Hi
On 3 September 2010 14:04, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> This tells postfix to accept any re...@* address, for any domain postfix
> accepts mail for. If postfix can't deliver to the computed recipient, it
> will be bounced. Not good. Worst case: your server is blacklisted as a
accepting reg-...@*
On 9/2/2010 10:08 PM, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hi there.
On 3 September 2010 12:24, Noel Jones wrote:
recipient_canonical_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/canonical
Careful, wildcard *canonical_maps defeat recipient validation.
This is what it contains:
/^(reg)-(.+)-(.+)@(.+)/ $...@${4}
This te
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 15:18:17 +0200, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
> My logs show alot of messages like: /SASL LOGIN authentication
> failed: authentication failure
>
> I would like to know which username failed to authenticate.
Postfix only logs a username when authentication is successful.
--
Sahil T
Hi there.
On 3 September 2010 12:24, Noel Jones wrote:
>> recipient_canonical_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/canonical
>
> Careful, wildcard *canonical_maps defeat recipient validation.
This is what it contains:
/^(reg)-(.+)-(.+)@(.+)/ $...@${4}
So any email like reg-user-ser...@domain.com are chang
On 9/2/2010 8:33 PM, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hi there.
Just completed the migration from sendmail to postfix.
It's all working fine for all machines (30+) but one.
Welcome to postfix!
This client is using Outlook and when sending a message, Outlook fails
and displays:
"The server respo
Hi there.
Just completed the migration from sendmail to postfix.
It's all working fine for all machines (30+) but one.
This client is using Outlook and when sending a message, Outlook fails
and displays:
"The server responded: 504 5.5.2 : Helo"
MASUKA is the name of this laptop.
It can send f
> > All I got was a '451 4.3.0 Error: queue file write error' for the
> > client, and just a disconnect and a double bounce in the log.
> > Turning on verbosity on smtpd did not help to explain the issue.
> > (version: postfix-current-2.8.20100728 from ports @ FreeBSD 8.1)
>
> By design, Postfix d
Mark Martinec:
> I'd like to report a rather minor/cosmetic problem - namely a lack of
> useful logging when an smtpd service tries to connect to a proxy content
> filter over a Unix socket which is too heavily protected - but which took
> me far longer to understand than necessary (the strong prot
Noel Jones put forth on 9/2/2010 5:37 PM:
> And yes, it is common and acceptable practice to put all restrictions
> under smtpd_recipient_restrictions.
Not only common, but as I discovered the hard way, it's very difficult,
nearly impossible, to manage some white listing scenarios if you don't
pu
I'd like to report a rather minor/cosmetic problem - namely a lack of
useful logging when an smtpd service tries to connect to a proxy content
filter over a Unix socket which is too heavily protected - but which took
me far longer to understand than necessary (the strong protection was on
a parent
Hi list,
I'm trying to integrate dspam filtering into my postfix system. The
way I have it now works for local users but when a user has an alias
to an external domain the mail bounces. This server is for receiving
mail only, so no submission is needed.
---
This is the mail system at hos
On 9/2/2010 4:51 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 02/09/2010 09:55, Stefan Seidel a écrit :
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:33:31 -1000 (HST), Julian
Cowley
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
Why would you use _recipient_ restrictions to block a _sender_?
it is ok to do that. smtpd_mumble_restrictions correspond to
s
Le 02/09/2010 09:55, Stefan Seidel a écrit :
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:33:31 -1000 (HST), Julian Cowley
wrote:
Hello,
I would like to block a particular user who is authenticated using
SASL from sending mail. Is there a way to do this?
I found one way to do it, but it is not perfect. I can bloc
Le 02/09/2010 11:05, Reuben (Plexus IT) a écrit :
So does anyone have any idea why VERP is not working on my postfix. Is it a
configuration problem?
can you first reply/comment on what I said?
Reubs
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us..
