On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 06:00:08PM -0700, Terry Barnum wrote:
> I noticed that macports has updated the postfix port to 2.7.1_0. I looked
> through the release notes and didn't see any upgrade gotchas but thought I'd
> ask here before pulling the trigger.
Download and read:
ftp://ftp.porc
I noticed that macports has updated the postfix port to 2.7.1_0. I looked
through the release notes and didn't see any upgrade gotchas but thought I'd
ask here before pulling the trigger.
Here's my 2.6.2 postconf -n. Any recommended changes for 2.7.1?
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
command_dire
Andrew G. Grant:
> I just got smtpd_sender_maps to work with smtpd_sender_restrictions
> using reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch.
>
> While researching how that worked, I saw information indicating
> that you could apply the reject_sender_login_mismatch to the
> smtpd_recipient_restriction
I just got smtpd_sender_maps to work with smtpd_sender_restrictions using
reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch.
While researching how that worked, I saw information indicating that you could
apply the reject_sender_login_mismatch to the smtpd_recipient_restrictions.
Can someone explain
On 6/15/2010 4:30 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Hi,
Postfix smtp logs outgoing emails like this:
postfix/smtp[13950]: E6DA025473: to=, relay=none,
delay=4537, delays=4536/0.06/0.53/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=etc...
I noticed that when an email has more than one receipient, smtp will
log
separate mess
I just got smtpd_sender_maps to work with smtpd_sender_restrictions using
reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch.
While researching how that worked, I saw information indicating that you could
apply the reject_sender_login_mismatch to the smtpd_recipient_restrictions.
Can someone explain ho
Thank you. I will give that a try.
Can anyone answer the question about how SASL is able to authenticate Users
with their
Passwords stored in Open Directory, but not pull their Email addresses?
On Jun 15, 2010, at 3:14 PM, Jerrale Gayle wrote:
On 6/15/2010 12:33 PM, Andrew G. Grant wrote:
>
>
On 06/15/2010 11:54 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 6/15/2010 4:30 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Postfix smtp logs outgoing emails like this:
>>>
>>> postfix/smtp[13950]: E6DA025473: to=, relay=none,
>>> delay=4537, delays=4536/0.06/0.53/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=etc...
>>>
>>> I noticed that
On 06/15/2010 11:30 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Postfix smtp logs outgoing emails like this:
>>
>> postfix/smtp[13950]: E6DA025473: to=, relay=none,
>> delay=4537, delays=4536/0.06/0.53/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=etc...
>>
>> I noticed that when an email has more than one receipient, smtp w
On 6/15/2010 4:30 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Hi,
Postfix smtp logs outgoing emails like this:
postfix/smtp[13950]: E6DA025473: to=, relay=none,
delay=4537, delays=4536/0.06/0.53/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=etc...
I noticed that when an email has more than one receipient, smtp will log
separate messag
Hi,
Postfix smtp logs outgoing emails like this:
postfix/smtp[13950]: E6DA025473: to=, relay=none,
delay=4537, delays=4536/0.06/0.53/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=etc...
I noticed that when an email has more than one receipient, smtp will log
separate messages, one for every receipient. Will smtp alway
On Jun 15, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Erik Logtenberg wrote:
> Postfix smtp logs outgoing emails like this:
>
> postfix/smtp[13950]: E6DA025473: to=, relay=none,
> delay=4537, delays=4536/0.06/0.53/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=etc...
>
> I noticed that when an email has more than one receipient, smtp will log
>
Viktor,
You said:
"You need correct mappings in smtpd_sender_login_maps, mapping each
sender address to the correct SASL login."
Does that mean that Postfix will not pull the User Name and Email address from
the Open Directory?
I had assumed that it was already pulling the User Na
Hi,
Postfix smtp logs outgoing emails like this:
postfix/smtp[13950]: E6DA025473: to=, relay=none,
delay=4537, delays=4536/0.06/0.53/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=etc...
I noticed that when an email has more than one receipient, smtp will log
separate messages, one for every receipient. Will smtp always
JC Putter a écrit :
> hi everyone,
>
> i have a postfix (2.3.3) server running with fetchmail to retrieve mail
> from the actual mailserver, the problem is that only the office users
> get their my from the local postfix/fetchmail server,
nobody "gets" mail using postfix nor fetchmail. users "g
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:32:07AM -0700, Andrew G. Grant wrote:
> Thank you Viktor. That does in fact stop the email if there is a mismatch.
> However, now I cannot send anything as it tells me that I don't own the
> email address I am trying to send to.
>
> Can you tell me what it is checking
Thank you Viktor. That does in fact stop the email if there is a mismatch.
However, now I cannot send anything as it tells me that I don't own the
email address I am trying to send to.
Can you tell me what it is checking to verify that the User Name
belongs to the Email address the user is sendi
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:33:12AM -0700, Andrew G. Grant wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have configured the default install of Postfix (version 2.5.5) on
> Apple OS X Server 10.6.3 (Darwin 10.3.0). Everything seems to run very
> well with the exception that once authenticated, a user can claim to be
> an
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
I think it was due to me using:
postscreen_blacklist_action = drop
and no postscreen_dnsbl_action at all.
Once I set
postscreen_dnsbl_action = drop
it seems to work as intended.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin
* Wietse Venema :
> More thoroughly, when I search for all IP addresses that show up
> in postscreen "DNSBL rank XXX" records:
>
> % egrep "`awk '/DNSBL rank/ { print $NF }' /var/log/maillog | sort -u`"
> /var/log/maillog | grep smtpd
If I try this, I'm getting:
-bash: /bin/egrep: Argument list
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> Jun 15 18:30:20 mail postfix/dnsblog[15154]: addr 79.15.172.144 blocked by
> domain mykey.zen.dq.spamhaus.net as 127.0.0.4
> Jun 15 18:30:24 mail postfix/postscreen[14995]: DNSBL rank 1 for 79.15.172.144
>
> again, blacklisted, 15 minutes later.
