Re: pipe flags vs lmtp

2012-04-10 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:48:38PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Since in most cases the LMTP server is not a queueing MTA, I would > > recommend a delivery agent option in Postfix that suppresses DSN > > NOTIFY=... transmission to the LMTP server. Still send ORCPT, but > > handle (any final) DS

Re: how to fix forwarding loop

2012-04-10 Thread Rich
It is postfix. It is being sent back to mail. It seems to be sent back to the mx mail server from archive. On Tuesday, April 10, 2012, mouss wrote: > Le 08/04/2012 20:13, Rich a écrit : > > I am trying to build an archive server for all email. Here is my setup. > > > > My domain is domain.com

Re: virtual_alias_domains/maps and address classes

2012-04-10 Thread btb
On Apr 10, 2012, at 10.44, /dev/rob0 wrote: >> + * Note: virtual_alias_maps will be used with other address classes unless >> +a given domain is listed in virtual_alias_domains. see the section on > > To me, this confuses things more. virtual_alias_maps will be > consulted (and its results

Re: pipe flags vs lmtp

2012-04-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Viktor Dukhovni: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:28:28PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > > >RCPT TO: ORCPT=rfc822;orig-rcpt ... > > > > > > Does Postfix already send this if LMTP server advertises DSN? > > > > Yes :-) It's the same code for both SMTP and LMTP. > > Since in most cases the LMT

Re: pipe flags vs lmtp

2012-04-10 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:28:28PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > > >RCPT TO: ORCPT=rfc822;orig-rcpt ... > > > > Does Postfix already send this if LMTP server advertises DSN? > > Yes :-) It's the same code for both SMTP and LMTP. Since in most cases the LMTP server is not a queueing MTA, I w

Re: pipe flags vs lmtp

2012-04-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Timo Sirainen: > On 10.4.2012, at 19.28, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Timo Sirainen: > >>> I wonder if careful use of the DSN extension would help. With DSN, > >>> the SMTP/LMTP client sends the original recipient with: > >>> > >>> RCPT TO: ORCPT=rfc822;orig-rcpt ... > >> > >> Does Postfix alre

Re: Filter incoming mail by sender -> forward, otherwise autoreply

2012-04-10 Thread Noel Jones
On 4/10/2012 4:36 AM, jonas wrote: > Hello, > > I need to configure the following setup with postfix: > > filter mail for 'supp...@example.com' based on sender address: > - if the sender address is inside a list of serveral 100.000 priorized >addresses, simply forward the mail to 'ticketsys.

Re: pipe flags vs lmtp

2012-04-10 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 10.4.2012, at 19.28, Wietse Venema wrote: > Timo Sirainen: >>> I wonder if careful use of the DSN extension would help. With DSN, >>> the SMTP/LMTP client sends the original recipient with: >>> >>> RCPT TO: ORCPT=rfc822;orig-rcpt ... >> >> Does Postfix already send this if LMTP server adve

Re: pipe flags vs lmtp

2012-04-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Timo Sirainen: > > I wonder if careful use of the DSN extension would help. With DSN, > > the SMTP/LMTP client sends the original recipient with: > > > >RCPT TO: ORCPT=rfc822;orig-rcpt ... > > Does Postfix already send this if LMTP server advertises DSN? Yes :-) It's the same code for both

Re: pipe flags vs lmtp

2012-04-10 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 9.4.2012, at 16.25, Wietse Venema wrote: > Timo Sirainen: >> There's a problem with aliases that LMTP server can't solve. Lets >> say I have two aliases: >> >> info@domain -> shared@domain >> sales@domain -> shared@domain >> >> The LMTP server sees RCPT TO: for mails that arrive >> to both of

Re: how to understand the log format of postfix,

2012-04-10 Thread /dev/rob0
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:13:03PM +0800, zjfha...@126.com wrote: > how to understand the log format of postfix, where can i get the > document about that? The logs are in plain language, so they should be understandable as is. Perhaps if there is a message which you had trouble with, you cou

Re: virtual_alias_domains/maps and address classes

2012-04-10 Thread /dev/rob0
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:36:42AM -0400, btb wrote: > On 2012.04.10 08.32, Wietse Venema wrote: > >>so the relationship between virtual_alias_maps/ > >>virtual_alias_domains is not quite the same as the relationship > >>between virtual_mailbox_maps/virtual_mailbox_domains or > >>relay_recipient

Re: Postfix and LDAP lookups

2012-04-10 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Igmar Palsenberg : alias_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf virtual_alias_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-virtual.cf virtual_alias_domains = $virtual_alias_maps The virtual_alias_domains probably does a lookup in 'jdi.nl'. That isn't directly in the map. Crap. As others sa

how to understand the log format of postfix,

2012-04-10 Thread 张俊峰
how to understand the log format of postfix, where can i get the document about that?

