On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Justin Mattock wrote:
finally after sometime I'm able to send.
as for balsa I'll have to come back to that issue
later on. but for now
using alpine as the client and postfix
sends like there's no tomorrow!!
cat /var/log/mail.log(g
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Justin Mattock wrote:
> finally after sometime I'm able to send.
> as for balsa I'll have to come back to that issue
> later on. but for now
> using alpine as the client and postfix
> sends like there's no tomorrow!!
>
> cat /var/log/mail.log(gives only the missing cert);
>
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Ashwin Muni wrote:
finally after sometime I'm able to send.
as for balsa I'll have to come back to that issue
later on. but for now
using alpine as the client and postfix
sends like there's no tomorrow!!
cat /var/log/mail.log(gives only the missing cert);
postfix/postfix-script[1779]: starting the Postfix mail syst
Hi,
Actually i have specified in the main.cf
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
abc.com smtp:[1.1.1.1]:25
123.com smtp:[2.2.2.2]:25
xyz.comsmtp:[3.3.3.3]:25
I want if the the primary smtp of the domain are down then it should try the
the other ip which i mention.
Say i
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 08:35:28AM +0530, Ashwin Muni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have several domains configured to receive mails in postfix say
> abc.com
> 123.com
> xyz.org
>
> I want abc.com to have fallback relay as 1.1.1.1
> 123.com as 2.2.2.2
>
Hi,
I have several domains configured to receive mails in postfix say
abc.com
123.com
xyz.org
I want abc.com to have fallback relay as 1.1.1.1
123.com as 2.2.2.2
xyz.org as 3.3.3.3
and also can i use
OK,Thanks.
I'll try cyrus imap.
Now I use Courier-imap as my imap/pop3 server.
Jeff Huang
2009-03-22
发件人： vg...@hotmail.com
发送时间： 2009-03-22 10:33:00
收件人： jbhu...@scut.edu.cn; postfix-users
抄送：
主题： Re: How to index maildir
--
From: "Jeff H
--
From: "Jeff Huang"
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 9:58 PM
To: "postfix-users"
Subject: How to index maildir
Hi,my mailserver is postfix and the mailbox is set to /Maildir.
But I found if there are too many email in maildir,the imap is very
Jeff Huang wrote:
Hi,my mailserver is postfix and the mailbox is set to /Maildir.
But I found if there are too many email in maildir,the imap is very slow.
Can we set the Maildir indexing?So we can accelerate to read/find the
email from Maildir.
Postfix doesn't do IMAP.
You might have b
Hi,my mailserver is postfix and the mailbox is set to /Maildir.
But I found if there are too many email in maildir,the imap is very slow.
Can we set the Maildir indexing?So we can accelerate to read/find the email
from Maildir.
Thank you.
Jeff Huang
2009-03-22
On 21.03.2009, at 14:41, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Is it (technically) possible to implement SRS or RPR in Postfix using
either a milter plugin or a policy? Does anyone know of such an
implementation?
It is technically possible with an SMTP-based content filter; I
don't know of
any existing imple
Victor Duchovni a écrit :
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 07:31:24PM +0100, mouss wrote:
>
alternatively, you can add an smtpd in the chain using proxy_filter:
- smtpd on port 25 does the rewrite. it then uses proxy_filter to pass
mail to an smtpd on port 10020.
>>> Rewriting is done
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 07:31:24PM +0100, mouss wrote:
> >> alternatively, you can add an smtpd in the chain using proxy_filter:
> >>
> >> - smtpd on port 25 does the rewrite. it then uses proxy_filter to pass
> >> mail to an smtpd on port 10020.
> >
> > Rewriting is done by cleanup(8). This can'
Victor Duchovni a écrit :
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:19:44PM +0100, mouss wrote:
>
>> Charles Marcus a ?crit :
>>> On 3/17/2009, LuKreme (krem...@kreme.com) wrote:
On 17-Mar-2009, at 06:09, Erwan David wrote:
> I would fear it breaks recipient validation, accepting mail for eavery
>
Heiko Baumann a écrit :
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 00:22:24 +0100, mouss wrote:
> [snip]
>> use a list manager (mailman, sympa, ...).
>
> i guess a list manager is overkill for our setup. we just export the alias
> maps from a db and only need the additional feature to block mails to a
> list from an
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:35:09PM +0100, Sebastian Chociwski wrote:
> I am (almost ;) ) 100% sure that only mail could be delivered is in ONE
> mysql db.
What in your Postfix configuration do you expect to reject mail not
listed in that MySQL table?
> _email2email.cf points at DB I use to decid
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:28:58PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Victor Duchovni :
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:34:01AM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> >
> > > * Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > > > With today's clients, is broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
> > > > still required? Which clients req
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:19:44PM +0100, mouss wrote:
> Charles Marcus a ?crit :
> > On 3/17/2009, LuKreme (krem...@kreme.com) wrote:
> >> On 17-Mar-2009, at 06:09, Erwan David wrote:
> >>> I would fear it breaks recipient validation, accepting mail for eavery
> >>> address with a _ as valid.
> >
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 09:05:34AM -0400, Terry Carmen wrote:
> Brandon Hilkert wrote:
>>
>>
>> So tmpfs does use the ram ? I as able to get tmpfs to work, but there was
>> some notion that it too uses the disk.
>
> It uses RAM, but will swap to disk if it needs to. There's no guarantee
> that i
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 02:08:51AM +, Duane Hill wrote:
> I'm just following this thread because of curiosity.
