On 12/17/2009 8:18 AM, JORGE CARMINATI wrote:
Hi all! I'm trying to integrate Postfix (chrooted) with ClamAV and am
looking for some information about this. It seems that the old fashioned
style of configuring Postfix + amavisd-new now days is not recommended
(performance) and that the best avail
Noah Sheppard:
> 3-Just setting quotas and letting procmail fail to deliver the message
> and generate a bounce message: fails because postfix keeps trying to
> deliver the message for a long time; we would like a relatively quick
> fail and notification.
procmail returns a TEMPORARY error conditi
Len Conrad:
> >>Len Conrad:
> >>> Dec 17 11:28:39 mx1 postfix/postscreen[4867]: fatal: open database
> >>> /var/db/postfix/ps_cache.db: Invalid argument
> >>>
> >>
> >>You switched Berkeley DB versions, or you switched
> >>btree/hash types.
> >
> >maybe "portsnap fetch update" upped the BDB versi
Postfix users,
I am attempting to set up postfix such that using filesystem quotas on
users' mail spaces (a directory whose subdirectories are maildirs).
After RTF{manual, google, list archives}, I haven't been able to find
any good way to do this.
A problematic requirement is that we can't let
-- Original Message --
From: "Len Conrad"
Reply-To:
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:30:54 +0100
>
>>Len Conrad:
>>> Dec 17 11:28:39 mx1 postfix/postscreen[4867]: fatal: open database
>>> /var/db/postfix/ps_cache.db: Invalid argument
>>>
>>
>>You switched Berk
On 12/17/2009 3:57 PM, Jack wrote:
-Original Message-
On 12/17/2009 9:24 AM, Jack wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I am rejecting a message that looks legit in respect to the SPF record and
I
can't figure out why.
The domain is scgc.org which shows the following SPF value:
v=spf1 ip4:207.20
-Original Message-
On 12/17/2009 9:24 AM, Jack wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
>
>
> I am rejecting a message that looks legit in respect to the SPF record and
I
> can't figure out why.
>
> The domain is scgc.org which shows the following SPF value:
>
> v=spf1 ip4:207.203.253.33 ~all
>
>
>
> Mai
On 12/17/2009 9:24 AM, Jack wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I am rejecting a message that looks legit in respect to the SPF record and I
can't figure out why.
The domain is scgc.org which shows the following SPF value:
v=spf1 ip4:207.203.253.33 ~all
Maillog shows this:
Dec 17 09:50:03 saturn post
>Len Conrad:
>> Dec 17 11:28:39 mx1 postfix/postscreen[4867]: fatal: open database
>> /var/db/postfix/ps_cache.db: Invalid argument
>>
>
>You switched Berkeley DB versions, or you switched
>btree/hash types.
maybe "portsnap fetch update" upped the BDB version, I've changed nothing in
the main.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:12:26PM -0600, osmcr...@gmail.com wrote:
> HI folks im getting this error with an user from my postfix mail
> server when i try to download its mails from its thunderbird mail
> client, i also deleted some messages on the server but the problem
> continue
This is not a P
Len Conrad:
> Dec 17 11:28:39 mx1 postfix/postscreen[4867]: fatal: open database
> /var/db/postfix/ps_cache.db: Invalid argument
>
You switched Berkeley DB versions, or you switched
btree/hash types.
Delete the file, and try again.
Wietse
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 06:54:37PM +0100, Len Conrad wrote:
> Dec 17 11:28:39 mx1 postfix/postscreen[4867]: fatal: open database
> /var/db/postfix/ps_cache.db: Invalid argument
Did you switch from btree to hash or vice-versa? Delete the cache and
start from scratch...
--
Viktor.
Discl
HI folks im getting this error with an user from my postfix mail server when
i try to download its mails from its thunderbird mail client, i also deleted
some messages on the server but the problem continue
The RETR command did not succeed. Error Retreiving messages
-- Original Message --
From: wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:48:37 -0500 (EST)
>Len Conrad:
>>
>> I did the usual freebsd upgrade
>>
>> postfix stop
>>
>> make
>> make reinstall ( with setenv FORCE_PKG_REGISTER )
>>
>>
Len Conrad:
>
> I did the usual freebsd upgrade
>
> postfix stop
>
> make
> make reinstall ( with setenv FORCE_PKG_REGISTER )
>
> postfix start
>
>
>
> mx1# postconf mail_version
> mail_version = 2.7-20091209
>
>
>
I did the usual freebsd upgrade
postfix stop
make
make reinstall ( with setenv FORCE_PKG_REGISTER )
postfix start
mx1# postconf mail_version
mail_version = 2.7-20091209
==
dnsblog unix - - n -
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:09 PM, wrote:
>
> I just couldn't figure out why Postfix says the email
> was possibly sent by us???
