On 11/8/2011 10:35 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
> On 8 November 2011 15:30, Wietse Venema
> wrote:
>> Simon Brereton:
>>> On 4 November 2011 15:49, Simon Brereton
>>> wrote:
Hi
Amavis checks both incoming and outgoing mail. ?DKIMPROXY
signs outgoing mail (sadly, before Amavis, s
On 8 November 2011 15:30, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Simon Brereton:
>> On 4 November 2011 15:49, Simon Brereton
>> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > Amavis checks both incoming and outgoing mail. ?DKIMPROXY signs
>> > outgoing mail (sadly, before Amavis, so amavis verifies the signature
>> > - but I'm okay
201108
Cleanup: postconf finally supports dynamic configuration
parameter names: parameters whose name depend on a mail
delivery transport name in master.cf, and parameters whose
names are specified with smtpd_restriction_classes in
main.cf. This adds 70 par
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:30:47 +0100, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre
wrote:
You could too take a look to Postfix Quota Reject.
http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net. It's a postfix policy daemon
which allow mail to be rejected at smtp dialogue when mailbox are
overquota... can work from the own mai
On 11/8/2011 6:48 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> His problem is spambots relaying *outbound* through Postfix. This isn't
>> an inbound problem. You're describing an inbound policy.
>
> In that case, any policy daemon that counts the messages or bytes
> per client or sender will do
Simon Brereton:
> On 4 November 2011 15:49, Simon Brereton
> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Amavis checks both incoming and outgoing mail. ?DKIMPROXY signs
> > outgoing mail (sadly, before Amavis, so amavis verifies the signature
> > - but I'm okay with that for now) on the submission port.
> >
> > Mail t
On 4 November 2011 15:49, Simon Brereton wrote:
> Hi
>
> Amavis checks both incoming and outgoing mail. DKIMPROXY signs
> outgoing mail (sadly, before Amavis, so amavis verifies the signature
> - but I'm okay with that for now) on the submission port.
>
> Mail that is injected (i.e. from CRON, ap
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net. It's a postfix policy daemon
which allow mail to be rejected at smtp dialogue when mailbox are
overquota... can work from the own mailbox machine or from t
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net. It's a postfix policy daemon
which allow mail to be rejected at smtp dialogue when mailbox are
overquota... can work from the own mailbox machine or from the own
mailscanning machine farm asking to a daemon in ma
Am 08.11.2011 18:16, schrieb Leslie León Sinclair:
Done, at last!!!
Missing stuff on my install:
[PostfixAdmin config file]
$CONF['used_quotas'] = 'YES'; // Was no activated, this was the main
reason of my past mails. Sorry again.
$CONF['quota'] = 'YES';
Don't forget:
[PostfixAdmin config fi
Done, at last!!!
Missing stuff on my install:
[PostfixAdmin config file]
$CONF['used_quotas'] = 'YES'; // Was no activated, this was the main
reason of my past mails. Sorry again.
$CONF['quota'] = 'YES';
Other changes made:
[Dovecot config file]
protocol imap {
mail_plugins = quota imap_quot
On 8 November 2011 02:53, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 11/8/2011 1:13 AM, Geert Mak wrote:
>
>> We had a user account hacked (weak password) and our SMTP server was used
>> for sending spam. We discovered it after our mail server IP began to show up
>> in RBLs. We improved the passwords, however th
Am 08.11.2011 15:18, schrieb Leslie León Sinclair:
The problem is showing the quota for the users[I have multiple
quotas, a field of a MySQL table], Users1 have 10MB quota and Users2
have 100MB, some users have 250MB, how can I show quota with a query,
with Dovecot or Postfix??? If all my users h
Leslie Le?n Sinclair:
> The problem is showing the quota for the users[I have multiple quotas, a
> field of a MySQL table], Users1 have 10MB quota and Users2 have 100MB,
> some users have 250MB, how can I show quota with a query, with Dovecot
> or Postfix??? If all my users have the same quota,
The problem is showing the quota for the users[I have multiple quotas, a
field of a MySQL table], Users1 have 10MB quota and Users2 have 100MB,
some users have 250MB, how can I show quota with a query, with Dovecot
or Postfix??? If all my users have the same quota, works for me great[I
have tes
Stan Hoeppner:
> His problem is spambots relaying *outbound* through Postfix. This isn't
> an inbound problem. You're describing an inbound policy.