Re: Postfix and LDAP lookups

2012-04-10 Thread /dev/rob0
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 03:20:23PM +0200, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > > >> alias_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf > >> virtual_alias_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-virtual.cf > >> virtual_alias_domains = $virtual_alias_maps > > The virtual_alias_domains probably does a lookup in 'jdi.nl'. Th

Re: Postfix and LDAP lookups

2012-04-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Igmar Palsenberg: > Is there a way to let postfix actually log the map lookups it does > ? I've got debug_peer_level = 10 and a debug_peer_list set to the > testmachine, but that gave me little to go on. Logging the actual > map > lookups would be a very good starting point to debug this setup. I c

Re: virtual_alias_domains/maps and address classes

2012-04-10 Thread btb
On 2012.04.10 08.32, Wietse Venema wrote: so the relationship between virtual_alias_maps/virtual_alias_domains is not quite the same as the relationship between virtual_mailbox_maps/virtual_mailbox_domains or relay_recipients/relay_domains? This is documented in virtual(5). thanks for the cla

Re: Postfix and LDAP lookups

2012-04-10 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
>> alias_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf >> virtual_alias_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-virtual.cf >> virtual_alias_domains = $virtual_alias_maps The virtual_alias_domains probably does a lookup in 'jdi.nl'. That isn't directly in the map. Crap. > > Looks like you are using virtual a

Re: virtual_alias_domains/maps and address classes

2012-04-10 Thread /dev/rob0
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:10:52AM -0400, btb wrote: > On 2012.04.09 23.32, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > >On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:21:05PM -0400, b...@bitrate.net wrote: > > > >>Given my understanding of address classes, it seemed that in > >>order to use virtual_alias_maps, those related domains wo

Re: virtual_alias_domains/maps and address classes

2012-04-10 Thread Wietse Venema
btb: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > On 2012.04.09 23.32, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:21:05PM -0400, b...@bitrate.net wrote: > > > >> Given my understanding of address classes, it seemed that in order to use > >> virtual_alias_maps, those related domain

Re: Postfix and LDAP lookups

2012-04-10 Thread Wietse Venema
>so far so good. Postfix however, doesn't seem to like this setup : >It keeps boun cing them with a relaying denied. In that case, you forgot to list the domain name in mydestination, virtual_alias_domains or virtual_mailbox_domains. Make your pick: http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_CLASS_README.ht

Re: Filter incoming mail by sender -> forward, otherwise autoreply

2012-04-10 Thread Tomas Macek
Now I think that policy and or after queue filtering are good solutions, but both seem rather complex for a relatively easy problem. If you will create something what policyd does (www.policyd.org) using http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html, you are able to do something with the mai

Re: virtual_alias_domains/maps and address classes

2012-04-10 Thread btb
On 2012.04.09 23.32, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:21:05PM -0400, b...@bitrate.net wrote: Given my understanding of address classes, it seemed that in order to use virtual_alias_maps, those related domains would need to be listed in virtual_alias_domains. This assumption i

Re: Postfix and LDAP lookups

2012-04-10 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Igmar Palsenberg : Hi, I'm attempting to migrate from sendmail to Postfix + LDAP, so bare with me, I'm an sendmail user :) I've migrated the live user database into LDAP, and added my own e-mail addresses to my LDAP entry : dn: uid=igmar,ou=employee,dc=jdi,dc=nl objectClass: a

Re: Postfix and LDAP lookups

2012-04-10 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2012-04-10 Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > Anyone with a suggestion on how to start debugging this ? You received the following link with the welcome message when you subscribed to this list: http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- "Abstractions save us time workin

Filter incoming mail by sender -> forward, otherwise autoreply

2012-04-10 Thread jonas
Hello, I need to configure the following setup with postfix: filter mail for 'supp...@example.com' based on sender address: - if the sender address is inside a list of serveral 100.000 priorized addresses, simply forward the mail to 'ticketsys...@example.com' - otherwise send an autoreply t

Postfix and LDAP lookups

2012-04-10 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
Hi, I'm attempting to migrate from sendmail to Postfix + LDAP, so bare with me, I'm an sendmail user :) I've migrated the live user database into LDAP, and added my own e-mail addresses to my LDAP entry : dn: uid=igmar,ou=employee,dc=jdi,dc=nl objectClass: account objectClass: posixAccount ob

Re: mail delivery system message

2012-04-10 Thread Reindl Harald
do NOT reply off-list - never, reply below Am 10.04.2012 06:07, schrieb Jon Miller: >> Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 13:22:51 +0200 >> From: h.rei...@thelounge.net >> To: postfix-users@postfix.org >> Subject: Re: mail delivery system message >> >> Am 08.04.2012 13:01, schrieb Jon Miller: >>> If u do not