On 10/25/2010 9:05 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 10/25/2010 10:38 PM, utahnix wrote:
Hello all,
This question has probably been asked on this list before, but maybe not
quite with these circumstances. I'm hoping one of you can give me some
direction.
I've got a fairly typical Postfix setup...
On 10/25/2010 10:38 PM, utahnix wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This question has probably been asked on this list before, but maybe not
> quite with these circumstances. I'm hoping one of you can give me some
> direction.
>
> I've got a fairly typical Postfix setup... Postfix, Cyrus IMAP, ClamAV,
> S
Hello all,
This question has probably been asked on this list before, but maybe not
quite with these circumstances. I'm hoping one of you can give me some
direction.
I've got a fairly typical Postfix setup... Postfix, Cyrus IMAP, ClamAV,
SpamAssassin... all on Linux.
Anyway, I've set up gr
Noel and others,
> In the specific case of "Relay access denied" it will always
> be the recipient address, but there are other reasons for mail
> to be rejected.
>
> That section of the log line shows "what" was rejected along
> with a brief text description/reason.
>
> The "what" can be any pa
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 02:20:51PM -0200, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
>
> I have a domain (domain.com.br) with lots of subdomains in the
> format nnn.domain.com.br.
>
> nnn.domain.com.br (about 40 different subdomains) have only 2
> (two) DNS entries:
>
> nnnINMX10 server.nnn.do
Jay G. Scott:
> alias_maps: The alias databases that are used for local(8) delivery
You can change the path for mail that is not delivered locally with
virtual_alias_maps and with transport_maps.
virtual_alias_maps changes the recipient address. Example:
search key lookup result
heh. the subject of my question seems to be wrong.
there's something else i don't understand. here's my postconf -n output:
-
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = pmx:127.0.0.1:10025
daemon_directory =
On 10/25/2010 08:30 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 02:25:32PM -0400, Zhou, Yan wrote:
Can you elaborate how different smtpd can have different transport
settings? I won't want to create my own SMTPD process.
The following won't work, because the "transport" cannot dist
To send mail to a script depending on the arriving SMTP port:
/etc/postfix/master.cf:
1.2.3.4:smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=script_for_1_2_3_4:
script_for_1_2_3_4 unix - n n - - pipe
flags=
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 04:43:15PM -0200, Lauro Costa G. Borges wrote:
>
>
> I'm using Postfix 2.7.0 and Dovecot 1.2.9.
>
> I don't understand why this machine (imap) is trying to send warning
> emails as if the recipient was local.
>
> If I set relay_domains to "target.example.org", it works
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 07:49:14PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 10/25/2010 07:41 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>> I know SPF is disliked here ;)
>
> Like doesn't enter into it.
>
> Discussion of SPF is verboten. simple.
The politics and wisdom of SPF are off topic. Simple configuration
I'm using Postfix 2.7.0 and Dovecot 1.2.9.
I don't understand why this machine (imap) is trying to send warning
emails as if the recipient was local.
If I set relay_domains to "target.example.org", it works ok, I can
send email to *...@gmail.com (or any other domain), from imap.
If I
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 02:25:32PM -0400, Zhou, Yan wrote:
> Can you elaborate how different smtpd can have different transport
> settings? I won't want to create my own SMTPD process.
>
> The following won't work, because the "transport" cannot distinguish IP
> address. I tried this but does no
Can you elaborate how different smtpd can have different transport
settings? I won't want to create my own SMTPD process.
The following won't work, because the "transport" cannot distinguish IP
address. I tried this but does not work. I wonder if only smtp process
can vary based on different IP.
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 19:49 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> Like doesn't enter into it.
>
> Discussion of SPF is verboten. simple.
Yeah I know,... but I thought Wietse might excuse me because I hoped one
could judge this as only answering a DNS question ;-D
Cheers,
Chris.
On 10/25/2010 07:41 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
I know SPF is disliked here ;)
Like doesn't enter into it.
Discussion of SPF is verboten. simple.
--
J.
