Patrick,
Hi
Thanks for your mail. I use the following options in smtpd.conf:
mech_list: gssapi plain
pwcheck_method: saslauthd
saslauthd_path: /var/run/saslauthd/mux
keytab: /etc/krb5.keytab
and I am able to use GSSAPI and PLAIN (Over PAM using pam_krb5.so)
mechanisms. How is it possible to add c
* Ali Majdzadeh :
> Hello All
> Is it possible to have both PLAIN and CRAM-MD5 authentication
> mechanisms using SASL?
Yes. The password must be stored as plaintext. Then plaintext and
shared-secret mechanisms will work.
p...@rick
--
All technical questions asked privately will be automatically
On Wed, November 11, 2009 7:29 am, Ali Majdzadeh said:
> Is it possible to have both PLAIN and CRAM-MD5 authentication
> mechanisms using SASL?
Yes.
--
Magnus Bäck
mag...@dsek.lth.se
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 17:07 -0500, Chris Arnold wrote:
> Hello list! We are being blacklisted every few days from verizon. This
> is less important right now as I need to find out if/who is sending
> spam from the email server or if the server is an open relay. I am
> less inclined to think postf
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 11:44 +0530, Manoj Burande wrote:
> Hello Wietse,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> Can you please guide me on how to use postfix "newaliases"?. I have
> already stopped sendmail on the server. And still it is using sendmail
> newaliases". Can you please tell me how to d
Hi Noel:
I just want to control the sending speed of postfix. Because some of ISP
complain me that my speed is too fast. So I want to make postfix send a
little slowly. I am not sure how can I accomplish this target, so I set up a
test ENV to do testing, to make sure how can I implement it.
Then I
Hello All
Is it possible to have both PLAIN and CRAM-MD5 authentication
mechanisms using SASL?
Best Regards
Ali Majdzadeh Kohbanani
Hello Wietse,
Thanks for your reply.
Can you please guide me on how to use postfix "newaliases"?. I have
already stopped sendmail on the server. And still it is using sendmail
newaliases". Can you please tell me how to do that?
> Manoj Burande:
>> /etc/aliases: 77 aliases, longest 36 bytes,
And seeing that the guy is blocking email by country, I really wonder
why I took time replying to him.
> When I run these through postmap -q I a get a "REJECT" return. When I
> add a fourth octect to the postmap -q input, I get nothing. I've been
> beating me head on the desk whilst re-reading man 5 access, and I can't
> figure out why real addresses matching these class C subnets aren't
> returni
When I run these through postmap -q I a get a "REJECT" return. When I
add a fourth octect to the postmap -q input, I get nothing. I've been
beating me head on the desk whilst re-reading man 5 access, and I can't
figure out why real addresses matching these class C subnets aren't
returning "REJECT
Hi Folks,
The current discussion re. Verizon blacklisting has been very
interesting in terms of log analysis suggestions. It leads me to ask
what seems to be a related question re. a problem I've been having lately.
Over the past couple of weeks I've seen my deferred queue get a LOT
larger
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 09:01:45PM -0500, Alex wrote:
> Reading from a message in the second queue waiting to be delivered,
> the source IP is not one from the pop-before-smtp database
"Is not now" is not the same as "was not then".
> and is not
> from the internal network.
You have shown no co
Hi,
> Hello list! We are being blacklisted every few days from verizon. This is
> less important right now as I need to find out if/who is sending spam from
> the email server or if the server is an open relay. I am less inclined to
> think postfix (which is what we use) is an open relay. More inc
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> /dev/rob0 put forth on 11/10/2009 7:58 PM:
>> On Tuesday 10 November 2009 19:21:04 Chris Arnold wrote:
>>> OK, nothing stands out from pflogsumm.pl:
>>
>> Nothing?
>>
>>> Per-Day Traffic Summary
>>> date received delivered def
/dev/rob0 put forth on 11/10/2009 7:58 PM:
> On Tuesday 10 November 2009 19:21:04 Chris Arnold wrote:
>> OK, nothing stands out from pflogsumm.pl:
>
> Nothing?
>
>> Per-Day Traffic Summary
>> date received delivered deferredbounced rejected
>> -
On 11/10/09 8:58 PM, "/dev/rob0" wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 November 2009 19:21:04 Chris Arnold wrote:
>> OK, nothing stands out from pflogsumm.pl:
>
> Nothing?
>
>> Per-Day Traffic Summary
>> date received delivered deferredbounced rejected
>> -
Chris Arnold put forth on 11/10/2009 7:56 PM:
> On 11/10/09 8:36 PM, "Stan Hoeppner" wrote:
>
>> Chris Arnold put forth on 11/10/2009 7:21 PM:
>>
>>> Don't want to post the whole pflogsumm file as 1 it is very long and 2 there
>>> are somethings that don't need to be shared on a mailinglist :)
>>
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 19:21:04 Chris Arnold wrote:
> OK, nothing stands out from pflogsumm.pl:
Nothing?
