Re: Allow a group of unauthenticated senders

Sahil Tandon wrote: On Sat, 11 Jul 2009, Andrew Thompson wrote: priscilla wrote: Is it possible to allow a group of unauthenticated senders while other senders are authenticated. Yes, maybe. How do you intend to identify these senders?

Re: Allow a group of unauthenticated senders

On Sat, 11 Jul 2009, Andrew Thompson wrote: > priscilla wrote: >> Is it possible to allow a group of unauthenticated senders while other >> senders are authenticated. > > Yes, maybe. > > How do you intend to identify these senders? Also clarify what you mean by "allow". Can you give two simple

Re: Allow a group of unauthenticated senders

priscilla wrote: Dear All, Is it possible to allow a group of unauthenticated senders while other senders are authenticated. Yes, maybe. How do you intend to identify these senders? -- Andrew Thompson

Allow a group of unauthenticated senders

Dear All, Is it possible to allow a group of unauthenticated senders while other senders are authenticated. Regards Priscilla

Re: TLS library problems

Scott Haneda: > Hello, I am seeing a lot of these in my syslog logs. I am not sure > what they mean, google did not yield a lot other than people calling > out an incorrctly named cert/key > > system.log:Jul 10 00:07:57 trex postfix/smtpd[45598]: warning: TLS > library problem: 45598:error:

Re: TLS library problems

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Scott Haneda wrote: > system.log:Jul 10 00:07:57 trex postfix/smtpd[45598]: warning: TLS > library problem: 45598:error:140760FC:SSL > routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol:s23_srvr.c:571: Debug the proxy. What is it? Not Postfix, I'd guess. -- Sahil Tandon

TLS library problems

Hello, I am seeing a lot of these in my syslog logs. I am not sure what they mean, google did not yield a lot other than people calling out an incorrctly named cert/key system.log:Jul 10 00:07:57 trex postfix/smtpd[45598]: warning: TLS library problem: 45598:error:140760FC:SSL routines:S

Re: mail dropped in ~/mail and not ~/Maildir

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:42:44 -0700 Admin wrote: > Gerard wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:34:10 -0700 > > Admin wrote: > > > >> Hi there, > >> > >> I have postfix 2.5.1-2 and procmail 3.22-16ubu installed on an > >> ubuntu box. I am trying to figure out why mail is delivered to > >> ~/mail in

Re: mail dropped in ~/mail and not ~/Maildir

Gerard wrote: On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:34:10 -0700 Admin wrote: Hi there, I have postfix 2.5.1-2 and procmail 3.22-16ubu installed on an ubuntu box. I am trying to figure out why mail is delivered to ~/mail instead of the postconf ~/Maildir . Is it possible that the procmail delivery rules ar

Re: Multiple Aliases Files - Same Domain

On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 10:53:50AM -0400, wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:04:33PM -0400, wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote: > > > >> alias_maps = dbm:/etc/postfix/aliases, dbm:/etc/newcompany/aliases, > >> nis:mail.aliases > > > > Are you sure you want a local aliases(

Re: unexpected filter response from SNFMilter when sending multiple messages to postfix over one SMTP connection

Alban Deniz: > Hi Wietse, > > Yes, the problem does go away when I run a version of SNFMilter that never > invokes smfi_quarantine(). I sent 1230 emails to postfix integrated with my > milter with no problem. > > Also, when I did invoke smfi_quarantine(), the problem occurred after 12 > messa

Re: unexpected filter response from SNFMilter when sending multiple messages to postfix over one SMTP connection

Hi Wietse, Yes, the problem does go away when I run a version of SNFMilter that never invokes smfi_quarantine(). I sent 1230 emails to postfix integrated with my milter with no problem. Also, when I did invoke smfi_quarantine(), the problem occurred after 12 messages. What can I do to help f

Re: unexpected filter response from SNFMilter when sending multiple messages to postfix over one SMTP connection

Does the problem go away when you NEVER invoke smfi_quarantine()? The Postfix SMFIR_QUARANTINE implementation seems to be wrong. Wietse

Re: mail dropped in ~/mail and not ~/Maildir

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:34:10 -0700 Admin wrote: > Hi there, > > I have postfix 2.5.1-2 and procmail 3.22-16ubu installed on an ubuntu > box. I am trying to figure out why mail is delivered to ~/mail > instead of the postconf ~/Maildir . Is it possible that the procmail > delivery rules are tak

Re: unexpected filter response from SNFMilter when sending multiple messages to postfix over one SMTP connection

Alban Deniz: > Hi Wietse, > > I ran a test case showing the unexpected filter response of SMFIR_ADDHEADER > to > the event SMFIC_MAIL. Here's a summary of my setup: > > postfix is configured with the SNFMilter milter. The master.cf file contains > the > line: > > smtp inet n -

