On Wed, June 3, 2009 8:28 am, Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL said:
> One of our users is requesting a batch of e-mail aliases ranging from:
>
> j10...@domain.com to j10...@domain.com
>
> I made the following regexp which kind of does the trick:
>
> /j10[0-3][0-9][0-...@domain\.com/ thisaddr...
Hi All,
One of our users is requesting a batch of e-mail aliases ranging from:
j10...@domain.com to j10...@domain.com
I made the following regexp which kind of does the trick:
/j10[0-3][0-9][0-...@domain\.com/ thisaddr...@domain.com
But this adds the range of j10300 to j10399 which
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 01:14:34AM -0300, Jose kojima wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Jose kojima
> Date: 2009/6/3
> Subject: Re: where
> To: Victor Duchovni
>
>
> it is used for your postfix users ?
> you ARE A STPUPID smtp USER suck your stupid
> POSTMULTI IS A SUCKZ
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jose kojima
Date: 2009/6/3
Subject: Re: where
To: Victor Duchovni
it is used for your postfix users ?
you ARE A STPUPID smtp USER suck your stupid
POSTMULTI IS A SUCKZ TOOL... SUCKZ.
ARE YOU UnDERSTAN IT?
2009/6/2 Victor Duchovni :
> On Tue, Ju
Juan Antonio Cuesta wrote:
Hello,
i have installed Postfix with support for Mysql, i want to write my
virtual file over a Mysql table.
I have 5 servers with postfix and is very simple shared the conf with
the 5 servers.
All works very very well, but if the Server of Mysql y down the emails
are
Juan Antonio Cuesta:
> Hello,
>
> i have installed Postfix with support for Mysql, i want to write my
> virtual file over a Mysql table.
> I have 5 servers with postfix and is very simple shared the conf with
> the 5 servers.
>
> All works very very well, but if the Server of Mysql y down the ema
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 05:24:04PM -0600, Just E. Mail wrote:
>> Start by answering the question:
>>
>> - What data will I be storing in Postgres?
>> - Why Postgres and not a CDB file, or similar?
>>
>> First get Postfix working with simple tools, add complexity slowly.
>
> I am setting up LVS
Hello,
i have installed Postfix with support for Mysql, i want to write my
virtual file over a Mysql table.
I have 5 servers with postfix and is very simple shared the conf with
the 5 servers.
All works very very well, but if the Server of Mysql y down the emails
are rejected and the smtp server
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 02:28:34PM -0600, Just E. Mail wrote:
I appreciate if someone can post or email me a sample copy of:
a. A Schema of Postfix-PGSQL tables/keys
b. A copy of the pgsql-aliases.cf
Why are you trying to use Postgres with Postfix if you don't
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 02:28:34PM -0600, Just E. Mail wrote:
> I appreciate if someone can post or email me a sample copy of:
>
> a. A Schema of Postfix-PGSQL tables/keys
> b. A copy of the pgsql-aliases.cf
Why are you trying to use Postgres with Postfix if you don't actually
know what the Postg
Sthu Pous a écrit :
> Good day.
>
> Could You please, explain me how it is possible for the users from local net
> to
> send mail if we have in main.cf:
>
always use 'postconf -n' to see the value of parameters. main.cf may
contain duplicate definitions or typos.
> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8
>
Just E. Mail wrote:
> Magnus Bäck wrote:
>> 3. On the backend SQL server, what Postfix tables are need? Is there a
>> SCHEMA for these tables or they are hand build?
>>
>> You can choose any schema you like as long as you can construct an
>> SQL query that returns the desired data given the input
Magnus Bäck wrote:
3. On the backend SQL server, what Postfix tables are need? Is there a
SCHEMA for these tables or they are hand build?
You can choose any schema you like as long as you can construct an
SQL query that returns the desired data given the input Postfix will
provide. The input
Sthu Pous:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Wietse and other people who have answered
> me:
>
> > Anti-virus software is known to do these things, because it would
> > not be able to decrypt the traffic. The software may be running on
> > the client, on the server, or on a firewall.
