Karol Babioch:
> Hi,
>
> Am 02.03.2012 23:32, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > Postfix will not look in alias_maps when the domain is not listed
> > in mydestination.
>
> So, when I understand this right, it is not possible to define common
> aliases for all virtual domains? Because virtual domains won
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:48:09PM +0100, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Am 02.03.2012 23:32, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > Postfix will not look in alias_maps when the domain is not
> > listed in mydestination.
>
> So, when I understand this right, it is not possible to
> define common aliases for all virtu
Hi,
Am 02.03.2012 23:32, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Postfix will not look in alias_maps when the domain is not listed
> in mydestination.
So, when I understand this right, it is not possible to define common
aliases for all virtual domains? Because virtual domains won't be listed
within $mydestinat
Karol Babioch:
> Hi,
>
> Am 02.03.2012 22:33, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> > theonly thing what is stronlgy recommended to match
> > is A-Record and PTR of the machine
>
> Ok, maybe I've mixed something up here :). Thanks for your replies.
>
> I've got it running now. However I've now got the proble
Hi,
Am 02.03.2012 22:33, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> theonly thing what is stronlgy recommended to match
> is A-Record and PTR of the machine
Ok, maybe I've mixed something up here :). Thanks for your replies.
I've got it running now. However I've now got the problem that my
alias_maps doesn't get
Am 02.03.2012 22:19, schrieb Noel Jones:
> On 3/2/2012 3:08 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 02.03.2012 22:02, schrieb Charles Marcus:
>>> What is your concern?
>>
>> to get flagged as spam without no other reason ;)?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Karol Babioch
>>
>
> Any anti-spam system that
On 2012-03-02 4:19 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/2/2012 3:08 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
Am 02.03.2012 22:02, schrieb Charles Marcus:
What is your concern?
to get flagged as spam without no other reason ;)?
Any anti-spam system that flags mail only because the sending
hostname doesn't match the
On 3/2/2012 3:08 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 02.03.2012 22:02, schrieb Charles Marcus:
>> What is your concern?
>
> to get flagged as spam without no other reason ;)?
>
> Best regards,
> Karol Babioch
>
Any anti-spam system that flags mail only because the sending
hostname doesn't ma
Hi,
Am 02.03.2012 22:02, schrieb Charles Marcus:
> What is your concern?
to get flagged as spam without no other reason ;)?
Best regards,
Karol Babioch
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2012-03-02 3:56 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
Am 02.03.2012 19:02, schrieb Charles Marcus:
You are mistaken.
Could you elaborate on that please? Its definitely a common way of
dealing with spam to check whether the PTR record points to the domain,
which the mailserver claims to work for.
>
W
Hi,
Am 02.03.2012 19:02, schrieb Charles Marcus:
> You are mistaken.
Could you elaborate on that please? Its definitely a common way of
dealing with spam to check whether the PTR record points to the domain,
which the mailserver claims to work for.
When my PTR record points to "example.com", but
On 3/2/2012 1:46 PM, Gary Chambers wrote:
> All,
>
> I had a piece of spam slip through this morning and I'm hoping it's
> beneficial
> that I post this information. Specifically, I'm wondering why the
> mail was
> delivered from a host without rDNS. The relevant portion of the log
> is as
> fol
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:46:03PM -0500, Gary Chambers wrote:
> I had a piece of spam slip through this morning and I'm hoping it's
> beneficial that I post this information. Specifically, I'm
> wondering why the mail was delivered from a host without rDNS. The
> relevant portion of the log i
On 3/2/2012 1:09 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> someone made this statement to me:
>
> | The MTA will record the IP address of the server that sent the message.
> | However, under some circumstances the MTA is not able to find that IP
> address.
Logging the client IP has nothing to
Hi!
Just for your information: not all hosts have correctly set rDNS.
I suggest you try setting up an actual spam filter (like assp,
spamassasin or other), spam is everyday harder to fight.
Ildefonso.
