On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:54:43AM -0500, Angus March wrote:
> > If sendmail(1) is unable to en-queue a message, it reports an error.
> > In all other cases (message en-queued), error reporting is asynchronous.
>
> Well, that's the problem here. There was no bounce, obviously, since
> the sender was bogus, and sendmail's return value (as taken from
> waitpid()) was 0.
If you want error reporting, specify a valid sender address. Not all
errors are synchronous. When an invalid sender address is supplied, some
or all error reports will be lost (unless you report double-bounces to
the postmaster, but that scales poorly).
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
