On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 09:50:16 -0700, Steve Jenkins wrote:
>
>> I saw this in my maillog just now:
>>
>> Apr 15 09:03:00 carbonfiber postfix/qmgr[28665]: 53D87104259C:
>> from=, size=16858, nrcpt=1 (queue
>> active) Apr 15 09:03:01 carbonfiber
Heya.
I've had a really simple Postfix server running for a couple of
months. I managed to get a decent hang of smtpd_*_restrictions and
been rejecting a bunch of spam. Not enough though so I'm looking to
do some more protection.
I've been reading about AddOns, and the lots of available ProxyFi
Houcem HACHICHA put forth on 4/15/2011 8:50 AM:
> Hi,
>
> I am using postfix and I would like to send an image in the email
> signature.
> Any idea how to do this?
"I want to add a signature, that contains an image, to all outgoing mail".
Is the above 'translation' correct? If so, look into 'al
Hi,
In <003D9CFDC4BC4D809B6802958A7E1EC7@vxcxc6cd28d6a9>
"selective greylisting with a long delay" on Sun, 10 Apr 2011 23:33:22 -0400,
"pf at alt-ctrl-del.org" wrote:
> Has anyone implemented or experimented with selectively
> greylisting specific networks, with a long delay? Let's say
> 4 h
Mike A. Leonetti:
>My main goal is to "archive" messages with the extra information
>(like what SASL user was used to authenticate to send the message
>etc) that postcat would give. Is it possible to pass that information
>along to a script that would do delivery for example for extra
>tracking inf
My main goal is to "archive" messages with the extra information (like
what SASL user was used to authenticate to send the message etc) that
postcat would give. Is it possible to pass that information along to a
script that would do delivery for example for extra tracking information
even after the
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 09:50:16 -0700, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> I saw this in my maillog just now:
>
> Apr 15 09:03:00 carbonfiber postfix/qmgr[28665]: 53D87104259C:
> from=, size=16858, nrcpt=1 (queue
> active) Apr 15 09:03:01 carbonfiber amavis[28076]: (28076-20) Blocked
> BAD-HEADER, [50.22.180.1
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 05:53:25PM -0400, James Chase wrote:
>
>> Locking methods should overlap with those used by all programs
>> otherwise files will be corrupted.
>>
>> Wietse
> Thanks, Wietse. I don't think postfix is corrupting any of the files. They
> are relayed via a transport map t
Locking methods should overlap with those used by all programs
otherwise files will be corrupted.
Wietse
Thanks, Wietse. I don't think postfix is corrupting any of the files.
They are relayed via a transport map to the SMTP server of SmarterMail
and then delivered to the users mailbox
James Chase:
> We have an issue with our SmarterMail mailboxes, especially via IMAP
> connections, where messages will become corrupted and/or deleted from
> the server. Just curious if there was anyone else out there also using
> Postfix and Smartermail together who has experienced the same sor
Am 15.04.2011 22:59, schrieb Jo Galara:
> Is there a way to bind Mail Submission on an own IP address? Now it's
> listening on the IPs I set in "smtp_bind_address" and
> "smtp_bind_address6". Is there a way to change the listening
> address of mail submission to an own IP address or let it listen o
Is there a way to bind Mail Submission on an own IP address? Now it's
listening on the IPs I set in "smtp_bind_address" and
"smtp_bind_address6". Is there a way to change the listening
address of mail submission to an own IP address or let it listen on IPv4
only?
--
Regards,
Jo Galara
signatu
We have an issue with our SmarterMail mailboxes, especially via IMAP
connections, where messages will become corrupted and/or deleted from
the server. Just curious if there was anyone else out there also using
Postfix and Smartermail together who has experienced the same sort of
issues, or if y
On 04/12/2011 05:34 PM, Zhou, Yan wrote:
Hi There,
How do you gather statistics for messages delivered and processed via
Postfix (both inbound and outbound)?
Use pflogsumm.pl - it's a standard of sorts.
