On Jul 11, 2011, at 11:17 PM, Mike Morris wrote:
> On 07/11/2011 10:12 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 11, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/11/2011 8:12 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
I'm trying to set up a relay host with authentication according to these
instructions:
>
On 07/11/2011 10:12 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
>
> On Jul 11, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> On 7/11/2011 8:12 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
>>> I'm trying to set up a relay host with authentication according to these
>>> instructions:
>>>
>>> http://anothersysadmin.wordpress.com/2009/02/06/post
On 2011-07-12 07:49, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
On 11/07/2011 15:01, Wietse Venema wrote:
Rule number one: present actual evidence of the problem. In this
case, present actual evidence that mail stays in the Postfix queue.
Wietse
Apologies
It was in the queues/incoming directory
So show us
On Jul 11, 2011, at 11:07 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 7/12/2011 12:12 AM, Ron Garret wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 11, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/11/2011 8:12 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
I'm trying to set up a relay host with authentication according to these
instructions:
On 7/12/2011 1:09 AM, Ron Garret wrote:
>
> On Jul 11, 2011, at 11:03 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>
>> On 2011-07-12 07:12, Ron Garret wrote:
>>> On Jul 11, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>>
On 7/11/2011 8:12 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
> I'm trying to set up a relay host with authentic
On Jul 11, 2011, at 11:03 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 2011-07-12 07:12, Ron Garret wrote:
>> On Jul 11, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/11/2011 8:12 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
I'm trying to set up a relay host with authentication according to these
instructions:
On 7/12/2011 12:12 AM, Ron Garret wrote:
>
> On Jul 11, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> On 7/11/2011 8:12 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
>>> I'm trying to set up a relay host with authentication according to these
>>> instructions:
>>>
>>> http://anothersysadmin.wordpress.com/2009/02/06/postf
On 2011-07-12 07:12, Ron Garret wrote:
On Jul 11, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 7/11/2011 8:12 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
I'm trying to set up a relay host with authentication according to these
instructions:
http://anothersysadmin.wordpress.com/2009/02/06/postfix-as-relay-to-a-smtp-r
On 11/07/2011 15:01, Wietse Venema wrote:
Rule number one: present actual evidence of the problem. In this
case, present actual evidence that mail stays in the Postfix queue.
Wietse
Apologies
It was in the queues/incoming directory
#ls -la queues/incoming/ | wc -l
384
# perl qshape
On Jul 11, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 7/11/2011 8:12 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
>> I'm trying to set up a relay host with authentication according to these
>> instructions:
>>
>> http://anothersysadmin.wordpress.com/2009/02/06/postfix-as-relay-to-a-smtp-requiring-authentication/
>>
On 7/11/2011 11:16 PM, jeffrey starin wrote:
> I am trying to use the smtp_bind_address command so that three seperate ips
> can be used for 3 separate clients who are using email campaign software as
> explained in this howto:
> http://www.kutukupret.com/2010/01/02/postfix-bind-sender-domain-to-de
On 7/11/2011 8:12 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
> I'm trying to set up a relay host with authentication according to these
> instructions:
>
> http://anothersysadmin.wordpress.com/2009/02/06/postfix-as-relay-to-a-smtp-requiring-authentication/
>
> but it's not working. I know my SMTP server is set up p
I am trying to use the smtp_bind_address command so that three seperate ips
can be used for 3 separate clients who are using email campaign software as
explained in this howto:
http://www.kutukupret.com/2010/01/02/postfix-bind-sender-domain-to-dedicated-outgoing-ip-address/
The error logs show the
I'm trying to set up a relay host with authentication according to these
instructions:
http://anothersysadmin.wordpress.com/2009/02/06/postfix-as-relay-to-a-smtp-requiring-authentication/
but it's not working. I know my SMTP server is set up properly because I can
send mail using various other
Local domains, listed in mydestination, are expected to have equivalent
namespaces. That is every user valid in one, is valid in all.