> Per-Day Traffic Summary
> date received delivered deferredbounced rejected
>
> Nov
Hi,
Some time ago I posted my smtpd_recipient_restrictions because I was
having a problem with unauthorized relaying (basically I had become an
open relay!), and received some suggestions. However, I think there is
still a problem and I'm open to relaying.
I'm still using postfix-1.x, set up with
On 11/10/09 8:36 PM, "Stan Hoeppner" wrote:
> Chris Arnold put forth on 11/10/2009 7:21 PM:
>
>> Don't want to post the whole pflogsumm file as 1 it is very long and 2 there
>> are somethings that don't need to be shared on a mailinglist :)
>> What are some things I should be looking for in the
Chris Arnold put forth on 11/10/2009 7:21 PM:
> Don't want to post the whole pflogsumm file as 1 it is very long and 2 there
> are somethings that don't need to be shared on a mailinglist :)
> What are some things I should be looking for in the pflogsumm.pl report?
You should be concentrating you
OK, nothing stands out from pflogsumm.pl:
Grand Totals
messages
15607 received
15755 delivered
0 forwarded
40 deferred (391 deferrals)
128 bounced
1115 rejected (6%)
0 reject warnings
0 held
0 discarded (0%)
685m bytes
Chris Arnold put forth on 11/10/2009 6:47 PM:
> OK, I have gotten access to the mail server and have downloaded
> pflogsumm.pl. I have followed the readme and chown and chmod. Did not
> copy the man page. Run perl pflogsumm.pl and nothing happens; it just
> sits there. I untar’ed the gz file that w
Quoting Miles Fidelman :
d.h...@yournetplus.com wrote:
Quoting Chris Arnold :
OK, I have gotten access to the mail server and have downloaded
pflogsumm.pl. I have followed the readme and chown and chmod. Did not copy
the man page.
The man page does state if no file(s) are specified, it read
d.h...@yournetplus.com wrote:
Quoting Chris Arnold :
OK, I have gotten access to the mail server and have downloaded
pflogsumm.pl. I have followed the readme and chown and chmod. Did not
copy
the man page.
The man page does state if no file(s) are specified, it reads from
stdin. Therefore,
Quoting Chris Arnold :
OK, I have gotten access to the mail server and have downloaded
pflogsumm.pl. I have followed the readme and chown and chmod. Did not copy
the man page.
The man page does state if no file(s) are specified, it reads from
stdin. Therefore, you need to specify the file or
OK, I have gotten access to the mail server and have downloaded
pflogsumm.pl. I have followed the readme and chown and chmod. Did not copy
the man page. Run perl pflogsumm.pl and nothing happens; it just sits there.
I untar¹ed the gz file that was downloaded and that made a dir
pflogsumm-1.1.1 and
micah anderson:
> > I was talking about DIFFERENT hosts instead of repeating the same
> > hostname in the Postfix config file.
>
> That makes sense.
>
> However, the mysql_table(5) doesn't specify in the MYSQL PARAMETERS
> section that the 'hosts' parameter can take different ports. The
The nam
Chris Arnold wrote:
Hello list! We are being blacklisted every few days from verizon. This
is less important right now as I need to find out if/who is sending
spam from the email server or if the server is an open relay. I am
less inclined to think postfix (which is what we use) is an open
rel
Excerpts from wietse's message of Tue Nov 10 17:22:57 -0500 2009:
> micah anderson:
> > > > hosts = mysql-cluster1 mysql-cluster1
> > >
> > > This repeats the query only if the session breaks. However, the
> > > hosts are tried without delay, so this is unlikely to be a solution
> > > for ke
micah anderson:
> > > hosts = mysql-cluster1 mysql-cluster1
> >
> > This repeats the query only if the session breaks. However, the
> > hosts are tried without delay, so this is unlikely to be a solution
> > for kernel panics.
> >
> > Consider configuring more than one mysql server.
>
> Ac
Hello list! We are being blacklisted every few days from verizon. This is
less important right now as I need to find out if/who is sending spam from
the email server or if the server is an open relay. I am less inclined to
think postfix (which is what we use) is an open relay. More inclined to
thin
Excerpts from wietse's message of Tue Nov 10 15:45:38 -0500 2009:
> micah anderson:
> > > If anything should retry the query, then it would be the mysql
> > > client. The proxymap can't make such decisions (for example, it
> > > makes no sense to retry after a read error from a local file).
> > >
micah anderson:
> > If anything should retry the query, then it would be the mysql
> > client. The proxymap can't make such decisions (for example, it
> > makes no sense to retry after a read error from a local file).
