Wietse Venema wrote:
Hari Hendaryanto:
Hi,
Does reject_rbl_client handle ipv6 address?
In Postfix 2.6 and later.
Wietse
thank you
PT.CITRA SARI MAKMUR
SATELLITE & TERRESTRIAL NETWORK
Connecting the distance - anytime, anywhere, any content
http://www.csmcom.com
Hello,
I'm new to Postfix and have been reading up on the various spam-fighting
features available. I get the general idea that I can have something of a
multi-tiered setup that should allow me to process a decent amount of mail
in an ISP environment. Smtp restrictions and reliable RBLs woul
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:33:05 -0500
Noel Jones wrote:
> Dan Farrell wrote:
> > hi all,
> >
> > I am hoping to relay mail for a friend's home server, which can't
> > use external port 25. I was hoping to define a hash somewhere for
> > relay recipients something like:
> >
> > relay-domain.com sm
Noel, many thanks a lot for information, much better now
Tatiana
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> tatiana philippova wrote:
>>
>> Joel, hi again
>>
>> Also question:
>> "Use DISCARD if you want to accept a message and silently discard it.
>> Note this affects ALL recipients o
tatiana philippova wrote:
Joel, hi again
Also question:
"Use DISCARD if you want to accept a message and silently discard it.
Note this affects ALL recipients of a multi-recipient message."
How exactly postfix deals with multi-recipient messages? Are there
any differences from simple telnet s
Joel, hi again
Also question:
"Use DISCARD if you want to accept a message and silently discard it.
Note this affects ALL recipients of a multi-recipient message."
How exactly postfix deals with multi-recipient messages? Are there
any differences from simple telnet smtp session where I send mul
tatiana philippova wrote:
Hi Noel,
many thanks for reply.
So if I need restrict sending to some recipients that are exactly in
mynetworks (this postfix instance relays email to other
email-application on the same host) I have to put
check_recipient_access regexp:/etc/postfix/recipient.regexp befo
Hi Noel,
many thanks for reply.
So if I need restrict sending to some recipients that are exactly in
mynetworks (this postfix instance relays email to other
email-application on the same host) I have to put
check_recipient_access regexp:/etc/postfix/recipient.regexp before
permit_mynetworks but hav
Dan Farrell wrote:
hi all,
sorry to ask this simple question. I couldn't find the solution
online.
I am hoping to relay mail for a friend's home server, which can't use
external port 25. I was hoping to define a hash somewhere for relay
recipients something like:
relay-domain.com smtp:rel
hi all,
sorry to ask this simple question. I couldn't find the solution
online.
I am hoping to relay mail for a friend's home server, which can't use
external port 25. I was hoping to define a hash somewhere for relay
recipients something like:
relay-domain.com smtp:relay-host.com:2525
wher
taphy wrote:
Hi all,
I'm not so experienced in dealing with postfix unfortunately and not sure if
I'm not breaking something in my security with applying next
smtpd_recipient_restrictions & etc (warn_if_reject - for testing period
only, will remove it later):
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code
Jeroen van Aart:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Postfix has proven to be rock solid, and there is no need to
> > make it less reliable with trigger-happy babysitters.
>
> I am not giving any value judgement to postfix. In fact it's one of the
> few MTAs I would trust to run on any systems I manage.
Hi all,
I'm not so experienced in dealing with postfix unfortunately and not sure if
I'm not breaking something in my security with applying next
smtpd_recipient_restrictions & etc (warn_if_reject - for testing period
only, will remove it later):
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 450
smtp_use
Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix has proven to be rock solid, and there is no need to
make it less reliable with trigger-happy babysitters.
I am not giving any value judgement to postfix. In fact it's one of the
few MTAs I would trust to run on any systems I manage.
The problem is not postfix, i
I would suggest using smtptest (part of cyrus) to confirm that your
server correctly authenticates using CRAM-MD5. If it works, then there's
a problem with thunderbird. If not, then you can either stop advertising
CRAM or look into fixing the problem on the server side.
that looks a
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 03:25:45PM -0500, Blake Hudson wrote:
> Original Message
> Subject: thunderbird 3.0, cram-md5 failing
> From: Jay G. Scott
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009 3:03:38 PM
>> Greetings,
>>
>> client = thunderbird 3.0 beta 3
>>
Jeroen van Aart:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Internally, "postfix stop" uses SIGTERM to terminate the master
> > daemon. This signal is also used by system shutdown procedures.