If you want email addresses to not be tied to the shared namespace of
system accounts, configure the domains in question as
either virtual_mailbox_domains or virtu
Greetings,
We used to have a separate server that handled some spam filtering
duties, and among its functions was only allowing email to specific
user and hostname combinations. We have a few legacy hostnames and
some hostnames we
provide email services for. Say, apple.blah.com, banana.blah.com,
Damien Robinet wrote:
> I am looking for a solution in the Postfix configuration to force it
> to always send emails to the outside and not try to deliver them
> locally.
We have such a setup, but afaik, it's only possible by using two postfix
instances. We have an "inbound" and an "outbound" in
Thank you Viktor, i will try this.
- Georg
Am 11.07.2011 16:57, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:49:19PM +0200, Georg Sch?nweger wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> is it possible to tell postfix to relay all mails from user A
>> (authenticated via SASL as user A) to a certain SMTP server
On 11/07/2011 15:21, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.07.2011 16:12, schrieb Mark Goodge:
On 11/07/2011 15:02, Бак Микаел wrote:
Easy!
Fix the software that your trusted users use to add their domain. Make
THAT software check that the domain's MX record points to the right
place BEFORE you actuall
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:49:19PM +0200, Georg Sch?nweger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to tell postfix to relay all mails from user A
> (authenticated via SASL as user A) to a certain SMTP server? I would
> like to relay all mails by a user (identified by SASL authentication)
> regardless of
Hi,
is it possible to tell postfix to relay all mails from user A
(authenticated via SASL as user A) to a certain SMTP server? I would
like to relay all mails by a user (identified by SASL authentication)
regardless of the envelope sender...
regards,
Georg
Klaus Friis ?stergaard:
> >
> > I have done the tcpdump I see that Postfix exchange some information and in
> > the maillog, I have turned the -v option on, I Don't see traces of the
TURN OFF ALL -V OPTIONS.
Postfix logs all SMTP connect and disconnect events as "connect
from name[address]" and "
On 11.07.2011, at 12:40, Damien Robinet wrote:
This issue is not to be solved in postfix, but in any kind of front-end
(organizational first, then maybe technical).
> We have many agencies that can use our mail server.
> Each agency has one or more domain name. They can add their domain in
Dear Wietse Venema,
>
> I have done the tcpdump I see that Postfix exchange some information and in
> the maillog, I have turned the -v option on, I Don't see traces of the
> communication 14:38 from the fast.it domain in the maillog, I see traces
> in the maillog of the internal 192.168.100.52 se
Mark Goodge:
> On 11/07/2011 15:02, ??? ?? wrote:
> >
> > Easy!
> > Fix the software that your trusted users use to add their domain. Make
> > THAT software check that the domain's MX record points to the right
> > place BEFORE you actually add it to the database.
>
> That's not actually helpf
Am 11.07.2011 16:12, schrieb Mark Goodge:
> On 11/07/2011 15:02, Бак Микаел wrote:
>>
>> Easy!
>> Fix the software that your trusted users use to add their domain. Make
>> THAT software check that the domain's MX record points to the right
>> place BEFORE you actually add it to the database.
>
>
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:12:10 +0100, Mark Goodge wrote:
Easy!
Fix the software that your trusted users use to add their domain.
Make
THAT software check that the domain's MX record points to the right
place BEFORE you actually add it to the database.
That's not actually helpful, because if yo
On 11/07/2011 15:02, Бак Микаел wrote:
Easy!
Fix the software that your trusted users use to add their domain. Make
THAT software check that the domain's MX record points to the right
place BEFORE you actually add it to the database.
That's not actually helpful, because if you want to avoid an
Damien Robinet wrote:
> Hi Harald,
>
> We have many agencies that can use our mail server.
> Each agency has one or more domain name. They can add their domain in
> our system to receive their emails professionals.
>
> We have already limited the users who have the right to the domain
> name in t
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:19:14PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>> Just don't return any result for lookup key.
>>
>
>
> Didn't the OP say that that produced a warning ?