In that case, any policy daemon that counts the messages or bytes
per client or sender will do the job. There are rate limits in
policyd and postfwd
Hi,
Just when I pressed "send" I realize that may be the sender dependent
relayhost maps should be useful too. Have a look at it, if you please.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#sender_dependent_relayhost_maps
Atenciosamente,
---
Fernando Maciel Souto Maior
LPIC/1(31908), LinuxCounter(3913
Hi,
May be you should have a look at transports table, at
http://www.postfix.org/transport.5.html
There are some useful examples you should try.
Best regards,
---
Fernando Maciel Souto Maior
LPIC/1(31908), LinuxCounter(391325)
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:53 AM, vr wrote:
> We have Exchange 201
-Oryginalna wiadomość-
From: Stan Hoeppner
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 11:06 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Symlink problem = file is a symbolic link or Mailbox
vulnerable - directory /var/spool/mail must have 1777 protection
Ok, so it appears you're having Postfix de
On 11/8/2011 3:30 AM, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Leslie León Sinclair wrote:
>
>> Thanks again, and sorry the thread, I´am stacked here. Almost near the
>> solution.
> You could too take a look to Postfix Quota Reject.
> http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net. It's a
On 11/8/2011 2:54 AM, Marek Krolikowski wrote:
>> From: Stan Hoeppner
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 8:59 AM
>> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Subject: Re: Symlink problem = file is a symbolic link or Mailbox
>> vulnerable - directory /var/spool/mail must have 1777 protection
>> Then you nee
On 11/08/2011 10:39 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/banned, ( add this map , it seems to
work :-) )
reject_unauth_pipelining,
permit_mynetworks,
reject_unauth_destination,
reject_unlisted_recipient,
* Frank Bonnet :
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/banned, ( add this map , it seems to
> work :-) )
>reject_unauth_pipelining,
>permit_mynetworks,
>reject_unauth_destination,
>reject_unlisted_recipient,
>permit
I think:
smtpd_recipient_restric
On 11/08/2011 10:16 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet:
On 11/08/2011 09:47 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet:
Hello
I would like to reject or discard outgoing emails to some particuliar
addresses
I'm a bit confuse on what to use the more efficiently.
I would DISCARD it.
Y
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Leslie León Sinclair wrote:
Thanks again, and sorry the thread, I´am stacked here. Almost near the
solution.
Best regards.
You could too take a look to Postfix Quota Reject.
http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net. It's a postfix policy daemon
which allow mail t
* Frank Bonnet :
> On 11/08/2011 09:47 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >* Frank Bonnet:
> >>Hello
> >>
> >>I would like to reject or discard outgoing emails to some particuliar
> >>addresses
> >>I'm a bit confuse on what to use the more efficiently.
> >I would DISCARD it.
> >
> Yes I too but I am con
On 11/08/2011 09:47 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet:
Hello
I would like to reject or discard outgoing emails to some particuliar
addresses
I'm a bit confuse on what to use the more efficiently.
I would DISCARD it.
Yes I too but I am confuse on WHICH Postfix functionnality
to do so
From: Stan Hoeppner
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 8:59 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Symlink problem = file is a symbolic link or Mailbox
vulnerable - directory /var/spool/mail must have 1777 protection
Then you need to tell us what MDA you are currently using and what type
of
* Frank Bonnet :
> Hello
>
> I would like to reject or discard outgoing emails to some particuliar
> addresses
> I'm a bit confuse on what to use the more efficiently.
I would DISCARD it.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Cam
Hello
I would like to reject or discard outgoing emails to some particuliar
addresses
I'm a bit confuse on what to use the more efficiently.
Some machines are infected by some email robots and I would like to block
those outgoing emails during the time we are searching
those infected machine t
Am 08.11.2011 08:13, schrieb Geert Mak:
> Hi,
>
> We had a user account hacked (weak password) and our SMTP server was used for
> sending spam. We discovered it after our mail server IP began to show up in
> RBLs. We improved the passwords, however the question is how best to watch
> the server
31 matches
Mail list logo