On 09/02/2010 02:19 PM, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
Hi all,
intro: I won't ask for amavis fix, I just need to make sure my postfix config
is ok before getting support elsewhere with amavis ;)
I've a bit of trouble with my production mail gateway:
FreeBSD 7.x in VMWare Virtual Machine, r
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 01:30:24PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> > The choice between "fingerprint" and "secure" depends on whether the
> > remote cert is self-signed and stable, or signed public CA and changes
> > each time it expires.
> >
>
> OK - so i get them to send me their cert file - th
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 13:47 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:41:47PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
>
> > Concerning outbound email to a specific domain that I need encrypted, I
> > use smtp_tls_policy_maps. I would like some level of verification that
> > the remote serve
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:41:47PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> Concerning outbound email to a specific domain that I need encrypted, I
> use smtp_tls_policy_maps. I would like some level of verification that
> the remote server IS the server I think it is. I see the
> smtp_tls_security_level
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 11:43 -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:29 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> > On 8/24/2010 10:24 AM, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> > > We have a few companies that we need have ALL email traffic encrypted.
> > > We can no longer 'blindly trust' the end user to not in
Steffan A. Cline put forth on 9/2/2010 10:59 AM:
> I can't imagine needing to change them. They are AWESOME!
>
> They work great just as they are. Kills off 80% of the spam at the least.
>
> Thank you, Stan the ma
Given your MX and general system load Steffan, if you edit those three
lines and f
How weird. That was supposed to say Stan the man!
Thanks
Steffan
---
T E L 6 0 2 . 7 9 3 . 0 0 1 4 | F A X 6 0 2 . 9 7 1 . 1 6 9 4
Steffan A. Cline
stef...@execuchoice.net Phoenix, Az
http://www.ExecuCho
Noel Jones put forth on 9/2/2010 10:41 AM:
> On 9/2/2010 10:14 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> mouss put forth on 9/1/2010 6:10 PM:
>>
Over 1600 regex patterns matching generic dynamics and statics.
Rejects
all generic dynamics, tags generic statics. Provided with no
warranties, u
I can't imagine needing to change them. They are AWESOME!
They work great just as they are. Kills off 80% of the spam at the least.
Thank you, Stan the ma
Thanks
Steffan
---
T E L 6 0 2 . 7 9 3 . 0 0 1 4 | F A X 6 0 2 . 9 7 1 . 1
On 9/2/2010 10:14 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
mouss put forth on 9/1/2010 6:10 PM:
Over 1600 regex patterns matching generic dynamics and statics. Rejects
all generic dynamics, tags generic statics. Provided with no
warranties, use at your own risk, etc. Has worked well here.
http://www.hardwa
Hello
with smtpd_recipient_limit I can limit the number of recipients in a email that
I send using the server who has that parameter configured.,
but how I can block the message that has more that X emails as TO: in the
header when they are sent by other server and Im receiving
Thanks
Octavio
mouss put forth on 9/1/2010 6:10 PM:
>> Over 1600 regex patterns matching generic dynamics and statics. Rejects
>> all generic dynamics, tags generic statics. Provided with no
>> warranties, use at your own risk, etc. Has worked well here.
>>
>> http://www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.regexp
>>
>>
I have set up sender dependent transport_maps different clients to use
different outgoing ips
>From the document at
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#sender_dependent_default_transport_maps
The transport_maps overrides sender_dependent_default_transport_maps
What I need to do is revers
Please don't top-post.
On 2010-09-02 Cimoni Enwis Ogwujiakwu wrote:
> netstat returned below which means server is listening on the port 25
> and the IP address is still same 192.168.20.19 from ifconfig -a
Good, so your Postfix instance is still listening on 192.168.20.19:25,
meaning that it's mo
netstat returned below which means server is listening on the port 25 and the
IP address is still same 192.168.20.19 from ifconfig -a and still I cannot
connect on port 25. What do I do now?
tcp4 0 0 *.25 *.* LISTEN
Cimoni Enwis Ogwujiakwu
On 9/2/2010 9:18 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
> Good afternoon list
>
> This is probably a stupid question, for which I apologize.