>
> Right, the monitor will use /etc/init.d/postfix stop|start in order to
> attempt to restart postfix.
Postfix has pr
Wietse Venema wrote:
Internally, "postfix stop" uses SIGTERM to terminate the master
daemon. This signal is also used by system shutdown procedures.
Right, the monitor will use /etc/init.d/postfix stop|start in order to
attempt to restart postfix.
Greetings,
Jeroen
Ralf Hildebrandt:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> * Wietse Venema :
>
> > > Oddly enough, this does only happen on mail-ausfall, mail, with the
> > > same master.cf doesn't show it...
> >
> > The message i logged only when you run an OLD master daemon.
>
> Very very strange. I sus
Jeroen van Aart:
> I should add that I was miss interpreting the "terminating on signal
> 15". That in fact is my monitor doing its work, which I installed after
> noticing postfix would regularly quit. It's likely the actual kill
Internally, "postfix stop" uses SIGTERM to terminate the master
On Thursday, August 13, 2009 at 22:18 CEST,
Eduardo Júnior wrote:
> > smtpd (listener) is not smtp (client).
>
> Ops, my mistake.
>
> -o smtpd_header_checks=regexp:/path/header_checks
There is no such configuration parameter. To have different header
checks for different smtpd(8) listeners
Original Message
Subject: thunderbird 3.0, cram-md5 failing
From: Jay G. Scott
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009 3:03:38 PM
Greetings,
client = thunderbird 3.0 beta 3
postfix 2.3.3
linux, host == jgstoy
doing TLS encryption and authentication.
w
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
>>
>> 2009/8/13 Eduardo Júnior :
>>>
>>> Right.
>>> For this I wanted more information about debug level of the daemons,
>>> of the cleanup in special, to analyze the actions from my expressions.
>>>
>>>
Wi
Hi,
>>
>> I have two daemons smtp, one to incoming messages, other to outgoing mesages.
>> So, in master.cf I did that:
>>
>> -o smtp_header_checks=regexp:/path/header_checks
>>
>
> smtpd (listener) is not smtp (client).
Ops, my mistake.
-o smtpd_header_checks=regexp:/path/header_checks
>
> A
On Aug 12, 2009, at 10:33 PM, email builder wrote:
I am wondering if anyone has advice on where there are any email
health checks online. I used to use dnsstuff.com but they have
since gone commercial.
You have been given links and other suggestions for this that are
sound, I would foll
Greetings,
client = thunderbird 3.0 beta 3
postfix 2.3.3
linux, host == jgstoy
doing TLS encryption and authentication.
windows/thunderbird 2.0.0.22 works
windows/outlook 2003 works
looking at /var/log/maillog i see that thunderbird 3 is setting
up a TLS connection okay.
but the authenticati
On Thursday, August 13, 2009 at 19:58 CEST,
pch0317 wrote:
> Is postfix capable to work in high-availability or load-balancing cluster?
> If yes, where I can read about this. Please, give me a hint.
This answer has been asked many times before so you can find many hints
in the list archives
On Thursday, August 13, 2009 at 19:16 CEST,
fmgre-list...@yahoo.fr wrote:
> We are reconfiguring our mail systems.
> We already have a mailfilter computer , which will be replaced.
>
> To test the new mailfiltering system, I would like to duplicate all
> incoming mail so as to forward it :
>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:58 PM, pch0317 wrote:
> Hi
> Is postfix capable to work in high-availability or load-balancing cluster?
> If yes, where I can read about this. Please, give me a hint.
>
> Thanks
>
>
http://www.google.com/search?q=postfix+high+availability
and since you posted an identica
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 05:23:17PM -0700, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
I am not sure if it's the kernel's OOM killer or postfix itself which
causes it to quit.
1. The OOM killer _always_ uses SIGKILL. A program is not even given the
possibility to react.
2. root processes (like
Thanks A lot for this Great and extremely fast answer
Fred
- Message d'origine
De : Noel Jones
À : fmgre-list...@yahoo.fr; postfix-users@postfix.org
Envoyé le : Jeudi, 13 Août 2009, 19h40mn 47s
Objet : Re: usage of smtpd_recipient_restrictions ; greylisting ; verify
fmgre-list...@ya
Jesus Alejandro Cuevas Villegas wrote:
Some random emails when they go to the altermine process are losing the
attachments:
This is the postfix support list.