> >
> > And in fact, the mysql client does implement retry logic. It retries
>
On Tuesday, November 10, 2009 at 07:49 CET,
"Arora, Sumit" wrote:
> I'm using mysql local_recipient_maps for rejecting email for unknown
> local users.
>
> Here are the changes in my main.cf
>
> local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps
> virtual_alias_maps = mysql:/etc/
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 01:36:28PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> At least read the docs before you start twiddling knobs.
> http://www.postfix.org/SCHEDULER_README.html
> http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html
> http://www.postfix.org/TUNING_README.html
Note, some of the content in SCHEDULER_READ
Excerpts from wietse's message of Mon Nov 09 17:06:11 -0500 2009:
> Micah Anderson:
> > I would like to reduce the mysql transport retry time (or perhaps the
> > proxymap retry time?), is there a variable that I can tweak down to
> > reduce the time between retries of mysql transport connection los
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 01:22:47PM -0500, Angus March wrote:
>
>
>> And finally, what was sent to the standard error:
>> sendmail: warning: -f option specified malformed sender: angus uducat.com
>> sendmail: fatal: No recipient addresses found in message header
>>
On 11/10/2009 8:51 AM, Coofucoo Zhang wrote:
> Hi Petrik:
> Thanks.
> But could you tell me why? Or which knobs can I use instead? I just want to
> control the sending speed of postfix, how can implement?
>
What's wrong with postfix default delivery scheduling that it
needs to be changed? Descri
Stan Hoeppner:
> Angus March put forth on 11/10/2009 12:22 PM:
>
> > The Postfix I'm using is the rpm that comes with SLE 10:
> > postfix-2.2.9-10.23. If what you say is correct, then this sendmail
> > operation is buggy.
>
> Probably unrelated to your current issue, but you should consider
> upg
Angus March:
> > If there is an ERROR, the Postfix sendmail command will NOT enqueue
> > the message, and it will return a non-zero exit status code as
> > defined in /usr/include/sysexits.h.
> sendmail: fatal: No recipient addresses found in message header
That is an ERROR. The Postfix sendmail
Angus March put forth on 11/10/2009 12:22 PM:
> The Postfix I'm using is the rpm that comes with SLE 10:
> postfix-2.2.9-10.23. If what you say is correct, then this sendmail
> operation is buggy.
Probably unrelated to your current issue, but you should consider
upgrading your Postfix to at least
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 01:22:47PM -0500, Angus March wrote:
> And finally, what was sent to the standard error:
> sendmail: warning: -f option specified malformed sender: angus uducat.com
> sendmail: fatal: No recipient addresses found in message header
This exits with EX_USAGE. Either you are n
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Angus March:
>
>>> No, that was a WARNING.
>>>
>>> warning: -f option specified malformed sender
>>>
>>> If there is an ERROR, the Postfix sendmail command will NOT enqueue
>>> the message, and it will return a non-zero exit status code as
>>> defined in /usr/include/s
Angus March:
> > If sendmail(1) is unable to en-queue a message, it reports an error.
> > In all other cases (message en-queued), error reporting is asynchronous.
> >
> Well, that's the problem here. There was no bounce, obviously, since
> the sender was bogus, and sendmail's return value (a
--- Begin Message ---
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:54:10AM -0500, Angus March wrote:
>
>
>> I have a C program that calls Postfix's sendmail front-end using execv()
>> (after calling fork()). I also have a waitpid() on the process, which
>> diligently checks the status v
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:54:43AM -0500, Angus March wrote:
> > If sendmail(1) is unable to en-queue a message, it reports an error.
> > In all other cases (message en-queued), error reporting is asynchronous.
>
> Well, that's the problem here. There was no bounce, obviously, since
> the sender w
On 11/10/2009 02:35 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
nunatarsuaq wrote:
Anybody knows how to set up server-side filtering using Sieve?
My server is running openSuse with postfix and cyrus-imap. I guess
both of them have to be somehow configured to use Sieve as a filter.
I need to move all messages ma
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:54:10AM -0500, Angus March wrote:
>
>
>> I have a C program that calls Postfix's sendmail front-end using execv()
>> (after calling fork()). I also have a waitpid() on the process, which
>> diligently checks the status value returned by sendma
Angus March:
> I have a C program that calls Postfix's sendmail front-end using execv()
> (after calling fork()). I also have a waitpid() on the process, which
> diligently checks the status value returned by sendmail. I tried to
> sabotage an e-mail by inserting a sender that is un-RFC822, and th
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:54:10AM -0500, Angus March wrote:
> I have a C program that calls Postfix's sendmail front-end using execv()
> (after calling fork()). I also have a waitpid() on the process, which
> diligently checks the status value returned by sendmail. I tried to
> sabotage an e-mai
Just try the following.. i think that should help.
