On 3/2/11 8:22 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:11:38AM -0600, I wrote without reading:
>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 07:26:55AM -0800, David Newman wrote:
>>> The error message in maillog is like this:
>>>
>>> Mar 1 13:30:04 mail3 postfix/smtpd[99904]: NOQUEUE: reject:
>>> RCPT from
Le 03/03/2011 15:39, Randy Ramsdell a écrit :
> mouss wrote:
>> Le 01/03/2011 11:25, Matthias Andree a écrit :
>>> Am 28.02.2011 23:57, schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
>>>
The main issue I see at the moment really is the inability to legally
link Postfix to MySQL, removing a valuable piece o
On 03/03/11 06:44, kapetr wrote:
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:11:53 + Ned Slider
wrote:
It's also listed in Spamhaus PBL:
http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL043205
I'd say it's pretty much a non-starter trying to reliably deliver
mail
>from that IP.
Sorry - I do not very well understand you
"Connection timed out" has nothing to do with greylisting
have you "tuned" any timeout-settings in postfix?
Am 03.03.2011 21:50, schrieb jason hirsh:
>
> On Mar 3, 2011, at 4:40 PM, John Hinton wrote:
>
>> On 3/3/2011 3:09 PM, jason hirsh wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 3, 2011, at 4:02 PM, John Hinton wr
On Mar 3, 2011, at 4:40 PM, John Hinton wrote:
On 3/3/2011 3:09 PM, jason hirsh wrote:
On Mar 3, 2011, at 4:02 PM, John Hinton wrote:
On 3/3/2011 2:52 PM, jason hirsh wrote:
On Mar 3, 2011, at 3:49 PM, John Hinton wrote:
On 3/3/2011 2:34 PM, jason hirsh wrote:
I have been inform
On 3/3/2011 3:09 PM, jason hirsh wrote:
On Mar 3, 2011, at 4:02 PM, John Hinton wrote:
On 3/3/2011 2:52 PM, jason hirsh wrote:
On Mar 3, 2011, at 3:49 PM, John Hinton wrote:
On 3/3/2011 2:34 PM, jason hirsh wrote:
I have been informed by a couple gmail users that my server is
blockin
On 03/03/2011 07:53 PM, F M wrote:
Hello,
We need to change change one of our email domain. So I would like to send a
email to all incoming email, about this change.
We are using Zimbra as our mail server.
I added another postfix server to handle the domain alone, change the MX and
used transp
On Mar 3, 2011, at 4:02 PM, John Hinton wrote:
On 3/3/2011 2:52 PM, jason hirsh wrote:
On Mar 3, 2011, at 3:49 PM, John Hinton wrote:
On 3/3/2011 2:34 PM, jason hirsh wrote:
I have been informed by a couple gmail users that my server is
blocking their access. They are getting
Te
oops
Begin forwarded message:
From: jason hirsh
Date: March 3, 2011 3:52:45 PM AST
To: John Hinton
Subject: Re: Google The recipient server did not accept our requests
to connect.
On Mar 3, 2011, at 3:49 PM, John Hinton wrote:
On 3/3/2011 2:34 PM, jason hirsh wrote:
I have been i
On 3/3/2011 2:34 PM, jason hirsh wrote:
I have been informed by a couple gmail users that my server is
blocking their access. They are getting
Technical details of temporary failure:
The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn
more athttp://mail.google.com/support/
I have been informed by a couple gmail users that my server is
blocking their access. They are getting
Technical details of temporary failure:
The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn
more athttp://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=7720
[mail.kasdivi.
Hi,
Meybe there is another solution.
Initaly I didn't want to generate private/public keys, because I was
planning to use the root account.
But, to solve this security issue, I create a user account with user rights,
and generate ssh private/public keys (less dangerous that root account)
I add c
Hello,
We need to change change one of our email domain. So I would like to send a
email to all incoming email, about this change.
We are using Zimbra as our mail server.
I added another postfix server to handle the domain alone, change the MX and
used transport to relay the email to the Zimbra
On 2011-03-02 5:10 PM, mouss wrote:
> Le 01/03/2011 10:09, Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit :
>> "MariaDB is a database server that offers drop-in replacement
>> functionality for MySQL. MariaDB is built by some of the original
>> authors of MySQL, with assistance from the broader community of Free
>> and
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Islam, Towhid wrote:
> I am trying to set up a mail system with postfix being the core (smtp) and
> dovecot for imap/pop3 for end-user mail delivery/retrieval. While I have
> configured spam and virus scanning for my postfix based mail relay hosts,
> I’m not sure h
Postfix receives the message and gives it via "check_recipient_access"
over lmtp to amavis, amavis is giving clean messages back on
smtp 127.0.0.1:10025 or rejects
dovecot has nothing to do here
amavisfeed unix - - n - 10 lmtp
-o disable_dns_lookups=yes
-o lmt
Islam, Towhid wrote:
I am trying to set up a mail system with postfix being the core (smtp)
and dovecot for imap/pop3 for end-user mail delivery/retrieval. While I
have configured spam and virus scanning for my postfix based mail relay
hosts, I’m not sure how to incorporate amavisd (for clamav
I am trying to set up a mail system with postfix being the core (smtp) and
dovecot for imap/pop3 for end-user mail delivery/retrieval. While I have
configured spam and virus scanning for my postfix based mail relay hosts, I'm
not sure how to incorporate amavisd (for clamav and spamassassin) in
On 03.03.2011 18:11, Pascal Volk wrote:
> On 03/03/2011 03:47 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Here a example on my homeserver with set quota down to 10 MB
>> while 50 MB are in the inbox for this test-case. You see
>> the same message-id so i sent one message to two rcpt while
>> one of them was over qu
Am 03.03.2011 16:11, schrieb Pascal Volk:
> On 03/03/2011 03:47 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Here a example on my homeserver with set quota down to 10 MB
>> while 50 MB are in the inbox for this test-case. You see
>> the same message-id so i sent one message to two rcpt while
>> one of them was over
On 03/03/2011 03:47 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
> Here a example on my homeserver with set quota down to 10 MB
> while 50 MB are in the inbox for this test-case. You see
> the same message-id so i sent one message to two rcpt while
> one of them was over quota
>
> rcpt 1: all ok, message accepted
> rc
Hajo Locke:
> Hello,
>
> my ambition is to completely separate mx and mail storage
>
> i use smtpd_sasl_type dovecot.