The receiving server accepted the message before attempting to reject
it. As a result it likely bounced based on the email address pointing
to your domain. That address
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:51:13AM +, T D wrote:
> My basic problem is that I can't work out how to forward email to more
> than one recipient. For example, let's say I want o...@example.com to
> 1) be delivered to its Cyrus mailbox as normal and 2) to be forwarded
> to b...@blackberry.net and
2009/12/16 Noel Jones :
> On 12/16/2009 10:18 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>
>> sfqsf qsfsfq:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I would like to configure Postfix to reject mail whose destination
>>> match a few addresses IF the mail was not sent from our internal
>>> network.
>>>
>>> Basically i would like to do
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:14:27 +0100
Len Conrad replied:
>Anybody know where to get this?
>
>The fix reversing the order of black/white queries in postscreen is
>important for us.
>
>thanks
>Len
You could try the port maintainer:
m...@freebsd.org
--
Jerry
postfix.u...@yahoo.com
TO RE
Hi,
On postfix 2.5.7 running on Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 8) I've
got the following error message:
Dec 15 12:09:56 lin2a postfix/smtpd[14097]: connect from 85-18-95-44.ip.fastwebnet.it[85.18.95.44]
Dec 15 12:09:56 lin2a postfix/smtpd[14097]: setting up TLS connection
On Dec 17, 2009, at 10:14 AM, "Len Conrad"
wrote:
Anybody know where to get this?
The fix reversing the order of black/white queries in postscreen is
important for us.
I filed a PR to update postfix-current in the tree but the committer
has not yet addressed it; I am sure he will soon.
Hello Everyone,
I am rejecting a message that looks legit in respect to the SPF record and I
can't figure out why.
The domain is scgc.org which shows the following SPF value:
v=spf1 ip4:207.203.253.33 ~all
Maillog shows this:
Dec 17 09:50:03 saturn postfix/smtpd[13371]: connect from
exch
Anybody know where to get this?
The fix reversing the order of black/white queries in postscreen is important
for us.
thanks
Len
* JORGE CARMINATI :
> Here's an example:
> http://slaptijack.com/system-administration/postfix-23-and-clamav-milter/
>
> Last line says "If the mail server was heavily loaded, you should see a
> significant decrease in load.". Anyway I don't know who's the writer.
Neither do I. Virus scanning
On 12/17/2009 2:12 AM, Vladimir Vassiliev wrote:
I'm trying to restrict recieving mail for some users. Target is to permit mail
only from mynetworks.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ...
check_recipient_access
hash:/etc/postfix/restricted_recipie
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Ralf Hildebrandt
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:29
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: OT: Postfix & ClamAV integration
>
> * JORGE CARMINATI :
>
> > Hi a
* Vladimir Vassiliev :
>
> IMHO antivirus checking with milter is bad idea because of possible large
> delays in processing. Some broken relays have small timeout and they don't
> await even couple of minutes. Result is endless delivery of the same mail, I
> had real incidents. Post-queue filterin
Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> mouss put forth on 12/16/2009 5:52 PM:
>
>> these are rdns warnings. the usual stuff. they are good for
>> "information", because when you get other logs, you'll see "from
>> unknown[a.b.c.d]", so if you want the PTR, you can consolidate the
>> warning logs (I do this wit
IMHO antivirus checking with milter is bad idea because of possible large
delays in processing. Some broken relays have small timeout and they don't
await even couple of minutes. Result is endless delivery of the same mail, I
had real incidents. Post-queue filtering is good here.
On Четверг 17
On Dec 17, 2009, at 8:18 AM, JORGE CARMINATI
wrote:
Hi all! I'm trying to integrate Postfix (chrooted) with ClamAV and
am looking for some information about this. It seems that the old
fashioned style of configuring Postfix + amavisd-new now days is not
recommended (performance)
FUD.
* JORGE CARMINATI :
> Hi all! I'm trying to integrate Postfix (chrooted) with ClamAV and am
> looking for some information about this. It seems that the old
> fashioned style of configuring Postfix + amavisd-new now days is not
> recommended (performance)
Says who?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäf
Hi all! I'm trying to integrate Postfix (chrooted) with ClamAV and am looking
for some information about this. It seems that the old fashioned style of
configuring Postfix + amavisd-new now days is not recommended (performance) and
that the best available options are: (1) ClamAV-milter with Post
On 17.12.2009 11:51, T D wrote:
> My basic problem is that I can't work out how to forward email to more
> than one recipient. For example, let's say I want o...@example.com to
> 1) be delivered to its Cyrus mailbox as normal and 2) to be forwarded
> to b...@blackberry.net and j...@vodafone.net.
Hi,
I've been asked to take over maintenance of a Postfix / Cyrus / LDAP
setup, and my background is in Courier / Exim. I've read as many docs
as I felt I could take in, but I'm still finding the learning curve a
little steep.
My basic problem is that I can't work out how to forward email to mor
I'm trying to restrict recieving mail for some users. Target is to permit mail
only from mynetworks.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ...
check_recipient_access
hash:/etc/postfix/restricted_recipients
.
36 matches
Mail list logo
