Jay G. Scott wrote:
[snip]
> mynetworks_style = host
[snip]
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
> permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination
[snip]
Hi,
Are you running mutt on the postfix host? In that case perhaps that is
why you can send email without AUTH.
H
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009, Willy De la Court wrote:
> This afternoon I noticed the policy server crashed hard and was not
> running anymore. And due to that mails where rejected with 451 result code.
>
> Aug 5 19:37:14 yumbilla postfix/smtpd[30457]: warning: connect to
> 127.0.0.1:2501: Connection ref
2009/8/6 Martin Schütte :
> Srdan Dukic wrote:
>> Ideally I would like Postfix to output its logs to a named unix fifo
>> pipe that would be read by my daemon process. In the configuration
>> documentation I can't find any way of specifying an alternative to
>> syslog. Is there any way to do this?
Srdan Dukic wrote:
> Ideally I would like Postfix to output its logs to a named unix fifo
> pipe that would be read by my daemon process. In the configuration
> documentation I can't find any way of specifying an alternative to
> syslog. Is there any way to do this?
Syslog is the right tool becaus
Srdan Dukic wrote:
> Is there any way to specify to Postfix to use an alternate file/daemon
> for logging? I am trying to create a custom application that will
> support email analysis in real time. In order to do this, I was hoping
> to feed in the Postfix logs directly, instead of just using a sy
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 15:28:27 Srdan Dukic wrote:
> Ideally I would like Postfix to output its logs to a named unix fifo
> pipe that would be read by my daemon process.
Or you can chroot postfix and let your daemon be the log socket. If nothing
else is logging in that chroot, then you shou
Hi,
Is there any way to specify to Postfix to use an alternate file/daemon
for logging? I am trying to create a custom application that will
support email analysis in real time. In order to do this, I was hoping
to feed in the Postfix logs directly, instead of just using a system
such a 'tail -f'
Jay G. Scott wrote:
Greetings,
I'm a newbie at the mail w/ authentication thing.
So tell me what to read, since what I need is how to find answers and
not just the answers. But I've been searching the web and
I'm getting close, but no exact matches.
postfix-2.3.3
cyrus-sasl-*-2.1.22
saslauthd
Greetings,
I'm a newbie at the mail w/ authentication thing.
So tell me what to read, since what I need is how to find answers and
not just the answers. But I've been searching the web and
I'm getting close, but no exact matches.
postfix-2.3.3
cyrus-sasl-*-2.1.22
saslauthd is running.
This is j
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 15:18:46 Eduardo Júnior wrote:
> what's the difference between smtp and smtps?
> According to what I read in [1], the difference is just the port where
> the daemon smtp listen
In the context you are asking, both are names for ports as defined in
your services(5) file (
Willy De la Court wrote:
Hi all,
I have a policy service in my smtpd_recipient_restrictions
check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:2501
This is a greylisting policy service.
This afternoon I noticed the policy server crashed hard and was not
running anymore. And due to that mails where rejected
Hi all,
I have a policy service in my smtpd_recipient_restrictions
check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:2501
This is a greylisting policy service.
This afternoon I noticed the policy server crashed hard and was not
running anymore. And due to that mails where rejected with 451 result code.
Aug
Hi,
what's the difference between smtp and smtps?
According to what I read in [1], the difference is just the port where
the daemon smtp listen
In smtps, all the information pass encrypted? Using key and cert from
tags tls in main.cf?
Now I have smtp+tls.
smtps == smtp+tls and different port?
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 13:25:32 Robert Socha wrote:
> My question: Is it possible to queue a message with diffrent time for
> the bounce?
What is the real-world problem you're trying to solve? I smell
backscatter here ... and this approach would not help.
--
Offlist mail to this address
thanks all i'll check with postfixadmin
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 05, 2009 at 14:43 CEST,
> K bharathan wrote:
>
> > in fact the setup is virtual users/mysql with postfixadmin; how can i
> > put a virtual alias map?
