How weird. That was supposed to say Stan the man!
Thanks Steffan --------------------------------------------------------------- T E L 6 0 2 . 7 9 3 . 0 0 1 4 | F A X 6 0 2 . 9 7 1 . 1 6 9 4 Steffan A. Cline [email protected] Phoenix, Az http://www.ExecuChoice.net USA AIM : SteffanC ICQ : 57234309 YAHOO : Steffan_Cline MSN : [email protected] GOOGLE: Steffan.Cline Lasso Partner Alliance Member --------------------------------------------------------------- On 9/2/10 8:59 AM, "Steffan A. Cline" <[email protected]> wrote: >I can't imagine needing to change them. They are AWESOME! > >They work great just as they are. Kills off 80% of the spam at the least. > >Thank you, Stan the ma > > > > >Thanks > >Steffan > >--------------------------------------------------------------- >T E L 6 0 2 . 7 9 3 . 0 0 1 4 | F A X 6 0 2 . 9 7 1 . 1 6 9 4 >Steffan A. Cline >[email protected] Phoenix, Az >http://www.ExecuChoice.net USA >AIM : SteffanC ICQ : 57234309 >YAHOO : Steffan_Cline MSN : [email protected] >GOOGLE: Steffan.Cline Lasso Partner Alliance Member >--------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >On 9/2/10 8:14 AM, "Stan Hoeppner" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>mouss put forth on 9/1/2010 6:10 PM: >> >>>> Over 1600 regex patterns matching generic dynamics and statics. >>>>Rejects >>>> all generic dynamics, tags generic statics. Provided with no >>>> warranties, use at your own risk, etc. Has worked well here. >>>> >>>> http://www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.regexp >>>> >>>> Use in main.cf as: >>>> >>>> check_client_access regexp:/etc/postfix/fqrdns.regexp >>> >>> Try pcre and you'll love it:) >> >>I have some basic PCREs I created and use for some header checks and >>client restrictions, but they're super simple, and I'm still king nubie >>WRT regexes. Alas, even if I had the skill, I wouldn't feel like taking >>the time to convert those 1600+ POSIX regexes to PCRE syntax. ;) As I >>said, these were donated to me. :) >> >>-- >>Stan >> >> > >
