http://cbl.abuseat.org/nat.html
http://cbl.abuseat.org/advanced.html
Some places NAT you without telling you.
This has happened on cable modems.
Are you sure your IP is the one you think it is?
I further highly doubt any link between Gmail and CBL exists.
There is no link.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nasser Heidari said the following on 06/03/11 06:43:
> Now I want to rewrite All of my emails domain from test.local to
> test.edu when they traveling to outside network.
I have many similar installations: Exchange (often on Windows SBS) inside and
P
Hello,
wrote:
>Subject: Re: posfix rejected from google server
>
>On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:29:08PM +0100, kapetr wrote:
>> first I have to say: the problem with home/dynamic IP ranges,
>> business accounts, ... and therefore the need of using relay of
>> my ISP in my case I have well understa
Hi,
I've two Mail servers , one local server running on MS-Exchange and the
other one is my external mail server that my MTA is postfix.
I have setup Postfix as relay agent on Exchange, so all outgoing Emails
is travels through Postfix.
There are also two domains , one on the Exchange(test.local)
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 12:04 PM, wrote:
> Yes, I'll try. I hope that the upstream will accept it, they have a very low
> (and weird) rate policy
This thread was helpful for me, too, since I'm trying to make sure our
Postfix settings are compliant with Yahoo!'s guidelines. Their
Postmaster site
Alan Fullmer put forth on 3/5/2011 6:16 PM:
> I have looked into the bcc always option, but it seems to require it to
> forward to an email address.
always_bcc is exactly what I would do, but with a twist. And it's
possibly simpler than other suggestions.
Use always_bcc to dump a copy of every
On 3/5/2011 7:06 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
Wietse Venema (wie...@porcupine.org) wrote on 5 March 2011 17:22:
>Noel Jones:
>> On 3/5/2011 12:58 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>> > Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote on 5 March 2011 12:30:
>> >
>> > Ops, my fault :-( I had put !.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 6:26 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Running a script, archiving, then forwarding.
Alan Fullmer:
> I am attempting to receive mai
Alan Fullmer:
> I am attempting to receive mail from one or many domains. I am then trying
> to run a script that [essentially] archives all mail coming through.
> Lastly, forwarding the messages onto another server.
Use the Postfix built-in recipient_bcc_maps feature to ADD a
recipient that reso
Wietse Venema (wie...@porcupine.org) wrote on 5 March 2011 17:22:
>Noel Jones:
>> On 3/5/2011 12:58 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>> > Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote on 5 March 2011 12:30:
>> >
>> > Ops, my fault :-( I had put !.my.domain instead of !192.168.0.0/16 in
>> > the last ed
On 03/06/2011 01:16 AM, Alan Fullmer wrote:
I have been trying to get this to work for a while now and have been
unsuccessful in my attempts. I can do each one individually, but when I try
to combine them, it doesn't work as I expected it to. And I imagine it's
something I am missing.
I am att
Am 06.03.2011 01:16, schrieb Alan Fullmer:
> I am trying to basically "archive" all messages coming through without using
> the bcc option. We are being required to archive/save all emails (by law
> requirement) and hang onto them for (x) years. My theory was to put this
> machine in between inc
I have been trying to get this to work for a while now and have been
unsuccessful in my attempts. I can do each one individually, but when I try
to combine them, it doesn't work as I expected it to. And I imagine it's
something I am missing.
I am attempting to receive mail from one or many domai
Noel Jones:
> On 3/5/2011 12:58 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> > Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote on 5 March 2011 12:30:
> >
> > Ops, my fault :-( I had put !.my.domain instead of !192.168.0.0/16 in
> > the last edition of main.cf. It's working fine now, thanks a lot.
> >
> > >BTW, better
On 3/5/2011 12:58 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote on 5 March 2011 12:30:
Ops, my fault :-( I had put !.my.domain instead of !192.168.0.0/16 in
the last edition of main.cf. It's working fine now, thanks a lot.