>
> Doesn't Postfixadmin
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 05:37:12 Yeray Gutiérrez Cedrés wrote:
> If it's right and virtual_mailbox_domain is not set, so its
> default value is virtual_mailbox_maps (wich lists an LDAP
> database), Postfix would perform twice the same LDAP lookup
> (one time in qmgr(8) and another time in virtu
Robert Socha:
> Hi,
>
> My problem is... :)
>
> I would like that the selected messages injected by specified interface
> remain in the queue for no longer than 2 hours. I used this
> configuration (master.cf), but it seems that it is not working as I want:
>
> bulk.example.pl: smtp inet n -
On Aug 5, 2009, at 2:25 PM, Robert Socha wrote:
Hi,
My problem is... :)
I would like that the selected messages injected by specified
interface remain in the queue for no longer than 2 hours. I used
this configuration (master.cf), but it seems that it is not working
as I want:
bulk.e
Robert Socha wrote:
Hi,
My problem is... :)
I would like that the selected messages injected by specified interface
remain in the queue for no longer than 2 hours. I used this
configuration (master.cf), but it seems that it is not working as I want:
bulk.example.pl: smtp inet n - n - - smt
Hi,
My problem is... :)
I would like that the selected messages injected by specified interface
remain in the queue for no longer than 2 hours. I used this
configuration (master.cf), but it seems that it is not working as I want:
bulk.example.pl: smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o maximal_queu
Robert Lopez wrote:
> On one mail gateway running postfix I see about 24 lines that look like this:
>
> postfix 7579 32735 0 10:00 ?00:00:00 smtpd -n smtp -t inet
> -u -c -o stress
>
> On all the other gateways I normally see lines that look like this:
>
> postfix 9243 3682 0 08:5
On one mail gateway running postfix I see about 24 lines that look like this:
postfix 7579 32735 0 10:00 ?00:00:00 smtpd -n smtp -t inet
-u -c -o stress
On all the other gateways I normally see lines that look like this:
postfix 9243 3682 0 08:52 ?00:00:00 smtpd -n smtp -t
Eduardo Júnior wrote:
> > Hi,
>
Hi,
> > just a detail:
> >
> > With postfwd, i didn't get control how many messages a IP can to send.
> > But my control have done through number of connections from host.
> > If you consider that a connection is equal a message, this is ok.
> >
>
That ma
Hi,
2009/8/5 Eduardo Júnior :
> Hi,
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Ing. Davy Leon
> wrote:
>> Wich policy daemon would you guys recommend to install? I have a Postfix
>> 2.3.3 with amavisd-new and clamav running.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> David
>
>
> I use postfwd [1] for that
> And it works wel
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Ing. Davy Leon wrote:
> Wich policy daemon would you guys recommend to install? I have a Postfix
> 2.3.3 with amavisd-new and clamav running.
>
> Cheers
>
> David
I use postfwd [1] for that
And it works well for me.
To build the rules is necessary time, just
Wich policy daemon would you guys recommend to install? I have a Postfix
2.3.3 with amavisd-new and clamav running.
Cheers
David
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 8/5/2009, Mikael Bak (mik...@t-online.hu) wrote:
>>> So, do you mean that changing this parameter to 250 would make postfix
>>> to accept the email?
>
>> No.
>
> Actually, the answer to his question is yes.
>
>> You should leave this parameter in its default value.
>
On 8/5/2009, Mikael Bak (mik...@t-online.hu) wrote:
>> So, do you mean that changing this parameter to 250 would make postfix
>> to accept the email?
> No.
Actually, the answer to his question is yes.
> You should leave this parameter in its default value.
Correct - but he specifically asked if
Mauricio Tavares wrote:
Here is another trivial question: I have a postfix box I want to
let a specific user in another domain, say otherdomain.com, to use it as
his smtp. So, he would authenticate against it but would not have an
email account in the machine. And, of course, nobody els
Here is another trivial question: I have a postfix box I want
to let a specific user in another domain, say otherdomain.com, to use it
as his smtp. So, he would authenticate against it but would not have an
email account in the machine. And, of course, nobody else but him from
that doma
Santiago Romero wrote:
Hi,
Quoting the documentation[1]:
"The unverified_recipient_defer_code parameter (default 450) specifies
the numerical Postfix SMTP server reply code when a recipient address
probe fails with some temporary error. Some sites insist on changing
this into 250. NOTE: This
Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
Hi,
Wietse Venema wrote:
Instead, use a policy daemon with persistent database.
As far as I remember I tried once http://www.policyd.org, but it didn't
work for me. As I remember there was a problem with message accounting,
...
