Alex a écrit :
> Hi,
>
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>>reject_non_fqdn_sender
>>reject_non_fqdn_recipient
>>permit_mynetworks
>>#permit_sasl_authenticated
>>reject_unauth_destination
>>#
>>reject_invalid_hostname
>>reject_non_fqdn
Lists:
> Hi all,
>
> Setup is: we have a server that does the spam checking running
> MailScanner / Spamassassin and of course postfix
>
> Mail is then delivered to a machine running MailEnable (where the boxes
> are held)
>
> We had a situation where the MailEnable machine went down
>
> *In
Hi all,
Setup is: we have a server that does the spam checking running
MailScanner / Spamassassin and of course postfix
Mail is then delivered to a machine running MailEnable (where the boxes
are held)
We had a situation where the MailEnable machine went down
*In the maillog of the server
Hi,
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> reject_non_fqdn_sender
> reject_non_fqdn_recipient
> permit_mynetworks
> #permit_sasl_authenticated
> reject_unauth_destination
> #
> reject_invalid_hostname
> reject_non_fqdn_hostname
> reject_un
/dev/rob0 a écrit :
> On Sunday 01 November 2009 12:24:54 mouss wrote:
>> Simon Morvan a écrit :
>>> Le 30/10/2009 16:05, /dev/rob0 a écrit :
[snip]
Consider Zen here. It also incorporates the (not-quite-so) new PBL,
which has been very effective here.
>>> The last time I tried
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009, Simon Morvan wrote:
[blah blah]
> And how am I supposed to send mail from my own mail server if I
> don't trust my ISP mail relay nor have $$$ to have a colo space and
> my own IP space ?
>
> And, Stan, you refuse mails from my ISP mail relay... (the second
> biggest in Fran
On Sunday 01 November 2009 12:24:54 mouss wrote:
> Simon Morvan a écrit :
> > Le 30/10/2009 16:05, /dev/rob0 a écrit :
> >>[snip]
> >>
> >> Consider Zen here. It also incorporates the (not-quite-so) new PBL,
> >> which has been very effective here.
> >
> > The last time I tried it, Zen included too
Simon Morvan a écrit :
> Le 30/10/2009 16:05, /dev/rob0 a écrit :
>>[snip]
>>>
>> Consider Zen here. It also incorporates the (not-quite-so) new PBL,
>> which has been very effective here.
>>
>>
> The last time I tried it, Zen included too many legitimate users behind
> ADSL lines. The "P
- Original Message
> From: Simon Morvan
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Sun, November 1, 2009 2:37:14 PM
> Subject: Re: smtpd_recipient_restrictions evaluation question
>
> Daniel V. Reinhardt a écrit :
> > - Original Message
> >
> >
> >> From: Stan Hoeppner
> >>
Alex a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Hopefully I don't have the most frequently asked question, but I'm
> spinning my wheels and perhaps followed some bad advice. I hoped
> someone could look over my recipient restrictions to see if I'm making
> some kind of mistake:
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>
Daniel V. Reinhardt a écrit :
- Original Message
From: Stan Hoeppner
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Sun, November 1, 2009 1:00:30 PM
Subject: smtpd_recipient_restrictions evaluation question
Simon Morvan put forth on 11/1/2009 4:20 AM:
That's prevent rejection but also
Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> mouss put forth on 10/31/2009 11:06 AM:
>
> mouss, you rock.
>
>> you can use a script if you prefer. the advantage of 'make' is that it
>> only re-generates files when needed (source change).
>
> The only likely changes would be adding another country.
sometimes, you
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:00:30 -0600
Stan Hoeppner replied:
[snip]
>Net Neutrality has nothing to do with SMTP receivers. It has
>everything to do with network carriers and QOS. You have no inherent
>right to send email to _my_ MX, nor anyone else's. Your rights end
>where mine begin.
> If I ch
- Original Message
> From: Stan Hoeppner
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Sun, November 1, 2009 1:00:30 PM
> Subject: smtpd_recipient_restrictions evaluation question
>
> Simon Morvan put forth on 11/1/2009 4:20 AM:
>
> > That's prevent rejection but also prevent my ability to
Simon Morvan put forth on 11/1/2009 4:20 AM:
> That's prevent rejection but also prevent my ability to ensure my
> freedom to use the network :
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality
>
> That's will be my last message on-list for this topic but feel free to
> keep on discuss this off-l
Hello all
I have configured saslauthd to use pam for password verification and I want
to use pam_krb5 as the authentication back-end. I have set the following
options in /etc/postfix/sasl/smtpd.conf:
log_level: 3
pwcheck_method: saslauthd
mech_list: plain login
Also, I have entered the following
Viktor,
Hello
Thanks a lot for your help. I managed to solve the problem. By the way, have
you got any experiences about using kerberos as a pam module?
Kind Regards
Ali Majdzadeh Kohbanani
2009/10/30 Ali Majdzadeh
> Viktor,
> Hi
> Thanks for your guidance. Would please keep an eye on this thre
Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Simon Morvan put forth on 10/31/2009 12:30 PM:
And why shouldn't be able to use my own mail server behind my private
residential ADSL line ?
You should be able to. Here's how to implement the outbound mail
portion to prevent mass rejections:
http://www.hardwa
* Alex :
> reject_maps_rbl,
That's deprecated, for years.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
ralf.hild
19 matches
Mail list logo
