On 12/20/2011 02:13 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stan Hoeppner:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On 12/19/2011 5:10 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 12/19/2011 12:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tolga:
I did like you said (did a postmap -q ip.add.ress.here
cidr:sinokorea.cidr). Today, I
Stan Hoeppner:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On 12/19/2011 5:10 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > On 12/19/2011 12:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >> Tolga:
> >>> I did like you said (did a postmap -q ip.add.ress.here
> >>> cidr:sinokorea.cidr). Today, I thought I'd check logs, and o
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 07:54:59AM -0800, Who Me wrote:
>
> > Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my
> > new one (V2.8.7) update their relay_recipients table daily
>
> This table is consulted *only* by smtpd(8).
>
> > On the older box, every day I see a messa
On 12/19/2011 5:10 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 12/19/2011 12:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Tolga:
>>> I did like you said (did a postmap -q ip.add.ress.here
>>> cidr:sinokorea.cidr). Today, I thought I'd check logs, and one thing I
>>> noticed is Dec 19 20:09:24 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[161
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 07:54:59AM -0800, Who Me wrote:
> Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my
> new one (V2.8.7) update their relay_recipients table daily
This table is consulted *only* by smtpd(8).
> On the older box, every day I see a message stating that
> hash:/etc/postf
On 12/19/2011 12:21 PM, Who Me wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestions. I like the way you think - but unfortunately,
> none of the services are chrooted. I am able to see other (normal) postfix
> messages in syslog. Additionally, both boxes are configured to log all mail
> messages the same:
On 2011-12-16 17:28, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-12-16 5:27 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 2011-12-13 12:30, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-12-13 3:11 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Yes, I caught that. (But thanks for the note, anyway). I plan to
let inbox be mbox format, just like it is in a "nor
On 12/19/2011 12:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Tolga:
>> I did like you said (did a postmap -q ip.add.ress.here
>> cidr:sinokorea.cidr). Today, I thought I'd check logs, and one thing I
>> noticed is Dec 19 20:09:24 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[16163]:
>> NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mail2-188.sinam
On 12/19/2011 12:21 PM, Who Me wrote:
>
>
>>> I'm in the process of replacing the hardware for my external mail relay.
>>> Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my new one (V2.8.7)
>>> update their relay_recipients table daily from Active Directory, using a
>>> very similar me
Tolga:
> I did like you said (did a postmap -q ip.add.ress.here
> cidr:sinokorea.cidr). Today, I thought I'd check logs, and one thing I
> noticed is Dec 19 20:09:24 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[16163]:
> NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mail2-188.sinamail.sina.com.cn[60.28.2.188]:
> 451 4.3.5 Server co
Forgot to CC
Original Message
Subject:Re: CIDR
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:27:50 +0200
From: Tolga
To: s...@hardwarefreak.com
On 18-12-2011 13:36, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 12/18/2011 4:49 AM, Duane Hill wrote:
Hi, I've confirmed that the IP is from China, u
>> I'm in the process of replacing the hardware for my external mail relay.
>> Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my new one (V2.8.7)
>> update their relay_recipients table daily from Active Directory, using a
>> very similar method as described here:
>> http://postfix.stat
Zitat von Noel Jones :
On 12/19/2011 9:54 AM, Who Me wrote:
I'm in the process of replacing the hardware for my external mail
relay. Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my
new one (V2.8.7) update their relay_recipients table daily from
Active Directory, using a very s
On 12/19/2011 9:54 AM, Who Me wrote:
>
>
> I'm in the process of replacing the hardware for my external mail relay.
> Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my new one (V2.8.7)
> update their relay_recipients table daily from Active Directory, using a very
> similar method as d
Claudio Prono:
> cat 1324286018.V811I1ea270M489235.mail | strace /usr/bin/vacation -t1
> testmedia
>
> But no way, no results at all
This will only send a reply if the message has testmedia
in the To: or Cc: header.
