Wietse Venema wrote:
Juha Pahkala:
Apr 24 15:42:30 server postfix/smtpd[8126]: name_mask: noanonymous
Apr 24 15:42:30 server postfix/smtpd[8126]:
xsasl_dovecot_server_connect: Connecting
Apr 24 15:42:40 server postfix/smtpd[8126]:
xsasl_dovecot_server_connect: auth reply: status
Apr 24 15:4
Terry Carmen wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to setup postfix with tls and smtp auth (dovecot sasl).
I'm now stuck with the smtp auth part, with a strange error. For a few
days I've tried to search information about similar problems, but found
none. Now I'm hoping somebody here could help me out.
Scott Haneda wrote, at 04/24/2009 07:41 PM:
> Thanks for this, this is getting me on track, comments interspersed
> below...
>
> On Apr 24, 2009, at 6:51 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
>
>> Scott Haneda wrote, at 04/24/2009 07:58 AM:
>>
>>> I am a little confused about main.cf and master.cf. Is there ove
2009/4/25 Scott Haneda :
> I have a little affliction against man type pages, they never seem to make a
> lot of sense to me :) This section does though. Just to be clear, this is
> a full blown over-ride, in that deleting the corresponding value from
> main.cf would do nothing to the server, so
As a test, I have disabled authenticated SMTP on port 25. I just
fired up thunderbird, set the SMTP port to 25, and enabled SSL.
Sending a test email, and I get an error back from the Thunderbird.
Thunderbird chewed on this for a long time. My concern is what was in
the logs. If a custo
On Apr 24, 2009, at 4:50 PM, Larry Stone wrote:
On 4/24/09 6:41 PM, Scott Haneda at talkli...@newgeo.com wrote:
If you do not like a lack of TLS enforcement on the submission port
what do you suggest for users who just do not care enough to use any
TLS? You let them work on port 25? I could
On 4/24/09 6:41 PM, Scott Haneda at talkli...@newgeo.com wrote:
> If you do not like a lack of TLS enforcement on the submission port
> what do you suggest for users who just do not care enough to use any
> TLS? You let them work on port 25? I could go that route, but I am
> really trying to fin
Thanks for this, this is getting me on track, comments interspersed
below...
On Apr 24, 2009, at 6:51 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
Scott Haneda wrote, at 04/24/2009 07:58 AM:
I am a little confused about main.cf and master.cf. Is there
overlap in
some of the settings? Do some settings exist in b
On Apr 24, 2009, at 6:15 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Scott Haneda:
Those seem to be the bulk of the log lines. What is this error
in
regards to, and any ideas on how to solve it?
Don't turn on VERBOSE LOGGING.
Ahh, thanks. In the log, how does one tell the difference between
notice, error
2009/4/25 N. Yaakov Ziskind :
>> This box is stock ubuntu, and i only use ssl, postfix and samba, so i'm
>> wondering what i did wrong. i'm not using sasl, tls or anything other
>> than postgrey added on.
>>
>> should i just remove postfix and re-install? is it safe to keep main.cf
>> and the files
Victor Duchovni wrote (on Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 03:00:52PM -0400):
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 02:37:36PM -0400, N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
>
> > # ldd smtpd
> > linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7f3e000)
> > libpostfix-master.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpostfix-master.so.1 (0xb7f2f000)
> > libpostfix-tls.so
N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote (on Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 02:37:36PM -0400):
> Wietse Venema wrote (on Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 02:28:12PM -0400):
> > N. Yaakov Ziskind:
> > > Uh-oh. Just upgraded a Ubuntu box to the latest and greatesti (jaunty
> > > jackelope), and postfix is dying all over the place:
> > >
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 02:37:36PM -0400, N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
> # ldd smtpd
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7f3e000)
> libpostfix-master.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpostfix-master.so.1 (0xb7f2f000)
> libpostfix-tls.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpostfix-tls.so.1 (0xb7f2)
> libpostfix-dns.so.1 => /
Wietse Venema wrote (on Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 02:28:12PM -0400):
> N. Yaakov Ziskind:
> > Uh-oh. Just upgraded a Ubuntu box to the latest and greatesti (jaunty
> > jackelope), and postfix is dying all over the place:
> >
> > Apr 24 14:06:25 chocolate postfix/smtpd[5176]: connect from unknown[unknow
N. Yaakov Ziskind:
> Uh-oh. Just upgraded a Ubuntu box to the latest and greatesti (jaunty
> jackelope), and postfix is dying all over the place:
>
> Apr 24 14:06:25 chocolate postfix/smtpd[5176]: connect from unknown[unknown]
> Apr 24 14:06:25 chocolate postfix/smtpd[5176]: lost connection after
Uh-oh. Just upgraded a Ubuntu box to the latest and greatesti (jaunty
jackelope), and postfix is dying all over the place:
Apr 24 14:06:25 chocolate postfix/smtpd[5176]: connect from unknown[unknown]
Apr 24 14:06:25 chocolate postfix/smtpd[5176]: lost connection after CONNECT
from unknown[unknown
Dan Lists:
> The ps/pgrep output is still perplexing. If I have just -o
> receive_override_options=no_milters the pgrep output is:
>
> 92212 smtpd -n 2525 -t inet -u -o stress= -o content_filter= -o
> receive_override_options=no_milters -o smtpd_sender_restrictions= -o
> smtpd_recipient_restrict
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> FYI,
>
> The header_checks parameter does not control whether or not Milter
> operation is invoked, so your observations are incorrect.