http://linxnet.com/postfix_contrib.html
For instance, to show on a daily
basis, how many
On 04/14/2011 08:07 PM, Lima Union wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:45 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 01:19:03PM -0300, Lima Union wrote:
Hi, I believe that this question is slightly OT but I'm seeing this
syslog format in Postfix: "Apr 10 08:53:12 relay1
postfix/cleanu
> Apr 14 17:22:57 tilapia postfix/smtp[19383]: 8F27A27954:
> to=, relay=mailrelay.imsweb.com[204.132.58.6],
> delay=0, status=bounced (host mailrelay.imsweb.com[204.132.58.6] said:
> 554 Format restriction violation. Email Session ID:
> {4DA765B1-6-6565EC3F-} (in reply to end of DATA command))
Shields, Rusty (IMS):
> Apr 14 17:22:57 tilapia postfix/smtp[19383]: 8F27A27954:
> to=, relay=mailrelay.imsweb.com[204.132.58.6],
> delay=0, status=bounced (host mailrelay.imsweb.com[204.132.58.6]
> said: 554 Format restriction violation. Email Session ID:
> {4DA765B1-6-6565EC3F-} (in reply to
Hi All,
Our postfix server has recently started reporting bounces for emails that are
being successfully delivered. These are all for email addresses that are all
within our domain, with one server acting as a relay for multiple servers
within our organization. Also, there's no real pattern t
Steve Jenkins wrote:
I saw this in my maillog just now:
Apr 15 09:03:00 carbonfiber postfix/qmgr[28665]: 53D87104259C:
from=, size=16858, nrcpt=1 (queue
active)
Apr 15 09:03:01 carbonfiber amavis[28076]: (28076-20) Blocked
BAD-HEADER, [50.22.180.134] [50.22.180.134]
-> , Message-ID:
<3297072511
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:58:38PM +0100, Jon Cutting wrote:
> Normally I'd use altermime as a content filter that puts the mail back
> into the queue with the sendmail command. In the case of multiple postfix
> instances, I don't seem to be able to find a way to specify which queue
> to put the m
On 04/15/2011 01:58 AM, Alexander Grüner wrote:
> The right forum is a SuSE support forum.
Ok, I will go there.
The postfix shipped in SLES is usually a bit stale anyway. I typically
grab a postfix source rpm from suse factory and rebuild it on SLES.
Here are some newish packages includin
I saw this in my maillog just now:
Apr 15 09:03:00 carbonfiber postfix/qmgr[28665]: 53D87104259C:
from=, size=16858, nrcpt=1 (queue
active)
Apr 15 09:03:01 carbonfiber amavis[28076]: (28076-20) Blocked
BAD-HEADER, [50.22.180.134] [50.22.180.134]
-> , Message-ID:
<3297072511617582...@ibu134.olepyk
Houcem HACHICHA:
> Hi,
>
> I am using postfix and I would like to send an image in the email
> signature.
> Any idea how to do this?
a) You use a mail submission program that formats email messages
according to the MIME standards.
b) You write a mail submission program that formats email mess
Am 15.04.2011 16:29, schrieb Ram:
> How can I configure postfix to silently discard mails from ips
> listed in a DNS blacklist
i hope your mailserver is private only because this idea disqualifies
you as server administrator!
why?
nobody would be able to find troubles if this would be possibl
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 07:59:17PM +0530, Ram wrote:
> How can I configure postfix to silently discard mails from ips
> listed in a DNS blacklist
Why do you want to do this? What problem will it solve, and what
benefit do you expect to see from doing this? I think it sounds
terrible.
> default
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:50:21 +0100
Houcem HACHICHA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using postfix and I would like to send an image in the email
> signature.
> Any idea how to do this?
Postfix is an MTA (Mail Transport Agent, or mail server). Things like
what goes in your email signature, etc. are a matt
* Ram :
> Hi,
>
> How can I configure postfix to silently discard mails from ips listed
> in a DNS blacklist
You can't. Just reject them, its the most efficient method (in terms
of traffic)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
C
Hi,
How can I configure postfix to silently discard mails from ips listed in
a DNS blacklist
default_rbl_reply=DISCARD
does not work ( Obviously I made this up .. that was not documented
anywhere :-) )
Thanks
Ram
* James Seymour :
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:17:06 +0200
> Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > * James Seymour :
> >
> > > I'm curious: How might one gather and process mail server statistics
> > > *other* than parsing and processing the mail server's log file(s)?
> >
> > The server could be gathering
Am 15.04.2011 15:50, schrieb Houcem HACHICHA:
> Hi,
>
> I am using postfix and I would like to send an image in the email signature.
> Any idea how to do this?
>
> Thank you in advance
Postfix is a MTA and has nothing to do with the mail-body!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sign
Hi,
I am using postfix and I would like to send an image in the email
signature.
Any idea how to do this?
Thank you in advance
--
*Regads,
Houcem*
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:17:06 +0200
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * James Seymour :
>
> > I'm curious: How might one gather and process mail server statistics
> > *other* than parsing and processing the mail server's log file(s)?
>
> The server could be gathering stats (snmp style) in a "stats"
> da
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:15:50 +0200
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>
>
> Am 15.04.2011 15:06, schrieb James Seymour:
> > I'm curious: How might one gather and process mail server statistics
> > *other* than parsing and processing the mail server's log file(s)?
