On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 02:39:11AM +0100, Hector Martin wrote:
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:11:17AM +0100, Hector Martin wrote:
> > Perhaps with an SRS milter, or similar content filter, assuming these
> > take extreme caution to avoid loops (never rewrite "<>" to a non
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:11:17AM +0100, Hector Martin wrote:
> Perhaps with an SRS milter, or similar content filter, assuming these
> take extreme caution to avoid loops (never rewrite "<>" to a non empty
> return path) and provide appropriate means for bounces to come b
Wendigo Thompson:
> Okay, I have some updates. Reducing the concurrency down (and
> ultimately to 1) increased performance: it seems the delays I was
> seeing were related to concurrency inside SQL. However, I am still
> seeing half second delays in local delivery while my insertion
> application
Wendigo Thompson put forth on 1/14/2010 6:39 PM:
> Okay, I have some updates. Reducing the concurrency down (and
> ultimately to 1) increased performance: it seems the delays I was
> seeing were related to concurrency inside SQL. However, I am still
> seeing half second delays in local delivery w
Okay, I have some updates. Reducing the concurrency down (and
ultimately to 1) increased performance: it seems the delays I was
seeing were related to concurrency inside SQL. However, I am still
seeing half second delays in local delivery while my insertion
application is showing ~.003s processin
On Thursday January 14 2010 20:14:48 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> It may be prudent to also treat:
> From:
> From:
> as synonymous with:
> From: ,
> the implied meaning is that the people with those email addresses,
> co-authored the email.
...or treated with utmost suspicion, as
While investigating why postgrey wasn't running on our fedora box, I
checked to see what run levels it was set to run at, and indeed it
wasn't set up to run at any. Then, since there wasn't any useful
information in the /etc/init.d/postgrey file about what run levels it
should start at, I che
toneeeda...@googlemail.com a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if anyone can help with what will probably be a very simple
> problem.
>
> I have setup postfix and am now just trying to setup my system so that
> all emails to root get redirected to an external address, this is done
> in teh aliases file
On 2010-01-14 Patrick Horgan wrote:
> Jan 14 15:03:44 s2 postfix/smtpd[10535]: connect from
> adsl-99-61-74-22.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net[99.61.74.22]
> Jan 14 15:03:44 s2 postfix/smtpd[10535]: warning: connect to
> 127.0.0.1:6: Connection refused
> Jan 14 15:03:44 s2 postfix/smtpd[10535]: wa
Patrick Horgan wrote:
I'm setting up a python script to do some sysadmin stuff and if it
detects a problem I want it to email. It does the email, but the
server rejects it. Taking python out of the picture, I did this:
I've "fixed" this. postgrey was not running, but I don't know why it
wasn
- Original Message
> From: Patrick Horgan
> To: postfix users list
> Sent: Thu, January 14, 2010 11:10:52 PM
> Subject: Can't send from script and don't understand NOQUEUE error
>
> I'm setting up a python script to do some sysadmin stuff and if it detects a
> problem I want it t
Patrick Horgan a écrit :
> I'm setting up a python script to do some sysadmin stuff and if it
> detects a problem I want it to email. It does the email, but the server
> rejects it. Taking python out of the picture, I did this:
>
> telnet s2.ootbcomp.com 25
> Trying 66.201.42.40...
> Connected t
I'm setting up a python script to do some sysadmin stuff and if it
detects a problem I want it to email. It does the email, but the server
rejects it. Taking python out of the picture, I did this:
telnet s2.ootbcomp.com 25
Trying 66.201.42.40...
Connected to s2.ootbcomp.com.
Escape character
Wendigo Thompson:
> Wietse:
>
> Sadly I generally don't keep logs at this granular of a level
> (mail.crit is what I usually store forever) but I can turn logging
> back on after the queue empties over the weekend and see if the delay
> is persisting. I know the command itself is completing qui
Wietse:
Sadly I generally don't keep logs at this granular of a level
(mail.crit is what I usually store forever) but I can turn logging
back on after the queue empties over the weekend and see if the delay
is persisting. I know the command itself is completing quickly -- it
seems like somethin
Wendigo Thompson:
> Wietse:
>
> I know who you are -- big fan of yours ever since tcpwrappers :-)
Hah!
(As for my claim, of course other people also wrote parts of
Postfix, in particular Victor has been a major contributor).
> The only reason I wrote in is that this queueing of mail issue
>
Wietse:
I know who you are -- big fan of yours ever since tcpwrappers :-)
The only reason I wrote in is that this queueing of mail issue
appeared fairly recently, and other times when I have had to collect
large volumes of mail from this client my system has been fine. Below
I have pasted so
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 08:07:34PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * K??rlis Repsons :
>
> > > According to RFC 5322:
> > >
> > >from= "From:" mailbox-list CRLF
> > >mailbox-list= (mailbox *("," mailbox)) / obs-mbox-list
> > >
> > > Thus, one From: header may contai
* Kārlis Repsons :
> > According to RFC 5322:
> >
> >from= "From:" mailbox-list CRLF
> >mailbox-list= (mailbox *("," mailbox)) / obs-mbox-list
> >
> > Thus, one From: header may contain multiple addresses.