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Gary Chambers wrote:
> All,
>
> I had a piece of spam slip th
All,
I had a piece of spam slip through this morning and I'm hoping it's beneficial
that I post this information. Specifically, I'm wondering why the mail was
delivered from a host without rDNS. The relevant portion of the log is as
follows:
Mar 2 10:28:52 lollipop postfix/smtpd[3621]: warnin
Greetings,
someone made this statement to me:
| The MTA will record the IP address of the server that sent the message.
| However, under some circumstances the MTA is not able to find that IP address.
how would i verify that my MTA is finding the IP?
(this may explain a lot of my issues. if po
--On Friday, March 02, 2012 4:31 PM +0400 Michael Tokarev
wrote:
On 02.03.2012 16:25, Nerijus Kislauskas wrote:
On 03/02/2012 01:56 PM, Jerry wrote:
There is <...> no custom "Postfix schema"
Hi,
maybe it is worth to make one to stop question cycle "where I can get
postfix.schema for LDAP?
On 2012-03-02 12:53 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
That's exactly what I'm trying to prevent, because the PTR record for
this IP points to "example.com". I'm guessing I'm getting into trouble
when there is a mismatch, because its standard procedure when trying to
block spam.
You are mistaken.
--
B
Hi,
Am 02.03.2012 18:51, schrieb Charles Marcus:
> name it mail.example.com, or smtp.example.com, or something like that.
> Then local mail is the form u...@mail.example.com, instead of
> u...@example.com.
That's exactly what I'm trying to prevent, because the PTR record for
this IP points to "ex
On 2012-03-02 12:32 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.03.2012 18:19, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2012-03-02 10:32 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
and you can make a 100% constistent backup pf this
many small files while the service is running?
you can not!
While all of this is totally OT for postfix,
On 2012-03-02 12:46 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
thanks for your reply. However I'm not quite sure whether I've
understood your advice in the right way. What value would $myhostname
have in the above example? Because when I set $myhostname to
"example.com"
example.com is a FQDN, not a hostname.
Hi,
Am 02.03.2012 10:26, schrieb Ansgar Wiechers:
> True, and the recommended way of handling things. However, the "main"
> domain of the server can be the server itself, and you can restrict the
> valid local mailboxes via $local_recipient_maps:
>
> 8<
> mydestination = $myhostname
> loc
Am 02.03.2012 18:19, schrieb Charles Marcus:
> On 2012-03-02 10:32 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> and you can make a 100% constistent backup pf this
>> many small files while the service is running?
>>
>> you can not!
>
> While all of this is totally OT for postfix, I just had to ask
> you have h
On Mar 2, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.03.2012 17:29, schrieb Mailinglist:
I won't be storing for long term and won't require backing up either.
It's more for custom php to query the emails that I receive.
The influx of email will only grow over time. Writing perl scripts to
On 2012-03-02 10:32 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
and you can make a 100% constistent backup pf this
many small files while the service is running?
you can not!
While all of this is totally OT for postfix, I just had to ask - you
have heard of LVM/snapshots, right?
--
Best regards,
Charles
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Chris
> Sent: 02 March 2012 16:55
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Queue ID with amavisd
>
> 2012/3/2 /dev/rob0 :
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:32:18PM +0100
2012/3/2 /dev/rob0 :
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:32:18PM +0100, Chris wrote:
>> 2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
>> > * Chris :
>> >> 2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
>> >> > * Chris :
>> >> >> I am using Postfix with amavisd.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com
>> >> >> (mail-wi0-f174
Am 02.03.2012 17:29, schrieb Mailinglist:
> I won't be storing for long term and won't require backing up either.
> It's more for custom php to query the emails that I receive.
> The influx of email will only grow over time. Writing perl scripts to
> look at flat txt files I feel will be too
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:32:18PM +0100, Chris wrote:
> 2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > * Chris :
> >> 2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> >> > * Chris :
> >> >> I am using Postfix with amavisd.