Or maybe you have different policy daem
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Mauricio Tavares wrote:
I am compiling postfix 2.6.1 in a Solaris 10 box using the
following script:
#!/bin/bash
make tidy
make makefiles CC=gcc \
CCARGS='-DUSE_TLS -DHAS_PCRE -DUSE_SASL_AUTH \
-DDEF_SERVER_SASL_TYPE=\"dovecot\" \
-I/usr/sfw/include
On Wednesday, August 05, 2009 at 14:43 CEST,
K bharathan wrote:
> in fact the setup is virtual users/mysql with postfixadmin; how can i
> put a virtual alias map?
Doesn't Postfixadmin already support this?
> i feel sql to be queried for expanding the list members; i'm not
> getting that p
K bharathan schrieb:
> in fact the setup is virtual users/mysql with postfixadmin; how can i
> put a virtual alias map?
> i feel sql to be queried for expanding the list members; i'm not getting
> that part properly..
should be easy with postfixadmin
create alias ( mailadress of the list )
fill i
in fact the setup is virtual users/mysql with postfixadmin; how can i put a
virtual alias map?
i feel sql to be queried for expanding the list members; i'm not getting
that part properly..
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Jose Alberto wrote:
> I create the list in ldap with groups.
>
> in my ma
Hi,
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Instead, use a policy daemon with persistent database.
>
As far as I remember I tried once http://www.policyd.org, but it didn't
work for me. As I remember there was a problem with message accounting,
and I have got an email from Nigel from policyd where he confirmed
I create the list in ldap with groups.
in my main.cf:
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases, ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap.cf
ldap.cf contains:
server_host = server.ldap
search_base = ou=Groups,dc=domain,dc=my
result_attribute = memberUid
scope = sub
query_filter = mail=%s
when you create group, must put att
Jaroslaw Grzabel:
> My company decided to limit a number of messages per day per IP. That's
> why we run anvil and limit 1000msg/24h/IP, so I put into main.cf:
Don't use anvil(8) for long-term statistics.
ANVIL(8) ANVIL(8)
...
Th
On Wednesday, August 05, 2009 at 12:37 CEST,
Yeray Gutiérrez Cedrés wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
>
> > Yes, but Postfix must know which domains are virtual mailbox
> > domains, i.e. which domains should be passed off to virtual(8).
> > It's not necessarily wro
I create the list in ldap with groups.
in my main.cf:
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases, ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap.cf
ldap.cf contains:
server_host = server.ldap
search_base = ou=Groups,dc=domain,dc=my
result_attribute = memberUid
scope = sub
query_filter = mail=%s
when you create group, must put att
Thank you for your suggestions! It works now.
This was an issue with my configuration of Postfix and Cyrus.
In master.cf, as Magnus suggested:
lmtp unix - - n - - lmtp
In main.cf:
virtual_transport = lmtp:[10.1.1.101]:2003
And in cyrus.conf, according to Rob
Stefan Förster wrote:
> "Clients that are excluded from connection count, connection rate,
> or"... "excluded".
>
Ah... you're completely right :). I've enabled limiting for everyone
from the list besides rest of the world! :).
> I think you need Postfix 2.4 or later to work with that bang-s
* K bharathan :
> hi
> can i make a distribution list in postfix? is it with aliasing?
yes.
> how can i do it?
list: a,b,c,d,e,f
in aliases
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12
hi
can i make a distribution list in postfix? is it with aliasing?
how can i do it?
appreciate the guidance
Magnus B?ck:
> On Wednesday, August 05, 2009 at 10:11 CEST,
> Robert Socha wrote:
>
> > Evgeniy Arbatov pisze:
> >
> > > This is what I have in master.cf:
> > > lmtp inet n - n - - lmtp
> > >
> > > I am sure all the LDAP lookups are working fine and I did
* Jaroslaw Grzabel :
> I had a problem with rate limiting in postfix in last week, and I had to
> disable it. I don't know why but I set up rate limiting per IP and it
> looks like it didn't count rates correctly. Let me shed a lit a bit for
> my problem.
>
> My company decided to limit a number o
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 05, 2009 at 10:48 CEST,
> Yeray Gutiérrez Cedrés wrote:
>
>> I don't know why $virtual_mailbox_maps is listed in
>> virtual_mailbox_domains. I've read that $virtual_mailbox_maps is the
>> default value for virtual_mailb
Hi everyone,
I had a problem with rate limiting in postfix in last week, and I had to
disable it. I don't know why but I set up rate limiting per IP and it
looks like it didn't count rates correctly. Let me shed a lit a bit for
my problem.
