
Yes. It is a cluster of physical servers using a SAN/NAS for data
storage. However, I don't know much more, because it is operated by a
different organization (you may see:
just out of curiosity, does this KVM host uses some nas\san for VMs HD?
On 03/05/2012 10:10, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 3/5/2012 1:54 πμ, Wietse Venema wrote:
For other details, see the local mail logfile
Look at the last line!
Thank you Wietse,
The only thing probably related to the issue,
On 3/5/2012 1:54 πμ, Wietse Venema wrote:
For other details, see the local mail logfile
Look at the last line!
Thank you Wietse,
The only thing probably related to the issue, logged with the same
timestamp *for the particular case I reported* is:
May 2 23:25:03 vmail postfix/cleanup[28676
24 matches
Mail list logo