Zhou, Yan:
> Hi there,
>
> How can I have one single Postfix instance routing messages differently,
> depends on which IP address they are arriving at SMTP.
>
> If an outside connection arrives, Postfix will deliver message to my
> customized transport, which calls a script and passes the messa
On 10/25/2010 07:43 PM, Zhou, Yan wrote:
Hi there,
How can I have one single Postfix instance routing messages differently,
depends on which IP address they are arriving at SMTP.
By making postfix listen with separate smtpd listeners on those IPs.
Those instances can then have different tr
Hi there,
How can I have one single Postfix instance routing messages differently,
depends on which IP address they are arriving at SMTP.
If an outside connection arrives, Postfix will deliver message to my
customized transport, which calls a script and passes the message.
If an internal connec
I know SPF is disliked here ;)
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 14:20 -0200, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
> nnnINTXT"v=spf1 include:domain.com.br -all"
But using TXT for it is (IIRC) discouraged by the RFC and "SPF" RR
shoudl be used.
Cheers,
Chris.
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 11:22:24AM +0200, martijn.list wrote:
> > Just use opportunistic TLS on both ends and go.
>
> It depends on the requirements whether TLS is good enough. It's not
> always possible to be 100% certain that the complete route is TLS
> protected. All intermediate servers shoul
Leonardo Rodrigues:
> i really dont know if this setup (MX record but no A record) is
> RFC-OK. The only think i know is that it's been working for years and i
> receive thousand of emails daily on my several subdomains with no
> problem at all.
The EMAIL RFC requirement is that a domain n
Hi,
This question is not postfix-related so its somehow off-topic.
But it's related to mail systems, so i cant imagine any other place to
get some help on this subject.
I have a domain (domain.com.br) with lots of subdomains in the
format nnn.domain.com.br.
nnn.domain
On 10/25/2010 8:24 AM, Len Conrad wrote:
-- Original Message --
From: Noel Jones
Reply-To: postfix users
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:16:07 -0500
On 10/25/2010 4:28 AM, Len Conrad wrote:
I'm testing a new filter, so I HOLD matching messages, then inspect
Len Conrad:
> >Several reasons come to mind...
> >Mail can trigger a HOLD rule but be rejected by a later rule.
>
> Why would a HOLD: continue to be processed by other rules?
>
> Isn't HOLD a first-match-wins case?
HOLD is a non-final action, like FILTER, WARN and IGNORE.
REJECT is an example o
-- Original Message --
From: Noel Jones
Reply-To: postfix users
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:16:07 -0500
>On 10/25/2010 4:28 AM, Len Conrad wrote:
>>
>> I'm testing a new filter, so I HOLD matching messages, then inspect them to
>> either release or delete
Zitat von Erwan David :
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:40:46PM CEST, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de said:
The address 2002:::1::21 is not within 2002::::/64 as
far as i can tell. You should use 2002:::1::/64 instead in
mynetworks. The :: means all zero if memory serves me right.
I
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:40:46PM CEST, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de said:
>
> The address 2002:::1::21 is not within 2002::::/64 as
> far as i can tell. You should use 2002:::1::/64 instead in
> mynetworks. The :: means all zero if memory serves me right.
I use [2a01:240:fe0f::
Hi Andreas and Christian
that has helped, now relaying without authenticatin works:
mynetworks = 192.168.97.0/24, aaa.bbb.206.128/27, [2002:::1::]/64
is the clue.
thank you both very much.
myuser
On 2010-10-25 14:03, Christian Roessner wrote:
1. Problem: format of IPv6 address in my
On 10/25/2010 01:46 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/25/2010 5:22 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 10/25/2010 07:14 AM, t...@diogunix.com wrote:
Noel,
thanks a lot for your help.