>
> Ple
Thank You for Your time and answer, Wietse and other people who have answered
me:
> Anti-virus software is known to do these things, because it would
> not be able to decrypt the traffic. The software may be running on
> the client, on the server, or on a firewall.
Please, if You say that, tell
On Tuesday, June 02, 2009 at 18:28 CEST,
"Just E. Mail" wrote:
> CentOS 5.3
> PostgreSQL 8.3.7
> Postfix 2.6.1
>
> I have setup a Postfix Mail Server & tested it. Now I am trying to
> setup Postfix with PostgreSQL as backend. I did build (by following
> Simon Mudd's instructions) Postfix wit
Wietse Venema:
> Sthu Pous:
> > Thank You for Your time and answer, Patrick:
> >
> > > > and please remove the
> > > > smtpd_banner = The eMail Service
> > > > because it is invalid. The banner must contain the hostname... etc.
> > >
> > > and it must contain "ESMTP" or the client will not know t
Sthu Pous:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Patrick:
>
> > > and please remove the
> > > smtpd_banner = The eMail Service
> > > because it is invalid. The banner must contain the hostname... etc.
> >
> > and it must contain "ESMTP" or the client will not know the server can speak
> > EXTENDE
Matt Hersant:
>
> I'm trying to debug a: lost connection after CONNECT error
>
> postfix/smtpd[18377]: connect from remote.smtpd.com[REMOTE_IPADDRESS]
> postfix/smtpd[18377]: > remote.smtpd.com[REMOTE_IPADDRESS]: 220
> local.mail.server.com ESMTP
> postfix/smtpd[18377]: lost connection after
I'm trying to debug a: lost connection after CONNECT error
I added the following to main.cf
debug_peer_list = [REMOTE_IPADDRESS]
Here is the following syslog entry. Does it show anything relevant?
Is there anything else I or the remote administrator can try?
postfix/smtpd[18377]: connect from
CentOS 5.3
PostgreSQL 8.3.7
Postfix 2.6.1
I have setup a Postfix Mail Server & tested it. Now I am trying to setup
Postfix with PostgreSQL as backend. I did build (by following Simon
Mudd's instructions) Postfix with PGSQL support. I have done
considerable reading and searched the Internet, b
://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4122 (20090602) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Sthu Pous wrote:
> Good day.
>
> Could You please, explain me how it is possible for the users from local net
> to
> send mail if we have in main.cf:
>
> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8
You want / need to also add the network parameter for which your local
clients are o
Good day.
Could You please, explain me how it is possible for the users from local net to
send mail if we have in main.cf:
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8
?
And moreover, how I can reduce the mail sending only for the users (their IPs
and authorization) so that at the same time the users could get the
Thank You for Your time and answer, Stefan:
> $ postconf -d smtp_always_send_ehlo mail_version
> smtp_always_send_ehlo = yes
> mail_version = 2.5.5
Just like mine.
Thank You for Your time and answer, Patrick:
> > and please remove the
> > smtpd_banner = The eMail Service
> > because it is invalid. The banner must contain the hostname... etc.
>
> and it must contain "ESMTP" or the client will not know the server can speak
> EXTENDED SMTP, which includes the
On Jun 2, 2009, at 2:52 AM, Bernd Nies wrote:
Hi,
Our users have the following complaint about the Postfix behaviour:
They write Emails to
From: someb...@somewhere.com
To: gro...@example.com, gro...@example.com
The mailgroup is expanded with aliases to
group1: user1, user2, user
On Saturday 23 May 2009 10:15:41 Sthu Pous wrote:
> Nice to see You here, Mouss! Thank You for Your time and answer, again:
> > Instead of this, use the 3d option: "Use the STARTTLS command ..."
> >
> > STARTTLS is the standard method for doing SSL/TLS in ESMTP.
>
> Ok. So I've done and here what I
Thank You for Your time and answer, mouss:
> and please remove the
> smtpd_banner = The eMail Service
> because it is invalid. The banner must contain the hostname... etc.