> >> >>
> >> >> Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com
> >> >> (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174])
* Chris :
> 2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > * Chris :
> >> 2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> >> > * Chris :
> >> >> Hello Postfix Users :)
> >> >>
> >> >> I am using Postfix with amavisd.
> >> >>
> >> >> Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
> >> >> [209.85.212.174])
> >> >>
2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Chris :
>> 2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
>> > * Chris :
>> >> Hello Postfix Users :)
>> >>
>> >> I am using Postfix with amavisd.
>> >>
>> >> Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
>> >> [209.85.212.174])
>> >> by my.postfix-server.org
On Mar 2, 2012, at 11:08 AM, "mail...@securitylabs.it"
wrote:
> Il 02/03/2012 16:32, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
>> because i can write my own admin-backends and have a FULL SQL driven
>> mailsystem with replication slave what can be used for postfix
>> as fallback / load balancer
> Just like me
Am 02.03.2012 17:08, schrieb mail...@securitylabs.it:
>> how do you do your backups?
> Bacula with Accurate backup
another software needed
>> i stop the slave per cron, make the backup with rsync
>> and start the slave again having a 100% consistent
>> copy
> You need two server or at least two
* Chris :
> 2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > * Chris :
> >> Hello Postfix Users :)
> >>
> >> I am using Postfix with amavisd.
> >>
> >> Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
> >> [209.85.212.174])
> >> by my.postfix-server.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS <<< no Queue ID
Il 02/03/2012 16:32, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
because i can write my own admin-backends and have a FULL SQL driven
mailsystem with replication slave what can be used for postfix
as fallback / load balancer
Just like me, web interface in php/mysql to manage domains and users,
the difference is t
2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Chris :
>> Hello Postfix Users :)
>>
>> I am using Postfix with amavisd.
>>
>> Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
>> [209.85.212.174])
>> by my.postfix-server.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS <<< no Queue ID
>>
>> Where is the Postfix
* Chris :
> Hello Postfix Users :)
>
> I am using Postfix with amavisd.
>
> Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
> [209.85.212.174])
> by my.postfix-server.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS <<< no Queue ID
>
> Where is the Postfix queue ID?
It's logged by the second
Hello Postfix Users :)
I am using Postfix with amavisd.
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
[209.85.212.174])
by my.postfix-server.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS <<< no Queue ID
Where is the Postfix queue ID?
my master.cf:
smtpd pass - - n
Am 02.03.2012 16:08, schrieb mail...@securitylabs.it:
> Il 02/03/2012 15:54, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
>>
>> Am 02.03.2012 13:19, schrieb Al:
>>> I'm curious if anyone uses DBMail with postfix to store mail.
>>> If so, what is the performance, could it be ran on
>>> the same system as posfix whil
On Mar 2, 2012, at 10:08 AM, "mail...@securitylabs.it"
wrote:
> Il 02/03/2012 15:54, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
>>
>>
>> Am 02.03.2012 13:19, schrieb Al:
>>> I'm curious if anyone uses DBMail with postfix to store mail.
>>> If so, what is the performance, could it be ran on
>>> the same sys
Il 02/03/2012 15:54, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
Am 02.03.2012 13:19, schrieb Al:
I'm curious if anyone uses DBMail with postfix to store mail.
If so, what is the performance, could it be ran on
the same system as posfix while receiving thousands of emails a day?
"some thousands of mails" are pe
Am 02.03.2012 13:19, schrieb Al:
> I'm curious if anyone uses DBMail with postfix to store mail.
> If so, what is the performance, could it be ran on
> the same system as posfix while receiving thousands of emails a day?
we are running dbmail since summer 2009 on all mailservers
with postfix a
On Friday, March 02, 2012 at 14:29:27 UTC, michael.demelba...@wsr.ac.at
confabulated:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 07:19:41AM -0500, Al wrote:
>> I'm curious if anyone uses DBMail with postfix to store mail. If
>> so, what is the performance, could it be ran on the same system as
>> posfix while re
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 07:19:41AM -0500, Al wrote:
> I'm curious if anyone uses DBMail with postfix to store mail. If
> so, what is the performance, could it be ran on the same system as
> posfix while receiving thousands of emails a day?
