Re: multi instance support bug (env not found)

2009-06-05 Thread Charles Seeger
| "type" is a built-in in POSIX shells, and even the pre-historic SunOS | /bin/sh has a "type" built-in, be it a bare-bones version that does not | support the "-p" switch, that is sufficient. So another possibility is: | | set -- `type find` | shift `expr $# - 1` | # Now, $1 is the fu

Re: Howto bounce a message in queue

2009-06-05 Thread Terry Carmen
> Noel Jones wrote: >> At 03:24 PM 2/7/2007, Dick Middleton wrote: >>> Is it possible to manually "bounce" a message in the deferred queue >>> so preempting the normal retry/timeout period? >>> >>> I've got a message sitting in the queue trying to connect to a >>> non-existent server. The sooner

Re: Howto bounce a message in queue

2009-06-05 Thread Noel Jones
Jon wrote: Noel Jones wrote: At 03:24 PM 2/7/2007, Dick Middleton wrote: Is it possible to manually "bounce" a message in the deferred queue so preempting the normal retry/timeout period? I've got a message sitting in the queue trying to connect to a non-existent server. The sooner it gets

Re: Howto bounce a message in queue

2009-06-05 Thread Jon
Noel Jones wrote: At 03:24 PM 2/7/2007, Dick Middleton wrote: Is it possible to manually "bounce" a message in the deferred queue so preempting the normal retry/timeout period? I've got a message sitting in the queue trying to connect to a non-existent server. The sooner it gets bounced bac

Re: multi instance support bug (env not found)

2009-06-05 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 03:30:55PM -0400, Rob Foehl wrote: > Surprisingly enough, which isn't a standard utility -- and it's not > installed by default in the "minimal" package sets on several platforms, > mostly Linux variants. (Yes, this is annoying.) > > /usr/bin/env is probably the safest b

Re: multi instance support bug (env not found)

2009-06-05 Thread Rob Foehl
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Wietse Venema wrote: Victor Duchovni: On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:05:16AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: Ralf Hildebrandt: /usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-script: 346: /bin/env: not found Replace "/bin/env find" by "`which find`. Perhaps /usr/bin/env, will be more portable?

Re: multi instance support bug (env not found)

2009-06-05 Thread Wietse Venema
Victor Duchovni: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:05:16AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Ralf Hildebrandt: > > > /usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-script: 346: /bin/env: not found > > > > Replace "/bin/env find" by "`which find`. > > Perhaps /usr/bin/env, will be more portable? It seems that /usr/bin/

Re: multi instance support bug (env not found)

2009-06-05 Thread Gerard
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:51:54 -0400 Victor Duchovni wrote: >Perhaps /usr/bin/env, will be more portable? It seems that /usr/bin/env >is "more" correct than /bin/env for both Linux and Solaris, does it >also work on *BSD systems? Also "find" is /usr/bin/find on both. FreeBSD: ~ $ which env /usr/bi

Re: multi instance support bug (env not found)

2009-06-05 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:05:16AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Ralf Hildebrandt: > > /usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-script: 346: /bin/env: not found > > Replace "/bin/env find" by "`which find`. Perhaps /usr/bin/env, will be more portable? It seems that /usr/bin/env is "more" correct than /bin/e

Re: can't get smtp_fallback_relay to work

2009-06-05 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Wietse Venema : > The Postfix SMTP client will never send mail to the SMTP port on > any IP address that is listed in $inet_interfaces. This is part of > the basic loop elimination algorithm that also keeps Postfix from > sending mail to equal-preference MX hosts. Yes, I initially suspected the

Re: multi instance support bug (env not found)

2009-06-05 Thread Wietse Venema
Ralf Hildebrandt: > /usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-script: 346: /bin/env: not found Replace "/bin/env find" by "`which find`. Wietse

