* Vladimir Vassiliev <v...@edu.yar.ru>: > > IMHO antivirus checking with milter is bad idea because of possible large > delays in processing. Some broken relays have small timeout and they don't > await even couple of minutes. Result is endless delivery of the same mail, I > had real incidents. Post-queue filtering is good here.
Agreed, unless federal law requires you to ALWAYS deliver a message if it was accepted by the mail server. Then you have to do pre-queue filtering. p...@rick > > On Четверг 17 декабря 2009, JORGE CARMINATI wrote: > > Hi all! I'm trying to integrate Postfix (chrooted) with ClamAV and am > > looking for some information about this. It seems that the old fashioned > > style of configuring Postfix + amavisd-new now days is not recommended > > (performance) and that the best available options are: (1) ClamAV-milter > > with Postfix's Milter support or (2) ClamSMTP. > > > > Can somebody enlightenment me about which method is the most common used > > and which advantages/disadvantages do they have ? any problem with a > > Postfix chrooted environment ? is there a good tutorial on this?, googling > > didn't help... > > > > Thanks in advance. > > JC. > > > > -- > Vladimir Vassiliev <v...@edu.yar.ru> -- All technical questions asked privately will be automatically answered on the list and archived for public access unless privacy is explicitely required and justified. saslfinger (debugging SMTP AUTH): <http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/>