>
> Jun 15 18:30:24 mail p
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> This is postfix-2.8-20100610
>
> From my log:
>
> mail:~# fgrep 79.15.172.144 /var/log/mail.log
> Jun 15 18:15:06 mail postfix/dnsblog[12235]: addr 79.15.172.144 blocked by
> domain mykey.zen.dq.spamhaus.net as 127.0.0.4
> Jun 15 18:15:10 mail postfix/postscreen[14995]: DNSBL
This is postfix-2.8-20100610
>From my log:
mail:~# fgrep 79.15.172.144 /var/log/mail.log
Jun 15 18:15:06 mail postfix/dnsblog[12235]: addr 79.15.172.144 blocked by
domain mykey.zen.dq.spamhaus.net as 127.0.0.4
Jun 15 18:15:10 mail postfix/postscreen[14995]: DNSBL rank 1 for 79.15.172.144
So it
Hello,
I have configured the default install of Postfix (version 2.5.5) on Apple OS X
Server 10.6.3 (Darwin 10.3.0). Everything seems to run very well with the
exception that once authenticated, a user can claim to be any valid email
address on my network.
I currently require SASL Authenticati
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 05:03:08PM +0200, Jan C. wrote:
> Hi Victor,
> I know this is a submission service and this was only for
> illustration/testing purpose.
>
> I just want to be sure how I can find a domain's TLS mapping from the
> smtp_tls_policy_maps when transport mappings are involved.
Hi Victor,
I know this is a submission service and this was only for
illustration/testing purpose.
I just want to be sure how I can find a domain's TLS mapping from the
smtp_tls_policy_maps when transport mappings are involved.
Thanks,
Jan
j...@weitan.org:
> But now for my understanding how mail is processed:
>
> the qmgr first makes a lookup locally and if not successful he will
> proceed to the relay-entries?
No, I guess that is how EXIM works.
With Postfix, the queue manager asks a different daemon (trivial-rewrite).
This daemo
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 03:58:43PM +0200, j...@weitan.org wrote:
> the qmgr first makes a lookup locally and if not successful he will
> proceed to the relay-entries?
No. See
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/OVERVIEW.html
http://
* Stefano Villa :
> I've the task to implement a disclaimer for all mail.
> What product can I use?
Altermime
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 5
Hi to all!
I've a postfix (2.3.3 version) server on RHEL (2.6.18-
164.11.1.0.1.el5 version).
The postfix role is to relay messages to another Exchange server.
I've the task to implement a disclaimer for all mail.
What product can I use?
Thanks!
--
Stefano Villa
Hi,
> http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html
>
> Look for mail gateway.
Works.
Thanks.
But now for my understanding how mail is processed:
the qmgr first makes a lookup locally and if not successful he will
proceed to the relay-entries?
qmgr -> try to deliver local if NOT suc
Avinash Pawar // Viva:
> Dear Sir/Madam,
>
> When any e-mail sent from postfix, the system's IP address will be use in
> email header.
>
> But I want that each mail should take different ip's.
>
> These ip's will store in ip tables or they will save in virtual interfaces.
>
> Please suggest me
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:00:51AM +0200, Jan C. wrote:
> This works for domains which are looked up via DNS MX. Now, since the
> gmail MTAs do not support TLS, I add the following transport mapping
> in transport_maps
> "gmail.com smtp.gmail.com:587"
Don't. This is a submission service. Not an
Jan C.:
> Did you just add this config option in Postfix 2.8
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#tls_append_default_CA
Yes.
Wietse
On 2010-06-15, at 12:53, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Have you tried the suggestion? I'm the person who wrote Postfix.
If course I tried. And of course I know that you're the one who wrote
Postfix (thank you very much for that!), that's why I asked why you find
my config weird.
With the your suggest
Dear Sir/Madam,
When any e-mail sent from postfix, the system's IP address will be use in
email header.
But I want that each mail should take different ip's.
These ip's will store in ip tables or they will save in virtual interfaces.
Please suggest me whether this is possible or not. If possibl
Matias E. Fernandez:
[blah blah 20 lines]
> > /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> >masquerade_domains = $mydomain
> >masquerade_classes = envelope_recipient, envelope_sender
[blah blah 10 lines]
Have you tried the suggestion? I'm the person who wrote Postfix.
Wietse
j...@weitan.org:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Hi,
>
> > Do not list weitan.org in mydestination. It should be a relay
> > destination. Therefore, use relay_domains and relay_recipient_maps
> > as explained in ADDRESS_CLASS_README and STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.
>
> > Use
В Пнд, 14/06/2010 в 09:39 -0500, Noel Jones пишет:
> On 6/14/2010 2:46 AM, Покотиленко Костик wrote:
> > Also can somebody state that my postfix version (Debian say its
> > 2.5.5-1.1) doesn't have postmaster hardcoded internal checks? It seems
> > like it have, because there is no postmaster accept
Did you just add this config option in Postfix 2.8
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#tls_append_default_CA
?
Hello,
I have Postfix with TLS policy maps set up to send traffic via TLS to
remote MTAs. I'm writing an application which should be able to
determine if an email to given domain will be sent through an TLS
connection or not, just by reading the Postfix configuration. I
thought that having a look i
Hi,
> Do not list weitan.org in mydestination. It should be a relay
> destination. Therefore, use relay_domains and relay_recipient_maps
> as explained in ADDRESS_CLASS_README and STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.
> Use virtual_alias_maps (NOT VIRTUAL ALIAS DOMAINS) to deliver that
> one user locall
42 matches
Mail list logo
