vtzan put forth on 12/14/2009 1:17 AM:
> Hello noel,
>
> thanks for you response but it didn't worked!
First, did you reload postfix after editing main.cf? If not, the change
won't take effect until you reload of restart postfix. And, how do you
know it didn't work? Is he still sending spam?
On 2009-12-14 at 09:16:29 +0200, Lucian @ lastdot.org wrote:
> I need to delete all attachments from emails at server level. I'm
> using stock postfix in Centos 5 (v 2.3.3).
> I found renattach (http://www.pc-tools.net/unix/renattach/), but this
> software seems to have been discontinued and the au
Dne 14.12.2009 v 09:16 Lucian @ lastdot.org napsal(a):
> I need to delete all attachments from emails at server level. I'm
> using stock postfix in Centos 5 (v 2.3.3).
> I found renattach (http://www.pc-tools.net/unix/renattach/), but this
> software seems to have been discontinued and the author
Hello noel,
thanks for you response but it didn't worked!
thanks
Bill
Noel Jones wrote:
On 12/11/2009 7:02 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
vtzan put forth on 12/11/2009 5:46 AM:
thanks for your fast reply. But that was my PLAN B ;-)
any idea for PLAN A?
thanks alot
Bill
Hay Bill,
First off, pl
Hello,
I need to delete all attachments from emails at server level. I'm
using stock postfix in Centos 5 (v 2.3.3).
I found renattach (http://www.pc-tools.net/unix/renattach/), but this
software seems to have been discontinued and the author does not
recommend it anymore.
Can you recommend another
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
vtzan put forth on 12/11/2009 5:46 AM:
thanks for your fast reply. But that was my PLAN B ;-)
any idea for PLAN A?
thanks alot
Bill
Hay Bill,
First off, please keep all replies on the postfix-users list. 2nd, send
your 'postconf -n' output and the relevant cont
Stefan Foerster:
> After a few years of Postfix, one usually knows all warnings and
> errors it reports. With the addition of postscreen(8), there appeared
> two new warnings that I don't know yet:
>
> postscreen[8790]: warning: getpeername: Transport endpoint is not connected
> postscreen[8790]:
* Sahil Tandon :
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, Stefan Foerster wrote:
> > postscreen[8790]: warning: getpeername: Transport endpoint is not connected
> > postscreen[8790]: warning: write unknown_address:unknown_port: Connection
> > reset by peer
>
> I think these messages in your log correlate with a '4
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, Stefan Foerster wrote:
> After a few years of Postfix, one usually knows all warnings and
> errors it reports. With the addition of postscreen(8), there appeared
> two new warnings that I don't know yet:
>
> postscreen[8790]: warning: getpeername: Transport endpoint is not co
On 12/13/2009 12:13 PM, Walter Breno wrote:
> Hi,
> i need to force everybody including local network users that uses mail
> clients and webmail to authenticate on smtp to send mails from my server
> , i has enables sasl_auth modules and authentication is working fine but
> when i set the option sm
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 03:13:19PM -0200, Walter Breno wrote:
> i need to force everybody including local network users that uses mail
> clients and webmail to authenticate on smtp to send mails from my server , i
> has enables sasl_auth modules and authentication is working fine but when i
> set t
Hi,
i need to force everybody including local network users that uses mail
clients and webmail to authenticate on smtp to send mails from my server , i
has enables sasl_auth modules and authentication is working fine but when i
set the option smtp_recipient_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated
After a few years of Postfix, one usually knows all warnings and
errors it reports. With the addition of postscreen(8), there appeared
two new warnings that I don't know yet:
postscreen[8790]: warning: getpeername: Transport endpoint is not connected
postscreen[8790]: warning: write unknown_addres
13 matches
Mail list logo