>
> tmpfs? Or, do you mean ramfs (like Ralf spoke of). I believe there was a
> response already made by Wietse with regards to tmpfs that stated:
>
> "tmpfs is backed by the swap
* Brandon Hilkert :
>> In /etc/fstab:
>>
>> /dev/shm /var/spool/postfix tmpfs
>> defaults,size=300m,mode=770,uid=0,gid=0 0 0
>>
>
> So tmpfs does use the ram ?
Yep
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.computerb
Heiko Baumann wrote:
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 00:22:24 +0100, mouss wrote:
Heiko Baumann a écrit :
hello,
in our postfix setup we use virtual_alias_maps to build some simple
mailing-/distribution lists. now we want to reject every mail to a list
where the sender is not a member of the list.
exam
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 00:22:24 +0100, mouss wrote:
> Heiko Baumann a écrit :
>> hello,
>>
>> in our postfix setup we use virtual_alias_maps to build some simple
>> mailing-/distribution lists. now we want to reject every mail to a list
>> where the sender is not a member of the list.
>>
>>
>> ex
Charles Marcus a écrit :
> On 3/17/2009, LuKreme (krem...@kreme.com) wrote:
>> On 17-Mar-2009, at 06:09, Erwan David wrote:
>>> I would fear it breaks recipient validation, accepting mail for eavery
>>> address with a _ as valid.
>
>> That is a drawback.
>
> Oh... well, if it does indeed do what
LuKreme a écrit :
> [snip]
>
> OK, ripping out cyrus as soon as I find a good walkthrough for dovecot.
> Especially if I can find one about ADDING dovecot.
>
if you use courier and have authdaemon working, then configure cyrus
sasl to use it instead of sql:
pwcheck_method: authdaemond
mech_list
Simon a écrit :
> [snip]
> OK.. sorry, just wanted to understand the issue. I have now changed this:
>
> 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd
> ..
> -o
> receive_override_options=no_header_body_checks,no_unknown_recipient_checks
>
> to this:
>
> 127.0.0.1:10025 ine
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Yves Kreis wrote:
> Is it (technically) possible to implement SRS or RPR in Postfix using
> either a milter plugin or a policy? Does anyone know of such an
> implementation?
It is technically possible with an SMTP-based content filter; I don't know of
any existing impleme
Chris Dos a écrit :
> [snip]
> I have read what the the bounce service does. I wish to intercept ALL hard
> bounces and process them
> internally with a script. I don't want it to bounce back to the sender that
> sent the bad message. I haven't
> been able to figure out a way to do it yet. If
Brandon Hilkert wrote:
So tmpfs does use the ram ? I as able to get tmpfs to work, but there
was some notion that it too uses the disk.
It uses RAM, but will swap to disk if it needs to. There's no guarantee
that it won't cause disk activity.
Terry
- Original Message -
From: "Wietse Venema"
To: "Brandon Hilkert"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: Performance tuning
Brandon Hilkert:
I was able to mount it to a tmpfs partition. There was no change in
throughput with my script on a tmpfs vs ext3 drive.
T
- Original Message -
From: "Ralf Hildebrandt"
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 5:28 AM
Subject: Re: Performance tuning
* Brandon Hilkert :
any thoughts on how to mount the ramfs to get a true test of running the
queue in memory?
In /etc/fstab:
/dev/shm /var/spool/po
* Victor Duchovni :
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:34:01AM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>
> > * Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > > With today's clients, is broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
> > > still required? Which clients require it anyway?
> >
> > Outlook 2000 to 2003
> > Outlook Express ? to 6
> >
>
Tony Liu:
> Any thoughts on how to bounce the following permanent messages immediately
>- without being in queue for a long time(for example in queue 5 days)? I can'
>-t do it by setting maximal_queue_lifetime and bounce_queue_lifetime for ther
>-e any other messages need to be sent again.
/etc/po
* Tony Liu :
> Any thoughts on how to bounce the following permanent messages
> immediately without being in queue for a long time(for example in queue
> 5 days)? I can't do it by setting maximal_queue_lifetime and
> bounce_queue_lifetime for there any other messages need to be sent
> again.
use
Brandon Hilkert:
> I was able to mount it to a tmpfs partition. There was no change in
> throughput with my script on a tmpfs vs ext3 drive.
That depends entirely on how good the script is.
You were talking about sending mail from Exchange though Postfix.
Now you are talking about a home-grown
Any thoughts on how to bounce the following permanent messages immediately
without being in queue for a long time(for example in queue 5 days)? I can't do
it by setting maximal_queue_lifetime and bounce_queue_lifetime for there any
other messages need to be sent again.
-
Dear,
Is it (technically) possible to implement SRS or RPR in Postfix using
either a milter plugin or a policy? Does anyone know of such an
implementation?
Is the new sendmail "socketmap" functionality available in Postfix?
Thanks,
Yves
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:26 AM, mouss wrote:
> Gregory Machin a écrit :
>> Hi
>> I'm green to Postfix. I have 2 anti-spam servers that I upgraded
>> MailScanner to the latest version and a completely new install of
>> MailScanner and postfix etc. All three have the same problems . the
>> one thin
* Brandon Hilkert :
> any thoughts on how to mount the ramfs to get a true test of running the
> queue in memory?
In /etc/fstab:
/dev/shm /var/spool/postfix tmpfs
defaults,size=300m,mode=770,uid=0,gid=0 0 0
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung T
40 matches
Mail list logo
