On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 03:37:11PM +0100, Raven wrote:
> > As for TLS, the security policy and certficate verification are tied to
> > the nexthop destination, not the recipient domain, if the two differ,
> > it is the nexthop destination that is used. This is documented, please
> > read the docum
Am 19.03.2011 19:32, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * David Touzeau :
>
>> Thanks for this procedure but this is not a bug/error request but an
>> howto request.
>
> What I'm doing is this (just a few examples):
>
> alo.com error:5.1.2 You probably meant aol.com,
> not
* David Touzeau :
> Thanks for this procedure but this is not a bug/error request but an
> howto request.
What I'm doing is this (just a few examples):
alo.com error:5.1.2 You probably meant aol.com, not
alo.com
aoll.comerror:5.1.2 You pro
Le samedi 19 mars 2011 à 10:20 -0500, Noel Jones a écrit :
> On 3/19/2011 10:14 AM, David Touzeau wrote:
> > Le samedi 19 mars 2011 à 11:05 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> >> David Touzeau:
> >>> I expected a feature that reduce the queue life time per SMTP error code
> >>> but it seems that this
Am 19.03.2011 16:14, schrieb David Touzeau:
> Le samedi 19 mars 2011 à 11:05 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
>> David Touzeau:
>>> I expected a feature that reduce the queue life time per SMTP error code
>>> but it seems that this kind of feature does not exists on postfix
>>
>> Do you mean, fea
On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 16:14:43 +0100, David Touzeau wrote:
> Le samedi 19 mars 2011 à 11:05 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> > David Touzeau:
> > > I expected a feature that reduce the queue life time per SMTP error code
> > > but it seems that this kind of feature does not exists on postfix
> >
On 3/19/2011 10:14 AM, David Touzeau wrote:
Le samedi 19 mars 2011 à 11:05 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
David Touzeau:
I expected a feature that reduce the queue life time per SMTP error code
but it seems that this kind of feature does not exists on postfix
Do you mean, feature to detect th
Le samedi 19 mars 2011 à 11:05 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> David Touzeau:
> > I expected a feature that reduce the queue life time per SMTP error code
> > but it seems that this kind of feature does not exists on postfix
>
> Do you mean, feature to detect that hotmiel.com is a typo?
>
> Do
David Touzeau:
> I expected a feature that reduce the queue life time per SMTP error code
> but it seems that this kind of feature does not exists on postfix
Do you mean, feature to detect that hotmiel.com is a typo?
Do you mean, feature to drop mail immediately when hotmiel.com
accepts no SMTP
Le samedi 19 mars 2011 à 10:35 -0400, Sahil Tandon a écrit :
> On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 13:00:29 +0100, David Touzeau wrote:
>
> > Sometimes the bounce queue is filled caused by users that did not type
> > the correct domains addresses.
>
> A common problem.
>
> > "Connect to hotmiel.com[69.6.2.98
David Touzeau:
> > You wrote:
> >
> > > But i did not want to postfix growing the bounce queue for 5 days for
> > > this kind of errors.
Postfix will not keep bounce messages in the queue for five days
when the bounced message had a valid sender address.
Therefore, if you don't want a queue full
On 3/19/11 9:22 AM, David Touzeau at da...@touzeau.eu wrote:
> Le samedi 19 mars 2011 à 08:46 -0500, Larry Stone a écrit :
>> On 3/19/11 8:29 AM, David Touzeau at da...@touzeau.eu wrote:
>>
>>> The problem is not really inbound mails but growing the queue by
>>> outbound mails.
>>>
>>> What is t
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 12:23 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 01:36:46PM +0100, Raven wrote:
>
> > How can I apply this to $relayhost without having to list all local
> > domains in the transport map (as they are already listed in
> > $virtual_mailbox_domains)?
>
> Why are
On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 13:00:29 +0100, David Touzeau wrote:
> Sometimes the bounce queue is filled caused by users that did not type
> the correct domains addresses.
A common problem.
> "Connect to hotmiel.com[69.6.2.98]:25: Connection refused"
This particular problem occurs because hotmiel.com
Le samedi 19 mars 2011 à 09:56 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> David Touzeau:
> > Le samedi 19 mars 2011 ? 09:11 -0400, Wietse Venema a ?crit :
> > > reject_unlisted_sender
> >
> > Dear weitse.
> >
> > i have read (and understand) ,that reject_unlisted_sender can only
> > available when senders
Le samedi 19 mars 2011 à 08:46 -0500, Larry Stone a écrit :
> On 3/19/11 8:29 AM, David Touzeau at da...@touzeau.eu wrote:
>
> > The problem is not really inbound mails but growing the queue by
> > outbound mails.
> >
> > What is the best strategy to filter these user's mistakes ?
>
> Perhaps yo
David Touzeau:
> Le samedi 19 mars 2011 ? 09:11 -0400, Wietse Venema a ?crit :
> > reject_unlisted_sender
>
> Dear weitse.
>
> i have read (and understand) ,that reject_unlisted_sender can only
> available when senders are known and internals.
> But when users send outbound mails to internet we c
On 3/19/11 8:29 AM, David Touzeau at da...@touzeau.eu wrote:
> The problem is not really inbound mails but growing the queue by
> outbound mails.
>
> What is the best strategy to filter these user's mistakes ?
Perhaps you should follow the list's directions from your initial
subscription confirm
Le samedi 19 mars 2011 à 09:11 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> reject_unlisted_sender
Dear weitse.
i have read (and understand) ,that reject_unlisted_sender can only
available when senders are known and internals.
But when users send outbound mails to internet we cannot list internet
domains.
T
David Touzeau:
> But i did not want to postfix growing the bounce queue for 5 days for
> this kind of errors.
Why are your NDRs queued for 5 days? Perhaps you need to turn on
reject_unlisted_sender/smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender and not accept
from bogus sender addresses.
Wietse
Dear
Sometimes the bounce queue is filled caused by users that did not type
the correct domains addresses.
For example type hotmil.com against hotmail.com
mistake Results are sometimes
"MX: Host not found, try again"
For postfix, this is normal.
But i did not want to postfix growing the boun
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:30:44 -0700, Neil wrote:
# you have
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination,
reject_invalid_helo_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname,
reject_non_fqdn_sender, reject_unlisted_sender, reject_unlisted_recipient
22 matches
Mail list logo
