On 24-Apr-2009, at 08:57, N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote (on Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 05:51:51AM -0400):
On 4/24/2009, Vince Sabio (vi...@vjs.org) wrote:
I'd rather not post information like that _pro forma_; if there's
some subset of that information that might be of help in diagnosing
this issue, then I'd be happy to post it. I realize that my
reluctance to post the entire data set might limit the likelihood of
getting to the bottom of this error.
It will not just limit it, it will probably cause most everyone to
totally ignire you. Oh... and its also extraordinarily silly... what
exactly do you think you are protecting by refusing to post it?
Perhaps his reluctance stems not from disclosing it, but from having
it
sit in archives forever, waiting to be scraped.
And? What's the issue? There's no personal or private information in
postconf -n. If you are superparanoid, you can obfuscate mynetworks to
hide the real server names. Of course, anyone who is paying attention
knows your real server names anyway (yours is icecream.egps.com
[38.119.130.6], which calls itself mail.egps.com for example).
With that in mind, would the denizens of this list mind posters
supplying links to the necessary info, said links to vanish when the
thread is over? That's what I'd like to do.
Well, I for one don't like loading links when I'm reading email if at
all possible. Email is email, web pages are web pages. This is also
why I avoid web-boards.
--
Love seekest only self to please, To bind another to its delight
Joys in another's loss of ease And builds a hell in Heaven's
despite!