My company decided to limit a number of messages per day
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:57:41 -0500
> Von: "/dev/rob0"
> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: Re: Question regarding Restriction Classes
> On Tuesday 04 August 2009 13:51:31 Steve wrote:
> > > But I don't think this is it. What you want to do is make
On Wednesday, August 05, 2009 at 10:48 CEST,
Yeray Gutiérrez Cedrés wrote:
> I don't know why $virtual_mailbox_maps is listed in
> virtual_mailbox_domains. I've read that $virtual_mailbox_maps is the
> default value for virtual_mailbox_domains, so I think that the
> previous guy thought that
Santiago Romero wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Quoting the documentation[1]:
>>
>> "The unverified_recipient_defer_code parameter (default 450) specifies
>> the numerical Postfix SMTP server reply code when a recipient address
>> probe fails with some temporary error. Some sites insist on changing
>> this
Well I'm new in the company (and new to Postfix) and the system was
already set, so I'm trying to understand how is this configured. I'm
seeing a warning regarding this in the logfile that tells me that the
domain name must not be listed in both virtual_mailbox_domains and
relay_domains, so obviou
Hi,
Quoting the documentation[1]:
"The unverified_recipient_defer_code parameter (default 450) specifies
the numerical Postfix SMTP server reply code when a recipient address
probe fails with some temporary error. Some sites insist on changing
this into 250. NOTE: This change turns MX servers
LuKreme wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2009, at 3:42, Thomas Gelf wrote:
>
>> the person who did not correctly set up the network is to be blamed,
>> if you have equipment acting as MTA it should be configured the right
>> way, otherwise use a relay server
>
> SHOULD be blamed? Yes. But the blame will f
On Wednesday, August 05, 2009 at 10:25 CEST,
Yeray Gutiérrez Cedrés wrote:
> I have this in my main.cf file:
>
> relay_domains = example.com
>
> virtual_mailbox_domains=$virtual_mailbox_maps hash:/etc/postfix/vmaildomains
Why are you listing $virtual_mailbox_maps here?
> virtual_mailbox_
I have this in my main.cf file:
relay_domains = example.com
virtual_mailbox_domains=$virtual_mailbox_maps hash:/etc/postfix/vmaildomains
virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:ldapvirtualmap
virtual_mailbox_base = /var/vmail/
virtual_transport = maildrop
And this is the content of /etc/postfix/vmaildomains
On Wednesday, August 05, 2009 at 10:11 CEST,
Robert Socha wrote:
> Evgeniy Arbatov pisze:
>
> > This is what I have in master.cf:
> > lmtp inet n - n - - lmtp
> >
> > I am sure all the LDAP lookups are working fine and I did specify
> > lmtp in /etc/servic
On Wednesday, August 05, 2009 at 09:46 CEST,
Evgeniy Arbatov wrote:
> I have a strange problem when Postfix is sending mail with LMTP over
> TCP sockets to Cyrus IMAP. Cyrus IMAP is listening on port 2003 and
> accepting telnet connections on that port from my Postfix server. But
> when it c
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 09:44 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> LuKreme schrieb:
> > On Aug 4, 2009, at 3:42, Thomas Gelf wrote:
> >
> >> the person who did not correctly set up the network is to be blamed,
> >> if you have equipment acting as MTA it should be configured the right
> >> way, oth
Evgeniy Arbatov pisze:
This is what I have in master.cf:
lmtp inet n - n - - lmtp
I am sure all the LDAP lookups are working fine and I did specify lmtp
in /etc/services.
This is a line from cyrus.conf
lmtpcmd="lmtpd" listen="[10.1.1.101]:lmtp" p
Hello,
I have a strange problem when Postfix is sending mail with LMTP over
TCP sockets to Cyrus IMAP. Cyrus IMAP is listening on port 2003 and
accepting telnet connections on that port from my Postfix server. But
when it comes to Postfix itself using LMTP, I see the following log
messages:
mgw1
LuKreme schrieb:
> On Aug 4, 2009, at 3:42, Thomas Gelf wrote:
>
>> the person who did not correctly set up the network is to be blamed,
>> if you have equipment acting as MTA it should be configured the right
>> way, otherwise use a relay server
>
> SHOULD be blamed? Yes. But the blame will
63 matches
Mail list logo
