I’ve been banging my head away at this for a while today and all I have is a
headache.
Is there a (preferably generic) way to redirect *all* delivery to local
accounts to $lo...@$mydomain instead of delivering to /var/mail/ ?
(I’m trying to setup a true NULL CLIENT configuration so that even ‘m
I got some error logs as following
The recipient domian is "mateford.com , 126.com , 163.com "
but their MX record does not point to my postfix server .
I don't know why postfix complaint "mail for x.com loops back to myself"
[root@ ~]# postconf -n
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
broken
You must check the model of you communication device, that happent to
us the last week, into the pix or asa device must disable "inspect
esmtp", this link could provide some help:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00806745b8.shtml
2010/3
On 23-Mar-2010, at 19:31, LuKreme wrote:
user+extens...@example.com = possibly excepted.
ACCEPTED. Doh.
--
Windle shook his head sadly. Five exclamation marks, the sure sign of
an insane
mind. --Reaper Man
On 23-Mar-2010, at 03:55, Bas Mevissen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:24 +0100, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2010-03-22 Bas Mevissen wrote:
Why catch-all? Because I often use the part before the "@" as a
key to
see the origin of the e-mail when subscribing.
That's what address extension was i
On 22-Mar-2010, at 05:17, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
you really should take a look on it.
http://www.policyd.org/
I did take a look at it, built the database for it, read the INSTALL
document very carefully.
I get to step 10.
10. Fire everything up and browse to the web gui to configu
On 23-Mar-2010, at 12:27, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Kaleb Hosie > wrote:
I am running CentOS 5.4 and the latest version of Postfix it has on
the repository is version 2.3.3. After looking at the Postfix site
I found out that that version is no longer updated.
Is
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Matias wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to move away from postgrey to a sql based greylist service, so that I
> can access the greylist database from more than one server.
>
> I've been reading about sqlgrey, gps, gld, etc...
>
> Can you recommend any of these?
>
>
> Which
And your point is ?
- "mouss" wrote:
> Leonardo Rodrigues a écrit :
> note that v2 has nothing to do with v1. It is unfortunate to see the
>
> same product name used for two different things. v1 was a single
> thread
>
> C program. v2 is a perl program (I like perl. this isn't the
> issu
On Wed, March 24, 2010 5:32 am, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> Disable SASL authentication for un-encrypted connections.
> Don't confuse SASL authentication (username/password typicall to verify
> submission access rights) with session encryption (prevent passive wiretap
> of session).
> SASL and SSL a
Leonardo Rodrigues a écrit :
>
> gld is very outdated, it couldnt handle medium to large traffic when
> i used it.
>
> i switched to policyd and never had problems it's MySQL based
> and can implement greylist and some other features.
>
> i'm still using policyd v1, i didnt migr
Luciano Mannucci a écrit :
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:17:42 -0300
> Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
>
>> gld is very outdated, it couldnt handle medium to large traffic
>> when i used it.
> I use gld on a dedicated server.
> It scales very well :-)
> Never had a problem either...
>
> luciano.
goo
Robert Schetterer a écrit :
> Am 23.03.2010 00:14, schrieb mouss:
>> Mauro Faccenda a écrit :
>>> Hi Reinaldo,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
> Alternative to that patch? I did some searches
I've been using policydv2 for quite a while now.
It's easy to install and manage, it's under active development ( well maybe not
so active but oh well ) and it plays nice. I am using it for both greylisting
and accounting. Especially i found the accounting feature very useful, since my
primary o
On 03/22/2010 02:23 AM, Matias wrote:
Hi,
I want to move away from postgrey to a sql based greylist service, so
that I can access the greylist database from more than one server.
I've been reading about sqlgrey, gps, gld, etc...
I've used postgrey and sqlgrey, but for the past few years I'
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 03:17:05PM -0400, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> > > smtpd_tls_security_level = may
> >
> > Use this instead of "smtpd_use_tls".
>
> Noted.
>
> >> smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes # ?
> >
> > Disable SASL authentication for un-encrypted connections.
>
> I am guessing I only have the a
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 02:23:30PM -0400, Carlos Mennens wrote:
>
>> In my Postfix main.cf, I have the following TLS parameters:
>>
>> smtpd_use_tls = yes #announce STARTTLS support to SMTP clients, but do
>
> This is the Postfix 2.2 syntax
> I am running CentOS 5.4 and the latest version of Postfix it has on the
> repository is version 2.3.3. After looking at the Postfix site I found out
> that that version is no longer updated.