>
> Does anyone have any other suggestions for a DBMail l
On 03/02/2012 02:57 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> So use any standard schema your LDA and mailbox access method
> (pop/imap/whatever, ie, dovecot/courier-imap/whatever) uses.
You won't believe, but people are asking same questions on dovecot's
mailing list. And the answer is much the same:
"There
* Nerijus Kislauskas :
> On 03/02/2012 02:31 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > It is the other way around: Postfix can use whatever scheme is
> > best for your needs, it does not dictate which schema to use.
> > Different usage scenarious will require different schemas.
>
> 99 cases out of 100 doesn'
On 02.03.2012 16:47, Nerijus Kislauskas wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 02:31 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> It is the other way around: Postfix can use whatever scheme is
>> best for your needs, it does not dictate which schema to use.
>> Different usage scenarious will require different schemas.
>
> 99 ca
On 03/02/2012 02:31 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> It is the other way around: Postfix can use whatever scheme is
> best for your needs, it does not dictate which schema to use.
> Different usage scenarious will require different schemas.
99 cases out of 100 doesn't need different schemas. So you ca
On 02.03.2012 16:25, Nerijus Kislauskas wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 01:56 PM, Jerry wrote:
>> There is <...> no custom "Postfix schema"
>
> Hi,
>
> maybe it is worth to make one to stop question cycle "where I can get
> postfix.schema for LDAP?".
It is the other way around: Postfix can use whatever s
On 03/02/2012 01:56 PM, Jerry wrote:
> There is <...> no custom "Postfix schema"
Hi,
maybe it is worth to make one to stop question cycle "where I can get
postfix.schema for LDAP?".
--
Sincerely,
Nerijus Kislauskas
I'm curious if anyone uses DBMail with postfix to store mail. If so,
what is the performance, could it be ran on the same system as posfix
while receiving thousands of emails a day?
Does anyone have any other suggestions for a DBMail like solution?
Thanks in advance!
On 03/02/2012 01:12 PM, Christian Roessner wrote:
Hi,
Does a Postfix specific (Open)LDAP schema exists ?
or a "mail server specific" ?
I have a custom LDAP schema for my whole mail system, including Postfix,
Dovecot and OpenDKIM. It is not perfect, but I can give it to you, if you want
it.
Hi,
> Does a Postfix specific (Open)LDAP schema exists ?
> or a "mail server specific" ?
I have a custom LDAP schema for my whole mail system, including Postfix,
Dovecot and OpenDKIM. It is not perfect, but I can give it to you, if you want
it.
Best wishes
Christain
---
Roessner-Network-Solut
On 03/02/2012 12:56 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:38:52 +0100
Frank Bonnet articulated:
Does a Postfix specific (Open)LDAP schema exists ?
or a "mail server specific" ?
There is, at least to my knowledge, no custom "Postfix schema"
available. If one was actually available, I might co
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
Ich bin von 2012-02-27 bis einschließlich 2012-03-16 nicht im Büro.
Während dieser Zeit habe ich keinen Zugriff auf meinen Email Account und kann
Ihre Nachricht daher erst ab 2012-02-19 lesen.
In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an unsere Zentrale unter +43
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:38:52 +0100
Frank Bonnet articulated:
> Does a Postfix specific (Open)LDAP schema exists ?
> or a "mail server specific" ?
There is, at least to my knowledge, no custom "Postfix schema"
available. If one was actually available, I might consider using LDAP
as opposed to MySQ
Hello
Does a Postfix specific (Open)LDAP schema exists ?
or a "mail server specific" ?
Thank you
On 2012-03-02 Karol Babioch wrote:
> I've got a server, which can be found at the domain "example.com"
> (including a PTR record for reverse DNS lookups).
>
> Now I want to run a mailserver for "example.com", but I don't want to
> create local users, but instead use virtual mailboxing.
>
> Furthe
59 matches
Mail list logo