Enter this in the main.cf
transport_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/transport.regexp
transport.regexp should have the following content.
if !/@locally.handled.domain.com$
/
/^[a-f]/ smtp1:
/^[g-j]/ smtp2:
/^[l-q]/ smtp3:
/^[r-w]/
I have a C program that calls Postfix's sendmail front-end using execv()
(after calling fork()). I also have a waitpid() on the process, which
diligently checks the status value returned by sendmail. I tried to
sabotage an e-mail by inserting a sender that is un-RFC822, and there
were errors sent
Marc Silver put forth on 11/10/2009 2:23 AM:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:03:56 +0200, Jack Knowlton
> wrote:
>> Is it possible to have a transport map with a regular expression? What I
>> want is to use an external relay server for all the emails to be
>> delivered
>> on Yahoo domains (eg, y
Hi Petrik:
Thanks.
But could you tell me why? Or which knobs can I use instead? I just want to
control the sending speed of postfix, how can implement?
-邮件原件-
发件人: Patrik Rak [mailto:pat...@raxoft.cz]
发送时间: 2009年11月10日 18:18
收件人: coofucoo zhang
抄送: postfix-users@postfix.org
主题: Re: who
On 11/10/2009 2:23 AM, Marc Silver wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:03:56 +0200, Jack Knowlton
wrote:
Is it possible to have a transport map with a regular expression? What I
want is to use an external relay server for all the emails to be
delivered
on Yahoo domains (eg, yahoo.com, yahoo.co.u
nunatarsuaq wrote:
Anybody knows how to set up server-side filtering using Sieve?
My server is running openSuse with postfix and cyrus-imap. I guess
both of them have to be somehow configured to use Sieve as a filter.
I need to move all messages marked as spam (by SpamAssasin) to user's
"Junk" fo
Sorry!! Could not find anything relevant
Need help!
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of suomi
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 3:05 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Required sender email address w
On Nov 9, 2009, at 20:48, Cameron Smith wrote:
We have a private network on our lan and a public network on our lan.
We want to put a mail gateway running postfix in the public network
and have it be the point of entry and egress for the other mail
servers also running postfix on both our pu
coofucoo zhang:
> HI ALL:
>
> I try to understand how the initial_destination_concurrency and
> default_destination_concurrency_limit work? How can it support to improve
> the output of delivery. I do a small test.
>
> I config the postfix like this:
>
> qmgr_message_active_limit = 50
As docume
Manoj Burande:
> /etc/aliases: 77 aliases, longest 36 bytes, 805 bytes total
That is SENDMAIL not POSTFIX.
Wietse
Zitat von Manoj Burande :
Hello There,
Can anybody please suggest me on the below error while adding new
aliases to the root user. I am just trying to forward all emails of
the root user to my own account but #newaliases command result with
the below error. I am a newbie on postfix please
Quoting Manoj Burande :
Hello There,
Can anybody please suggest me on the below error while adding new
aliases to the root user. I am just trying to forward all emails of
the root user to my own account but #newaliases command result with
the below error. I am a newbie on postfix please s
Hello There,
Can anybody please suggest me on the below error while adding new
aliases to the root user. I am just trying to forward all emails of
the root user to my own account but #newaliases command result with
the below error. I am a newbie on postfix please suggest me.
Error:
==
[
Anybody knows how to set up server-side filtering using Sieve?
My server is running openSuse with postfix and cyrus-imap. I guess
both of them have to be somehow configured to use Sieve as a filter.
I need to move all messages marked as spam (by SpamAssasin) to user's
"Junk" folder.
--
ToMasz
HI ALL:
I try to understand how the initial_destination_concurrency and
default_destination_concurrency_limit work? How can it support to improve
the output of delivery. I do a small test.
I config the postfix like this:
qmgr_message_active_limit = 50
qmgr_message_recipient_limit = 50
initial_
HI ALL:
I try to understand how the initial_destination_concurrency and
default_destination_concurrency_limit work? How can it support to improve
the output of delivery. I do a small test.
I config the postfix like this:
qmgr_message_active_limit = 50
qmgr_message_recipient_limit = 50
initial_desti
man pipe
suomi
On 2009-11-10 07:49, Arora, Sumit wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm using mysql local_recipient_maps for rejecting email for unknown
local users.
Here are the changes in my main.cf
local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps
virtual_alias_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-rel
Hi,
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:03:56 +0200, Jack Knowlton
wrote:
Is it possible to have a transport map with a regular expression? What I
want is to use an external relay server for all the emails to be
delivered
on Yahoo domains (eg, yahoo.com, yahoo.co.uk, yahoo.es, ecc).
If it is possible,
70 matches
Mail list logo