Kaleb,
RedHat tends to backport security patches even for older products, when they
can. I personally
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 02:23:30PM -0400, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> In my Postfix main.cf, I have the following TLS parameters:
>
> smtpd_use_tls = yes #announce STARTTLS support to SMTP clients, but do
This is the Postfix 2.2 syntax. With 2.3 and later, use:
smtpd_tls_security_level = may
N
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Kaleb Hosie wrote:
> I am running CentOS 5.4 and the latest version of Postfix it has on the
> repository is version 2.3.3. After looking at the Postfix site I found out
> that that version is no longer updated.
>
> Is it worth downloading the source code for the
I am confused by the following Postfix definition of
'smtpd_tls_auth_only' & 'smtpd_tls_security_level' & would appreciate
if someone could please help me understand this. TLS configuration is
new to me so I appologise for my ignorance and I did bother to review:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Kaleb Hosie wrote:
> I am running CentOS 5.4 and the latest version of Postfix it has on the
> repository is version 2.3.3. After looking at the Postfix site I found out
> that that version is no longer updated.
>
> Is it worth downloading the source code for the
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 01:50:30PM -0400, Kaleb Hosie wrote:
> I am running CentOS 5.4 and the latest version of Postfix it has on the
> repository is version 2.3.3. After looking at the Postfix site I found out
> that that version is no longer updated.
>
> Is it worth downloading the source co
I am running CentOS 5.4 and the latest version of Postfix it has on the
repository is version 2.3.3. After looking at the Postfix site I found out that
that version is no longer updated.
Is it worth downloading the source code for the latest stable version and
manually compile and install it? O
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 04:18:49PM +, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
[ Received: from stytwo.spampig.org.uk (stytwo.spampig.org.uk [212.69.52.158]) ]
> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 12:05 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> > Everything you need to know is the RELEASE_NOTES.
>
> You are such a rude arse
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 09:09:24AM -0700, Gary Smith wrote:
> > Everything you need to know is the RELEASE_NOTES.
>
> Read them already... I just wanted to do a double check first.
Good. You should be all set then. By all means go with 2.7.
--
Viktor.
P.S. Morgan Stanley is looking
> There may be several legitimate reasons to stick with an older version
> for some time, but if it's all the same to you, then using the latest
> stable release is always the best default choice.
For products like postfix (in terms of how they manager their product), I have
high confidence when
Postfix 2.7.0 is stable and thus considered production ready. The
2.7-release features some nice improvements over the 2.6-release,
described in the release notes:
http://postfix.rhinotech.nl/postfix-release/official/postfix-2.7.0.RELEASE_NOTES
There may be several legitimate reasons to stick wit
> Everything you need to know is the RELEASE_NOTES.
>
Read them already... I just wanted to do a double check first.
Thanks,
Gary-
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 08:47:27AM -0700, Gary Smith wrote:
> Our Q2 patch cycle is coming up and I was going to upgrade 2.6.5 -> 2.6.6 on
> the servers but then though maybe 2.6.5 -> 2.7.0 might be in order. I have
> everything ready to go either way (download and created RPM's for both 2.6.6
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 01:16:03PM +, Daniel Gomes wrote:
> postfix/master[1043]: warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 1790
> killed by signal 6
> postfix/master[1043]: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd: bad command
> startup -- throttling
Is smtpd running in a chroot jail?
Is OpenLDAP
Our Q2 patch cycle is coming up and I was going to upgrade 2.6.5 -> 2.6.6 on
the servers but then though maybe 2.6.5 -> 2.7.0 might be in order. I have
everything ready to go either way (download and created RPM's for both 2.6.6
and 2.7.0).
Is there any consideration that needs to be made in
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:10:44AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > * issuer "TERENA Personal CA"
> > * O=TERENA
> > * C=NL
> >
> > I guess what I am looking for is a new restriction called something like
> > "check_ccert_attr", that would use user defined attributes to take
> > decisions. That wo
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.6.6.html]
Postfix legacy releases 2.6.6, 2.5.10 and 2.4.14 contain fixes that
were already included with Postfix 2.7 (stable release) and Postfix
2.8 (experimental release).
NOTE: Postfix
Dick Visser:
> Hi guys
>
> At the moment we use SASL authentication to allow our users to
> send mail through our mailer (Postfix 2.5). I would like to extend this
> to using client certificates for authentication as well.