>
> Well, another possible trouble I was about to ask later,
On Thursday 14 January 2010 11:59:16 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Is that possible for mail headers field to continue multiple /^From: .*/
> > speaking in terms of maildrop and PCRE?
>
> According to RFC 5322:
>
>from= "From:" mailbox-list CRLF
>mailbox-list= (mailbox *(",
Wendigo Thompson:
> Victor:
>
> I wanted to use Postfix as a delivery mechanism so that I would be
> able to queue and hold mail during database outages and other
> maintenance -- a job that it does very well. Is there really no
> advice available on how to increase the speed of Postfix's local
>
>From: "toneeeda...@googlemail.com"
>To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>Sent: Thu, January 14, 2010 2:46:47 PM
>Subject: a little bit of help with aliases
>
>Hi,
>
>I wonder if anyone can help with what will probably be a very simple problem.
>
>I have setup postfix and am now just trying to set
On 2010-01-14 toneeeda...@googlemail.com wrote:
> I have setup postfix and am now just trying to setup my system so that
> all emails to root get redirected to an external address, this is done
> in teh aliases file ine /etc/
>
> i have then ran newalises and all seems to be fine.
>
> If i then s
Victor:
I wanted to use Postfix as a delivery mechanism so that I would be
able to queue and hold mail during database outages and other
maintenance -- a job that it does very well. Is there really no
advice available on how to increase the speed of Postfix's local mail
delivery?
Thanks,
Wendy
Wietse Venema:
> ram:
> > I need to configure a postfix server that relays mails from a windows
> > based App.
> > The App is an age old custom application written and has no options to
> > configure except an outgoing IP :-(
> >
> > But I need to manage the bounces and so I was thinking of chang
Hi,
I wonder if anyone can help with what will probably be a very simple
problem.
I have setup postfix and am now just trying to setup my system so that all
emails to root get redirected to an external address, this is done in teh
aliases file ine /etc/
i have then ran newalises and all seems to
ram:
> I need to configure a postfix server that relays mails from a windows
> based App.
> The App is an age old custom application written and has no options to
> configure except an outgoing IP :-(
>
> But I need to manage the bounces and so I was thinking of changing the
> env from to a VERP
On Jan 13, 2010, at 10:23 PM, Jim Seymour wrote:
Hi All,
As many of you may be aware, about a year ago I emailed the list
asking if anybody would be interested in taking over maintenance
of Pflogsumm. Several people volunteered. In the mean-time,
after un-loading a bit (basically taking a hi
On 14-Jan-2010, at 04:59, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Is that possible for mail headers field to continue multiple /^From: .*/
>> speaking in terms of maildrop and PCRE?
>
> According to RFC 5322:
>
> from= "From:" mailbox-list CRLF
> mailbox-list= (mailbox *("," mailbox)) /
> Is that possible for mail headers field to continue multiple /^From: .*/
> speaking in terms of maildrop and PCRE?
According to RFC 5322:
from= "From:" mailbox-list CRLF
mailbox-list= (mailbox *("," mailbox)) / obs-mbox-list
Thus, one From: header may contain multipl
Is that possible for mail headers field to continue multiple /^From: .*/
speaking in terms of maildrop and PCRE?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Il giorno Gio 14 Gen 2010 09:55:06 CET, Steve ha scritto:
[...]
You probably have a service listening on port 10025 (probably a greylisting service or
such) and you forgot to start that service or the service crashed. Can you restart that
service and then issue a "postsuper -r ALL"?
[...]
Of
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:19:05 +0100
> Von: RaSca
> An: Postfix users
> Betreff: Re: Understanding Postfix and smtpd_recipient_restrictions priorities
> Il giorno Mer 13 Gen 2010 18:52:58 CET, Brian Evans - Postfix List ha
> scritto:
> [...]
> > In addi
I need to configure a postfix server that relays mails from a windows
based App.
The App is an age old custom application written and has no options to
configure except an outgoing IP :-(
But I need to manage the bounces and so I was thinking of changing the
env from to a VERP format.
How do I c
Il giorno Mer 13 Gen 2010 18:52:58 CET, Brian Evans - Postfix List ha
scritto:
[...]
In addition, list.dsbl.org is dead and gone for some time now.
You are just adding a DNS lookup that will never return anything valuable.
Thanks everybody for the suggestions, I've got another problem now: thi
35 matches
Mail list logo
