Re: Question regarding this mailing list & privacy.

** At 23:24 +0100 on 02/24/2009, mouss wrote: I don't know for you, but I get a lot of attempts to "funny" addresses like <47f280be.9000...@netoyen.net>. one of my pseudo-traps is /\d{5...@netoyen\.net$/. Those "funny" addresses look a lot like Message-IDs. I suspect that harvesters (dumb har

Re: Postfix support for NTLM

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:28:09PM -0600, Justin Pasher wrote: > I have a client that wants us to setup the Postfix SMTP server on their web > server to use authentication when relaying through their Exchange server > (even though both are on the same local network). I'm working on just > getting

Re: Question regarding this mailing list & privacy.

mouss wrote: > KLaM Postmaster a écrit : > >> [snip] >> >>> >>> >> An alternative is to put up a decoy address. One for which email appears >> to be accepted, but where it is dropped, >> > > I use what I call pseudo-traps here. they are only enabled from time to > time. when

Postfix support for NTLM

Hello, I have a client that wants us to setup the Postfix SMTP server on their web server to use authentication when relaying through their Exchange server (even though both are on the same local network). I'm working on just getting them to allow relay from the web server IP address, but in the m

Re: mailbox_size_limit , quota + some other questions

replies below > > so, that box can handle with postfix's default settings, 1 users? > > that's > nice to know. thanx. > > we wont be going to that size. > > > > the problem you will have is not on the postfix side. content filters > and imap are more hungry. noted. > >> one has worki

Re: policy server continually timing out

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 04:39:58PM -0800, pa...@compugenic.com wrote: snip > > It's as if the 'policy_time_limit' line has no effect. This is the > second greylist server I've setup on this box with the exact same issue. > I am thinking something else in my configuration must be wrong, but I >

Re: Problem with ldap table lookups and TLS

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 06:48:12PM -0600, Nick Geron wrote: > So as root or my limited rights postfix user this works: > > #postmap -q j...@example.com ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap/aliases.cf > j...@example.com You only show a test running as root, not "postfix". What versions of Postfix and OpenLDAP a

Re: Problem with ldap table lookups and TLS

--On Tuesday, February 24, 2009 6:48 PM -0600 Nick Geron wrote: I'm in the process of putting together a postfix system with an ldap back-end and have come across something very odd regarding ldap_table. Basically, postfix does not load my private CA. The CA is really a self signed cert gene

Problem with ldap table lookups and TLS

I'm in the process of putting together a postfix system with an ldap back-end and have come across something very odd regarding ldap_table. Basically, postfix does not load my private CA. The CA is really a self signed cert generated by java keytool - try as I might, I couldn't get keytool to

policy server continually timing out

I've setup a greylist policy server from http://mimo.gn.apc.org/gps/. It works fine for a few minutes, then I start getting these types of error messages: -- Feb 23 11:21:20 router postfix/smtpd[28012]: warning: problem talking to server private/policy: Connection timed out Feb 23 11:21:20 router

Re: reject header question

Thx Magnus. I had the work 'approved' in the header_checks and just didn't read what the message in the maillog was telling. -jm Magnus Bäck wrote: On Wednesday, February 25, 2009 at 00:15 CET, Jim McIver wrote: I'm running Postfix 2.1 on Freebsd 4.10 and would like to know where I c

Re: reject header question

On Wednesday, February 25, 2009 at 00:15 CET, Jim McIver wrote: > I'm running Postfix 2.1 on Freebsd 4.10 and would like to know where I > can get more information on the following message in the maillog, and > if it's my problem or the senders problem. Maybe a possible fix? > > I can send

reject header question

Greetings, I'm running Postfix 2.1 on Freebsd 4.10 and would like to know where I can get more information on the following message in the maillog, and if it's my problem or the senders problem. Maybe a possible fix? I can send an email to this user , but never get their reply. I believe the

Re: alias question

On Tuesday, February 24, 2009 at 22:08 CET, Leonardo Coelho wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Magnus Bäck wrote: > > > On Tuesday, February 24, 2009 at 20:18 CET, > > Leonardo Coelho wrote: > > > > > This is my first time that I send a message on this list and I > > > hope

Re: Your Email

Daniel C a écrit : > What would be the best strategy? Create a new user and change postfix, amavis > and Courier-IMAP to use this user for message storing? No. do not the same user for different services: - keep the 'postfix' account for the postfix "server" - use amavis or vscan or whatever fo

Re: Time-Out ability?