You'll need to ask on an altermime support channel about
problem with altermime.
I review my disclaimer.sh and I found a strang
Hi
Is postfix capable to work in high-availability or load-balancing cluster?
If yes, where I can read about this. Please, give me a hint.
Thanks
Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
2009/8/13 Eduardo Júnior :
Right.
For this I wanted more information about debug level of the daemons,
of the cleanup in special, to analyze the actions from my expressions.
With header_checks, some choices are to add it to main.cf and remove
matching headers from
2009/8/13 Eduardo Júnior :
>
> Right.
> For this I wanted more information about debug level of the daemons,
> of the cleanup in special, to analyze the actions from my expressions.
>
>
>>
>> With header_checks, some choices are to add it to main.cf and remove
>> matching headers from all mail, def
Eduardo Júnior wrote:
I have two daemons smtp, one to incoming messages, other to outgoing mesages.
So, in master.cf I did that:
-o smtp_header_checks=regexp:/path/header_checks
Good. That should do the trick.
checks_headers:
^Received: from amavis IGNORE
...
proper form would be
/^Receiv
Quoting Melvyn Sopacua :
On Thursday 13 August 2009 07:22:33 /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thursday 13 August 2009 06:17:37 Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:28 AM, ram wrote:
> > I use in smtpd_recipient restrictions
> > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
> >
> > To reject mails from spamhaus
fmgre-list...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hello,
We are reconfiguring our incoming mail server.
It was working with greylisting enabled ; and we've just added the verify
(reject_unverified_recipient) capacity.
To avoid email address harvesting, we would like to keep on greylisting all
incoming mail whe
* Wietse Venema :
> > Oddly enough, this does only happen on mail-ausfall, mail, with the
> > same master.cf doesn't show it...
>
> The message i logged only when you run an OLD master daemon.
Very very strange. I suspected something like this and rebuilt. To no
avail. I will now nuke all the ol
Hi,
2009/8/13 Noel Jones :
> Eduardo Júnior wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i'm trying remove some headers from outgoing messages.
>> I read in somewhere that this is enough:
>>
>>
>> -o header_checks=regexp:/etc/postfix/checks_headers
>
> Where'd you read this misinformation?
I don't remember, but wasn
Wietse Venema wrote:
I was thinking of adding a second line to the antispam reject
messages. For example:
550-5.7.1 The existing reject message
550 5.7.1 Please see http://foo.example.com/ for support.
Nice.
One catch-all banner is infinitely better than nothing, and it's a good
Hello,
We are reconfiguring our mail systems.
We already have a mailfilter computer , which will be replaced.
To test the new mailfiltering system, I would like to duplicate all incoming
mail so as to forward it :
1/ to the old mailfilter computer ( where it will be distributed )
2/ to th
Hello,
We are reconfiguring our incoming mail server.
It was working with greylisting enabled ; and we've just added the verify
(reject_unverified_recipient) capacity.
To avoid email address harvesting, we would like to keep on greylisting all
incoming mail wheteher or not it may fail the rej
On 13-Aug-2009, at 10:44, Jesus Alejandro Cuevas Villegas wrote:
Hello Everyone, I'm new to postfix/altermine and I have this problem:
This is my environment:
Solaris 10
postfix-2.5.0
altermime-0.3.8
Is altermime part of postfix?
--
What the hell's goin' on in the engine room? Were there
Hello Everyone, I'm new to postfix/altermine and I have this problem:
This is my environment:
Solaris 10
postfix-2.5.0
altermime-0.3.8
Some random emails when they go to the altermine process are losing the
attachments:
When they arrive to my smpt gateway -
Aug 13 09:34:10 smtpgw01 pos
On Thursday 13 August 2009 07:22:33 /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Thursday 13 August 2009 06:17:37 Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:28 AM, ram wrote:
> > > I use in smtpd_recipient restrictions
> > > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
> > >
> > > To reject mails from spamhaus listed IP's. If
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Ralf Hildebrandt :
>
> > mail_version = 2.7-20090807
> Some more details:
>
> Aug 13 14:52:40 mail-ausfall postfix/master[5607]: daemon started -- version
> 2.7-20090807, configuration /etc/postfix
> Aug 13 14:52:40 mail-ausfall postfix/master[5607]: warning: service "smtp"
Hari Hendaryanto:
> Hi,
>
> Does reject_rbl_client handle ipv6 address?