>
> If you want to pursue this further, show a telnet mail submission
> and the corresponding logging.
>
Juha Pahkala:
> Apr 24 15:42:30 server postfix/smtpd[8126]: name_mask: noanonymous
> Apr 24 15:42:30 server postfix/smtpd[8126]:
> xsasl_dovecot_server_connect: Connecting
> Apr 24 15:42:40 server postfix/smtpd[8126]:
> xsasl_dovecot_server_connect: auth reply: status
> Apr 24 15:42:50 server pos
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to setup postfix with tls and smtp auth (dovecot sasl).
> I'm now stuck with the smtp auth part, with a strange error. For a few
> days I've tried to search information about similar problems, but found
> none. Now I'm hoping somebody here could help me out. I'm runni
Hello,
I've been trying to setup postfix with tls and smtp auth (dovecot sasl).
I'm now stuck with the smtp auth part, with a strange error. For a few
days I've tried to search information about similar problems, but found
none. Now I'm hoping somebody here could help me out. I'm running Ubunt
On 24-Apr-2009, at 08:57, N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote (on Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 05:51:51AM -0400):
On 4/24/2009, Vince Sabio (vi...@vjs.org) wrote:
I'd rather not post information like that _pro forma_; if there's
some subset of that information that might be of help in diagnos
Victor Duchovni:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 05:15:52PM -0700, David Jonas wrote:
>
> > When a bounce message from <> is going to an address that is in
> > virtual_alias_maps the sender gets rewritten to , or at
> > least that is what seems to happen. Some mail servers reject MAILER-DAEMON
> > as
David Jonas:
> When a bounce message from <> is going to an address that is in
> virtual_alias_maps the sender gets rewritten to , or at
> least that is what seems to happen. Some mail servers reject
> MAILER-DAEMON as a sender due to the lack of domain (att.net,
> comcast.net). How can I contr
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:22:32AM -0400, Shelley Waltz wrote:
> > Apr 12 05:25:21 roadrunner postfix/smtp[10809]: B7D9311D8008:
> > to=, relay=none, delay=43453,
> > delays=43453/0.01/0/0, dsn=4.4.6, status=SOFTBOUNCE (mail for
> > buena.cabm.rutgers.edu loops back to myself)
> >
> >
> I am still
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 05:15:52PM -0700, David Jonas wrote:
> When a bounce message from <> is going to an address that is in
> virtual_alias_maps the sender gets rewritten to , or at
> least that is what seems to happen. Some mail servers reject MAILER-DAEMON
> as a sender due to the lack of
Charles Marcus wrote (on Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 05:51:51AM -0400):
> On 4/24/2009, Vince Sabio (vi...@vjs.org) wrote:
> > I'd rather not post information like that _pro forma_; if there's
> > some subset of that information that might be of help in diagnosing
> > this issue, then I'd be happy to post
David Jonas wrote:
When a bounce message from <> is going to an address that is in
virtual_alias_maps the sender gets rewritten to , or at
least that is what seems to happen. Some mail servers reject
MAILER-DAEMON as a sender due to the lack of domain (att.net,
comcast.net).
You'll need to
>
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 09:22:00AM -0400, Shelley Waltz wrote:
>>
>>> >> # postconf -n
>>> >> masquerade_domains = !master2.cabm.rutgers.edu
>>> !raven.cabm.rutgers.edu
>>> >> !heron.cabm.rutgers.edu cabm.rutgers.edu
>>> >
>>> > This looks OK, show unedited (consistent
Rick Duval:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Victor Duchovni
> wrote:
> > There you are message delivered to procmail, and procmail returned a
> > success (0) exit code. What happened after "procmail" is outside
> > the scope of Postfix.
>
> Ok, fair enough but can procmail issue the "mesage t
Scott Haneda wrote, at 04/24/2009 07:58 AM:
> I am a little confused about main.cf and master.cf. Is there overlap in
> some of the settings? Do some settings exist in both files, or at least
> are interchangable? If this is the case, under what conditions do you
> decide to do so?
