Daniel L. Miller put forth on 3/2/2010 1:18 AM:
> OK - I'm an idiot. I'll just admit that up front and get it out of the
> way.
>
> Now that that's settled, what is the difference between "SSL" and "TLS"
> in a MUA - particularly Thunderbird - in a Postfix context?
>
> I would have sworn I used
OK - I'm an idiot. I'll just admit that up front and get it out of the way.
Now that that's settled, what is the difference between "SSL" and "TLS"
in a MUA - particularly Thunderbird - in a Postfix context?
I would have sworn I used to use Thunderbird with "SSL" specified and
connected to my P
On 02.03.2010 06:09, Alex wrote:
> What encryption/cipher/key length, session key options, etc, choices
> should I be making if I were to do this today?
That is dificult to say without knowing what you are trying to protect,
your threat model etc. If in doubt, go with the defaults.
> Under what
Hi all,
I have a Postfix virtual users setup based on mysql tables. Messages are
stored in Maildir format. Maildirs are owned by "vmail:vmail" .
I want another user to be able to read those Maildir files so I added him
to the "vmail" group.
Unfortunately Postfix seems to create the directory struc
Hi,
I have an existing old postfix TLS server set up and working
successfully. It was created several years ago and has been working
fine ever since.I'm wondering what the benefits would be with
upgrading? In other words, I realize I can only support SSLv2, but are
there other security designs and
Carlos Williams a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>> It "slips past" because there are no rules to block it.
>> You can add "postmas...@your_domain REJECT" to this list if you want.
>
> I am assuming I would add this to 'sender_access', correct?
>
> On Mon, Mar 1,
Yves Kreis:
> Dear,
>
> Does Postfix invoke milter when sending a DSN for local mail?
Postfix does not filter messages that it creates itself. That
includes bounces.
As of Postfix 2.3 this is configurable for before-queue filters
(i.e. milters and header/body_checks). For details, see:
http://w
Dear Martijn
Your idea did it. Other problems I had were results of misconfiguration inside
tmvw.
Thank you very much!
Ilja
Martijn de Munnik schrieb:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:47 +0100, Ilja Beeskow wrote:
Hello @ll
I have a little problem with postfix 2.5, trendmicro viruswall and an o
On Mon, March 1, 2010 11:34 pm, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jack Knowlton:
>> I would like Postfix to
>> accept mail for any recipient of that particular domain and create the
matching Maildir once the first message has been received.
>> Thanks,
> This is possible but I don't think it is a good idea to
Dear,
Does Postfix invoke milter when sending a DSN for local mail?
Thanks,
Yves
Jack Knowlton:
> I would like Postfix to
> accept mail for any recipient of that particular domain and create the
> matching Maildir once the first message has been received.
> Thanks,
This is possible but I don't think it is a good idea to auto-create
maildirs for users whose name starts with "..
Hi all.
I have a Postfix virtual users setup based on mysql tables. Messages are
stored in Maildir format.
I am aware that creating a virtual alias @domain1.com -> u...@domain2.com
will make Postfix accept emails for any username and deliver them to
u...@domain2.com.
Is it possible to do the same
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> It "slips past" because there are no rules to block it.
> You can add "postmas...@your_domain REJECT" to this list if you want.
I am assuming I would add this to 'sender_access', correct?
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:31 AM, LuKreme wrote:
> Oft
On 3/1/2010 10:50 AM, Carlos Williams wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
That parameter doesn't prevent spammers from sending junk to postmaster, it
prevents mail to postmaster from bypassing your existing anti-spam controls.
Big difference.
It looks like it does pass
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> That parameter doesn't prevent spammers from sending junk to postmaster, it
> prevents mail to postmaster from bypassing your existing anti-spam controls.
> Big difference.
It looks like it does pass my 'anti-spam' controls however & I am not
s
On 01-Mar-10 06:08, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Stan Hoeppner:
If you sub the list, ask Rich K about ipdeny. I learned about it from him.
He's been a spam fighter since 1994 (maybe earlier). He's old school.
Yay, I'm old school :)
You're so old school you're PRE school!
No, wait, that's
On 2/26/2010 3:09 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> David Schraeder:
>> How are you guys getting those stats on the blocks?
>
> awk '
> /blocked using [^;]+;/ { stats[$20]++ }
> END { for (name in stats) print name, " ", stats[name] }
> ' /var/log/maillog
>
> Wietse
Thanks for the infor
Zitat von donovan jeffrey j :
Greetings
I had several of these on my primary MX this weekend and one just
popped up. Can someone explain where this Insufficient system
storage is ?
both mail queues are empty, and DF shows < 20% on the reporting system.
Out: 220 mx2.beth.k12.pa.us ESMTP
On 3/1/2010 8:47 AM, Ilja Beeskow wrote:
Hello @ll
I have a little problem with postfix 2.5, trendmicro viruswall and an
old exchange 2k behind it. Perhaps somebody could give me a hint because
I'm really confused after some days of trying different things.
for incoming mail everything is clear
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:47 +0100, Ilja Beeskow wrote:
> Hello @ll
>
> I have a little problem with postfix 2.5, trendmicro viruswall and an old
> exchange 2k behind it. Perhaps somebody could give me a hint because I'm
> really confused after some days of trying different things.
>
> for incom
Hello @ll
I have a little problem with postfix 2.5, trendmicro viruswall and an old
exchange 2k behind it. Perhaps somebody could give me a hint because I'm
really confused after some days of trying different things.
for incoming mail everything is clear:
relay_domains and transport_maps, tm
On 2/28/2010 2:26 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
/^localhost$/ 550 Don't use my own domain (localhost)!
/^iamghost.\com$/ 550 Don't use my own domain!
/^64\.95\.64\.198$/ 550 Your spam was rej
On 2/28/2010 1:55 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
Or you can have postfix add it to main.cf for you by typing the command:
# postconf -e 'address_verify_sender=$double_bounce_sender'
I added the above parameter
(address_verify_sender=$double_boun
Greetings
I had several of these on my primary MX this weekend and one just
popped up. Can someone explain where this Insufficient system storage
is ?
both mail queues are empty, and DF shows < 20% on the reporting system.
Out: 220 mx2.beth.k12.pa.us ESMTP Postfix
In: EHLO mx1.beth.k12.pa.
* Stan Hoeppner :
> If you sub the list, ask Rich K about ipdeny. I learned about it from him.
> He's been a spam fighter since 1994 (maybe earlier). He's old school.
Yay, I'm old school :)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Carlos Williams put forth on 2/28/2010 10:02 PM:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Carlos, I think it's time you join spam-l and learn all the tricks to
>> fighting spam. http://spam-l.com/mailman/listinfo/spam-l
>
> Thanks. I will research this and see what I can learn
26 matches
Mail list logo
