Stephen Atkins:
> So is this valid or bad?
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>permit_mynetworks,
>permit_sasl_authenticated,
>reject_unauth_destination,
This is safe. When you put the access table lookups after these,
then you can't become an open relay.
Wietse
On 12/30/2011 4:11 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stephen Atkins:
On 12/30/2011 3:59 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stephen Atkins:
So it turns out my replacement while I was on vacation modified my
main.cf. I went back to an back up I have a few weeks ago and changed
it back. Now I don't have that prob
Stephen Atkins:
> On 12/30/2011 3:59 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Stephen Atkins:
> >> So it turns out my replacement while I was on vacation modified my
> >> main.cf. I went back to an back up I have a few weeks ago and changed
> >> it back. Now I don't have that problem any more. What it came
On 12/30/2011 3:59 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stephen Atkins:
So it turns out my replacement while I was on vacation modified my
main.cf. I went back to an back up I have a few weeks ago and changed
it back. Now I don't have that problem any more. What it came down to
was "check_relay_domains"
Stephen Atkins:
> So it turns out my replacement while I was on vacation modified my
> main.cf. I went back to an back up I have a few weeks ago and changed
> it back. Now I don't have that problem any more. What it came down to
> was "check_relay_domains" had been removed for some reason.
U
Am 30.12.2011 20:59, schrieb Al Zick:
> I know I don't have a back scater problem.
but you have many other problems sending such a phrase
without context and subject to a mailing-list
what did you want to tell us?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 12/30/2011 2:12 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Friday 30 December 2011 14:46:46 Lorens Kockum wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:51:27PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
These are rejected and not useful to our discussion. Please
show ALL the postfix logging of a suspect transaction that
makes it to your q
On 30 Dec 2011, at 21:47, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Sabahattin Gucukoglu:
>> Couldn't find any clear answers to this question anywhere in the
>> documentation. I'm not specifically referencing the error, retry
>> or discard transports. Can I keep them commented out in master.cf?
>> Are they used int
Sabahattin Gucukoglu:
> Hi,
>
> Couldn't find any clear answers to this question anywhere in the
> documentation. I'm not specifically referencing the error, retry
> or discard transports. Can I keep them commented out in master.cf?
> Are they used internally?
Postfix uses error and retry when
On 2011-12-30 20:33, Lee Roth wrote:
Currently, we have a Postfix V2.4.5 server
That is quite old; consider upgrading to at least one of the current 2.8
branches.
with no local accounts receiving email.
We permit internal, local systems to freely use the system as a relay:
smtpd_client_r
On Friday 30 December 2011 14:46:46 Lorens Kockum wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:51:27PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> > These are rejected and not useful to our discussion. Please
> > show ALL the postfix logging of a suspect transaction that
> > makes it to your queue. In particular, we want
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:51:27PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> These are rejected and not useful to our discussion. Please show
> ALL the postfix logging of a suspect transaction that makes it to
> your queue. In particular, we want to see if there is a
> sasl_username= line logged for a suspiciou
* Sabahattin Gucukoglu :
> Hi,
>
> Couldn't find any clear answers to this question anywhere in the
> documentation.
man 8 error
> I'm not specifically referencing the error, retry or discard
> transports.
You're not? (typo?)
> Can I keep them commented out in master.cf? Are they used interna
Hi,
Couldn't find any clear answers to this question anywhere in the documentation.
I'm not specifically referencing the error, retry or discard transports. Can
I keep them commented out in master.cf? Are they used internally?
Cheers,
Sabahattin
I know I don't have a back scater problem.
Currently, we have a Postfix V2.4.5 server with no local accounts receiving
email.
We permit internal, local systems to freely use the system as a relay:
smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject
permit_mynetworks
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 295.283.0.0/16, 10.0.0.0/8
(internal s
On 12/30/2011 11:31 AM, Stephen Atkins wrote:
>
> Here is the output of my postconf -n
>
> bounce_queue_lifetime = 2h
Instead of covering up the problem of a queue full of bounces, don't
accept mail you aren't able to deliver. This usually means don't
use wildcard aliases, do correctly populat
Stephen Atkins:
> sorry for the inconvenience. Looks like I just have to fix that.
> Here's the log of a couple:
>
> Dec 30 10:29:02 mta5 postfix/smtpd[3679]: E6F13186001: reject: RCPT from
> unknown[113.94.89.26]: 554 5.7.1 : Recipient
> address rejected: 521; from=
> to= proto=ESMTP helo=
>
Without knowing for sure I would say that one of your accounts has been
compromised and is being used to send out spam.
Look at your messages on the postfix queue, usually under
/var/spool/postfix. Use the strings command to search through the queued
email and look for common patterns like the sam
On 12/30/2011 10:26 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 12/30/2011 11:19 AM, Stephen Atkins wrote:
On 12/30/2011 10:17 AM, Gary Smith wrote:
I've been administering the same postfix server for years so I'm
a little
confused as to how this happened. Granted postifx hasn't been
updated in a
year or so.
Th
On 12/30/2011 10:19 AM, Stephen Atkins wrote:
On 12/30/2011 10:17 AM, Gary Smith wrote:
I've been administering the same postfix server for years so I'm a
little
confused as to how this happened. Granted postifx hasn't been updated
in a
year or so.