No, what produced a warning, was returning a restring name that expands
to an empty list. Instead, the lookup key should not be
Tom Kinghorn:
> Hi List.
>
> I have a string issue whereby the old queue files appear to remain
> behind after the delivery.
>
> The queue, therefore appears to be growing, even though it is not.
>
> has anyone experienced the same problem?
> If yes, how can I rectify this.
>
> mail_version =
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:03:46 +0200, Damien Robinet wrote:
Is there a solution to force postfix to check the MX of a domain name
?
why ?, an a record is fine with me?
I can not prevent users from adding the domain name in the mail
system.
We limit the rights, but the solution is not optimal.
Hi List.
I have a string issue whereby the old queue files appear to remain
behind after the delivery.
The queue, therefore appears to be growing, even though it is not.
has anyone experienced the same problem?
If yes, how can I rectify this.
mail_version = 2.5.6
SpamAssassin Server version
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.7.5.html]
Postfix legacy releases 2.7.5, 2.6.11 and 2.5.14 are available.
These contain fixes and workarounds that were already included
with Postfix stable release 2.8.4.
Fixed with Postf
On 7/11/2011 4:17 AM, Rytec wrote:
> So I'm afraid pcre is not available
Strange that Debian installs postfix-pcre by default but Ubuntu doesn't.
They both seem to include all the others.
> Or I can install the postfix-pcre module in Ubuntu but Would it do harm or
> willI
> have to reconfigur
Klaus Friis ?stergaard:
> How do I trace down if it is a firewall problem or Postfix problem?
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#sniffer
> Where can I see what actually reaches Postfix?
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
Wietse
Noel Jones:
> > Jul 9 14:32:10 mail postfix/master[3409]: terminating on
> > signal 15
>
>
> [Post in plain text only next time please -- no html]
>
> Postfix master process crashed.
No. The master received the SIGTERM signal, which Postfix
uses internally with "postfix stop".
If you don't wa
Hi,
I am new to postfix, and I am trying to set-up postfix with dovecot on
FreeBSD, following the tutorial on purplehat.org.
I have installed all files, I have the postfix servere running on a DMZ,
locally I can telnet it telnet localhost 25, from my lan inside I can also
telnet 192.168.x.x 25 an
Damien Robinet:
> For example, if a user adds the domain "mma.fr" in the mail system, it
> will receive all emails from users who are sending to MMA.FR.
> The problem is that MMA.FR does not point to the mail server and all
> messages are "stolen" by the user with a catchall...
Postfix works as de
On 11/07/2011 11:40, Damien Robinet wrote:
Hi Harald,
We have many agencies that can use our mail server.
Each agency has one or more domain name. They can add their domain in
our system to receive their emails professionals.
We have already limited the users who have the right to the domain
na
Hi Harald,
We have many agencies that can use our mail server.
Each agency has one or more domain name. They can add their domain in
our system to receive their emails professionals.
We have already limited the users who have the right to the domain
name in the system, but there are always "failu
Am 11.07.2011 12:03, schrieb Damien Robinet:
> Hi All Postfix Users,
>
> Is there a solution to force postfix to check the MX of a domain name ?
it does normally
> I can not prevent users from adding the domain name in the mail system
> We limit the rights, but the solution is not optimal.
wh
Hi All Postfix Users,
Is there a solution to force postfix to check the MX of a domain name ?
I can not prevent users from adding the domain name in the mail system.
We limit the rights, but the solution is not optimal.
For example, if a user adds the domain "mma.fr" in the mail system, it
will
Dear Jeroen, Dear Viktor,
If I put "grey0 = dunno", when this value is used, Postfix return a
Warning on le logfiles.
The rules from Viktor work "grey0 = check_client_access static:dunno" work.
Postfix understand the value and don't give a warning on the logfiles.
With my other script and the pr
Hello Noel,
Thanks for your fast reply, this is the output:
btree
cidr
environ
hash
internal
mysql
nis
proxy
regexp
sdbm
static
tcp
texthash
unix
So I'm afraid pcre is no
45 matches
Mail list logo