Just to precise my need for information:
> 554 5.7.1
> : Relay access denied;
This is the response postfix sent to the r
>>> 1. Problem: format of IPv6 address in mynetworks
>>>
>>> After many trials, I have found out that the ipv6 Address in the
>>> mynetworks attribute must have a double semicolon at the end,
>>> otherwise the smtpd server throttles:
>>>
>>> Oct 25 12:40:10 mailhost postfix/smtpd[5019]: connect f
Zitat von postfix :
Hi Andreas
I have tried 2002:::1::/48, but then, I got the following
error message from the server:
Oct 25 12:51:17 mailhost postfix/smtpd[5229]: fatal: non-null host
address bits in "2002:::1::/48", perhaps you should use
"2002::::/48" instea
Hi Andreas
I have tried 2002:::1::/48, but then, I got the following error
message from the server:
Oct 25 12:51:17 mailhost postfix/smtpd[5229]: fatal: non-null host
address bits in "2002:::1::/48", perhaps you should use
"2002::::/48" instead
And again, smtpd went
On 10/25/2010 5:22 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 10/25/2010 07:14 AM, t...@diogunix.com wrote:
Noel,
thanks a lot for your help.
Just to precise my need for information:
> 554 5.7.1
> : Relay access denied;
This is the response postfix sent to the remote client. The
SMTP response is 554 (a p
Zitat von postfix :
Hi listers
[r...@mailhost ~]# rpm -q postfix
postfix-2.5.6-3.fc11.i586
[r...@mailhost ~]#
[r...@mailhost ~]# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
anvil_rate_time_unit = 60s
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directo
On 10/25/2010 12:14 AM, t...@diogunix.com wrote:
Noel,
thanks a lot for your help.
Just to precise my need for information:
> 554 5.7.1
> : Relay access denied;
This is the response postfix sent to the remote client. The
SMTP response is 554 (a permanent error) with an extended code
o
Hi listers
[r...@mailhost ~]# rpm -q postfix
postfix-2.5.6-3.fc11.i586
[r...@mailhost ~]#
[r...@mailhost ~]# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
anvil_rate_time_unit = 60s
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
cont
Len Conrad:
>
> I'm testing a new filter, so I HOLD matching messages, then inspect them to
> either release or delete them.
>
> egrep -ic "hold: " /var/log/maillog
> 298
You have multiple logfile records per queue file?
grep ' hold:' /var/log/maillog | awk '{print $6}' | sort -u | wc -l
(t
On 10/25/2010 4:28 AM, Len Conrad wrote:
I'm testing a new filter, so I HOLD matching messages, then inspect them to
either release or delete them.
egrep -ic "hold: " /var/log/maillog
298
but in mailq:
mailq | mailq-oneline.pl | egrep -ic "! "
35
cross checking:
find /var/spool/postfix/hol
On 10/25/2010 07:14 AM, t...@diogunix.com wrote:
Noel,
thanks a lot for your help.
Just to precise my need for information:
> 554 5.7.1
> : Relay access denied;
This is the response postfix sent to the remote client. The
SMTP response is 554 (a permanent error) with an extended co
I'm testing a new filter, so I HOLD matching messages, then inspect them to
either release or delete them.
egrep -ic "hold: " /var/log/maillog
298
but in mailq:
mailq | mailq-oneline.pl | egrep -ic "! "
35
cross checking:
find /var/spool/postfix/hold -type f | wc -l
35
In case I for
Rich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Instead of "permit_mynetworks" I'd suggest "permit_sasl_authenticated"
> on the above line. The submission service is not very often used without
> authentication.
>
> Mike are you saying remove "permit_mynetworks"?
>
Yes, I do not see any reason to hav
Rich put forth on 10/25/2010 1:23 AM:
>> 587 inet n - n - - smtpd
>>-o smtpd_enforce_tls=yes
>>-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
>>-o content_filter=
>>-o header_checks=
>>-o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_sasl_authentica
Mikael Bak put forth on 10/25/2010 1:18 AM:
> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> [snip]
>> Yes. I would suggest configuring a new smtpd listener for this. Most
>> people use the master.cf default TCP 587 listener daemon to accept
>> submitted mail. MUA clients will need to be configured accordingly.
>> Appa
44 matches
Mail list logo
