On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:09 PM, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
>
> Oscar m Cruz wrote:
>
>> F003D25C001 2057 Fri Aug 21 16:10:58 u...@domain.com
>> (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451-4.5.0 Error in processing,
>> id=08510-11,
>> virus_scan FAILED: virus_scan: ALL VIRUS SCANNERS FAILED: ClamAV-clam
Hello List,
I have setup a virtual alias at my Postfix mail server as:
u...@mydomain.com ---> u...@gmail.com
I have set up SPF record for 'mydomain.com' and passes SPF, in case
email originates from my postfix server. But SPF verification fails while it
forwards email using virtual aliases. Fo
Oscar m Cruz wrote:
F003D25C001 2057 Fri Aug 21 16:10:58 u...@domain.com
(host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451-4.5.0 Error in processing, id=08510-11,
virus_scan FAILED: virus_scan: ALL VIRUS SCANNERS FAILED: ClamAV-clamd
av-scanner FAILED: CODE(0x816e564) Too many retries to talk to
127.0.0
I have setup a virtual alias at my Postfix mail server
as:u...@mydomain.com--->
u...@gmail.com
I have set up SPF record for 'mydomain.com' and passes SPF, in case
email originates from my postfix server. But SPF verification fails while it
forwards email using virtual aliases. For example, an
Hi list
I've been doing a problem with my server apparently all virus scan fail
after 2 weeks of working without reboot it, i suspect that my server is not
mount on the best equipment, because im runnning a postfix mail server, web
server, ftp server etc using an simple desktop computer, whenever
Olivier Nicole a écrit :
> Hi Dave,
>
>> I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my
>> postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have some
>> rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best place for them or should i
>> disable that and activate t
Dave a écrit :
> Hello,
> I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my
> postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have some
> rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best place for them or should i
> disable that and activate them in spamassassi
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:54:49PM +0200, gmx wrote:
> Hi Victor,
>
> In http://marc.info/?l=postfix-users&m=116171112425304&w=2 you described
> problems with ciphers when connecting from MS-Exchange to postfix. Has there
> been any improvement in the last almost-3 years?
AFAIK, the problem is r
postconf -n
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
enable_server_options = yes
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
home_mailbox = Mailbox
html_directory
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:08:31AM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> It has been some time since I looked at this, hence the IIRC. Mulberry
>> made the setting explicit, and perhaps allowed one to choose the right
>> client cert. If I recall correctly, Thunderbird uses certif
Victor Duchovni wrote:
It has been some time since I looked at this, hence the IIRC. Mulberry
made the setting explicit, and perhaps allowed one to choose the right
client cert. If I recall correctly, Thunderbird uses certificates
silently, without explicit configuration control... I any case, t
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:35:38PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > I looked up TLS_README, and it would not hurt to have a short
> > sentence here and there to define terminology.
>
> Will the following do?
Yes, that helps.
Wietse
> Index: proto/TLS_README.html
> -
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:35:38PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> I looked up TLS_README, and it would not hurt to have a short
> sentence here and there to define terminology.
Will the following do?
Index: proto/TLS_README.html
--- proto/TLS_README.html 28 Apr 2009 21:44:30 - 1.1.
Noel Jones:
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 06:09:52AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> >
> >> Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Aug 20 22:49:01 server postfix/smtpd[7724]: connect from
> unknown[XXX.YYY.ZZZ.KKK]
> Aug 20 22:49:02 server postfix/smtpd[7724]: setting up TLS co
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 04:51:45PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Victor Duchovni :
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 06:02:41AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> >
> > > Florin Andrei wrote:
> > >> Is there any magic incantation that needs to be performed to convince
> > >> the iPhone to present the c
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 06:09:52AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Aug 20 22:49:01 server postfix/smtpd[7724]: connect from
unknown[XXX.YYY.ZZZ.KKK]
Aug 20 22:49:02 server postfix/smtpd[7724]: setting up TLS connection
from unknown[XXX.YYY.ZZZ.KKK]
Aug 2
* Victor Duchovni :
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 06:02:41AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> > Florin Andrei wrote:
> >> Is there any magic incantation that needs to be performed to convince
> >> the iPhone to present the certificate to Postfix? The puzzling part is
> >> that it seems to work fine with
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 06:02:41AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> Florin Andrei wrote:
>> Is there any magic incantation that needs to be performed to convince
>> the iPhone to present the certificate to Postfix? The puzzling part is
>> that it seems to work fine with Dovecot and imaps.
>
> Very few
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 06:09:52AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>>
>>> Aug 20 22:49:01 server postfix/smtpd[7724]: connect from
>>> unknown[XXX.YYY.ZZZ.KKK]
>>> Aug 20 22:49:02 server postfix/smtpd[7724]: setting up TLS connection
>>> from unknown[XXX.YYY.ZZZ.KKK]
>>> Aug 20
Sorry in advance for the top posting or whatever gmail does on mobile
phones - i have no control over that. I bumped into a very similar
problem today. Mail was queuing up on one of our servers with exactly
the same messages as what you had. In our case a perl script on the
postfix server had gone
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Aug 20 22:49:01 server postfix/smtpd[7724]: connect from
unknown[XXX.YYY.ZZZ.KKK]
Aug 20 22:49:02 server postfix/smtpd[7724]: setting up TLS connection
from unknown[XXX.YYY.ZZZ.KKK]
Aug 20 22:49:02 server postfix/smtpd[7724]: Anonymous TLS connection
established from unkn
Florin Andrei wrote:
Is there any magic incantation that needs to be performed to convince
the iPhone to present the certificate to Postfix? The puzzling part is
that it seems to work fine with Dovecot and imaps.
Very few mail clients support client certificates. Unless you
will be using
* Florin Andrei :
> I'm setting up SASL with TLS for remote clients. As an additional
> security measure, I would like the server to ask the email clients to
> present their client certificates. According to the docs, this is
> accomplished with:
>
> smtpd_tls_ask_ccert = yes
>
> But there are so
Using smtpd_tls_req_ccert=yes on port 587.
submission inet n - - - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_cert_file=/blah/server.crt
-o smtpd_tls_key_file=/blah/server.key
-o smtpd_tls_CAfile=/blah/ca.crt
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=enc
Barney Desmond wrote:
Of course, you couldn't enforce this except on a
non-public-facing system, or on the submission port (587).
Actually, that's exactly what I just did. I configured a separate
listener on 587 and moved all TLS stuff to it. I was reluctant to do so
at first (the client is a
25 matches
Mail list logo
