Hi all,
I'm planning now a LDAP-based Postfix setup and struggling designing
the how the LDAP schema should look like.
Basically the schema should :
- Be OpenLDAP compatible
- Allow multidomain
- Host transports for each defined account / email address.
- Integrate with dovecot and/or cyrus-imap
Gary Chambers wrote:
Asai,
Eero, can you please elaborate on this? I don't follow you.
"Nice servers with cisco pix smtp fixout enabled."
Eero is asserting that the mail server to which you are trying to
connect is behind a Cisco PIX/ASA firewall. Those devices have a
known bug th
Alexander Moisseev a écrit :
> mouss wrote:
>> if you are talking about your own mail (not customer mail), then
>> differentiate between outbound (submitted) mail and inbound mail. for
>> example, use port 587 for outbound mail (ideally enforce SASL/TLS here).
>> Then for such mail, simply remove a
Sahil Tandon put forth on 7/2/2010 4:13 PM:
> On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 13:41:06 -0700, Asai wrote:
>
>> For some reason, which I don't know how to figure out, our emails to
>> this one specific email domain are being refused. Can anyone point
>> me in the right direction? Here's an example of the l
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 13:41:06 -0700, Asai wrote:
For some reason, which I don't know how to figure out, our emails to
this one specific email domain are being refused. Can anyone point
me in the right direction? Here's an example of the log:
Jul 2 09:33:40 triata pos
I can't connect from my location...
[r...@smtp1 postfix]# telnet mail2.draxlerinsurance.com 25
Trying 67.227.17.36...
telnet: connect to address 67.227.17.36: Connection refused
2010/7/3 Asai :
> Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
> 2010/7/2 Asai :
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> For some reason, which I don't know how to figure out, our emails to this
> one specific email domain are being refused. Can anyone point me in the
> right direction? Here's an example of the log:
Nice servers with
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 13:41:06 -0700, Asai wrote:
> For some reason, which I don't know how to figure out, our emails to
> this one specific email domain are being refused. Can anyone point
> me in the right direction? Here's an example of the log:
>
> Jul 2 09:33:40 triata postfix/smtp[1485]:
Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/7/2 Asai :
Greetings,
For some reason, which I don't know how to figure out, our emails to this
one specific email domain are being refused. Can anyone point me in the
right direction? Here's an example of the log:
Jul 2 09:33:10 triata amavis[1162]: (01162-09)
2010/7/2 Asai :
> Greetings,
>
> For some reason, which I don't know how to figure out, our emails to this
> one specific email domain are being refused. Can anyone point me in the
> right direction? Here's an example of the log:
>
> Jul 2 09:33:10 triata amavis[1162]: (01162-09) Passed CLEAN, [
Asai put forth on 7/2/2010 3:41 PM:
> Greetings,
>
> For some reason, which I don't know how to figure out, our emails to
> this one specific email domain are being refused. Can anyone point me
> in the right direction? Here's an example of the log:
>
> Jul 2 09:33:10 triata amavis[1162]: (011
Greetings,
For some reason, which I don't know how to figure out, our emails to
this one specific email domain are being refused. Can anyone point me
in the right direction? Here's an example of the log:
Jul 2 09:33:10 triata amavis[1162]: (01162-09) Passed CLEAN,
[xx.xx.xx.xx] [xx.xx.xx.
Is there a nice diagram of these flow charts
http://www.postfix.org/OVERVIEW.html
I was looking for something like one with qmail
http://qmail.jms1.net/qmail-system.pdf
I am planning to migrate from qmail to postfix slowly.
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Becaus
Already have a home grown log scrapper dynamically managing (add/remove)
firewall rules and love the results.
Not only have bad behaving bots disappeared but there seems to be fewer spam
attempts for unique clients as well. Leaving log files much less cluttered
and much smaller. When I say dis
James R. Marcus put forth on 7/1/2010 4:40 PM:
> Slightly off topic, but a user has observed that any email sent in plain text
> is bounced, any mail sent as HTML gets sent.
>
> Has anyone encountered such an issue? My environment hasn't really changed
> in months and I'm confused.
Roll Twilig
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 04:14:23PM +0200, Michele Petrazzo wrote:
> If the recipient are inside virtual_alias_maps, postfix deliver
> email inside maildir, otherwise it forward it through relay_host.
Minor nitpick:
/usr/sbin/postconf: warning: relay_host: unknown parameter
> All works but like n
Hi all,
I have a local postfix configuration where lan users point to for send
mails.
If the recipient are inside virtual_alias_maps, postfix deliver email
inside maildir, otherwise it forward it through relay_host.
All works but like now I have to setup postfix for accept email, created
by an a
[top-posting fixed]
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 07:25:41AM -0400, David Hill wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:06:29PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * David Hill :
> > > soft_bounce = yes
> >
> > turn it off
> >
> Still, shouldn't the logfile show what actually was returned?
The log shows wh
First, a note about posting etiquette. Please don't top-post your
replies. And when starting a new thread, start with a NEW message,
not a reply to someone else's post. Thank you.
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:07:18AM +0200, Datatronics Gmail wrote:
> Looks like our ISP got us out of the blacklist,
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 11:13:55AM +0400, Alexander Moisseev wrote:
> If you don't want to use submission, you may remove headers only
> for your local networks (but it may affect on some incoming mail):
> /^Received:.*192\.168\.0\..*/ IGNORE
> /^Received:.*192\.168\.10\..*/ IGNORE
> /^Received:.*
Still, shouldn't the logfile show what actually was returned?
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:06:29PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * David Hill :
> > soft_bounce = yes
>
> turn it off
>
> --
> Ralf Hildebrandt
> Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
> Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 06:42:07AM +0200, Eddy Ilg wrote:
> warning: Connection concurrency limit exceeded: 11 from xx[w.x.y.z] for
> service smtp
Butchered logs make it difficult to help you, the "xx" and "w.x.y.z"
need to be shown unaltered, so that they can be compared with the
configuration
* Matt Hayes :
> ASA:
>
> config t
> no inspect smtp
Amen to that!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
ralf.hi
mouss wrote:
if you are talking about your own mail (not customer mail), then
differentiate between outbound (submitted) mail and inbound mail. for
example, use port 587 for outbound mail (ideally enforce SASL/TLS here).
Then for such mail, simply remove all received headers:
/^Received:/IGNO
Hello Patric,
Thanks for your quick Reply,
Looks like our ISP got us out of the blacklist, and all of the emails in the
queue where delivered during the night, but my question is the following,
Why were we getting the same 451 error inside our network?, I understand
that if we are marked as a Sp
25 matches
Mail list logo