>
> Is there a way to log the username which failed to authenticate using
> postfix?
>
> My logs show alot of messages like: /SASL LOGIN authentication failed:
> authen
On Thursday 02 September 2010 14:26:33 Zhou, Yan wrote:
>
> I observed that the transport only get one single message with multiple
> TO: address in it. So, this means my transport should do the work of
> sending to multiple destinations?
If it is an SMTP transport yes the remote end should do tha
Hi all,
intro: I won't ask for amavis fix, I just need to make sure my postfix config
is ok before getting support elsewhere with amavis ;)
I've a bit of trouble with my production mail gateway:
FreeBSD 7.x in VMWare Virtual Machine, running on top of a 6 blades HP
chassis, 4Go RAM and
Hi there,
If Postfix server gets a mail message with multiple TO: address (i.e.,
multiple recipients), does Postfix send one message to each address? If
so, at what stage does this happen? The postfix log seems to indicate
that.
For my Postfix, I customized my transport in postfix like this,
t
Louis-David Mitterrand:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 09:01:44AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Louis-David Mitterrand:
> > > On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 08:21:06AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > > Louis-David Mitterrand:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Can I select a specific transport depending on
Good afternoon list
This is probably a stupid question, for which I apologize.
Is there a way to log the username which failed to authenticate using
postfix?
My logs show alot of messages like: /SASL LOGIN authentication failed:
authentication failure
/I would like to know which username
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 09:01:44AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Louis-David Mitterrand:
> > On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 08:21:06AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Louis-David Mitterrand:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Can I select a specific transport depending on the envelope sender?
> > >
> > > No,
schnell-im-netz GmbH - Dominik Sennfelder:
> >
> > This is part of the SASL authentication RFC.
> >
> > 5. The AUTH parameter to the MAIL FROM command
> >
> > AUTH=addr-spec
> >
> > Arguments:
> > An addr-spec containing the identity which submitted
> > the message
> >
Louis-David Mitterrand:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 08:21:06AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Louis-David Mitterrand:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Can I select a specific transport depending on the envelope sender?
> >
> > No, that would break mail delivery with local recipients.
> >
> > You can have se
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 08:21:06AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Louis-David Mitterrand:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can I select a specific transport depending on the envelope sender?
>
> No, that would break mail delivery with local recipients.
>
> You can have sender-dependent relayhost or default_transp
>
> This is part of the SASL authentication RFC.
>
> 5. The AUTH parameter to the MAIL FROM command
>
> AUTH=addr-spec
>
> Arguments:
> An addr-spec containing the identity which submitted
> the message
> to the delivery system, or the two character sequence "<>
Louis-David Mitterrand:
> Hi,
>
> Can I select a specific transport depending on the envelope sender?
No, that would break mail delivery with local recipients.
You can have sender-dependent relayhost or default_transport, for
mail delivery with non-local recipients.
http://www.postfix.org/postc
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Stefan Seidel wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:33:31 -1000 (HST), Julian Cowley
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to block a particular user who is authenticated using
> > SASL from sending mail. Is there a way to do this?
> >
> > I found one way to do it, but it is no
Hi,
Can I select a specific transport depending on the envelope sender?
schnell-im-netz GmbH - Dominik Sennfelder:
> Hello,
>
> I have an Ubuntu 10.04 Server with postfix installed.
> several of our web servers deliver outgoing mail to this server
> They do this without authentication allowed by the
> mynetworks =
> option.
>
> This works.
> The server is setup to u
Hello,
I have an Ubuntu 10.04 Server with postfix installed.
several of our web servers deliver outgoing mail to this server
They do this without authentication allowed by the
mynetworks =
option.
This works.
The server is setup to use our mail server as relay host.
