On 3/31/2010 9:58 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/31/2010 7:41 PM, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
I have a setup where the local deliver using cyrus-imapd is located on
an encrypted volume. When the server is rebooted, we will manually mount
the volume and start the cyrus application. However, until we start
On 3/31/2010 7:41 PM, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
I have a setup where the local deliver using cyrus-imapd is located on
an encrypted volume. When the server is rebooted, we will manually mount
the volume and start the cyrus application. However, until we start
cyrus, how can i configure postfix to acc
I have a setup where the local deliver using cyrus-imapd is located on
an encrypted volume. When the server is rebooted, we will manually
mount the volume and start the cyrus application. However, until we
start cyrus, how can i configure postfix to accept email but defer or
hold the local de
Paul Enlund a écrit :
> Hi
>
> I want to stop MAIL FROM: someb...@[a.b.c.d] (IP address) being accepted.
> My impression would have been the config below would do this as say
> [1.1.1.1]
> does not have A or MX records.
>
try a check_sender_access with a pcre map:
/@\[/ REJECT Sorry, we do n
On Thu, April 1, 2010 1:31 am, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 3/31/2010 6:37 AM, Voytek Eymont wrote:
> "no limit" is usually a bad choice; unexpected things can happen.
> Better choices include
> - set virtual_mailbox_limit to some large value you don't ever
> expect to exceed, maybe 10x ~ 100x the mes
Sharma, Ashish a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I am running my postfix with 3 mail filters and 2 content filters (actually
> one of the content filter (amavisd) is piping it's output to the other).
>
> My question here is how can I make sure to make my setup robust in the sense
> that if one of the mai
Hi
I want to stop MAIL FROM: someb...@[a.b.c.d] (IP address) being accepted.
My impression would have been the config below would do this as say [1.1.1.1]
does not have A or MX records.
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
reject_unknown_sender_domain
How can I achieve my goal.
Regards Paul En
Steve a écrit :
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:44:58 +0200
>> Von: Louis-David Mitterrand
>> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Betreff: Re: max length of pcre rule?
>
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:38:17PM +0200, Steve wrote:
>>> Ohhh boy. Now looking at the re
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> Ok. Please see:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#undisclosed_recipients_header
>
> Either leaving undisclosed_recipients_header at its default value by
> removing it from your main.cf, or explicitly setting it empty should fix
> th
On 3/31/2010 3:46 PM, Josh Cason wrote:
My mailserver is behing a firewall that also does nat tranlastion. So
the inside has a dmz zone. When you hit from the oustide you hit the
outside / public ip numbers. You are hitting the firewall box. Then
going in to the dmz zone. The firewall is setup to
My mailserver is behing a firewall that also does nat tranlastion. So
the inside has a dmz zone. When you hit from the oustide you hit the
outside / public ip numbers. You are hitting the firewall box. Then
going in to the dmz zone. The firewall is setup to route the proper
ports back and f
Sorry for missing this.
I have these emails going to a special mailbox and I forgot.
Sorry again, but thanks again for the help and I will try this out today!
jg
On 3/31/10 1:55 PM, "Victor Duchovni"
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:28:22PM -0400, Jon Giles wrote:
>
>> Thanks again for th
Victor:
Thanks for the tips. After removing fallback_relay from my main.cf the
loops stopped when the mailbox server is offline, but I still need to set up
the second relayhost.
I don't think a local DNS server would work out for us. The relayhosts may
change their IPs, and so it would be best
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:28:22PM -0400, Jon Giles wrote:
> Thanks again for the suggestions. Having removed fallback_relay has
> stopped the loops, but I am still challenged in setting up the failover to
> the second relayhost.
>
> Unless there is something I am missing, using a local DNS ser
Hello,
For me you have to do a script which select the message over 2 megabytes
and put them hold.
At night you put those mail on queue.
With the command postqueue -p and command awk you can put email on hold.
Like this to hold email on day :
On cron you put this => postqueue -p| awk 'BEGIN {
Victor:
Thanks again for the suggestions. Having removed fallback_relay has
stopped the loops, but I am still challenged in setting up the failover to
the second relayhost.
Unless there is something I am missing, using a local DNS server to create
the failover isn't an option for me. I can't u
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:31:29AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> Better choices include
> - set virtual_mailbox_limit to some large value you don't ever expect to
> exceed, maybe 10x ~ 100x the message_size_limit.
> - set "virtual_mailbox_limit = $message_size_limit" so that changes to
> message_si
helo people
i has been (unlucky) searching a lot in the list archives and google for
a way to having a dual scheme for delivering message queue, one for
messages below 2 megabytes, this kind with inmediately deliver and
messages over this limit with delivery only between 18:00 and 6:00
someb
On 3/31/2010 6:37 AM, Voytek Eymont wrote:
I currently have in main.cf like:
message_size_limit = 1024
and
virtual_mailbox_limit = 1024
so, if I want to increase it, I need also increase virtual_mailbox_limit
to at least same as message_size_limit
can I just use message_size_limit = va
I know postfix has no native support for "Sender Rewriting Scheme" (IMHO
it should ..)
We implement forwarding using virtual_alias_maps or using cyrus+sieve.
So what is the recommended way to implement SRS. I think since a milter
now can do sender rewrite that will be the easiest way to do it
Hello,
I guess this message is off-topic as it is only loosely related to postfix.
You may stop reading this now if you are non interested in such topics.
---
I am responsible for a mailing list with roughly half a million
subscribers. The flow is outgoing only as we send a newsletter to
subs
I currently have in main.cf like:
message_size_limit = 1024
and
virtual_mailbox_limit = 1024
so, if I want to increase it, I need also increase virtual_mailbox_limit
to at least same as message_size_limit
can I just use message_size_limit = value, and, don't worry about
virtual_mailbox_l
an...@isac.gov.in:
> Dear List,
>
> We are using the smtpd-policyd feature from long time to allow some
> specific users to receive higher size mails. It is working fine.
> But, it does not work when the recipient_count is more than one as we
> are comparing the value with recipient.
>
>
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 09:03 +0530, an...@isac.gov.in wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> We are using the smtpd-policyd feature from long time to allow some
> specific users to receive higher size mails. It is working fine.
> But, it does not work when the recipient_count is more than one as we
> are
24 matches
Mail list logo
