punit jain put forth on 5/19/2010 12:52 AM:
> I am using Postfix as an MTA but I see nowadays lot of spam going out of my
> system. I have used transport based throttling for a domain but I am looking
> for options for per sender based rate limiting. Can I achieve per user based
> throttling using
On Tue, 18 May 2010 13:54:51 -0400, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 07:47:12PM +0200, Julien Vehent wrote:
>
>
> 1.Your Postfix is not directly linked with LDAP at all, it looks like
> you are on a Debian system, and the LDAP table driver is dynamically
> loaded.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:22 AM, punit jain wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I am using Postfix as an MTA but I see nowadays lot of spam going out of my
> system. I have used transport based throttling for a domain but I am looking
> for options for per sender based rate limiting. Can I achieve per user based
>
Hi ,
I am using Postfix as an MTA but I see nowadays lot of spam going out of my
system. I have used transport based throttling for a domain but I am looking
for options for per sender based rate limiting. Can I achieve per user based
throttling using postfix or I have to use some 3rd party softwa
> A while back I changed my aliases to use the mysql database. Well I
> thought everything was fine until I had a changed and relized the
> postmaster address was not working. Okay no problem I'll just link a
> postmaster address to the support account of my system. Well that is
> great if I send a
reject unverified sender is nice way to block spam. But it also blocks
my other servers that really are not e-mail servers. I have tried to
get around this with no luck. I have two backup servers that are not
really e-mail servers. There is no route to them but they do send out
information
A while back I changed my aliases to use the mysql database. Well I
thought everything was fine until I had a changed and relized the
postmaster address was not working. Okay no problem I'll just link a
postmaster address to the support account of my system. Well that is
great if I send a m
* Phil Howard :
> I'm looking for an SMTP testing tool I can use to do tests of configuration
> changes to Postfix. To do the proper tests I need to carry out the actual
> SMTP protocol from this program (as opposed to just putting mail in the
> queue), with TLS, STARTTLS, and login/authentication
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 15:15, mouss wrote:
> if perl is acceptable for you, then it's easy to do what you want using
> available perl modules, or you can just use:
>
> http://www.logix.cz/michal/devel/smtp-cli/smtp-cli
>
I think Wietse was on the right track. I'll probably just use pexpect +
o
I'm confused about the following in the main.cf
smtpd_receipient_restrictions
smtpd_sender_restrictions
smtpd_client_restrictions
smtpd_data_restrictions this I pretty much get
smtpd_helo_restrictions this I pretty much get
Now with postfix all of these are blank except
smtpd_recei
ram a écrit :
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 10:15 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
>> On 5/10/2010 8:33 AM, ram wrote:
>>> Can I use somthing like lmtp_generic_maps for delivery to dovecot
>>>
>> Your question is incomplete.
>> What are you trying to accomplish? How does postfix deliver
>> to dovecot?
>
>
>
Phil Howard a écrit :
> I'm looking for an SMTP testing tool I can use to do tests of
> configuration changes to Postfix. To do the proper tests I need to
> carry out the actual SMTP protocol from this program (as opposed to just
> putting mail in the queue), with TLS, STARTTLS, and login/authenti
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 07:47:12PM +0200, Julien Vehent wrote:
> > Is the LDAP library linked into Postfix compiled with Cyrus SASL support?
> > The "ldapdb" auxprop plugin needs an LDAP library that can do SASL binds.
> > If your LDAP library is not SASL (rather than simple bind) enabled, this
>
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:59, Wietse Venema wrote:
> This sounds like a job for Expect and "openssl s_client".
> Expect is at http://expect.nist.gov/
>
Ah, yeah ... that ... or pexpect for Python (just used pexpect last month to
extract stats from our Cisco routers).
On Tue, 18 May 2010 12:37:47 -0400, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:44:43PM +0200, Julien Vehent wrote:
>
>> I want to set up SASL authentication using LDAPDB, but it seems that
>> postfix connects to LDAP but doesn't send anything to it...
>>
>> I try to authenticate using '
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:44:43PM +0200, Julien Vehent wrote:
> I want to set up SASL authentication using LDAPDB, but it seems that
> postfix connects to LDAP but doesn't send anything to it...
>
> I try to authenticate using 'auth plain ', and I receive :
>
> 535 5.7.8 Error: authentication f
Hey guys,
I want to set up SASL authentication using LDAPDB, but it seems that
postfix connects to LDAP but doesn't send anything to it...
I try to authenticate using 'auth plain ', and I receive :
535 5.7.8 Error: authentication failed: authentication failure
Connection to LDAP works fine at t
I'm looking for an SMTP testing tool I can use to do tests of configuration
changes to Postfix. To do the proper tests I need to carry out the actual
SMTP protocol from this program (as opposed to just putting mail in the
queue), with TLS, STARTTLS, and login/authentication support, do it from a
c
Hello
Thank You for all informations sent over.
Could You please send me specs for that commercial software so I can ask
the client if that's what he supposed to have ?
You can email me off-list,don't know this list rules by heart.
Sincerely
Dragan
Nataraj wrote:
Dragan Zubac wrote:
Hello
Juan Devas:
> Hi,
>
> I have setup postfix as an mx backup using:
>
> relay_domains = betterthanbacon.com
> defer_transports = smtp
>
> Works ok, but upon browsing the log /var/log/mail.log, I have found the
> following entry:
>
> May 18 13:06:56 ks postfix/error[14135]: 781A83E1F9:
> to= pl>
Hi,
I have setup postfix as an mx backup using:
relay_domains = betterthanbacon.com
defer_transports = smtp
Works ok, but upon browsing the log /var/log/mail.log, I have found the
following entry:
May 18 13:06:56 ks postfix/error[14135]: 781A83E1F9: to=, relay=none, delay=0.14, delays=0.09/0.0
Simon:
> What I am trying to achieve is to have the following:
>
> - All clients listed in mynetworks unrestricted sending
> - All clients NOT in mynetworks using sasl_authenticated unrestricted
> sending
> - All clients NOT in mynetworks NOT using sasl_authenticated (all other
> clients i guess?)
22 matches
Mail list logo