>From master
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> There you are message delivered to procmail, and procmail returned a
> success (0) exit code. What happened after "procmail" is outside
> the scope of Postfix.
>
Ok, fair enough but can procmail issue the "mesage too big" response
that th
Scott Haneda:
> Apr 23 16:28:02 postfix/pipe[49289]: fatal: get_service_attr:
> unknown username: vmail
This error is logged in non-verbose mode.
In master.cf you have "pipe ... user=vmail". Either there is no
such user in the password database, or you have incorrect access
permissions so that
Scott Haneda:
> Those seem to be the bulk of the log lines. What is this error in
> regards to, and any ideas on how to solve it?
> >>>
> >>> Don't turn on VERBOSE LOGGING.
> >>
> >>
> >> Ahh, thanks. In the log, how does one tell the difference between
> >> notice, error, and normal me
On Apr 24, 2009, at 5:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Scott Haneda:
On Apr 24, 2009, at 4:50 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Still working on getting postfix and dovecot playing nice, current
issue I am trying to understand and solve is this error:
Apr 24 02:14:58 catalyst postfix/smtpd[358]: private/a
On Apr 23, 2009, at 4:41 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
Looking at the log, I hit an error:
Apr 23 16:28:02 postfix/qmgr[49216]: 0B073225D0D: from=>, size=410, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Apr 23 16:28:02 postfix/qmgr[49216]: 11803227FEE: from=>, size=419, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Apr 23 16:28:02 postfix/pipe
Scott Haneda:
> On Apr 24, 2009, at 4:50 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> >> Still working on getting postfix and dovecot playing nice, current
> >> issue I am trying to understand and solve is this error:
> >>
> >> Apr 24 02:14:58 catalyst postfix/smtpd[358]: private/anvil: wanted
> >> attribute: sta
On Apr 24, 2009, at 4:50 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Still working on getting postfix and dovecot playing nice, current
issue I am trying to understand and solve is this error:
Apr 24 02:14:58 catalyst postfix/smtpd[358]: private/anvil: wanted
attribute: status
I have 123 log lines of that, they
Hello, mail_version = 2.5.5, Dovecot for pop and imap, myqsl as the
auth backend.
I am a little confused about main.cf and master.cf. Is there overlap
in some of the settings? Do some settings exist in both files, or at
least are interchangable? If this is the case, under what conditions
Andre H?bner:
> Hello,
>
> for testing purposes i wrote a policy-service for postfix as a shellscript.
> My Script is working very well, iam happy with its functionality ;)
> But unfortunately there is one problem when a lot of mails are incoming. the
> shellscript just does some grepping in sma
Scott Haneda:
> Still working on getting postfix and dovecot playing nice, current
> issue I am trying to understand and solve is this error:
>
> Apr 24 02:14:58 catalyst postfix/smtpd[358]: private/anvil: wanted
> attribute: status
>
> I have 123 log lines of that, they vary somewhat:
> want
FYI,
The header_checks parameter does not control whether or not Milter
operation is invoked, so your observations are incorrect.
If you want to pursue this further, show a telnet mail submission
and the corresponding logging.
Also, instead of "it does work" and "it does not work" please
descri
Hello,
for testing purposes i wrote a policy-service for postfix as a shellscript.
My Script is working very well, iam happy with its functionality ;)
But unfortunately there is one problem when a lot of mails are incoming. the
shellscript just does some grepping in small files etc. and is giv
Dear All,
One of my client is very keen to use open source products and right
now they are using Microsoft exchange server. There plan is to migrate
the users slowly from exchange to postfix .
how can I accomplish it by using postfix.
I tried some testing based on this on lab and sending mails f
2009/4/24 Steve Head :
> I'm curious as to how you make all domains non-local? Would you not
> then have to list every local mailbox/alias as u...@real.domain as a
> virtual entry?
Yep, it makes everything nice and uniform, +1 to sanity as far as I'm
concerned. Assuming you already have a decent
On 4/24/2009, Vince Sabio (vi...@vjs.org) wrote:
> I'd rather not post information like that _pro forma_; if there's
> some subset of that information that might be of help in diagnosing
> this issue, then I'd be happy to post it. I realize that my
> reluctance to post the entire data set might lim
Still working on getting postfix and dovecot playing nice, current
issue I am trying to understand and solve is this error:
Apr 24 02:14:58 catalyst postfix/smtpd[358]: private/anvil: wanted
attribute: status
I have 123 log lines of that, they vary somewhat:
wanted attribute: count
wanted a
On Apr 23, 2009, at 7:21 PM, MacShane, Tracy wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Scott Haneda
Sent: Friday, 24 April 2009 11:54 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: How to change the log location
I th
48 matches
Mail list logo