Sahil Tandon a écrit : > On Feb 24, 2009, at 5:08 PM, Aaron Abramson > wrote: > >> Is it possible to configure postfix with a threshold where if a >> certain user or IP address sends 1000 emails or more in an hour, they >> are blocked from sending email for a period of time? >> >> >> We occasiona

Re: ACL for outbound email

Joe Benson a écrit : > Does anyone know how to configure Postfix to only allow outgoing email > to a set list of email addresses? I would like to have anything going > out to an unlisted address to go to a local mailbox. > define "outgoing". is it mail from mynetworks? is it SASL authenticated ma

Re: alias question

Leonardo Coelho a écrit : > The "postconf -n" log: http://rafb.net/p/JLbjbi42.html > > Debug Log: http://rafb.net/p/LDBCNL67.html > please: - use normal logging. do not enable verbose logging until asked. verbose logs take longer to "parse" - post the infos (logs and postconf -n) inline (here,

Re: mailbox_size_limit , quota + some other questions

Linux Advocate a écrit : > [snip] > so, that box can handle with postfix's default settings, 1 users? that's > nice to know. thanx. > we wont be going to that size. > the problem you will have is not on the postfix side. content filters and imap are more hungry. >> one has working recipient

Re: upgrading amavisd

deconya a écrit : > Hi! > > Im upgrading a server with Postfix and in the part to upgrade the Amaisd > from 2.1.2 version to 2.6.1 it appears the next message when Im in the > debug part: > > Problem in Amavis::DB or Amavis::DB::SNMP code: Can't locate loadable > object for module BerkeleyDB in @

Re: Question regarding this mailing list & privacy.

KLaM Postmaster a écrit : > [snip] >> > An alternative is to put up a decoy address. One for which email appears > to be accepted, but where it is dropped, I use what I call pseudo-traps here. they are only enabled from time to time. when they are enabled, I check the messages, and I use that

Re: Time-Out ability?

On Feb 24, 2009, at 5:08 PM, Aaron Abramson wrote: Is it possible to configure postfix with a threshold where if a certain user or IP address sends 1000 emails or more in an hour, they are blocked from sending email for a period of time? We occasionally have users on our network with in

Time-Out ability?

Is it possible to configure postfix with a threshold where if a certain user or IP address sends 1000 emails or more in an hour, they are blocked from sending email for a period of time? We occasionally have users on our network with infected machines, or perhaps they are actually spammers

Re: Prevent vacation autoreply for recipient_delimiter?

post...@corwyn.net a écrit : > [snip] >> >> 1- explain in _detail_ how mail reaches your vacation script. > > That presumes I know :-) but I'll give it a try. When a user is on > vacation, they have an table entry in mysql, and an additional alias > that is something like: > test#example@autor

ACL for outbound email

Does anyone know how to configure Postfix to only allow outgoing email to a set list of email addresses? I would like to have anything going out to an unlisted address to go to a local mailbox. Thanks Joe

Re: alias question

The "postconf -n" log: http://rafb.net/p/JLbjbi42.html Debug Log: http://rafb.net/p/LDBCNL67.html On the secound log i see that the alias_maps really works but do not pass the email to another address. On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Magnus Bäck wrote: > On

FIXED: Re: Prevent vacation autoreply for recipient_delimiter?

At 06:41 PM 2/23/2009, Rick Steeves wrote: So I would guess that how it should work is that it should be mail > postfix > amavisd > expanding aliases > delivery and vacation > vacation response delivery ? Well, here at least is what seems to fix is based on all the guidance I've received.

Re: alias question

On Tuesday, February 24, 2009 at 20:18 CET, Leonardo Coelho wrote: > This is my first time that I send a message on this list and I hope > that you guys can help me! > I'm using the postfix package form Debian last Stable version and my > aliases redirections stop to redirect the mysql table

alias question

Hello List, This is my first time that I send a message on this list and I hope that you guys can help me! I'm using the postfix package form Debian last Stable version and my aliases redirections stop to redirect the mysql table is there the file configuration is working (postmap -q file user) but

Re: regexp header_check failure

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:43:16AM -0800, Corey Chandler wrote: > I have a regexp header_checks rule as follows: > > /^Received: from (.* \([-._[:alnum:]]+ > \[[.[:digit:]]{7,15}\]\)).*\(Authenticated sender: ([^)]+)\).*by > (alcatraz\.sequestered\.net) \(([^)]+)\) with (E?SMTP) id > ([A-F[:dig

regexp header_check failure

I have a regexp header_checks rule as follows: /^Received: from (.* \([-._[:alnum:]]+ \[[.[:digit:]]{7,15}\]\)).*\(Authenticated sender: ([^)]+)\).*by (alcatraz\.sequestered\.net) \(([^)]+)\) with (E?SMTP) id ([A-F[:digit:]]+)(.*)/ REPLACE Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (

Re: Deferr mail for only certain users

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:03:08AM -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >> Direct mail for those users to the retry transport via transport maps. > > > >This is not very efficient, because the mail moves between the deferred > >and active queues until the user's transport setting is updated, and then

RE: Deferr mail for only certain users

>> Direct mail for those users to the retry transport via transport maps. > >This is not very efficient, because the mail moves between the deferred >and active queues until the user's transport setting is updated, and then >all mail for the user (old and new) is released. The OP probably wants >a

bounced, loopback

I've scanned previous issues, and tweaked the main.cf and .db files to try to resolve this - when I send mail to an address that is supposed to be forwarded to an internal (exchange) MX I was getting bounce notices like this: The mail system (expanded from ): mail for i

Re: Deferr mail for only certain users

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:35:07AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Feb 24, 2009, at 11:31 AM, "Joseph L. Casale" > wrote: > >> Is it possible to hold mail destined to only certain users in a queue >> until I then >> release it manually? > > Direct mail for those users to the retry transport via

Re: Your Email

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 04:31:55PM +, Daniel C wrote: > What would be the best strategy? Create a new user and change postfix, > amavis and Courier-IMAP to use this user for message storing? Is it easy > to adjust configuration for this new user? Yes, create a new user that will own IMAP mail

Re: Deferr mail for only certain users

On Feb 24, 2009, at 11:31 AM, "Joseph L. Casale" > wrote: Is it possible to hold mail destined to only certain users in a queue until I then release it manually? Direct mail for those users to the retry transport via transport maps.

RE: Your Email

What would be the best strategy? Create a new user and change postfix, amavis and Courier-IMAP to use this user for message storing? Is it easy to adjust configuration for this new user? Also, I think this is not causing my duplicate email, right? Daniel > No, this is wrong, the "postfix" u

Deferr mail for only certain users

Is it possible to hold mail destined to only certain users in a queue until I then release it manually? Thanks! jlc

Re: user getting spoofed

jeff donovan wrote: On Feb 20, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Noel Jones wrote: jeff donovan wrote: On Feb 20, 2009, at 9:56 AM, J.P. Trosclair wrote: You should see the REJECT please... from Noel's example in the logs. J.P. got it working. You can also # grep 'reject: .*backscatterer' /var/log/mai

Re: mailbox_size_limit , quota + some other questions

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:41:07PM -0800, Linux Advocate wrote: > i have been thinking of using sorbs instead of spamhaus because sorbs > allows sites with upto 100k user to connect to them but with spamhaus > u are limited to 100users max. Sorbs has a detection rate of about 68% > and i was think

Re: user getting spoofed

On Feb 20, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Noel Jones wrote: jeff donovan wrote: On Feb 20, 2009, at 9:56 AM, J.P. Trosclair wrote: You should see the REJECT please... from Noel's example in the logs. J.P. got it working. You can also # grep 'reject: .*backscatterer' /var/log/maillog to see how your

Re: Postfix problems when system spool has files

Quanah Gibson-Mount: > --On Thursday, February 19, 2009 11:48 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount > wrote: > > >>> Anyone have an insight into why? Postfix version is 2.4.7. > >> > >> This is really a platform-specific question, that can be answered > >> only by people who have access to the affected

Re: user getting spoofed :; update ::

On Feb 20, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Noel Jones wrote: jeff donovan wrote: okay,.. no errors in logs I beg to differ... Just not the errors you've looked for. I am now the proud recipient of a million of these. all from different domains. Transcript of session follows. Out: 220 mail2.beth.k12.

Re: anvil - dynamical limits

Andre H?bner: > Hello, > > i try to find further infos for anvil-service and how to use it. > In my Maillogs i see some statistics written by anvil but i do not > understand the plan to use anvil to do a client based session/request > control. anvil is not a policy tool. It is a safty mechanism

anvil - dynamical limits

Hello, i try to find further infos for anvil-service and how to use it. In my Maillogs i see some statistics written by anvil but i do not understand the plan to use anvil to do a client based session/request control. In german list i got one answer that i should write own policy-service. Ist