Re: can't get smtp_fallback_relay to work

2009-06-05 Thread Wietse Venema
Ralf Hildebrandt: > * Wietse Venema : > > Ralf Hildebrandt: > > > Jun 5 15:35:18 hanni postfix-ram/smtp[24385]: warning: > > > smtp_fallback_relay configuration problem > > > smtp_fallback_relay = [194.126.158.237] > > > > I don't think you can set smtp_fallback_relay to the local SMTP port. >

Re: can't get smtp_fallback_relay to work

2009-06-05 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse Venema: > Ralf Hildebrandt: > > Jun 5 15:35:18 hanni postfix-ram/smtp[24385]: warning: smtp_fallback_relay > > configuration problem > > smtp_fallback_relay = [194.126.158.237] > > I don't think you can set smtp_fallback_relay to the local SMTP port. Unless of course you update the postf

Re: can't get smtp_fallback_relay to work

2009-06-05 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Wietse Venema : > Ralf Hildebrandt: > > Jun 5 15:35:18 hanni postfix-ram/smtp[24385]: warning: smtp_fallback_relay > > configuration problem > > smtp_fallback_relay = [194.126.158.237] > > I don't think you can set smtp_fallback_relay to the local SMTP port. Grmbl. Neither 127.0.0.1 nor 194.1

Re: can't get smtp_fallback_relay to work

2009-06-05 Thread Wietse Venema
Ralf Hildebrandt: > Jun 5 15:35:18 hanni postfix-ram/smtp[24385]: warning: smtp_fallback_relay > configuration problem > smtp_fallback_relay = [194.126.158.237] I don't think you can set smtp_fallback_relay to the local SMTP port. Wietse

can't get smtp_fallback_relay to work

2009-06-05 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
I'm trying to run two instances, I'm injection on localhost port 10025 into postfix-ram, which has the queue in RAM: Jun 5 15:35:17 hanni postfix-ram/cleanup[24403]: 45F4A2E369: message-id=<20090605133514.45f4a2e...@nanni.state-of-mind.de> Jun 5 15:35:17 hanni postfix-ram/qmgr[24345]: 45F4A2E36

Re: Rejecting mail to unknown recipients

2009-06-05 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
Peter Smith wrote: >> On Friday 05 June 2009 09:24:54 Peter Smith wrote: >> >>> virtual_mailbox_domains = $transport_maps >>> >> Whats this for? >> >> Are the problem domains listed in /etc/postfix/transport for some reason. >> > > I have an entry in transport: > > mydomain.com

Re: Rejecting mail to unknown recipients

2009-06-05 Thread Peter Smith
All solved now - thanks for your help guys! The changes I made were: virtual_mailbox_domains = $transport_maps to: virtual_mailbox_domains = mydomain.com Added: virtual_transport = maildrop virtual_mailbox_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual

multi instance support bug (env not found)

2009-06-05 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
I built and install 2.6.x today: % make makefile % make % make install on a pristine machine and tried the multi-instance support. I did this (fresh from my shell, no edits): r...@hanni:/etc/postfix# postmulti -l -a - - y /etc/postfix r...@hanni:/etc/postfix#

Re: Policy delegation client request question

2009-06-05 Thread Wietse Venema
Rob Tanner: > Hi, > > I?ve got the front-end of a policy engine in place and connected to postfix > on a test server. All it?s really doing is logging what postfix sends and > returning an ?OK?. What I notice is that when I?ve sent emails through that > server with multiple recipients, rather th

Re: Rejecting mail to unknown recipients

2009-06-05 Thread Peter Smith
> On Friday 05 June 2009 09:24:54 Peter Smith wrote: >> >> virtual_mailbox_domains = $transport_maps > > Whats this for? > > Are the problem domains listed in /etc/postfix/transport for some reason. I have an entry in transport: mydomain.commaildrop: Is this the problem?

Re: Rejecting mail to unknown recipients

2009-06-05 Thread Peter Smith
--- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, Pascal Volk wrote: > > On 06/05/2009 02:25 AM Peter Smith wrote: > > If I telnet to my mail server, anyth...@... is accepted. If I > > turn up the logging verbosity, I see: > > How do you telnet to your server? > `telnet localhost 25`? Actually I was telnett