In Postfix 2.6 and later.
Wietse
Dabrien 'Dabe' Murphy:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Instead of having to maintain a bazillion different reply parameters,
> > would not it be sufficient to have one generic reply line that
> > gets appended to all those reject commands?
> >
>
> Hi Wietse,
>
> If the dilemma is between:
I was t
On Thursday 13 August 2009 06:17:37 Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:28 AM, ram wrote:
> > I use in smtpd_recipient restrictions
> > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
> >
> > To reject mails from spamhaus listed IP's. If I want to accept
> > mails and relay to an admin email-id , is th
Eduardo Júnior wrote:
Hi,
i'm trying remove some headers from outgoing messages.
I read in somewhere that this is enough:
-o header_checks=regexp:/etc/postfix/checks_headers
Where'd you read this misinformation?
The header_checks parameter is only used by the cleanup daemon.
With header_ch
2009/8/13 Eduardo Júnior :
> Hi,
>
> i'm trying remove some headers from outgoing messages.
> I read in somewhere that this is enough:
>
>
> -o header_checks=regexp:/etc/postfix/checks_headers
>
> checks_headers:
> ^Received: from amavis IGNORE
> ...
>
No special configuration is required, only m
On 8/13/2009 8:01 AM, Joerg Toellner wrote:
> Hi Postfix-Group,
> Any ideas appreciated. Would someone enlighten me, please? If you need more
> information or some parts of the config file posted, please don't hesitate
> to ask for it.
>
> Thanks in advance for reading, your effort and maybe a
Hi,
i'm trying remove some headers from outgoing messages.
I read in somewhere that this is enough:
-o header_checks=regexp:/etc/postfix/checks_headers
checks_headers:
^Received: from amavis IGNORE
...
I'd like some references about this subject.
And references about debug level of the daemon
On 8/13/2009, Dabrien 'Dabe' Murphy (d...@parabon.com) wrote:
>> Instead of having to maintain a bazillion different reply parameters,
>> would not it be sufficient to have one generic reply line that
>> gets appended to all those reject commands?
> * Implementing your proposed work-around quickly
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> mail_version = 2.7-20090807
Some more details:
Aug 13 14:52:40 mail-ausfall postfix/master[5607]: daemon started -- version
2.7-20090807, configuration /etc/postfix
Aug 13 14:52:40 mail-ausfall postfix/master[5607]: warning: service "smtp" (25)
has reached its process lim
Hi Postfix-Group,
I am new to postfix and the list. And awkwardly i just have to waste your
all time with a maybe simple problem. But i am not able to solve it myself
and i didn't find anything useful while searching in the internet.
THE SITUATION:
I have a Postfix mailserver on Ubuntu that work
On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:28 AM, ram wrote:
I use in smtpd_recipient restrictions
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
To reject mails from spamhaus listed IP's. If I want to accept mails
and
relay to an admin email-id , is that possible.
Probably with a policy server and the REDIRECT action.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 05:23:17PM -0700, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> I am not sure if it's the kernel's OOM killer or postfix itself which
> causes it to quit.
1. The OOM killer _always_ uses SIGKILL. A program is not even given the
possibility to react.
2. root processes (like master) have a much l
I use in smtpd_recipient restrictions
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
To reject mails from spamhaus listed IP's. If I want to accept mails and
relay to an admin email-id , is that possible.
Or should I simply accept all mails and move spamhaus checks to
SpamAssassin and write rules over ther
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * email builder :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am wondering if anyone has advice on where there are any email
> > health checks online. I used to use dnsstuff.com but they have since
> > gone commercial.
>
> MXtoolbox
http://www.mxtoolbox.com/eom/index.aspx
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
* email builder :
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering if anyone has advice on where there are any email
> health checks online. I used to use dnsstuff.com but they have since
> gone commercial.
MXtoolbox
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin
Florin Andrei wrote:
> Mikael Bak wrote:
>>
>> Is it really recommended to run a mail server that accepts email from
>> outside with non static IP address?
>>
>> I would not do it.
>
> As long as the dynamic DNS service works well, and the IP address only
> changes very rarely, why not?
>
Hi,
Yo
63 matches
Mail list logo