Wietse
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Claudio Prono wrote:
> I have thinked also to this, so i have deleted the .vacation.db, re-do
> vacation -I [user] then do
>
> cat 1324286018.V811I1ea270M489235.mail | strace /usr/bin/vacation -t1
> testmedia
>
> But no way, no results at all
If you're reall
Il 19/12/2011 17.06, Pierre Girard ha scritto:
> Le 2011-12-19 10:37, Claudio Prono a écrit :
>> Claudio Prono:
For my vacation is different, from the man page:
-tNChange the interval between repeat replies to the same
sender. N is the number of days between repli
Il 19/12/2011 16.52, Ralf Hildebrandt ha scritto:
> * Claudio Prono :
>
>> cat 1324286018.V811I1ea270M489235.mail | strace /usr/bin/vacation -t0
>> testmedia
> OK. There are two different versions of vacation. The one that's
> giving ME the best results is from Marco D'Itri. The other version
>
Le 2011-12-19 10:37, Claudio Prono a écrit :
Claudio Prono:
For my vacation is different, from the man page:
-tNChange the interval between repeat replies to the same
sender. N is the number of days between replies. Default is one week..
Infact, my command line is
Maybe is a my p
Am 19.12.2011 16:53, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Hi Patrick, die wuerden sowas machen
> hab kurz mit dem telefoniert
>
> Dr. Henning Blaufuß
> Rechtsanwalt
> Peters, Schönberger & Partner GbR
> Schackstr. 2, D-80539 München
> Tel.: 089-38172-0 Fax.: 089-38172-204
> E-mail: h.blauf...@psp.eu
> In
I'm in the process of replacing the hardware for my external mail relay. Both
my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my new one (V2.8.7) update
their relay_recipients table daily from Active Directory, using a very similar
method as described here:
http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/pa
Hi Patrick, die wuerden sowas machen
hab kurz mit dem telefoniert
Dr. Henning Blaufuß
Rechtsanwalt
Peters, Schönberger & Partner GbR
Schackstr. 2, D-80539 München
Tel.: 089-38172-0 Fax.: 089-38172-204
E-mail: h.blauf...@psp.eu
Internet: http://www.psp.eu
wie gesagt ist ein Kunde der NCI
Stunden
* Claudio Prono :
> cat 1324286018.V811I1ea270M489235.mail | strace /usr/bin/vacation -t0
> testmedia
OK. There are two different versions of vacation. The one that's
giving ME the best results is from Marco D'Itri. The other version
drove me mad.
Find out which one you're using.
--
Ralf Hild
Il 19/12/2011 16.39, Ralf Hildebrandt ha scritto:
> * Claudio Prono :
>
>> Maybe is a my problem and i don't understand, but specifying -t0 is
>> equal to say to the vacation "respond to every mail", or i am wrong?
> Indeed.
>
>> If is true what i know, why the vacation don't respond?
>>> In concl
* Claudio Prono :
> Maybe is a my problem and i don't understand, but specifying -t0 is
> equal to say to the vacation "respond to every mail", or i am wrong?
Indeed.
> If is true what i know, why the vacation don't respond?
> > In conclusion, vacation doing "exit 0" without sending mail is the
Il 19/12/2011 15.31, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
> Claudio Prono:
>> For my vacation is different, from the man page:
>>
>>-tNChange the interval between repeat replies to the same
>> sender. N is the number of days between replies. Default is one week.
>>
>> Infact, my command line is
Claudio Prono:
> For my vacation is different, from the man page:
>
>-tNChange the interval between repeat replies to the same
> sender. N is the number of days between replies. Default is one week.
>
> Infact, my command line is
Read the manpage carefully, and notice that vacation
Il 19/12/2011 13.38, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
> Claudio Prono:
>>> As i can see, the vacation reads the first line of the message, then
>>> exit...but i don't know why
>>>
>>> Any suggestion about this?
> Perhaps this is a good time to RTFM the vacation manual page.
>
>Vacation retu
Claudio Prono:
> > As i can see, the vacation reads the first line of the message, then
> > exit...but i don't know why
> >
> > Any suggestion about this?
Perhaps this is a good time to RTFM the vacation manual page.
Vacation returns a message, ~/.vacation.msg by default, to the send
Il 16/12/2011 10.10, Claudio Prono ha scritto:
> Hello all,
>
> Into a fresh install of OpenSuSE 12.1, i have some problem to make
> vacation workin (vacation-1.2.6.2-138.1.2.i586).
>
> I have configured vacation like this:
>
> /home/claudio # cat .forward
> \claudio, "|/usr/bin/vacation -t0 -r c
30 matches
Mail list logo