Re: mail dropped in ~/mail and not ~/Maildir

Admin wrote: > Hi there, > > I have postfix 2.5.1-2 and procmail 3.22-16ubu installed on an ubuntu > box. I am trying to figure out why mail is delivered to ~/mail instead > of the postconf ~/Maildir . Is it possible that the procmail delivery > rules are taking over. If you note postconf explic

mail dropped in ~/mail and not ~/Maildir

Hi there, I have postfix 2.5.1-2 and procmail 3.22-16ubu installed on an ubuntu box. I am trying to figure out why mail is delivered to ~/mail instead of the postconf ~/Maildir . Is it possible that the procmail delivery rules are taking over. If you note postconf explicitly knows Maildir is d

RE: Per user graph statistics

> From: skib...@wrladv.com > > On Friday 10 July 2009 09:24:33 am you wrote: >> Hello Sean, >> thanks for your answer. I already know about mailgraph. I read about cacti >> templates based on mailgraph scripts too, but all tools i heard about are >> monitoring "just" overall statistics. >> >> If

Re: postfix as relay host

Michael Fischer wrote: Hi, I have a groupwise system and want to use postfix as a relay host for virus scanning and spam checking. Receiving mail from out the world and passing it on to groupwise works smoothely. But I want to scan mails that are sent via groupwise for viruses, too. I have my

Re: Postfix and AUTH

On Jul 9, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Scott Haneda: Hello, I have been looking into this for the better part of today. I am using a proxy in front of postfix. In order to be able to AUTH a user through the proxy, the proxy needs the 250-AUTH credentials to show up. I discovered t

Re: Per user graph statistics

On Friday 10 July 2009 09:24:33 am you wrote: > Hello Sean, > thanks for your answer. I already know about mailgraph. I read about cacti > templates based on mailgraph scripts too, but all tools i heard about are > monitoring "just" overall statistics. > > If there is no script for this purpose yet

postfix as relay host

Hi, I have a groupwise system and want to use postfix as a relay host for virus scanning and spam checking. Receiving mail from out the world and passing it on to groupwise works smoothely. But I want to scan mails that are sent via groupwise for viruses, too. I have my groupwise server defined

Re: Mail routing problem

On Jul 10, 2009, at 5:44 AM, Sam Przyswa wrote: Hi, I have to build a mail system with one main server (main) who send mails to several secondaries servers on the net as serv1, serv2, servX, for the same domain but how to send mail from the serv1 to an user on the serv2 for the same doma

Re: policyd-weight and postgrey: which should work first?

On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 05:15:41PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > Ignacio Garcia wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> Hi there. We use both postgrey and policyd-weight to block spam. >> policyd-weight checks against several RBL and DNSBL so each time a mail >> is receive

Re: Mail sometimes is not delivered to one customer

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:50:29AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Jakub Nadolny: > > > One SMTP client process was delivering message DF7C21811E53, and > > > that process hangs. > > > > > > THIS IS WHY YOU SEE THE 'DF7C21811E53: SKIPPED, > > > STILL BEING DELIVERED' MESSAGE IN THE LOGFILE.

Re: Mail sometimes is not delivered to one customer

Jakub Nadolny: > > One SMTP client process was delivering message DF7C21811E53, and > > that process hangs. > > > > THIS IS WHY YOU SEE THE 'DF7C21811E53: SKIPPED, > > STILL BEING DELIVERED' MESSAGE IN THE LOGFILE. > > > > Normally, a watchdog timer will terminate such a process, and the

Re: Per user graph statistics

On Friday 10 July 2009 07:15:08 am Digest of postfix-users list wrote: > Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:01:51 +0200 > From: =?UTF-8?B?SmnFmcOtIEhsaW5rYQ==?= > Subject: Per user graph statistics > > - --0016e6d96751af30e4046e570fef > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encodi

Re: Mail sometimes is not delivered to one customer

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 07:15:05AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Jakub Nadolny: > [ Charset ISO-8859-2 unsupported, converting... ] > > On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 05:36:58PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Jakub Nadolny: > > > > Jul 8 12:43:33 zonk postfix/qmgr[7095]: DF7C21811E53: > > > > from=,

Re: Mail sometimes is not delivered to one customer

Jakub Nadolny: [ Charset ISO-8859-2 unsupported, converting... ] > On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 05:36:58PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Jakub Nadolny: > > > Jul 8 12:43:33 zonk postfix/qmgr[7095]: DF7C21811E53: > > > from=, size=4254293, nrcpt=2 (queue active) > > > Jul 8 13:33:40 zonk postfix/qmg

Per user graph statistics

Hi, im curious if there is a way how to present a per user statistics of incoming/outgoing e-mails in time by graph. This is the situation: postfix relay for a few domains and many users. I want to present (the best will be via web, cacti for example...) these informations: recieved, sent, bounced,

Mail routing problem

Hi, I have to build a mail system with one main server (main) who send mails to several secondaries servers on the net as serv1, serv2, servX, for the same domain but how to send mail from the serv1 to an user on the serv2 for the same domain without got the "user unknown" reply on serv1 and

Re: Mail sometimes is not delivered to one customer

On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 05:36:58PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Jakub Nadolny: > > Jul 8 12:43:33 zonk postfix/qmgr[7095]: DF7C21811E53: > > from=, size=4254293, nrcpt=2 (queue active) > > Jul 8 13:33:40 zonk postfix/qmgr[16317]: DF7C21811E53: skipped, still > > being delivered > > Jul 8 13:3