>
> Our users have personal certificates that are signed by a the "TERENA
Noel Jones a écrit :
On 3/23/2010 9:02 AM, Alain NAKACHE wrote:
Hi all,
I need to send to an email address <-...@domain.tld> (with a minus at
the beginning of the localpart). I've checked the BNF from RFC 822 and
this syntax seems to be correct but postfix (v2.3.3) qmgr refuse it :
http://www
On 3/23/2010 9:02 AM, Alain NAKACHE wrote:
Hi all,
I need to send to an email address <-...@domain.tld> (with a minus at
the beginning of the localpart). I've checked the BNF from RFC 822 and
this syntax seems to be correct but postfix (v2.3.3) qmgr refuse it :
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.
Hi all,
I need to send to an email address <-...@domain.tld> (with a minus at
the beginning of the localpart). I've checked the BNF from RFC 822 and
this syntax seems to be correct but postfix (v2.3.3) qmgr refuse it :
Mar 22 10:56:41 ns201715 postfix/pickup[13076]: 3FB0F29F0CE: uid=48
from=
Hi guys
At the moment we use SASL authentication to allow our users to
send mail through our mailer (Postfix 2.5). I would like to extend this
to using client certificates for authentication as well.
Our users have personal certificates that are signed by a the "TERENA
Personal CA". Due to the na
Hey group,
I am having some problems with virtual aliases that are fetched from a
LDAP server with STARTTLS. Unfortunately, the error logs in this case
don't seem to be very helpful, as all I can see is:
postfix/master[1043]: warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 1790
killed by signal 6
pos
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 05:43 -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > I'm aware of address extension.
>
> I think maybe I have discussed this with you before as well.
>
I don't think so :-)
> > It is a well-known trick, so the
> > extension is likely to be stripped off by spam senders.
>
> Funny thing abou
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Robert Schetterer
wrote:
> Am 23.03.2010 00:14, schrieb mouss:
>>> Also I droped the use of the VDA patches, since it implements
>>> everything in Postfix's LDA and I am actually using the Dovecot's
>>> (deliver).
>>
>> well, if you use dovecot, then forget about v
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 02:36:21PM +0200, Dudi Goldenberg wrote:
> >250-mail.iamghost.com
> >250-PIPELINING
> >250-SIZE 1024
> >250-VRFY
> >250-ETRN
> >250-XXXA
> >250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN
> >250-AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN
> >250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
> >250-8BITMIME
> >250 DSN
>
> My guess is that you ha
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:55:04AM +0100, Bas Mevissen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:24 +0100, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> > On 2010-03-22 Bas Mevissen wrote:
> > > Why catch-all? Because I often use the part before the "@"
> > > as a key to see the origin of the e-mail when subscribing.
> >
> >
> Is the MTU<->buffer-size mismatch in the SMTP client or the milter?
An upgrade to clamav-milter is being carried out tonight during scheduled
downtime so I will investigate at this time and post to the list
accordingly.
Dave Green
2010/3/19 mouss :
> Oleksii Krykun a écrit :
>> If I use smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient=yes or
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions=reject_unlisted_recipient options all
>> messages to non-existant addresses are rejected.
>> But if anybody sends message to multiple addresses in same domain and
>> one o
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:24 +0100, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2010-03-22 Bas Mevissen wrote:
> > Why catch-all? Because I often use the part before the "@" as a key to
> > see the origin of the e-mail when subscribing.
>
> That's what address extension was invented for. See the respective
> secti
On 2010-03-22 Bas Mevissen wrote:
> Why catch-all? Because I often use the part before the "@" as a key to
> see the origin of the e-mail when subscribing.
That's what address extension was invented for. See the respective
section of man 8 local.
Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
"Abstractions save us
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 11:18 +0600, Meshbah Uddin Ahmed wrote:
> Actually it is not happen only on xyz user. although size of the
> mailbox is 8mb. FYI, if i stop dovecot service and run postfix flush
> then all mails are successfully send to the mailbox. after that i need
> to start dovecot service
Matias wrote:
Hi,
I want to move away from postgrey to a sql based greylist service, so
that I can access the greylist database from more than one server.
I've been reading about sqlgrey, gps, gld, etc...
Hi,
I've tried gld with success and satisfaction. I recommed it to you!
Angelo
50 matches
Mail list logo