Ok. Thank You.
> on the postfix bow, run the following command
>
> openssl s_client -starttls smtp -connect 127.0.0.1:25
>
viktor
I tried re-editing the main.cf and its now working. Haven't seen any
"Temporary Lookup Failures" since.
I must have left a typo in there. Must remember to edit more carefully
;-(
thanks
jon
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@po
2009/6/2 Kaj Niemi :
>
> Please consider compiling and building packages as a non-privileged user
> rather than as root. It will save you a lot of headache especially if
> something unexpected happens (install script screws up on directory where
> it's supposed to install). Using another directory
Antonis Rizopoulos wrote:
> Can you please be more specific?
> What do you mean policy service?
>
Some of the more popular ones are listed here:
http://www.postfix.org/addon.html#policy
Of course, you could write you own:
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 09:40:41PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> To be fair, their whole world is upside-down down there, so their top
> posting is really bottom posting!
>
> On 1-Jun-2009, at 09:43, Noel Jones wrote:
> > Sadly, no.
> >
> > -- Noel Jones
> >
> > Gerard wrote:
> >> On Mon, 1 Jun 2009
?
For this you need a policy service.
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4122 (20090602) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009, Antonis Rizopoulos wrote:
> Is it possible to set the /message_size_limit/ value per user so each
> user has his own message size limit?
> Maybe using a hash file or mysql ?
For this you need a policy service.
--
Sahil Tandon
Hello everyone!
Is it possible to set the /message_size_limit/ value per user so each
user has his own message size limit?
Maybe using a hash file or mysql ?
Thank you!
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4122 (20090602) __
The
Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Tue, June 2, 2009 11:08 am, J. Bakshi said:
>
>
>> I have come with a strange problem with my email server which is running
>> almost 2 years now. actually I have never tried the mail forwarding
>> with the system but it has the option. Today I need to add the mail
>> fo
Bernd Nies:
> Hi,
>
> Our users have the following complaint about the Postfix behaviour: They
> write Emails to
>
> From: someb...@somewhere.com
> To: gro...@example.com, gro...@example.com
>
> The mailgroup is expanded with aliases to
>
> group1: user1, user2, user3, user4,
On Tue, June 2, 2009 11:08 am, J. Bakshi said:
> I have come with a strange problem with my email server which is running
> almost 2 years now. actually I have never tried the mail forwarding
> with the system but it has the option. Today I need to add the mail
> forwarding feature and found that
The date inside the mail (on the "Date:" header) was for February.
Since spam is junk there is no reason to expect this date to be valid,
spammers frequently use future or past dates to end up at the top or the
bottom of the in tray and thus more prominent and more likely to be read.
Sometimes
* K bharathan :
> i find myself dumb on this
> appreciate an explanation
"Date:" is just a header - meaning the user can specify it, just like
"To:", "Subject:" or "Cc:". It need not be correct.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http:
Dear all,
I hope you all are very well.
I have come with a strange problem with my email server which is running
almost 2 years now. actually I have never tried the mail forwarding
with the system but it has the option. Today I need to add the mail
forwarding feature and found that the forwardin
i find myself dumb on this
appreciate an explanation
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt <
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de> wrote:
> * K bharathan :
> > the attached is a header of a spam mail; i found the dates are different
> and
> > delivered today; but inbox date shows 13/02/2009
* K bharathan :
> the attached is a header of a spam mail; i found the dates are different and
> delivered today; but inbox date shows 13/02/2009;
> what could have gone wrong?
Nothing.
> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:48:52 - (GMT)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung
the attached is a header of a spam mail; i found the dates are different and
delivered today; but inbox date shows 13/02/2009;
what could have gone wrong?
Return-path:
Received: from relay1.xxx.xx by xxx.xx
(MDaemon.PRO.v8.1.3.R)
with ESMTP id md50004123477.msg
for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2009
45 matches
Mail list logo