This works with authenticati
* Julian Cowley :
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > * Julian Cowley :
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I would like to block a particular user who is authenticated using
> > > SASL from sending mail. Is there a way to do this?
> >
> > Where do you keep this users credentials? Disable
So does anyone have any idea why VERP is not working on my postfix. Is it a
configuration problem?
Reubs
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of mouss
Sent: Thursday, 2 September 2010 11:25 a.m.
To: Postfix Users
Subje
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Julian Cowley :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to block a particular user who is authenticated using
> > SASL from sending mail. Is there a way to do this?
>
> Where do you keep this users credentials? Disable the auth account.
Yes thanks, tha
On 2010/09/02 10:24 AM, Aniruddha wrote:
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Aniruddha wrote:
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
That is true :) I meant that there is no error in my postfix
configuration. This error needs to be solved by the person providing
the DNS serve
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Aniruddha wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
> wrote:
>>>
>>> That is true :) I meant that there is no error in my postfix
>>> configuration. This error needs to be solved by the person providing
>>> the DNS server for my domain (in my case
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
>>
>> That is true :) I meant that there is no error in my postfix
>> configuration. This error needs to be solved by the person providing
>> the DNS server for my domain (in my case the hosting provider)
>
> Yep
>
You have been a great hel
* Boris Dimitrov :
> Hi group ,
> my question is what this error means , and where in config i can get rid
> of it. In general I dont want to restrict senders with this option.
So don't do it then
> Sep 2 11:05:35 digital postfix/smtpd[32536]: warning: 92.242.99.142:
> hostname sputniknet-1-m
Hi group ,
my question is what this error means , and where in config i can get rid
of it. In general I dont want to restrict senders with this option.
Sep 2 11:05:35 digital postfix/smtpd[32536]: warning: 92.242.99.142:
hostname sputniknet-1-mt.donbass.com verification failed: No address
asso
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
> I consider a DNS error to be a configuration error.
>
That is true :) I meant that there is no error in my postfix
configuration. This error needs to be solved by the person providing
the DNS server for my domain (in my case the hosting p
* Aniruddha :
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
> wrote:
>
> > $ host -t mx redmijncomputer.nl
> > redmijncomputer.nl mail is handled by 10 95.97.73.154.
> >
> > It should be mail.redmijncomputer.nl instead of 95.97.73.154
> > --
> Thank you for your quick reply. I'll ask my host
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
> $ host -t mx redmijncomputer.nl
> redmijncomputer.nl mail is handled by 10 95.97.73.154.
>
> It should be mail.redmijncomputer.nl instead of 95.97.73.154
> --
Thank you for your quick reply. I'll ask my hosting company to fix
this. This me
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:33:31 -1000 (HST), Julian Cowley
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to block a particular user who is authenticated using
> SASL from sending mail. Is there a way to do this?
>
(...)
> Is this the right approach or have I missed something entirely?
It appears to me that yo
* Aniruddha :
> Hi,
>
> Most of my mails are delivered and send without problems. However
> some domains reject e-mails with the error message below. What can I
> do to fix this? Is this a DNS error? Or a postfix config problem?
> Thanks in advance!
>
> <>: host mxb.mail.widexs.nl[213.206.122.19
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:33:31 -1000 (HST), Julian Cowley
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to block a particular user who is authenticated using
> SASL from sending mail. Is there a way to do this?
>
> I found one way to do it, but it is not perfect. I can block the
> the email address of that us
Hi,
Most of my mails are delivered and send without problems. However
some domains reject e-mails with the error message below. What can I
do to fix this? Is this a DNS error? Or a postfix config problem?
Thanks in advance!
<>: host mxb.mail.widexs.nl[213.206.122.196] said:
550-Verification
* Julian Cowley :
> Hello,
>
> I would like to block a particular user who is authenticated using
> SASL from sending mail. Is there a way to do this?
Where do you keep this users credentials? Disable the auth account.
> I found one way to do it, but it is not perfect. I can block the
> the em
61 matches
Mail list logo