>
> Query amavis snmp agent. It keeps
* James Seymour :
> I'm curious: How might one gather and process mail server statistics
> *other* than parsing and processing the mail server's log file(s)?
The server could be gathering stats (snmp style) in a "stats" daemon
(which is, like qmgr, long running). Upon stop it would write
statisti
Am 15.04.2011 15:06, schrieb James Seymour:
> I'm curious: How might one gather and process mail server statistics
> *other* than parsing and processing the mail server's log file(s)?
Query amavis snmp agent. It keeps track of Postfix queue status if it
finds Postfix queues.
p@rick
--
state o
Replying to Yan via a follow-up to Zoltan, as I didn't see Yan's
original question...
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:08:30 +0200
Zoltan Balogh wrote:
> 2011/4/12 Zhou, Yan
>
[snip]
> > I have seen some options relying on passing the maillog file, I
> > wonder if there is any other option?
> >
[snip]
On 4/15/2011 4:14 AM, Jannis Kafkoulas wrote:
Hi,
Sometimes we receive mails with sender-domain our company,
i.e. from: any...@mycompany.com to: some...@mycompany.com which we'd like to
block (the entire domain).
Can it be done e.g. by header checks?
Or is it possible at all?
You can block ma
2011/4/15 Noel Jones :
> On 4/15/2011 5:47 AM, Timo Veith wrote:
>>
>> Hi postfix users,
>>
>> I think I don't understand the ADDRESS_REWRITING_README in the
>> "virtual" section where it says:
>>
>> "Addresses found in virtual alias maps are subjected to
>> another iteration of virtual aliasing, b
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:56:05PM +0200, Alexander Gr?ner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just learned about http://support.novell.com/security/cve/ and especially
> http://support.novell.com/security/cve/CVE-2011-0411.html.
>
> Just for future requests...
>
> Answer from Novell "The updates for this issue are
2011/4/12 Zhou, Yan
> How do you gather statistics for messages delivered and processed via
> Postfix (both inbound and outbound)? For instance, to show on a daily
> basis, how many messages we have received from each domain, how many
> messages we have delivered to each domain, etc.
>
> I have s
Hi,
just learned about http://support.novell.com/security/cve/ and
especially http://support.novell.com/security/cve/CVE-2011-0411.html.
Just for future requests...
Answer from Novell "The updates for this issue are in QA and will be
released to the update channels in the next week."
Fine.
On 4/15/2011 5:47 AM, Timo Veith wrote:
Hi postfix users,
I think I don't understand the ADDRESS_REWRITING_README in the
"virtual" section where it says:
"Addresses found in virtual alias maps are subjected to
another iteration of virtual aliasing, but are not subjected
to canonical mapping, in
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:31:18PM +0200, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
> This is the recommended submission setup and the most common MUAs
> (Thunderbird, Outlook, Evolution etc.) will not ignore certificate
> verification failures, no?
> So every public submission service correctly setup is affec
Thank you to all for your responses. I'm learning a lot from them.
I was curious about the multiple froms in the received header. It's
unconventional to me. In my twenty years dealing with mail I can't recall
receiving a message with this kind of header before. Also, in Mailman there no
fi
Hi postfix users,
I think I don't understand the ADDRESS_REWRITING_README in the "virtual"
section where it says:
"Addresses found in virtual alias maps are subjected to another iteration of
virtual aliasing, but are not subjected to canonical mapping, in order to
avoid loops."
Let's say in main
Zitat von Victor Duchovni :
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 08:57:19AM +0200, Alexander Gr?ner wrote:
I am running SLES 11 SP1 (SuSE Linux Enterprise Server). After all patches
are applied from standard update Novell sources it seems to me that
STARTTLS bug is still unfixed.
mail_version = 2.5.6
Un
Hi,
Sometimes we receive mails with sender-domain our company,
i.e. from: any...@mycompany.com to: some...@mycompany.com which we'd like to
block (the entire domain).
Can it be done e.g. by header checks?
Or is it possible at all?
Thanks
jannis
> The right forum is a SuSE support forum.
Ok, I will go there.
Your server needs to
be patched if either:
- remote sites verify your certificate when sending email over TLS.
This is the case on my server.
Thanks for the answer anyway :-)
Best regards,
Alexander
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 08:57:19AM +0200, Alexander Gr?ner wrote:
> I am running SLES 11 SP1 (SuSE Linux Enterprise Server). After all patches
> are applied from standard update Novell sources it seems to me that
> STARTTLS bug is still unfixed.
>
> mail_version = 2.5.6
Unless they (SuSE) backp
49 matches
Mail list logo