>BTW, better to match the allowed clients by IP
Le 5 mars 2011 à 18:46, Noel Jones a écrit :
> On 3/5/2011 5:23 AM, N Z wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm using 2.8.0. I've added a new transport in master.cf :
>>
>> slow unix - - n - - smtp
>> -o syslog_name=slow
>>
>> and the following in main.cf
>>
>> slo
Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote on 5 March 2011 12:30:
>On 3/5/2011 12:20 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>> Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote on 5 March 2011 12:15:
>> >On 3/5/2011 12:07 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>> >> Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote on 5 March 201
On 3/5/2011 12:20 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote on 5 March 2011 12:15:
>On 3/5/2011 12:07 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>> Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote on 5 March 2011 11:23:
>>>On 3/5/2011 11:05 AM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>>>> I
Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote on 5 March 2011 12:15:
>On 3/5/2011 12:07 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>> Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote on 5 March 2011 11:23:
>> >On 3/5/2011 11:05 AM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>> >> I'm trying to limit the connection rate for internal (my
On 3/5/2011 12:07 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote on 5 March 2011 11:23:
>On 3/5/2011 11:05 AM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>> I'm trying to limit the connection rate for internal (mynetworks)
>> clients, with some exceptions. I did
>>
>> smtpd_client_
Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote on 5 March 2011 11:23:
>On 3/5/2011 11:05 AM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>> I'm trying to limit the connection rate for internal (mynetworks)
>> clients, with some exceptions. I did
>>
>> smtpd_client_message_rate_limit = 2
>> smtpd_client_event_limit_exc
Hello,
and thanks again for answer.
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> Your username/password are not safe from
>a man-in-the-middle attack, thwarting that requires authentication
>as
>>well as encryption. With stunnel that means "verify = 3" and a
>local
>>copy of the SMTP server certificate.
You are
On 3/5/2011 5:23 AM, N Z wrote:
Hello,
I'm using 2.8.0. I've added a new transport in master.cf :
slow unix - - n - - smtp
-o syslog_name=slow
and the following in main.cf
slow_destination_rate_delay = 20
slow_destination_concurrency_limit = 3
slow_de
On 3/5/2011 9:32 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
mouss put forth on 3/5/2011 7:20 AM:
Le 05/03/2011 00:18, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
/^.*\.(dyn|dhcp)\.embarqhsd\.net$/ REJECT Please use ISP relay
you can simplify that:
/\.(dyn|dhcp)\.embarqhsd\.net$/ REJECT Please use ISP relay
more generally /
On 3/5/2011 11:05 AM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
I'm trying to limit the connection rate for internal (mynetworks)
clients, with some exceptions. I did
smtpd_client_message_rate_limit = 2
smtpd_client_event_limit_exceptions = allowed1.my.domain allowed2.my.domain
!.my.domain
It works for the allow
I'm trying to limit the connection rate for internal (mynetworks)
clients, with some exceptions. I did
smtpd_client_message_rate_limit = 2
smtpd_client_event_limit_exceptions = allowed1.my.domain allowed2.my.domain
!.my.domain
It works for the allowed ones but not for !.my.domain; these are stil
Andy put forth on 3/5/2011 9:59 AM:
> Hi.
> While I am working on solving the delivery problem to Hotmail MXs, I
> would like to set up postfix to connect directly to their servers to
> deliver mail.
> What should I put in transport_maps? I tried with:
>
> hotmail.com:
> live.com:
You're not spec
Hi.
While I am working on solving the delivery problem to Hotmail MXs, I
would like to set up postfix to connect directly to their servers to
deliver mail.
What should I put in transport_maps? I tried with:
hotmail.com:
live.com:
but the mail keeps going through $relayhost.
Thanks!
Andy
postc
mouss put forth on 3/5/2011 7:20 AM:
> Le 05/03/2011 00:18, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
>> /^.*\.(dyn|dhcp)\.embarqhsd\.net$/ REJECT Please use ISP relay
>>
> you can simplify that:
> /\.(dyn|dhcp)\.embarqhsd\.net$/ REJECT Please use ISP relay
>
> more generally /^.* is never needed.
Does this ex
On 3/5/11 9:02 AM, Andy at andyre...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all.
> Since yesterday we are having major issues with our outbound relay,
> mostly with Hotmail/Live servers. Gmail & others seems to work fine.
> I updated postfix to the latest squeeze version and turned on debugging:
...
> Where should
Am 05.03.2011 16:18, schrieb Andy:
>> Why in the world do you start with a debug-log instead a normal
>> one with filtered where you see a problem?