> In dovecot2 i can use a tcp-socket for auth-service.
> i want to use this tcp-socket in postfix by smtpd_sasl_path
> an assignment like:
>
> smtpd_sasl_path = inet:localhost
Am 03.03.2011 15:33, schrieb Pascal Volk:
> On 03/03/2011 02:55 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>> we do quotas this with dbmail-lmtp on the mda-side
>>
>> in this case postfix delivers every message via lmtp
>> and if the mailbox is full dbmail-lmtp is giving
>> a error back for this unique rcpt
>
> Wha
On 03/03/2011 03:27 PM Noel Jones wrote:
> On 3/3/2011 7:21 AM, Pascal Volk wrote:
>> …
>> if recipient_count> 1&& any_recipient_has_quota_reached:
>> (do not deliver to recipients which are still under quota)
>> action=552 5.2.2 Quota … (mailbox for one or recipients is full)
>
> Thi
mouss wrote:
Le 01/03/2011 11:25, Matthias Andree a écrit :
Am 28.02.2011 23:57, schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
The main issue I see at the moment really is the inability to legally
link Postfix to MySQL, removing a valuable piece of Postfix functionality.
Not a loss. If MySQL and Postfix turn
On 03/03/2011 02:55 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
> we do quotas this with dbmail-lmtp on the mda-side
>
> in this case postfix delivers every message via lmtp
> and if the mailbox is full dbmail-lmtp is giving
> a error back for this unique rcpt
What exactly does that mean? Posfix accepts the message
On 3/3/2011 7:21 AM, Pascal Volk wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying reject messages for recipients which are over quota or will
be over quota when the current message would be accepted and delivered.
That works fine as long as there is only one recipient.
Now I have the following idea:
smtpd_reci
Hello,
my ambition is to completely separate mx and mail storage
i use smtpd_sasl_type dovecot.
In dovecot2 i can use a tcp-socket for auth-service.
i want to use this tcp-socket in postfix by smtpd_sasl_path
an assignment like:
smtpd_sasl_path = inet:localhost:1434
seems to work but it is
we do quotas this with dbmail-lmtp on the mda-side
in this case postfix delivers every message via lmtp
and if the mailbox is full dbmail-lmtp is giving
a error back for this unique rcpt
another point is that quoats on the mta is the wrong place
because the mta do not know anything about via imap
/dev/rob0 put forth on 3/1/2011 7:00 PM:
> [1] I believe the Debian BIND package has another unwise default,
> which is to use global forwarders rather than recursion. Use
> caution, and consult Debian and ISC documentation, if you decide
> to run your own nameserver for the Postfix ma
Hello,
I'm trying reject messages for recipients which are over quota or will
be over quota when the current message would be accepted and delivered.
That works fine as long as there is only one recipient.
Now I have the following idea:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
…
Erik de Castro Lopo:
> Is there a way to detect and reject any email from IP addresses
> falsly claiming to be localhost?
check_reverse_client_hostname_access type:table
Search the specified access database for the unverified reverse
client hostname, parent domains, client IP address
Hello
it's a typo ... corrected
but it was also the case without SPF
or with a simpler SPF config
n 03/03/2011 11:39 AM, Erwan Loaëc wrote:
Hello Frank,
First, I see a strange settings: is it normal that the mask of your SPF
rule is a "/2" ?? (Instead of /24, /25 maybe...?)
;; ANSWER SECT
Reindl Harald wrote:
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_helo_restrictions
>
> I would mean this should do that and the permits are needed because
> we do not want that authenticated endusers are rejected
>
> smtpd_helo_required = yes
> smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, per
Hello Frank,
First, I see a strange settings: is it normal that the mask of your SPF
rule is a "/2" ?? (Instead of /24, /25 maybe...?)
;; ANSWER SECTION:
esiee.fr. 86395 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:147.215.1.0/2 mx -all"
Regards,
--
Erwan
Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
We are in trouble with GMAIL ( an
Hello
We are in trouble with GMAIL ( and probably yahoo too )
We run a web application to register new students.
When the registration is completed an email is sent by the application
to the student's email address to confirm the registration and give
some informations.
Our problem is that occ
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_helo_restrictions
I would mean this should do that and the permits are needed because
we do not want that authenticated endusers are rejected
smtpd_helo_required = yes
smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_non_
Hi all,
I'm running postfix 2.7.1 from Debian testing.
I'm getting quite a bit of spam from machines in places like Vietnam
whose IP addresses resolve to localhost.
For example:
postfix/smtpd[1427]: warning: 117.4.33.231: address not listed for hostname
localhost
postfix/smtpd[1427]: connect f
Zitat von kapetr :
And the:
http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=85.71.234.108+&.submit=Lookup
says -as you wrote:
IP Address 85.71.234.108 is listed in the CBL. It appears to be
infected with a spam sending trojan or proxy.
It was last detected at 2011-03-01 07:00 GMT (+/- 30 minutes),
approxi
39 matches
Mail list logo