This morning I came in to a mailq of over 9300
On 12/30/2011 11:19 AM, Stephen Atkins wrote:
> On 12/30/2011 10:17 AM, Gary Smith wrote:
>>> I've been administering the same postfix server for years so I'm
>>> a little
>>> confused as to how this happened. Granted postifx hasn't been
>>> updated in a
>>> year or so.
>>>
>>> This morning I came
Am 30.12.2011 18:19, schrieb Stephen Atkins:
> On 12/30/2011 10:17 AM, Gary Smith wrote:
>>> I've been administering the same postfix server for years so I'm a little
>>> confused as to how this happened. Granted postifx hasn't been updated in a
>>> year or so.
>>>
>>> This morning I came in to
On 12/30/2011 10:53 AM, Mark wrote:
> My apologies for the cross-posting but I believe it is relevant.
>
> I have been running postfix for 8+ months without problems.
> Recently ( a week or two) I had a user complain that he could no
> longer send. It appears that postfix is no longer accept
On 12/30/2011 10:17 AM, Gary Smith wrote:
I've been administering the same postfix server for years so I'm a little
confused as to how this happened. Granted postifx hasn't been updated in a
year or so.
This morning I came in to a mailq of over 93000 messages all destine to
@yahoo.com.tw
For n
> I've been administering the same postfix server for years so I'm a little
> confused as to how this happened. Granted postifx hasn't been updated in a
> year or so.
>
> This morning I came in to a mailq of over 93000 messages all destine to
> @yahoo.com.tw
>
> For now I'm just blocking all ema
I've been administering the same postfix server for years so I'm a
little confused as to how this happened. Granted postifx hasn't been
updated in a year or so.
This morning I came in to a mailq of over 93000 messages all destine to
@yahoo.com.tw
For now I'm just blocking all email destined
My apologies for the cross-posting but I believe it is relevant.
I have been running postfix for 8+ months without problems.
Recently ( a week or two) I had a user complain that he could no longer
send. It appears that postfix is no longer accepting SSL/TLS
connections. STARTTLS is work
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 09:27:08AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > This is easily done with Postfix virtual_alias_maps (NOT:
> > virtual_alias_domains).
> >
> > If the user wants a local copy:
> >
> > Search string Lookup result
> > u...@example.com -> u...@example.com, xxx@yyy.exam
pritam raote:
> Hello,
>
> * DSN(sender delivery status notification) does not work on my box running
> postfix.
> * the version of postfix on the non working box is postfix-2.8.7-1
DSN works only if:
1 - The POSTFIX SMTP server sends the DSN announcement to the REMOTE
SMTP client.
2 - The
Hello,
* DSN(sender delivery status notification) does not work on my box running
postfix.
* the version of postfix on the non working box is postfix-2.8.7-1
In Mozilla Thunderebird
write message --> options --> Delivery Status Notification
* Read this didnt help much http://www.postfix.org/DSN_
Wietse Venema:
> G?bor L?n?rt:
> > implement). However there is the project now that every mail user can set
> > forward address (or even addresses - it's possible to give more forward
> > addresses) with or without the "local copy" option (which means: original
> > rcpt will receive it too, "with
G?bor L?n?rt:
> implement). However there is the project now that every mail user can set
> forward address (or even addresses - it's possible to give more forward
> addresses) with or without the "local copy" option (which means: original
> rcpt will receive it too, "without local copy" means tha
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 03:01:03PM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> >The key of my idea: I don't even bother mail store server even if I am able
> >to. The reason: why I have to give load to the mail store server to pass
> >mails there which will be forwarded then back, if I can do the forward step
On 2011-12-30 14:52, Gábor Lénárt wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 08:12:59AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:01:52 +0100
Gábor Lénárt articulated:
I have a "mail store server" which is's not an open source software
and I can't modify its internals (neither it supports the feature I
h
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 08:12:59AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:01:52 +0100
> Gábor Lénárt articulated:
>
> > I have a "mail store server" which is's not an open source software
> > and I can't modify its internals (neither it supports the feature I
> > have to implement).
>
> I c
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:01:52 +0100
Gábor Lénárt articulated:
> I have a "mail store server" which is's not an open source software
> and I can't modify its internals (neither it supports the feature I
> have to implement).
I cannot speak for others; however, I feel I could be of more
assistance t
Hi,
I have a "mail store server" which is's not an open source software and I
can't modify its internals (neither it supports the feature I have to
implement). However there is the project now that every mail user can set
forward address (or even addresses - it's possible to give more forward
add
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt <
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de> wrote:
> * DN Singh :
>
> > So Ralf, with a score of 99 with ReturnPath, what is the maximum delivery
> > that you have got to hotmail in a single day?
>
> on mail.python.org for the last week:
>
> 2554 28th
> 3764 2
On 2011-12-30 08:18, Goutam Baul wrote:
Dear List,
Is there any performance related or other concerns if I try to send
mail to a group containing thousands of users (say 8000) using the
alias map? In case we want to use alias map for this, then which type
of db we should use?
With regards,
40 matches
Mail list logo