>
> Because I already went through those. The outbound server has been
> working perfectly for more than a year with the same configuration,
> nothin
Well, I found it!
If I pass change `fsspace(".", &fsbuf);' to `fsspace("/", &fsbuf);' it
works, no oopses, and the messages are received without problems. I
will make some stress tests later.
So the remaining question is what "." in smtpd context mean? Is it the
dir postfix has been started from?
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 05.03.2011 16:02, schrieb Andy:
>> Hi all.
>> Since yesterday we are having major issues with our outbound relay,
>> mostly with Hotmail/Live servers. Gmail & others seems to work fine.
>> I updated postfix to the latest squeeze version and
Why in the world do you start with a debug-log instead a normal
one with filtered where you see a problem?
> mx1.hotmail.com[65.54.188.94]:25: 220 BAY0-MC2-F32.Bay0.hotmail.com
> Sending unsolicited commercial or bulk e-mail to Microsoft's compu
sounds like hotmail is pissed off about to many mai
Hi all.
Since yesterday we are having major issues with our outbound relay,
mostly with Hotmail/Live servers. Gmail & others seems to work fine.
I updated postfix to the latest squeeze version and turned on debugging:
Mar 5 14:43:11 out postfix/smtp[19842]: name_mask: resource
Mar 5 14:43:11 ou
Hi all,
I have investigated the problem a little, and here are some results:
First of all, it has nothing to do with memory consumption. The smtpd
crashes on statfs() in fsspase() function, which is called from
smtpd_check_queue() to check available free space on current
filesystem for a queue.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
I do hope this email is not considered inappropriate or off topic.
I'd just like to announce that we have released a new web based
interface to manage mailboxes, virtual domains and aliases called
ViMbAdmin (vim-be-admin). It is free software
Am 05.03.2011 14:13, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> Reindl Harald put forth on 3/5/2011 6:02 AM:
>
> Thanks for the info. Need one clarification:
>
>>> Can you cluster the dbmail IMAP daemon on multiple external hosts to
>>> support thousands of concurrent IMAP users, without the locking
>>> contentio
Le 05/03/2011 00:18, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> lst_ho...@kwsoft.de put forth on 3/4/2011 3:33 PM:
>
>> BTW, is there any "how-to" for getting the least possible memory
>> footprint for Postfix.
>
>> - don't use regex/pcre maps
>
> This isn't necessarily true, is it? In some cases I would think
Reindl Harald put forth on 3/5/2011 6:02 AM:
Thanks for the info. Need one clarification:
>> Can you cluster the dbmail IMAP daemon on multiple external hosts to
>> support thousands of concurrent IMAP users, without the locking
>> contention of NFS or cluster filesystems, thus achieving lower l
Am 05.03.2011 12:51, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> Reindl Harald put forth on 3/5/2011 4:46 AM:
>
>> we are using dbmail since 2009 and i love it
>> http://www.dbmail.org/
>>
>> until now the administration is a weakness because i don't know
>> any useable, free frontend and it depends on the amount
Reindl Harald put forth on 3/5/2011 4:46 AM:
> we are using dbmail since 2009 and i love it
> http://www.dbmail.org/
>
> until now the administration is a weakness because i don't know
> any useable, free frontend and it depends on the amount
> of users / domains if phpmyadmin is enough or you ha
Hi,
I'd like to make a special transport never bounce.
For role accounts (abuse, postmaster, etc.) I'd like to pipe the mails
directly into our trouble ticket system using a special pipe transport.
However this delivery could fail and normally postfix would generate a bounce
from that. Instead
Hello,
I'm using 2.8.0. I've added a new transport in master.cf :
slow unix - - n - - smtp
-o syslog_name=slow
and the following in main.cf
slow_destination_rate_delay = 20
slow_destination_concurrency_limit = 3
slow_destination_recipient_limit = 2
and
Am 05.03.2011 02:39, schrieb Rafał Radecki:
> Hi all.
>
> Is it possible to store not only user info but also e-mails in a database
> such as MySQL or PostgreSQL?
> If yes can you share your experience?
we are using dbmail since 2009 and i love it
http://www.dbmail.org/
until now the administ
45 matches
Mail list logo
